Clothes/Suggestions/Footwear

Brand Names/Spoof Names

Im just talking about jordans, uggz for the girls, sketchers. found in malls or any where you guys can think of. --CJ 00:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes (Name suggestion)

Author Vote--CJ 00:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Leather Thigh-High Boots

For the ladies. Found inside clubs. Available in black and red. --Uncle Bill 01:21, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Because nightclubs need their own style of party clothes. --Uncle Bill 01:21, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. Well, if ladies want to wear high heels in the middle of zombie apocalypse, why not... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 06:52, 5 June 2007 (BST)
3. Female equivalent for shoes? Why not. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:34, 5 June 2007 (BST)
4. Heels would be great too, but this is cool.--Lachryma^☭ 10:42, 5 June 2007 (BST)
5. Sure, why not. But we also want high heals. Stilettos and such. Just because we are ladies.--Hejsa 13:13, 5 June 2007 (BST)
6. seems reasonable.-- Vista  +1  15:37, 5 June 2007 (BST)
7. it works, there would have to be more club clothes too though.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:21, 5 June 2007 (BST)
8. Aye -- TheDavibob ^T 21:45, 5 June 2007 (BST)
9. Nothing wrong with variety. --User:Sgt Cannon 22:30, 5 June 2007 (BST)
10. Wouldn't wear 'em myself, of course, but I wouldn't mind seeing Lach in a pair ;) --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:18, 6 June 2007 (BST)
11. Same as Specialist ;)--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 23:44, 6 June 2007 (BST)
12. I've been looking for something to offset my stumpy looking legs. --Skitchipoo 00:26, 7 June 2007 (BST)
13. Awww I didn't think your legs were stumpy lookin' Skitch. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:33, 7 June 2007 (BST)
14. Yes, and agreed, more club wear! --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
15. Shoes are a girls best friend. --genie in a bottle ^{♥ - zone} 05:09, 8 June 2007 (BST)
16. Yes. Because that's the way I roll. xD --Heiki 20:10, 6 June 2007 (AEST)
17. I'd wear 'em. --karek 11:18, 8 June 2007 (BST)
18. YES YES YES --Evl kitty 16:54, 8 June 2007 (BST)
19. Good for zombies that try to ankle grab you as you walk past...--John Blast 19:31, 8 June 2007 (BST)
20. knee-highs, thigh-highs, whatever; they are beautiful. --Toast Outlaw 15:45, 9 June 2007 (BST)
21. Not quite stilletos but still pretty good. --Moctezuma 23:26, 9 June 2007 (BST)
22. Haha, imagine some kinky hooker zombies wandering around. --DrBowman 17:56, 29 June 2007 (BST)
23. --EMAG TRESNI 21:22, 6 July 2007 (BST)
24. Yep. --Midianian 18:10, 15 July 2007 (BST)
25. Yes, but not just for ladies. "Leather Thigh-High Boots" or "Leather Knee-High Boots" (I would prefer the latter) could be worn by ladies or men - women would mostly wear the ones with high heels, while skinheads, punks, and leather obsessed dudes would wear the waffle sole, steel toe, work boot kind. Clay5x 12:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
26. Sure. More variety is always good... KamikazeRomantic 14:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
27. Why only for the women? Men might utilize them if, I don't know, there was a fascist movement in Malton or some such nonsense. Actually, fascist zombies don't sound that implausible, given the success of the Wolfenstein series. I'll vote them in. --Klaus Gruber 20:45, 12 November 2007 (PCT)
28. I'm sure you guys don't need more help, but... <3 --JAston 09:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
29. You had me at "nightclubs". -- Diano 05:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
30. Would love a pair of these.--Aiwe 03:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

No

1. I just don't like this idea. --Sonofagun18 09:41, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. What he said. -S Aline 20:14, 12 June 2007 (BST)

Flip-Flops

Yeah. That's thongs, for all us Aussies. Not to be confused with the one you wear around your waist. Anyway, available in Malls only. Goes on your feet, btw. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 14:15, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Yea

1. Uh huh. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 14:15, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. like flip-flops -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 16:12, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Mheh, -- Vista  +1  16:13, 7 June 2007 (BST)
4. Eh, not much of a filp-flopper. Now that I think about it, I've never worn a pair in my life. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:28, 7 June 2007 (BST)
5. Shoes are a girls best friend. --genie in a bottle ^{♥ - zone} 05:15, 8 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yay, sandals! Perfect for walking on the beach, or kicking lazy mallrats, or jumping from roof to roof, or....--Lachryma^☭ 10:32, 8 June 2007 (BST)
7. Ah yes, the preferred shoe of The Dude. --Skitchipoo 20:56, 8 June 2007 (BST)
8. More foot wear.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)
9. Oh come on whats wrong with flip-flops. I honestly can't believe anyone voted no for this. Its just another pair of shoes its not like you have to wear them if you don't want to. Oh and i could see some people having been wearing them during the initial outbreak. --Sephikus ^T 11:25, 10 June 2007 (BST)
10. Hilarious suggestion. I would have certainly have one of my characters wear flip flops. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
11. I wear flip-flops everywhere, snow, sleet, or rain, you just have to watch out for zombie gore.--Aleksander 03:21, 13 June 2007 (BST)
12. For Flip-Flops! --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 01:31, 30 June 2007 (BST)
13. --EMAG TRESNI 21:23, 6 July 2007 (BST)
14. Yes. Totally fits. There should be scared, huddled survivors with nothing better at hand (like Clive Owen's character toward the end of the apocalyptic Children of Men and the protagonist at the beginning of 28 Days Later) and zombies who don't know any better or care to change out of them (as in countless background zombies in countless zombie movies wearing ridiculously inappropriate clothing or being naked and not knowing or caring). Clay5x 12:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
15. For the Civilians who really want to be civilians... Try free Running in those! KamikazeRomantic 14:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
16. Now where did I put that loud Hawaiian shirt? --JAston 09:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
17. I'd love 'em, especially if there were sandals available as well. RottenHarley 14:01, 12 December 2007
18. Like this, like sandals more. -- Diano 05:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Nea

1. I don't know about anyone else but, I rather just go barefoot, then have flip flops on. --Sonofagun18 23:49, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. dude, no. --Toast Outlaw 15:38, 9 June 2007 (BST)
3. no --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:36, 9 June 2007 (BST)
4. If there are flip flops fools will ware their socks as well. =P 11:48, 11 June 2007 (BST)
5. Oh come on! I can't even believe this would be suggested. This is a serious game, and it's not warm enough everywhere in the world to wear flip flops anyway.--Leon Vulcan 23:13, 13 June 2007 (BST)

   Never been to university, have you? I knew at least three people in college who refused to wear anything more than flip-flops, even in the snow. Just saying, is all... --MolotovH 06:32, 27 June 2007 (BST)

6. just no.--DerangedFerret 06:02, 18 June 2007 (BST)
7. No.--karek 21:59, 6 July 2007 (BST)
8. No - Who would even think about wearing flip-flops when you're running away from a zombie, or when you're free running into a building? It's just asinine. --Corinthias 21:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Canvas basketball Shoes

I think that Malton should have canvas basketball shoes. If you're unfamiliar with these, they are frequently worn by punks, goths (apparently) and the like. Also, they look pretty badass. I don't know if you can post images here, but if you want, I can put 'em on my user page. Or here if it's aloud. Anyways, they should be found in towers, malls and clubs(if its an indie rock or punk venue, than I can totally see them being left behind) They should come in black, pink, blue, dark blue and red. They are based on the style made by converse, but they're diffrent. Yeah thats it.

Yes (Canvas basketball shoes)

1. Author vote--Kouchpotato 04:06, 7 July 2007 (BST)

   Ok, so I've changed it to Canvas basketball shoes. I just put Converse, so people would know what they acually are. I agree about the company name. Thanks for the imput!--Kouchpotato ^T 03:39, 9 July 2007 (BST)

   To comment like so, use #:. Just using : will break the voting order. What you should do is let this die, then repost it as canvas shoes. Not change the name. It'll still retain all the previous kill votes, until they notice you changed it. Which could take a while.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:53, 9 July 2007 (BST)

   Ok thanks. I will wait a couple of weeks, then repost, unless everybody notices I've changed.--Kouchpotato ^T 16:37, 10 July 2007 (BST)

2. Keep Well now that it's been changed. I love those things, and for any whiners about only being converse, there are many brands of shoes that are like these. --Rodwy 05:34, 9 July 2007 (BST)
3. I would love to have [canvas basketball shoes] in the game. [canvas basketball shoes] are really cool, and a major part of popular culture. --EMAG TRESNI 20:55, 11 July 2007 (BST)
4. i was hoping to pick up some chucks at the mall, actually... i mean, what Malton hipster/skater/punker/emo kid could survive be without a pair of chucks! :P but seriously, whether you like them or not, and whatever name you want to call them, i these are common and popular enough that they should be available. rappers get their trainers, we want our chucks! --WanYao 14:59, 29 July 2007 (BST)
5. Why not? BoboTalkClown 22:26, 14 August 2007 (BST)
6. Yes. Clay5x 12:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
7. Yeah, those are cool. --JAston 09:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
8. Yes, as I am currently wearing some.(Nothing else looks good on my feet, oddly enough. Not even slip-ons.) --RobertG 03:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
9. Definatly, i love mine in life. So why not urban dead. Daniel camburn 16:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
10. KEEP! i also love mine in life and would really like to have them available in urban dead--Themaccles 10:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

No (Canvas basketball shoes)

1. As you said, Converse is a company, and it is also trademarked. Suey Suey gimmah five dollah! --karek 05:02, 7 July 2007 (BST)
2. Not unless Converse pays Kevan for advertising their shoes.--Lachryma^☭ 05:09, 7 July 2007 (BST)
3. Hope Kevan give us some left-over money if he do advertize it :) --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 08:39, 7 July 2007 (BST)
4. Well, they hit most of the possible arguments on the nose. Besides, if we started putting in specific brands of things in, people would be saying left and right about how this or that brand should be put in.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 09:11, 7 July 2007 (BST)
5. We should add in Just Jeans and many other brands! Capitalism baby! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 10:07, 7 July 2007 (BST)

   get over the brand-name thing already, it's been fixed... and consider the idea now on its own merit. as i said in my yes vote, these are a very common and very popular form of footwear, so why not make them available?--WanYao 15:05, 29 July 2007 (BST)

6. Well, no. No free advertising, thankyou very much. If you want converse, re-submit this as canvass basketball shoes. Everyone will know what you mean.--Seventythree 11:34, 7 July 2007 (BST)
7. I'm pretty sure Converse is trademarked or copyrighted or something like that. Also, I think "trainers" = "sneakers," although I could be wrong. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 12:09, 7 July 2007 (BST)

   no. chucks (the most commonly known brandname) are different from sneakers/trainers. and if you support something as subtley different from a normal tie as fancy ties, ascots, etc., then you should support this item, too. --WanYao 15:05, 29 July 2007 (BST)

8. As above --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 14:44, 7 July 2007 (BST)
9. Yep. This is like saying Converse, and saying Converse is like asking for a lawsuit. -- Diano 05:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Some more boots.

You all know the drill by now.

• Steel toecapped boots. Used commonly by people in warehouses and factories as a precaution. (so your feet aren't crushed by stuff landing on them) Found in warehouses and factories. Found in black.
• Biker boots. Sturdy leather boots. Sometimes decorated with steel plates. Similar, but not Identical in look to cowboy boots I reckon, found in pubs. Found in dark red, balck and dark brown.
• Hiking boots. Sturdy leather boots. Never owned a pair myself, but I beleive that theyr'e designed mainly for comfort and to be hardwaring. If i'm completely honest, this is probably what I'd be wearing in a zombie apocolypse. FOund in mall, and maybe somewhere else? Dark brown, tan, and black.

Steel toe-capped boots - implemented

Yes (Name suggestion)

1. Author vote.--Seventythree 14:48, 13 July 2007 (BST)
2. - sure - Mordac the Refuser 19:54, 13 July 2007 (BST)
3. I like it a lot User:Lock:Lock 15:29 July 13 2007 (BST)
4. Meh.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:35, 13 July 2007 (BST)
5. Couldn't Hurt. --EMAG TRESNI 04:54, 14 July 2007 (BST)
6. MOAR BOOTZ! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:52, 14 July 2007 (BST)
7. Most nifty. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 21:33, 14 July 2007 (BST)
8. Of course. This is probably what you would want to be wearing in a zombie apocalypse...well, minus the steel toed unless you're stupid. A little known fact (unless you have worked in them before), is that steel-toed boots wear down and the steel begins to come out of the toe of the boot. It can eventually get to the point where it is cutting your foot. Bottom-line, if you walked/ran alot, you'd need a new pair of ST boots almost every month...--Big Bur 05:25, 22 July 2007 (BST)
9. Hell yeah. Love my steel-toes. --JAston 09:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
10. I'm all for boot variety. -- Diano 05:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
11. WHERE ARE MY COMBAT BOOTS!? "leather" doesnt cover it, "cammo" might -- Pestilence 12:15 29 January 2008 (EST)

I need me some cowboy boots

No (Name suggestion)

1. No - No need. I don't think boot descriptions need to get that specific. "Tan Boot" or "Brown Boot" covers most hiking boots well enough. "Black Leathet Boot" covers a nice range of biker, combat, and work boots. KISS. And that's coming from a guy who owns more boots than shoes... _. ^. _{. swiers} 16:51, 26 July 2007 (BST)
2. I'll be from the "boots and leather boots cover that" crowd too --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 18:41, 26 July 2007 (BST)
3. redundant, not necessary. a good character description will give the context very easily. already enough kinds of boots, methinks. --WanYao 15:09, 29 July 2007 (BST)
4. Doesn't really add anything... BoboTalkClown 22:27, 14 August 2007 (BST)

Heelys

"HEY! YOU KIDS STOP WEARING THOSE ROLLY SHOES IN THIS MALL!" - a line not likely to be heard in the middle of a zombie apocalypse. --Slicer 04:13, 19 August 2007 (BST)

Yes (Heelys)

1. Author Vote- Picture the zombies on them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slicer (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
2. Yes! I thought of these 28 years ago when I was in kindergarten and the halls were so big.--Hung Henry 07:58, 31 August 2007 (BST)
3. BEG (Big Evil Grin) - Almost as good as zombies on rollerskates. We MUST have this. --Uncle Bill 00:46, 7 September 2007 (BST)
4. Sure, why not? It sounds cool, and doesn't hurt anybody. --Thragnor 04:25, 13 September 2007 (BST)
5. YESSS I WANT MAH HEELYZ PLZ! BoboTalkClown 14:56, 16 September 2007 (BST)
6. Yes I constantly want to punch little kids that wear them, and having them in UD would enable me to do just that!      Ekashp wuz here (aht harman bra!nz!)        22:39, 24 September 2007 (BST)
7. People really seem to hate this idea, but I'm going to go ahead and throw my support behind it. As ridiculous as these shoes are, they do exist in abundance. -- Diano 05:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Heelys)

1. Not the kind of thing I'd go for, and the odd person might even think that this may enable them to move faster. So that's a nay from me. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 04:16, 19 August 2007 (BST)
2. Hate em in real life, hate em now.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:36, 19 August 2007 (BST)
3. i never heard of them before i've just gooogled it... --~~~~_T^''' 09:20, 19 August 2007 (BST)
4. No. No. No. No and, um..... No. Plese leave them out of UD, even if I would be able to take out my frustration of them ingame (wheels on trainers- buy some rollerblades you prick!) with a shotgun.--Seventythree 10:26, 19 August 2007 (BST)
5. Sorry, but it's too easy to make the mental connection between "wheeled shoes" and "less AP to travel." - MolotovH 06:17, 22 August 2007 (BST)
6. no chance - this is far, far too obscure an item to add to the game. zombies stumbling around on roller skates or even shuffling around on ice skates... that makes more sense and is more in-genre than this. --WanYao 05:37, 25 August 2007 (BST)
7. As Seventythree, If this were implemented I would be introducing survivors with this crap to my friends Mr. shotgun and Mr. pistol. --Sonofagun18 17:15, 29 August 2007 (BST)
8. The bleedin' things are everywhere I go in real life. In fact, I mainly play UD to get away from them. -- Pavluk 18:56, 29 August 2007 (BST)
9. -- Vista  +1  09:08, 7 September 2007 (BST)
10. stupid fashion craze --Stark Senap 14:36, 14 September 2007 (BST)
11. Sorry, I'll have to agree with MolotovH on this. --Vkkhamul 04:57, 20 September 2007 (BST)
12. I hate heelys. I'd become a PKer just to hunt down people with them--Liam Degen 02:17, 21 September 2007 (BST)
13. Implied bonus. Sockem 07:24, 15 October 2007 (BST)
14. No. - I'm all for people being able to wear stupid things, but this should really come with a movement bonus (have you seen the annoying kids wearing these things? They can be ridiculously quick), which these suggestions don't cover, as I understand it. I think such things belong in the regular suggestions list. Clay5x 06:34, 27 October 2007 (BST)
15. No, for pretty much all the comments above... KamikazeRomantic 14:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
16. No! Please no! Not in a million, billion years! --JAston 09:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
17. omgbbq. No. God, no. --RobertG 03:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
18. We really don't need to use a trademarked footwear. Skates are just a bad idea in a disaster zone. -- Sapwood2 16:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
19. I used to work in a grocery store, and every day a women brought their kids in with them. Every time I saw a kid take a running start and slide across the linoleum floor, all I wanted to do was knock him over. Sadistic? Maybe, but don't tell me you never thought of it. -- William Told 2:10, 10 May 2008
20. no - Rather stupid idea. Original (kinda), but still. Besides, how would a brain dead zombie know how to use it? And don't say memories of life. --Corinthias 21:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Snow boots

Since it's winter in Urban Dead, I have a new idea to put in the footwear slot. During winter people like to wear boots made to walk in snow and keep their feet warm when they play outside. The boots will be found at malls and only during winter. They will come in usual colors for boots in UD Please tell me how you like my idea in your votes. --Waterspark2 05:36 P.M., 12 February 2008 (EST)

Yes (Snow Boots)

1. Yes- My feet are cold. I need some snow boots! And maybe some socks too. --Waterspark2 05:43 P.M., 12 February 2008 (EST)
2. Yes- I live in Canada, that's all I have to say about this.--Jamie Cantwell3 02:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
3. I'm getting frostbite on my feet! Ahhhhhhhhhh! --Hhal 18:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
4. Yes - Snow is enough reason.--Karek^maps?! 04:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
5. Yes - These and other winter specific clothes should be available for as long as it is snowing in game. I'd also want to see parkas, warm hats (maybe furry Russian hats from the hat store) and various warm gloves / mittens. And maybe snow mobile suits, ski pants, etc. I lived in Minneasotta for 6 years and spent a lot of time doing winter sports; let me tell you, the right clothes are IMPORTANT when you are out in the snow (or even just not in a heated building) for hours at a time in sub freezing temperatures!  Swiers 05:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
6. Yes - I can see no reason not to have this clothing item.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  19:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
7. EH? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
8. Yep Love the idea.--MikhailA 21:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
9. Keep - as all above--Corndoghero^T-S-Z 02:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
10. Keep - Even zambahs get frostbite! --Aeon17x 14:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
11. keep - Cos it's cold :(--Seventythree^Talk 15:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
12. Keep - I have no objections, so I'll vote for this. --Diano 23:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
13. Yes - I assume they are seasonal? --Amanu Jaku 07:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
14. Yes - As another Canadian, I have to agree. And some people wear winter boots year-round as some kind of delusional fashion statement or something. --WanYao 18:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
15. Yes sure fine even though I have to agree with all these socialist guys. --Vandurn 00:46, 3 April 2008 (BST)
16. Yes - Sounds cool, like it. --Corinthias 21:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

No (Snow Boots)

1. I thought the boots already in-game were an assortment of hiking/military/snow boots... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2. will people expect not sliping from ruined building and taking injuries if wearing special boots?.. --~~~~ [talk] 06:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

   Well no. This is a clothing suggestion, NOT a item suggestion. Besides, such an item would probally nerf the icy ruined building thing anyway and that would be unbalanced. -- Waterspark2 02:36 P.M., 13 February 2008 (EST)

   You didn't get my point. people will expect benefit. --~~~~ [talk] 14:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

   The only benefits are that it is stylish and it keeps your feet warm. If I wanted to, I would have suggested this as a special item for such use. There's a reason why it is called snow boots, not ice climbing boots. --Waterspark2 05:07 P.M., 14 February 2008

3. No- I don't live in Canada, that's all I have to say about this.--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 00:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

   HA! you little copy-cat.--Jamie Cantwell3 05:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

   Just because you don't live in a place that snows a lot is not a reason for voting no. I live in Florida. I'm talking about the game, not real life. Sheesh! Waterspark2 10:29 P.M., 13 February 2008 (EST)

Socks!!

I can't believe that we haven't suggested this before! We need socks! They could either be in the same slot as footwear or a separate slot altogether (similar to Coat and Jacket slots) and come in a nice variety of colours and styles (examples below). They would be found in Malls, Hotels and various other places.
Examples:

• Woolly knitted socks (various colours)
• Odd socks (various colours)
• Ankle socks (various colours)
• Sports socks (various colours)
• Novelty socks (Reindeer, Cartoon characters, etc)
  

Either way, socks are good. :) And in a zombie apocalypse you need to get your feet warm. -- Cheese 22:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes (Socks)

1. Keep - Dis user lieks socks. -- Cheese 22:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
2. Keep - Yeah, I think that this fits completely. If somebody's inside and wearing socks without shoes before the zombies kill them, then they'll be stuck with socks but no shoes throughout their zombie life. For that reason, I think that socks should just be in the same category as shoes, and socks should be assumed for shoe-wearing users. --Hegel5000 15:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
3. Keep - Cool--Jamie Cantwell3 07:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
4. Keep - It's logical! • DS • ^{Tlk•Dev•W!•+1} 21:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
5. This suggestion roxor my soxors. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 21:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
6. I knew someone was gonna say that Axe Hack.... Sure sounds good to me... gets a Keep from me >.<--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 02:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
7. Yes - Makes sense. Why wear shoes when you don't have socks? --Waterspark2 22:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
8. Yes - Sure, why not? EDIT: But ONLY if it goes under the foot slot. I would be against its own separate slot.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  19:35, 10 May 2008 (BST)
9. yes I would love it if they had little moose sockies like from I Z --Mystarisjumpyman 00:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
10. yes - why not? it'd be nice to add some more on here. --Corinthias 21:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

No (Socks)

1. No - as with underpants, not needed, and certainly should NOT get its own slot. At best, they would be an alternative to shoes / boots, for people who go barefoot. Anybody wearning shoes / boots, you can't see their socks, so its simplest to just not have them.  Swiers 22:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2. as the above anonymous. --~~~~ [talk] 22:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

   Don't we strike out anonymous votes here? Or is that only for the regular suggestions? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

   dunno and don' care :P --~~~~ [talk] 22:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

   Dur, forgot to sign. Signed now.  Swiers 22:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

3. am i allowed to have two different color socks as i often mistakengly do in real life? if not, i cant really get excited over a pair of socks, sorry --Scotw 20:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

   You should except you just voted no so probably not. --Vandurn 00:51, 3 April 2008 (BST)

4. I just voted no. Even though I only wear funny socks. Fact. --Vandurn 00:52, 3 April 2008 (BST)