User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/Archive5

First...

on your newly cleared page. Also, I appreciate your input at SA's page up till now. Atleast you try to remain neutral, without offending anyone.--Thadeous Oakley, Europeans, don't forget to VOTE! 16:46, 20 May 2009 (BST)

Thanks. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:10, 21 May 2009 (BST)

youre such a bastion of INTELLECTUAL INTEGRITY ddr (see how mature i am) would it be acceptable to you if i was to allow you to use my arse as a receptacle for your penis and in return you support my side of the argument --Cyberbob 12:33, 21 May 2009 (BST)

I thought your preferred your mouth as an accessible entrypoint?--Thadeous Oakley, Europeans, don't forget to VOTE! 12:59, 21 May 2009 (BST)

That was the funniest thing I can remember reading on this wiki since the log of Finis on #rrf-ud. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:05, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Hey!

Thanks for fixing my sig!--Orange Talk 22:00, 20 May 2009 (BST)

	A FREE COOKIE
	Orange has given DanceDanceRevolution a cookie for fixin mah sig

No problem, I learned the hard way. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:10, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Userpage help

Thank you I can do with all the advice I can gather, your name sounds familiar something to do with Red Rum possibly? I copied Aphelions page to give me an idea of the general setup. It a little more complicated than I imagined. Eventually I thought it might even lead to setting up a group on here. My concentration isn't too flash I received a beating and now have some major problems so this is going to be quite an effort.

Thanks PastyGeeky --PastyGeeky 10:50, 21 May 2009 (BST)

You don't have to write PastyGeeky. Just press the button on the edit toolbar.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 10:59, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Thanks DDR. :/ --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 11:06, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Donkeys

No offence, I'm running a contest from Example page's talk page, where people find where I put the word Donkey. I just used it for teh lulz, because it worked well. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:49, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Right here, you Donkey!--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:53, 21 May 2009 (BST)

While we're at it, the upload file page appears to be screwing with me. When i try to upload a file, I select the file, choose the destination name, and then click upload file, and the browse for file bar empties. Then nothing happens. Any idea what's happening to me? --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:57, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Fantastical, it works now. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:03, 21 May 2009 (BST)

And the same to you. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:06, 21 May 2009 (BST)

karoke

well you know - 13hours or pure unadulterated-karoke art. Once you open that beatles back-catalogue its hard to stop.

--Betamaxx ^◆◆◆ 12:28, 21 May 2009 (BST)

bub-ies

yeh - i know its a commonly known thing - just thought a page would be intresting to see what happens, and If i get any replies. --Betamaxx ^◆◆◆ 15:34, 23 May 2009 (BST)

Cheers for the update on the bub page - it looks better now.. hopefully it wont get deleted. --Betamaxx ^◆◆◆ 15:26, 24 May 2009 (BST)

It won't. And I appreciate the idea to make the page in the first place, so good job yourself. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:11, 26 May 2009 (BST)

:( :( :(

Axe Hack :( :( :( :( --Janus ^talk 15:09, 26 May 2009 (BST)

...But I'm not using it :( and when I did, it was two days ago and only Obi saw it... D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:10, 26 May 2009 (BST)

..then, either the wiki is bugged or I'm bugged. And it's probably the latter :'( --Janus ^talk 15:14, 26 May 2009 (BST)

I could create a status: bugged for me, now. --Janus ^talk 15:17, 26 May 2009 (BST)

Odd. Well, if it makes you feel better, you might just get a surprise if you join #udwiki just now. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:19, 26 May 2009 (BST)

..Too late, right? D:

Congrats for the promotions! --Janus ^talk 12:54, 27 May 2009 (BST)

It's never too late! And thanks. I missed you entries on my talk page, sorry. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:27, 30 May 2009 (BST)

Wai do you want to ban me?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 20:00, 8 June 2009 (BST)

You're the only one I could think of at the time... But it doesn't seem like a half-bad idea... D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:04, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Mr Watt

I responded to you here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Mr_Watt with a question. Thanks. --Mr Watt 04:22, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Great!! Thanks for your help. It was much appreciated.--Mr Watt 04:55, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Rabit Hole and DHPD Testemonials

AS far as the Rabit Hole goes I doubt anyone else in the DHPD even know about it since it dates back to 2006 and was part of a Massive arby's case that ended up getting Maxwell Hammer/Reetoric permabans. The Testimonials I'm sure just didn't get moved when people decided that everything had to be in the DHPD Namespace. Though it is pretty obvious by its title who it belongs to. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 05:46, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Alrighty, thanks. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:48, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Congrats

You now have the power to delete pages, protect them from editing and ban people. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:02, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Congrats on the promotion. --Honestmistake 08:53, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Thanks. I'll make sure what you fear doesn't happen (my squashing by Nubis). D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:58, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Congrats, Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 07:22, 28 May 2009 (BST)

Congrats on being a new sysops--Ratyoupop 06:13, 30 May 2009 (BST)

	Feel the Love
	This user is a Mod, and is loved for their efforts towards fighting stupidity.

Thanks. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:35, 30 May 2009 (BST)

You know

I'm pretty sure you'd be able to get away with a little bit of fooling around. You don't have to be a complete sellout. --Cyberbob 08:53, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Yeah, I know. You do understand though, right? The fear of going the J3D way... D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:58, 27 May 2009 (BST)

"The J3D Way" was him allowing his friendships to affect his rulings on A/VB. You can pretty much do whatever as long as you keep it away from official duties. --Cyberbob 12:14, 27 May 2009 (BST)

I thought the J3D way was much more than just that incident, but yeah. I'll be good within the boundaries that matter. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:05, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Dual-Wielded Congrats

Congrats on sysop and the sig fix thing. Though I clicked the new block button in your sig and I was most disappointed a random heathen had not been smitten with the powers of blockage. --  RoosterDragon  13:34, 27 May 2009 (BST)

To be honest, it's just a matter of finding something that the 'block' button can link to, but soon I'll find something worthwhile. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:05, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Maybe you could rickroll people? --  RoosterDragon  14:27, 27 May 2009 (BST)

It has to be revolutionary. It has to change the way the world thinks ;) D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:30, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Would this awesome stoat be enough? --  RoosterDragon  14:44, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Almost, it is pretty awesome. Am I allowed to subtle-link to external sites in my signature? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:34, 28 May 2009 (BST)

The policy doesn't ban stealth links. --  RoosterDragon  15:49, 28 May 2009 (BST)

I WILL FIGHT YOU!!!

;) congrats jerk.----Sexualharrison 16:23, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Thanks, I look forward to doing battle with you in the future. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:35, 28 May 2009 (BST)

the two old enemies stared into each others' eyes with the burning fury of a thousand suns. all of their untold struggle had come to this, and they each knew only one of them would be walking away this time. --Cyberbob 02:43, 28 May 2009 (BST)

You:

Devious asshat! (You know what I'm talking about). --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:32, 27 May 2009 (BST)

What did he do?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 19:59, 27 May 2009 (BST)

I KNEW that would be about the furthest I could take it! Ha Ha Ha! D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:33, 28 May 2009 (BST)

Too obvious. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:54, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Conndraka

Don't bother arguing with him --Cyberbob 16:32, 28 May 2009 (BST)

Zombie Lord

I used to just put up with his attitude but, unfortunately, recently he's just brought out the worst in me (and others) because of his horrible attitude. I'm going to do my best to clean up my own act, but is there ANYTHING that can be done about this guy?--Pesatyel 23:39, 31 May 2009 (BST)

Arbies, A/VB, theres a few options you can try.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:46, 31 May 2009 (BST)

Unless you want to make a case on arbitration, I don't think so. There seems to be a larger backstory between you two than I realised, so I'll have to check that out before I can help you further. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:35, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Iscariots Vandal case

"there will always be users like Honestmistake and SirArgo who justify his antagonism and fuel him further"

I would appreciate it if you would strike my name from that comment, I know you already apologized and I do appreciate that but; since the linked comments were moved; it still reads as if I had something to do with Izzy's attitude. Obviously I can't do it as it would be vandalism. --Honestmistake 12:47, 4 June 2009 (BST)

I could assume you would have heard worse before, but okay. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:52, 4 June 2009 (BST)

I have but its usually obvious that its part of a disagreement or biased or just nonsense... or actually true. This was none of those, it was just a simple slip and i would prefer it gone so thanks for agreeing. --Honestmistake 15:58, 4 June 2009 (BST)

No problem, and good luck for the future. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:24, 4 June 2009 (BST)

email

got one? --Cyberbob 16:20, 5 June 2009 (BST)

Yeah. the button under the toolbox will send it straight to me. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:21, 5 June 2009 (BST)

Wow, never saw that button before. --Cyberbob 16:23, 5 June 2009 (BST)

It's also how I emailed you. It gives the email all that generic impersonal bs that you saw in mine to you.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 16:32, 5 June 2009 (BST)

nigger.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by J3D (talk • contribs) 07:13, 8 June 2009.

thank god!

the wiki has people like you. --xoxo 09:41, 10 June 2009 (BST)

OOZE

M to The J

-IT WAS TOTALLY J3D 10 June 2009

User Page

Brock Sampson FTW. that is a damn fine page you got there! --Honestmistake 12:44, 11 June 2009 (BST)

Thanks. It's been like that for a while cause I like simplicity, but I only added Brock Samson the other day. Venture bros for life. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:49, 11 June 2009 (BST)

Hello.

Thanks for pointing out the militia thingy. You want to join? Trying to get all known pro-survivors to join. --Robert Egleton 03:15, 13 June 2009 (BST)

Only if you'll accept a babah human, all my maxed alts are taken at the moment. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:18, 13 June 2009 (BST)

If only i knew what a babah human was friend. If that means low leveled thats fine. I myself am only level 2. But I played before 'till level 41 then never got revived. --Robert Egleton 03:21, 13 June 2009 (BST)

Yeah, sweet. It means 'baby', as in newbie. I got a level 9 character hanging around somewhere, I'll throw him in. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:22, 13 June 2009 (BST)

Okay. Guess your in. So far we should be a strong force. Anddddddddddd. I am looking for a HQ at the moment in Peddlesden Village. Waiting for Rosslessness to reply. Any idead's? And a group page to talk on there all 3 of us. --Robert Egleton 03:27, 13 June 2009 (BST)

War Buddies Militia --Robert Egleton 20:11, 13 June 2009 (BST)

Whats the characters back ground? Like mine is Robert Egleton: The former doctor. Now soldier, searching for A.L.I.C.E. --Robert Egleton 21:32, 13 June 2009 (BST)

Mine is Brock Samson. If you've seen The Venture Bros, then you'll understand. If not, watch this and this. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:18, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Did you see mine? What do you want your to be? --Robert Egleton 15:33, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Ohhh. I'll fix it up now. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:34, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Giggles. You near Peddlesden Village? Also watch my user page. Its like my dayily thingy. --Robert Egleton 15:38, 14 June 2009 (BST)

I'll watch it now. I'll make my way to Peddle too. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:42, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Okay. Can I have a link to see what skills you have. I know for sure that we're going to need construshion. And you might have to revive me. Heres mine [1]. --Robert Egleton 15:45, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Mine's [2]. Can't revive anyone. And your link didn't work. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:48, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Robert Egleton - Level 2 Scientist Class: Scientist Currently Trying To Get To 150XP For Free Running. Wearing: a crucifix necklace, a white T-shirt, a bloodstained pair of dark blue trousers and a scuffed pair of black boots

Level: 2 XP: 84 Group: Buddies Joined: 2009-05-03 23:39:40 Skills: Basic Firearms Training (Player gets +25% to hit with all firearms attacks.) Diagnosis (The HP values of nearby survivors are displayed next to their name.) --Robert Egleton 15:50, 14 June 2009 (BST)

And your dead... Okay! What do you think? --Robert Egleton 15:57, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Of what? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:03, 14 June 2009 (BST)

My autherbness. Did you read it. It's like a story! And of not getting free running. Which was retarded. --Robert Egleton 16:04, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Yeah, it was alright. I liked how you tied in the cities. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:13, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Thanks. I usally update it every day. And that is what I do. So if you ever want to know what I had done just look right there. How did you die? --Robert Egleton 16:15, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Lol survivors die all the time. Samson died a year ago and I never really bothered getting a revive, I just moved onto other characters. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:21, 14 June 2009 (BST)

lol --Cyberbob 16:24, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Cyberbob has been watching us I think. Sooo. Who is this Alice person? --Robert Egleton 16:25, 14 June 2009 (BST)

She has something to do with NercoTech right? I never really got her. --Robert Egleton 16:49, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Don't ask me... I always just related it to the girl from the Resident Evil movie series. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:51, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Lol. I have my own thoery. I think Alice did it. The whole zombie thing. I think she is the reason for it I will find her! --Robert Egleton 16:53, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Good luck with that, I'm going to head off now. Goodnight, and good luck. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 17:23, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Talk to you tomorrow. --Robert Egleton 17:25, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Noooooo! I was murdered! Awwww. --Robert Egleton 18:50, 15 June 2009 (BST)

Lol. You're a level 1 user in a ghost town by yourself. Kind of explainable. We are all such low level, why not go somewhere safe first to level up? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:32, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Level 2. Thank you very much. --Robert Egleton 02:48, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Tell me what you think of 'me story. --Robert Egleton 20:12, 16 June 2009 (BST)

I have decided after some consideration that it is not in my capacity to join your group. As well as the fact that I am overcommitted on this wiki, I have three main characters being used in Malton and adding another to that would simply go over the IP hit limit. After reviewing your groups intentions, I also can't say I am interested in going next to Dunnel Hills and trying to reclaim a ghost town with a group of low-level roleplaying survivors. Perhaps in the future. Sorry, and good luck with your group. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:52, 17 June 2009 (BST)

We don't have 2 be roleplaying. And Julie is level 17 or so. But I can not stop you. --Robert Egleton 17:22, 17 June 2009 (BST)

Sorry. I applaud your decision to make a full-on group with a true purpose, unfortunately I don't have the time to be in another one of them. I hope you understand. Good luck though. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:17, 18 June 2009 (BST)

Thank You

I noticed the same thing, I've already made a similar page with the correct name. The first page; the incorrectly spelled one- Shall be submitted for deletion. Thanks anyways for letting me know.--Captain Rickety 08:12, 16 June 2009 (BST)

OH SHI-

Awww. I'm getting so much love from pkers these days, that zambahs are more than welcome. :P saw you in a mall, can't remember which one though --Janus ^talk 13:00, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Should have stopped by to say hello =[ D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:35, 18 June 2009 (BST)

VD

There's no need to list permbans on A/VD unless they've worked their way up the escalation ladder. The page is for keeping track of the escalations of long term members, and there's just no need when they get nuked straight up. The page is far to long anyway -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 08:26 18 June 2009 (BST)

Thanks for that. I'll rollback the edits. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:31, 18 June 2009 (BST)

Cunty cunts

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Man, you've gotta check this out. Remember Mr. Cunt? He's got a website and way too much time on his hands, and a dong five sizes too small. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 22:32, 18 June 2009 (BST)

LOL oh my GOD THAT IS AWESOME! I've wondered how long it would come before some moron thought I was the evil ignorant bastard of his internet world. HA! D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:15, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Wow. Just wow. I would laugh if the green background didn't blind me!--SirArgo ^Talk 02:29, 19 June 2009 (BST)

He HAS to be taking the piss. He can't even bear to swear on his own website, he must be 11. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:32, 19 June 2009 (BST)

I know. He doesn't even seem to know much about the game! Try to read this page, I dare you. If the text was flashing, you would go into convulsions.--SirArgo ^Talk 02:55, 19 June 2009 (BST)

You're a sysop. Didn't you get the memo? Linkthewindow  Talk  08:48, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Aw, you were mentioned? I'm jealous. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:59, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Cause I was apparently the one to ban the first of his many vandal accounts. And he loves me. And I'm the new overlord, according to his in-depth and long term analysis of wiki powerplay. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:48, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Here's a great inspirational, intelligent and truly well thought out quote you should put on your quote page from Mr. Cunt's set of real rules for UD. "How do video diaries work? Gay." Truly brilliant.--SirArgo ^Talk 04:13, 19 June 2009 (BST)

my eyes hurt...but i'm impressed someone hates ud so much, its just so damned lovable.--xoxo 07:37, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Such raw anger. Sometimes I miss grim. At least this guy knows what he's talking about. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:12, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Yeah, we take up that much of his time? It's cute. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:02, 20 June 2009 (BST)

I think he's even made an appearance on the stats page. Check the last group on the listing. --  RoosterDragon  16:25, 20 June 2009 (BST)

Excellent, it's begun. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:26, 20 June 2009 (BST)

irc

why create ANOTHER channel for an already existing one ? its not like any current sysop wouldnt get ops there --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 13:59, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Because of you, actually. --Cyberbob 14:16, 19 June 2009 (BST)

sorry, bob, but you failed. I barely join the channel these days, joining less than five times in the past four months. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 14:27, 19 June 2009 (BST)

hahahahahaha oh man you're retarded. I'm talking about your choice of person to give control of the channel to. --Cyberbob 14:31, 19 June 2009 (BST)

I created the channel as per Bob's decision. He has been requesting that sysops get ^ops of the channel #udwiki, but animesucks and sonny did not yield, apparently. As such, sonny occasionally kicks/bans users when we disagree with him (light-heartedly, of course) but it was what made Bob choose to make a new channel. Essentially, it was your choice of who to leave the channel to that Bob disagrees with. And if you go there once a month, why should you give a shit what happens to it? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:10, 20 June 2009 (BST)

Editing the Mall status report

Don't know what I'm doing wrong, but I get garbage every time I try to change your 6/16 report for Lumber. I have, for the meantime, reverted to your last update. Asheets 18:11, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Never mind... I figured it out. Asheets 18:15, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Yeah, I just made a custom template, because I am the only one who "unknown's" danger reports, and I do it every so often so typing it manually gets repetitve. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)

hey

maybe if you keep delaying the manhunt you might stand a chance of winning, bitch. --xoxo 21:06, 19 June 2009 (BST)

1. was only ever delayed once. 2. not my choice. 3.stop being so bitter, just casuse ima pwn u noob D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:15, 20 June 2009 (BST)

Ze Manhunt

Unfortunately I need to drop out, as the character in question accidentally a whole Brain Rot and I don't have any to spare. --Lexi^cali^ty 10:02, 20 June 2009 (BST)

That's quite alright. Better luck next time, if you choose to play again in the future :) D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:59, 20 June 2009 (BST)

Was the start date really pushed to July 1st?

You forgot to tell that to Good Bub...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bloodiedfool (talk • contribs) 14:29, 21 June 2009.

Oh my... D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 21 June 2009 (BST)

hmm

Please to be not touching my misconduct page just because there is an edit on there that you don't understand TIA.--– Nubis ^NWO 15:42, 21 June 2009 (BST)

How about you tell me? I didn't know we owned our own misconduct archive portals. I might stick my picture of Brock Samson onto mine. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:46, 21 June 2009 (BST)

Can you put the alim nav on mine for me plox--xoxo 16:06, 21 June 2009 (BST)

no don't --Cyberbob 16:08, 21 June 2009 (BST)

Dude, Misconduct portals aren't protected. You may do it yourself. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:44, 27 June 2009 (BST)

Uploaded Images

Should I be catagorizing my own pics? If so, how do I do it?--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bonghit420 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 23 June 2009.

You don't need to because there'll always be someone around to do it for you, but if you'd like to do it yourself, you just follow that box on Category:Images. So, group images go into Category:Group Images, Screenshots in Category:Screenshots, and so on. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:25, 23 June 2009 (BST)

May I e-mail you the image for you to host it and add my kill? I have an awful transfer here and imageshack refuses to work... (If I may, where can I find an e-mail of yours?)--Jim Bim 23:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Click "Email This User" on the 'toolbox' on this page. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:23, 3 July 2009 (BST)

Sorry...

About the spaz attack at A/MR. Big internal changes. We need a new wiki editor. Is it possible to edit so much you want to barf? --Haliman - Talk 06:05, 27 June 2009 (BST)

The images that just won't die.

On one of your pages somewhere you keep a small history of those three images that refuse to be removed from the lists despite being deleted. Well on Special:Unusedimages all three obviously show up (near the top), but better yet all three original files are on there and still recoverable. Mayhaps reuploading those original files, triggering a few updates in the job queue then nuking the images will do the job? Dunno, just thinking aloud here. --  RoosterDragon  21:01, 29 June 2009 (BST)

We have tried uploading the original files, and according to the revision history, Karek tried restoring a revision back in 2008, and by the looks of it, it didn't work :( I was always interested in just uploading my own images over it, but Link already tried that and apparently it doesn't work either. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:44, 30 June 2009 (BST)

Wait, what did you mean by updating the 'job queue'? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:56, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Wait a second, I've found out why they don't die, at leased. Check the actual code of the images, [3],[4] and [5]. For some reason, there are extra codes on the filenames, eg. %E2%80%8EPDA_Badge.jpg, which ties these images in the same group as the pages that similarly won't die ([eg. 7th Fallschirmj�ger Div.) Now, if we find a way to de-code the sections (%E2%80%8E), upload an image with those symbols, then maybe it would upload it over what the Wiki thinks the images are? I got some help via #batshit, they led me here, but only the first character is à but the others are undefined. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:26, 1 July 2009 (BST)

...It's the hex code for "0xE2 0x80 0x8E (e2808e)". More info at [6] and [7]. Moonshine and Zbahnz tell me it may mean the uploader was from a country where the language is right-to-left and the code was automatically included into the upload? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:32, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Agreed, after doing some investigation on php's function to encode URL's, it seems that is indeed the code for a left to right mark. The html code is ‎ so we can easily link to the right images.

	Without Mark	With Mark
PDA Badge	Image:PDA_Badge.jpg	Image:‎PDA_Badge.jpg
PDA Badge1	Image:PDA_Badge1.jpg	Image:‎PDA_Badge1.jpg
39229141	Image:39229141.jpg	Image:‎‎39229141.jpg

The upload thing appears to lose the code in transition though, might need a bit more thinking before we get there yet... --  RoosterDragon  16:32, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Uploaded the original PDA badge for another try. It appears as a separate listing on the unused files, so that's proof the the nicely named image which I uploaded is a different file from the crap one. All the old deletions are just deleting the nice file. The problem is all the links to the crap one are redirected by the wiki to the nice one. So some meddling around with the upload destination or some URL fiddling when deleting the image is in order. --  RoosterDragon  17:20, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Just tried fiddling around with the URL when uploading: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=%E2%80%8EPDA_Badge.jpg and then attempting to upload yields:

• File name has been changed to "PDA_Badge.jpg".
• A file with this name exists already, please check Image:PDA Badge.jpg if you are not sure if you want to change it.

So it removes the mark, and then of course the filename matches the nice one. How did the image ever make it in the first place if it removes the stupid code? --  RoosterDragon  17:32, 1 July 2009 (BST)

... Maybe an older version of Wiki software didn't change the filename, then Kevan updated the software (after these images were uploaded), and the new software had a feature which did not allow this type of symbol use when uploading files? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:41, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Probably, Bugzilla turns up lots of entries for inaccessible/undeletable stuff. They patched it but the devs had to manually run scripts to fix the pages that were already bad. So we're probably stuck with them. --  RoosterDragon  13:12, 2 July 2009 (BST)

And I thought I was so close ;_; D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:20, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Spam Bots

I have seen Valtrex on another wiki, but I can't get herpes to buy Valtex until I get some Cialis to increase my performance! It's a vicious circle with these guys!--SirArgo ^Talk 18:16, 30 June 2009 (BST)

Omg.

A/VB - I'm disappointed, DDR. Really. --Haliman - Talk 03:43, 1 July 2009 (BST)

yeah ddr why cant you ignore pretty much every rule in the book so we can all have a creepy laugh over a GURL ON TEH INTERNET --Cyberbob 03:45, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. --Haliman - Talk 03:46, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Rules are rules. It is obviously humorous, regardless of how serious Moonie claimed. I also warned Moonie via IRC that this would be the outcome. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:48, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Rules are rules, and you warned him on IRC that it would be vandalism... obviously the course of action you would take in response would be to vote Keep on it and wait until someone else brought him to A/VB to openly declare it as such. --Cyberbob 03:58, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Was one hour too much for you, Bob? Everything happens in it's due course, there is no reason why my right to vote should immediately become nullified by my position as a sysop. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:00, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yes one hour was too much, and your "right to vote" does not extend to turning a blind eye to vandalism. --Cyberbob 04:03, 1 July 2009 (BST)

It's a joke! Even if it technically is Vandalism, who was hurt? --Haliman - Talk 04:05, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Where was this "argument" every other time a humourous suggestion in the main space has been ruled vandalism? --Cyberbob 04:07, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I probably wasn't online when it happened? --Haliman - Talk 04:08, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Why would that stop someone who obviously feels as strongly about this topic as you? --Cyberbob 04:11, 1 July 2009 (BST)

It's not creepy! --dgw 04:11, 1 July 2009 (BST)

lets have a sowrd fite over it!!!!!!!! --Cyberbob 04:14, 1 July 2009 (BST)

*draws her sword* en garde! --dgw 04:19, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I haven't noticed any cases of this before this one is what I'm trying to say. --Haliman - Talk 04:12, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Surely you'd go looking if it matters to you so much? --Cyberbob 04:14, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. But I didn't know I would care that much until just now. --Haliman - Talk 04:16, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Why don't you go make a policy repealing humourous suggestions in the mainspace being vandalism, as well as the elimination of the separate Humourous Suggestions space? I'm sure you care deeply enough to actually get your hands dirty over it. --Cyberbob 04:19, 1 July 2009 (BST)

That comment doesn't even deserve a yep. --Haliman - Talk 04:22, 1 July 2009 (BST)

If you don't care enough to actually go out and do something about it then you shouldn't bother opening your mouth. --Cyberbob 04:26, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I'll say whatever the hell I want. I WILL NOT BE SILENCED! --Haliman - Talk 04:27, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Hey, I'm not complaining - your bleatings are always good for a laugh. I'm just saying. --Cyberbob 04:29, 1 July 2009 (BST)

How can one person unilaterally decide that a well-recieved suggestion is humorous? What guidelines are there for determining that something is humorous? omg wikidrama!! I want to get drunk and vote for Fiffy without being told it's humorous! *sharpens sword moar* --dgw 04:30, 1 July 2009 (BST)

you're dumb. --Cyberbob 04:32, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I'm dumb? You're tryin to kill people's fun. And it's a serious question, even if it seeeeems obvious to you in this case that it's humorous. --dgw 04:41, 1 July 2009 (BST)

How am I killing your fun? You can still have your funny suggestion, just not in the main area. Go to Humorous Suggestions and post it there. --Cyberbob 04:46, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Bob, Done. and DDR: "Also, I'd prefer a "Ban Retards" button which would instantly ban all petty users, and Umbrella employees in the blink of an eye" - Good Thing I'm NOT an Umbrella Employee ^_^ --Haliman - Talk 04:59, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Any pitiful group with Umbrella in it's name is a retarded attempt at copying a legitimate antagonist faction from a well-respected videogame franchise. I don't care how both you two groups refer to each other, but to the outside world you are both Umbrella. Both you and the other Umbrella should be ashamed of yourselves. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:01, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I'm ashamed of the OTHER pitiful Umbrella if that counts for anything. ^_^ --Haliman - Talk 05:04, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Judging a group you have never been into, now that is pitiful. --Thadeous Oakley 10:22, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Your opinion of pitiful does not sway me, Mistergame. Avoiding an arbitration case which you previously accepted, by spurting bits of Dutch is pitiful to me, but I don't run in and whinge about it. If you were the exact same group but called the Parasol Biohazard Containment Service, then perhaps I wouldn't be against your group, however tryhard and irritating it looks (Grand Marshal? General? Please...) But I don't approve of groups taking the name of Umbrella and making it into the own group. Furthermore, when two groups who plagiarised the name go on a massive drama/vandal spree because both the groups were unoriginal enough to make their own group name, then it tips the boat for me. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:30, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I accepted that arbitration as much as a post-order bride accepts her marriage. The case would have gone through without me so a choice, no I hadn't. And be happy about Umbrella. Both groups are well organized, structured, nice wiki and have been or are successful to a good extent. If we would disband UC and UBCS then you can count on one hand how long it would take for a trenchcoater to turn Umbrella into the laughingstock that probably won't even hit the statspage. You can't create a zombie apocalypse without Umbrella turning up sooner or later. At least now its something good. --Thadeous Oakley 11:08, 1 July 2009 (BST)

It's a terrible and embarrassingly unoriginal concept for a group, but as long as we get in there before some noob trenchcoater, it'll be okay is a very poor mentality to have. You had no interest in talking to suicidalangel, as you don't now, so you should have just refused the case and have someone else represent you, it would at leased be the mature, productive thing to do. My talk page has had enough petty junk on it for one day, as you'd notice above, and I have no interest in furthering this argument about the Umbrellas or your arbitration woes. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:13, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Thadeous has a point. The groups are, to some extent, successful, the groups are somewhat calm towards each other now, and the members aren't powertripping troll assholes. We could go about making fun of every group weaker than us, but we don't, because we're not egomaniacs. Just my two-cents. --Haliman - Talk 04:08, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Milla was pretty hot in the first movie. --Brigadier Sergeant Major Field Marshal Paddy Dignam 23:28, 1 July 2009 (BST)

/me sighs. Better sig now? --Haliman - Talk 04:14, 2 July 2009 (BST)

I'll vote no, because it still has the petty message to Cyberbob at the end. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:46, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Same here - for that reason and that I've seen better versions. "General" was alright, "Grand Marshal" was silly (but that might be the anti-WoW talking), and the current one falls in between those two. Maybe just "Haliman - UBCS" or something. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 04:49, 2 July 2009 (BST)

I refuse to change the Yep. Maybe Founder of the UBCS, or UBCS Wiki Editor? --Haliman - Talk 05:10, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Maybe just get rid of the bureaucracy and unnecessary self-titling, if people wanted to find out the founder of the group, they would look at the group page, if they wanted to see the Wiki Editor, they would check the history. Putting it in your signature appeals to them, but the other 96% of the wiki probably find the titling a little redundant. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:14, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Well, good point. But just "Haliman" sounds too dull.. Any ideas what I should put with it? --Haliman - Talk 05:18, 2 July 2009 (BST)

If your name is boring, maybe try jazz up the formatting, I guess. When I'm bored with my sig I just change the formatting to a dif style/colour. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:20, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Hmm... Maybe. I like my format tho D: --Haliman - Talk 05:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Colour? Variety is the spice of life! D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:27, 2 July 2009 (BST)

One sec. :) --Haliman - Talk 05:29, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Well, green pops out, but idk. --Haliman - Talk 05:36, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Instead of "Green", use "DarkOliveGreen". D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Or even "SeaGreen". D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:40, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Now it seems too old and crusty... And I swear if ANY of my guys make a comment... --Haliman - Talk 05:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)

I guess. I saw you try black, that was alright. When in doubt, go black. The other ones previously, like blue and stuff, were good, I just didn't like green. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:49, 2 July 2009 (BST)

I didn't try black. I tried the non-existent OliveGreen, so it reverted to back. I tried blue, steelblue, and slateblue. But meh. Idk. --Haliman - Talk 05:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Hali, that sig looks like you. Old and lame. Die in a fire. loljk <3 --Skouth 05:52, 2 July 2009 (BST)

MidnightBlue? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:53, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Maybe make your sig text black or a dark colour and try lighter backgrounds. :P --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 05:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)

I like this one alot. Agreed? --Haliman - Talk 07:38, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Still hate the self titling and now its twice as long as before. But at leased you used Midnightblue. That's good enough for me. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:48, 2 July 2009 (BST)

Template help

How do you format a template so it will show up on a page if you only put Template:Suchandsuch? --Imthatguy 16:04, 3 July 2009 (BST)

Ah, see if you want to put a page up as a template (for example, that page in your userspace, you do {{User:XXXXXX/Page}}. That way it just uses the page as a source instead of searching in the Template: namespace. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:07, 3 July 2009 (BST)

	Anti-Bureaucracy
	This user hates bureaucracy and encourages wiki-revolution!

DONT FORGET SUPPORT THE WIKIREVOLUTION!!!!!!! DOWN WITH THE CRATS!!!!!!!!!!!--Imthatguy 05:11, 4 July 2009 (BST)

Awrr - Don't kill civility!

Oh buddy I can't believe you just voted against my civility article. You know you loves it, and the "Text-rape rules!" crowd hardly needs your support. Come baby change your vote. STRONG VARCH!--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 19:28, 6 July 2009 (BST)

Aww. Look, I do love it, but the against votes were just too right. Cmon, surely you know another buddy who can push that article over 50%... D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:37, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Yarp. I could probably round up some support from my groups. Oh well. I'll just crawl over to them with this knife in my back. Love, --_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 05:16, 7 July 2009 (BST)

hope you enjoy the sight of me striking votes due to meatpuppetry --Cyberbob 05:19, 7 July 2009 (BST)

What is this "meatpuppetry" you speak of? --_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 05:32, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Do you really not know or are you being cute? --Cyberbob 05:34, 7 July 2009 (BST)

I really don't know how you mean it in this context. I would think of meatpuppetry as being using alts or something to vote. --_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 05:36, 7 July 2009 (BST)

That's sockpuppetry. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:37, 7 July 2009 (BST)

No Giles, you are the puppets. (Meatpuppetry is like sockpuppetry, except they're actually different people. Like that Fiffy lazer beem eyes suggestion.) --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 05:40, 7 July 2009 (BST)

This too. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:45, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Of course. Under sockpuppetry in the wiki, we find a subsection for meat puppet: "Editors of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia use "meat puppet" to deprecate contributions from a new community member if the new member was (apparently) recruited by an existing member only to back up the recruiting member's position." Of course I wouldn't stoop to that. A couple of members of CAPD and the SWA do already actively maintain wiki accounts and contribute to the wiki. I'm not above shooting them a link to the voting on our forums and asking them to make up their own minds. That certainly isn't meatpuppetry, yeh? --_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 05:42, 7 July 2009 (BST)

It is, but only slightly. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 05:43, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Whether it's slightly or strongly meatpuppetry is irrelevant. --Cyberbob 05:44, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Isnt that what the democrats and republicans do every election? I also demand proof that he is meatpuppeting or im putting cyberbob up for misconduct--Imthatguy 05:48, 7 July 2009 (BST)

you're precious --Cyberbob 05:50, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Firstly, real life =/= UDwiki.

Secondly, you're an idiot. Misconduct is for abuse of sysop powers (not just regular editing,) and Bob never accused Giles of anything. He warned him against meatpuppeting. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:51, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Apart from anything else, Giles, meatpupeting is hella lame. It's a fucking guide, FFS. Some people don't think it deserves to be a reviewed one, and voted that way. Deal with it, instead of fucking over the wiki by getting your mates, who wouldn't have otherwise voted, to force it through simply to stroke your own ego -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 21:50 7 July 2009 (BST)

but some people have self-esteem issues and need this kind of internet glory or they get all emo and everyone dislikes emos --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 21:53, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Votes unstruck. There is nothing in the rules that permits anyone from removing anyones votes unless they are made by sock puppets. Until such time as there is something that allows it, kindly piss off. - Grim s

I have no idea why you guys are so apeshit over such a minor, petty vote, when there have been plenty over other more seriousness meatpuppeting issues that have even been let through. I thought it was decided there would be no meatpuppet striking, especially for such a little thing like this. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:47, 7 July 2009 (BST)

So i cant vote? please ciberbob... i think you cant vote for me ...and if i want to vote i can vote no?..so meat pupeting is because i am on CAPD¨?no?..watch my Sig please i am a MPD member too...and there i used to teach new player to read that guide...why? because need to remember is a game but still we can have respect for others...So say what you want but my vote is my vote..have respect for me...i respect you..--(x)Alvaromesa^{Talk | Bacardi |MPD | Malton Public Radio} 23:13, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Hey, I struck your vote too! What about me? What about MY NEEDS?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:16, 7 July 2009 (BST)

I dont care if you or bob have problem with my vote...so for what is a vote if i cant vote what i want? and a admin crossed my vote? what the is the dead?--(x)Alvaromesa^{Talk | Bacardi |MPD | Malton Public Radio} 23:33, 7 July 2009 (BST)

U have special needs?--Thadeous Oakley 23:18, 7 July 2009 (BST)

His momma always said he was special so, of course, he has special needs! --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 23:29, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Apparently, this is important enough for people to make sockpuppets. User:lolwat64 --Thadeous Oakley 23:18, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Or it could quite easily be a meat puppet, which is entirely allowed.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:23, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Indeed, perhaps you should do an IP check? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:31, 7 July 2009 (BST)

It doesn't match any current user. What do you know? Maybe it isn't a sock puppet!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:33, 7 July 2009 (BST)

OMG! Colour me shocked and amazed! --AHLG 23:34, 7 July 2009 (BST)

D'okay!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:41, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Did this really need to happen, especialy on someones talkpage who wasen't really involved? --^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 23:38, 7 July 2009 (BST)

U herd of proxies rite? Honestly, whatever puppet it is, it obviously is a puppet. Can't say the same about Alvaro and Michelson.--Thadeous Oakley 23:42, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Yeah, in all likeliness it's not just some random user who happened along. ;/ --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:44, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Defying the odds.--Thadeous Oakley 23:47, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Wow, you're still pushing that tired old line of "durfahurf look at me not knowing the difference between meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry"? Fucking hell you're stupid. --Cyberbob 01:51, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Thas no SHOCKED enough! Colour me! COLOUR ME!! @Michaleson we do this all the time.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:44, 7 July 2009 (BST)

WHAT FONTS SHOULD I USE D00D?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:52, 7 July 2009 (BST)

ALL OF THEM!! AARRRGG! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:53, 7 July 2009 (BST)

But, but, that will take too long...--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:54, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Ahhhhhhh..... wimp --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:55, 7 July 2009 (BST)

I shamefully admit it. ;_; --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:57, 7 July 2009 (BST)

I want to edit this thread too :~ --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 23:37, 7 July 2009 (BST)

You have problem of others opinions? all this for a vote? next time i not vote anything guys...that is the idea of a wikipedia?so what is the deal if civility recive the votes? the word explode?--(x)Alvaromesa^{Talk | Bacardi |MPD | Malton Public Radio} 23:50, 7 July 2009 (BST)

It's all good, thank you alvaro for voting your mind. It sucks that such drama would unfold as a result of that. For any interested parties, I've defended my actions on User_talk:Cyberbob240#Garr_Knock_it_off. With this, the matter is resolved for me, regardless of how the vote goes. In the end, the fact that 22 people have registered their opinion of civility is quite positive. I hope to someday have a better understanding of the confounding and frustrating maze of unwritten rules and precedents that surface on the wiki from time to time. --_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 00:30, 8 July 2009 (BST)

yes...subverting democracy is a pretty hard thing to get a handle on i agree --Cyberbob 01:28, 8 July 2009 (BST)

What? Advising us to read something we are interested in, so we could vote if we agree, is subverting democracy? That is idiotic. Giles did nothing wrong. --Sophie ^{◆◆◆ CAPD} 01:42, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Firstly, as if there was ever a chance of you voting no. Secondly, yes it is wrong. --Cyberbob 01:49, 8 July 2009 (BST)

*Cough* Yet another reason why most voting on this wiki is retarded. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:51, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Are we suddenly Wikipedia? Because I'm pretty sure we're only based on the software for the most part. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 01:53, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Ah yes wikipedia... always a reliable rallying point when things are looking bleak for your side. Too bad we're wiki.urbandead.com, not en.wikipedia.org. --Cyberbob 01:56, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Too bad, I've always been a supporter of changing the voting system to a consensus based one. I think you are misunderstanding me, I am never citing that as our policy.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:57, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Consensus voting might work for wikipedia but here it would literally be the devil. Sorry. --Cyberbob 02:00, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Nah, except suggestions which work fine as is, attempts at discussion to get something done work, people are just lazy. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:01, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Urban Dead IRC Channels

care to protect this page while i file an arbies ? content must be rolled back to what it looked like before suicidal's edit, but j3d's edit is better --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 15:02, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Yes. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:04, 8 July 2009 (BST)

thank you. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 15:11, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Signature not working

Hey im dearly sorry to bother you with this.But i made a signature and edited it to my User:Suffery/sig as im supposed to.. If you have any free time could you help me with this? thanks--Suffery 09:53, 11 July 2009 (BST)

Of course. I'll reply the necessary steps onto your talk page. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:09, 11 July 2009 (BST)

== Your Sig ==--xoxo 16:10, 11 July 2009 (BST)

The timestamp starts on a new line, which makes the page a bit longer, and less visually attractive. I'll try and find a fix now (and post back here if I do,) so here's you're notification :P. It's probably just a rouge line break.

(User_talk:WanYao - example.) Linkthewindow  Talk  16:06, 11 July 2009 (BST)

That didn't fix it. Since it's not a wiki-breaking issue, I'll leave it up to you to revert back to the last working version or not. Linkthewindow  Talk  16:09, 11 July 2009 (BST)

Yeha stop fucking our wiki up yuo retard i'm sick of your shit.--xoxo 16:10, 11 July 2009 (BST)

Yeah I copied and pasted new + old code together without giving it any checkthrough. Noticed just before I hopped into bed. I'll fix now. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:11, 11 July 2009 (BST)

Rev got it. Linkthewindow  Talk  16:12, 11 July 2009 (BST)

the halftime air was sweet perfume? NO.--xoxo 16:19, 11 July 2009 (BST)

That didnt work lol..heres my sig now --{{SUBST:Nosubst|User:Suffery/sig}} 19:55, 11 July 2009 (BST)

yea i unchecked it.--{{SUBST:Nosubst|User:Suffery/sig}} 02:54, 12 July 2009 (BST)

It worked on your talk page a couple of minutes ago -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:59 12 July 2009 (BST)

I closed the <font> tags and got rid of the redundant noinclude tags, it should work fine now. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:17, 12 July 2009 (BST)

Thanks i owe you one lol. i love my new sig--Suff-TMS- <-- Killin' zombies! 05:32, 12 July 2009 (BST)

Signature

I finally broke down and jacked some of the code from your epically setup sig to create a new, revised one for myself. I hope my selfish act of wiki-code-stealing swells your pride. :D -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 03:49, 13 July 2009 (BST)

Thanks, I like it. It's a worthy fraud :D D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:49, 13 July 2009 (BST)

Archiving

I've been archiving a few suburb News posts, and I've arrived at a conundrum. I've archived the whole month of June for most suburbs, but not deleted posts under a month old. Is this correct? Or should I be deleting the whole month?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:56, 14 July 2009 (BST)

While we're at it, what do I do if the last post on a page is more than a month old? Do I leave it, or put some snazzy line saying "There is no recent news for this suburb. Go to the archive, indicated here." --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:00, 14 July 2009 (BST)

There isn't a rule of thumb, but for the first problem, generally you just archive the whole month regardless of whether it's over a month old or not. Especially at this time of month, where it usually doesn't matter. For the second problem, just get rid of all the old news and add that notice, probably saying There is no recent news for this suburb. News older than 1st July 2009 can be found in the archive. The given month in a notice like this won't need an update because anyone who adds to the news will delete it anyway, but otherwise people will know just when the last news post was. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 18:07, 14 July 2009 (BST)

And while you're here, thanks, I like users who dedicate themselves to under-maintained tasks in the wiki. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 18:08, 14 July 2009 (BST)

Actually, I don't know why I did it. It's like some weird force came over me. Anyway, as I'm nearly done, I'll come back to the pages where June remains, and I'll take it away, but for now I'll stop. I might end up doing it tomorrow.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:10, 14 July 2009 (BST)

Good luck. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 18:12, 14 July 2009 (BST)

Alright, I've done it now. June has been cleansed from the wiki.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:07, 22 July 2009 (BST)

Good job. Mass editing tasks always cleanse the soul, don't they? --ϑϑℜ 12:12, 22 July 2009 (BST)

They do indeed.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:13, 22 July 2009 (BST)

Hey

Thanks for the welcome back - I don't know how long I'm going to be back, but being on the outside of the drama looking in makes it a whole lot easier to stomach and get back to work. It's good to see people step up and put in some effort on the wiki. I like your status stuff in your sig - nice coding. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 18:42, 14 July 2009 (BST)

I miss Amazing. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 18:50, 14 July 2009 (BST)

Thanks anyway

I'm basically leaving UD and the wiki for an undetermined period of time. ;) Ciao --Janus ^talk 19:13, 15 July 2009 (BST)

Good luck IRL Janus! D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:27, 16 July 2009 (BST)

Ditto here. You're one of the few people that I've seriously thought about nominating for sysop. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:59, 16 July 2009 (BST)

Aww, thanks! ;) --ϑϑℜ 13:00, 16 July 2009 (BST)

I meant Janus :P Linkthewindow  Talk  13:07, 16 July 2009 (BST)

;_; --ϑϑℜ 13:07, 16 July 2009 (BST)

You're already a sysop anyways, dork! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:49, 19 July 2009 (BST)

But thats nothing if no one had always considered putting me up!!! :'( --ϑϑℜ 03:51, 19 July 2009 (BST)

DDR hai!!Aw

Hai! =-D

I descnided sonce im driunk to dome says hi to folk. So hai! -- Cheese 03:23, 19 July 2009 (BST)

Hello, friend! --ϑϑℜ 03:24, 19 July 2009 (BST)

<3 Yay.! You saud Hi back! =D 00 Cheese 03:26, 19 July 2009 (BST)

fake demotion summary

this joke was funny in the beginning. It aint no more. Stop it. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 15:38, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Oh shut up. Most people deal with being fooled by chuckling about it and having a friendly joke with the user who did it. How about instead of eyeballing RC you get back to 'fixing' your bastardised version of User:Amazing. --ϑϑℜ 15:43, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Lol. -- Cheese 15:49, 20 July 2009 (BST)

like i said, it was funny... but you are so overusing it that it aint anymore. And Amazing's thing requires a lil more attention and though... its not something ima gonna do at work in between builds and compilings. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 15:54, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Then perhaps you should have considered leaving it in its useful and historically relevant state while you messed around with this 'improved' version in a sandbox. --ϑϑℜ 15:58, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Historical use of Historical

History was made today when a historically large amount of history was revised so that future history for this historical idea will be different. As future history was changed in one way, and pending this historical votes passing, in another, the word "historical" itself and all of it's other tenses and uses were used a historical number of times. When historical members of the community were asked to comment on this historical day, a historical number of them didn't care at all. For this quasi -historical figure, I would just like to say I can't wait until this day and these writings are historical.--SirArgo ^Talk 18:33, 20 July 2009 (BST)

What the hell? :D --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 21:38, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Lol. It does make sense, kinda. I have translated it!--SirArgo ^Talk 03:39, 21 July 2009 (BST)

Nah, it did make sense. I loved it. --ϑϑℜ 03:41, 21 July 2009 (BST)

Support our siggy!!!

DDR, support the mudkip TOOOOOO!!!!

Quick Question

Can anything be done about This? I find it amusing, because the fellow who created it is long gone, and I've been a PKer for awhile. I'm just curious if it could be deleted or some such. It's not really fun when someone searches my username and comes up with that farce. Thanks for anything. -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 22:18, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Actually, yes it can be deleted. It's one of those one-off groups that don't go anywhere. Not to mention that it was an almost entire copy of the old kill Deus page, which has since changed. And not to mention that pudge was a griefer that the Demons (who Kill Deus was playing against, and in a good manner, at the time) nor the members of Deus liked him (if I'm not mistaken. I'm not sure about the Deus's, but I was a Demon at the time, so I know we didn't like him). It could easily be put up for deletions, hell, if you put it on SD as a crit one, I'd delete it myself. They even use the same image that Kill deus used, and the one they use on their template Template:Kill_Deus257.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 22:39, 20 July 2009 (BST)

I've put it up for A/SD, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were sent to A/D, or even just rejected outright. Still, it could always be moved to a subpage of the user's namespace. We'll see how it goes. --ϑϑℜ 03:30, 21 July 2009 (BST)

Many thanks gentlemen. -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 04:47, 21 July 2009 (BST)

I'll leave this link alone. --Cyberbob 11:43, 21 July 2009 (BST)

Borehamwood

Why you revert your last edit? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:55, 22 July 2009 (BST)

I don't know, I get in those moods some times. I just don't think my last comments really needed to be said. --ϑϑℜ 13:56, 22 July 2009 (BST)

It was entirely true. I'd say 70-80 percent of the survivors who are left spawned in a 20x20 area. The area was sufficiently underpopulated that we knew most survivors and zombies by name, and with GNR's help had an effective communication net up almost immediately. Smaller was better. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 16:08, 22 July 2009 (BST)

Perhaps... I might re-add it later on with a more coherent explanation and more decent points, in the morning. --ϑϑℜ 16:37, 22 July 2009 (BST)

My Story

Hey, thanks for telling me about the page being deleted... I was actually about to paste my story in there (didn't have time this past week). Would I make the page with user first? as in User:Jobava/Story?--Jobava 16:09, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Yes. --Cyberbob 16:03, 23 July 2009 (BST)

also how do I edit my signature? --Jobava 16:09, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Here is a pretty awesome article that has everything you need to know about signatures. Help:Signatures--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 16:39, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Re:Phone

Thanks. :) I was going to use it as my userpage, but I kinda gave up on that as I don't think it's possible to make the buttons clickable objects. - User:Whitehouse 18:28, 23 July 2009 (BST)

IRC question

Why is the IRC channel set to +m? People who come in and aren't +v can't talk when the channel is +m. --User:Axe27/Sig 20:43, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Because DDR is stoopid.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 20:44, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Do you mean #udwiki? Because #urbandeadwiki hasn't had +m set for a few days now. --Cyberbob 20:46, 23 July 2009 (BST)

No, I mean #urbandeadwiki. Boberton came into channel without +v and was unable to speak. --User:Axe27/Sig 20:49, 23 July 2009 (BST)

I just looked then and there's no +m set... strange. --Cyberbob 20:51, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Never mind, Cyberbob was right. Boberton was unable to speak because he didn't know he was able to speak. : D--User:Axe27/Sig 20:54, 23 July 2009 (BST)

lol --Cyberbob 20:55, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Wait, I was on IRC? I didn't even notice... --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 20:55, 23 July 2009 (BST)

It were me. Don't worry Boberton. --Rahrah^{Come join the #party!} 21:03, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Status

Dude-ism. It'd be great if you could help me with a status template for me. :) It'd be used for the end of my sig. The "Current BICotry part". --Rahrah^{Come join the #party!} 20:57, 23 July 2009 (BST)

K. --ϑϑℜ 02:28, 24 July 2009 (BST)

Thanks, I think I get how it works n'all. Just one thing; What is Nosubst? --Rahrah^{Come join the #party!}19:19, 24 July 2009 (BST)

My signature is SUBST, so it pastes the code down onto the page manually every time I use it, whereas the {{SUBST:Nosubst|User:XXXX/sig}} means that it throws the template on the page instead. It's better for longer sigs. --ϑϑℜ 02:03, 25 July 2009 (BST)

The mysteriously disappearing page

I recently made a deletion request deletion request that was on course to pass. And then it got deleted. Before the 2 week deadline, and no one has owned up to it or said they deleted it. Because this is a misconductable action, I'll leave it your discretion, but please wag the finger at whoever deleted the page before the 2 weeks. --User:Axe27/Sig 16:57, 28 July 2009 (BST)

The deletion log reveals all. Cheese probably just forgot to move it afterwards. --  RoosterDragon  17:22, 28 July 2009 (BST)

Cheese did it, but he preceded the 2 week deadline by 3 hours. --ϑϑℜ 01:28, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I would say this is likely a case of timezone differences rather than any kind of HOLY FUCKING SHIT MISCONDUCT WAG UR FINGER --Cyberbob 01:47, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I got a/vb'd for time zone confusion. :/--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:40, 29 July 2009 (BST)

It was pretty obviously a deliberate action, done to make sure your action got through early, and thus your hegemony. But let's assume for a minute that there was no wilful, malicious intent here -- we'll stretch the limits of our credulity, to point of bursting, just for argument's sake... Well, even in that case, you're clearly incompetent and untrustworthy. Enough is fucking enough. --Cyberbob 04:42, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I hate you too cb. ^^--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:47, 29 July 2009 (BST)

How long have you been on the wiki, SA? You've been a sysop before. You claim you know the rules, etc. etc. Why do you keep doing these things when you really ought to know better? Stop making excuses. Seriously. --Cyberbob 04:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Once more you turn it into a personal attack, scoffing off legitimate criticism as trying to "score drama points". I see, finally, how hopeless it is to expect you to take responsibility for your actions and to act even a little like an adult. Feh. --ϑϑℜ 05:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Oooooooooooh, ad hominems! I'm so impressed!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:07, 29 July 2009 (BST)

This isn't your personal fiefdom, cyberbob sa. Stop acting like it is. --ϑϑℜ 05:08, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Strawman. --Cyberbob 05:09, 29 July 2009 (BST)

What the hell are you talking about now???--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:10, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Oh SA you're so droll. Now, someday, maybe you'll pay less attention to being such a wag, and more attention to not making stupid "mistake" after stupid "mistake"... Then we won't have to listen to more of your repeated "apologies" or hollow promises that such things won't happen again, either. --Cyberbob 05:12, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I am honestly sorry, but for some things bad faith is not a prerequisite for vandalism. That is one of them. You'll note that I have taken steps to try and ensure that nobody unknowingly does it again in the way I did with the creation of this section. That's the absolute best I can do after the fact.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:22, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Also a very nice way to attempt to sidestep my refutations of DDR's mis-appropriation of what Wan was talking about.... You're damn good at the sleazeball politician thing, SA, damn good, I'll give you that much. --Cyberbob 05:27, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Does "being the bigger man" ring any kind of bell at all? Seriously, you could fight and troll yourself couldn't you?--SirArgo ^Talk 05:31, 29 July 2009 (BST)

You do realise that all of these posts are essentially quoting WanYao? --Cyberbob 05:36, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Or cb and maybe even zl.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:38, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Wow. You guys are that determined to "show me up" that you can't understand how editign while drunk and deleting something early... yet I cycled a suggestion early... you can't comprehend how that isn't the same, you think it's harmless and innocuous and in "good faith"??? Wow. You take the cake, you really do. How's that job at the Ministry of Truth pay, anyway?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:35, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Yeah I know that's pretty harsh... But, you may not believe this... but even when I go one a histrionics binge, I can most always step back and admit when I am wrong... and/or back off, let things cool down and give a person a deserved "second chance". The fact that you don't get any such consideration shows how completely reproachable and over-the-top I consider your behavior to be. You blew it, man, big time. --Cyberbob 05:40, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I know I screwed up really badly, but there's literally nothing else I can do apart from work to make sure it never happens again. I think I deserve a second chance - I really do. I know you don't believe me on this one but my motivation in making those cases and whatnot was seriously not in bad faith. That is the honest truth.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:50, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Yes, your right, but that's not enough here. Come back when you have some friends over at the sysops team. --Cyberbob 05:52, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Heh. Once again you fail to mount an argument. Time to hide behind your insults and your little clique. You're getting far too predictable :) --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 05:59, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I'll just rehash some points to you. 1. I am not a petty schmuck and don't behave as such 99% of the time, unless dealing with the most petty of users such as yourself. 2. My intelligence is so irrelevant to any of this because the fact is that I have at leased some sort of knowledge and experience on wikis that you obviously don't. And 3. The fact you made that deletion 3 hours early is not only irrelevant, but also proves that you'll always just be another sheep that herds the deletions section. With your attitude and perceptiveness, I suggest you stay there. --Cyberbob 06:08, 29 July 2009 (BST)

HA HA HA. The extent of your delusions is truly amazing. By all means, try to keep your fucktarded ramblings out of my way. I only deal with them perfunctorily, and would gladly not waste any more of my time on them. Up to you.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 06:14, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Q.E.D. --Cyberbob 06:19, 29 July 2009 (BST)

So I guess presenting any opinion that goes against the Status Quo is automatically "Q.E.D.". Convenient.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 06:20, 29 July 2009 (BST)

I live in a country where we use common law, as inhereted from the UK. Which means that the tradition of established precedent rules. And if a judge goes against established precedent his ruling can be -- and routinely is, in such rare cases -- overturned. As for the rest of it... you were being mocked, SA, pure and simple... but your response demonstrates what a self-important prig you are... which was why I was trolling you in the first place, lol --Cyberbob 06:28, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Did you have to attend some sort of special trade school in order to learn how to be this obtuse?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 06:33, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Just pointing out the obvious. Sorry if it didn't appeal. --Cyberbob 06:42, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Ha ha ha. Seriously, in order to point out something you have to present some kind of evidence, not just make statements and toss around weak insults. Point that out. Heh.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 06:49, 29 July 2009 (BST)

LOL I was just looking for that quote to use... --ϑϑℜ 09:54, 29 July 2009 (BST)

Thanks for ruining 90% of the joke with that heading change. --Cyberbob 07:46, 30 July 2009 (BST)

If you think it that important you can change it back to the original, I actually don't mind. --ϑϑℜ 07:47, 30 July 2009 (BST)

It's not that important, it just kinda feels a bit forced now. --Cyberbob 07:49, 30 July 2009 (BST)

It was over before I changed it. And damn, I almost had you at A/VB ;D --ϑϑℜ 07:51, 30 July 2009 (BST)

Huh? You explicitly gave me your permission; not even the blindest of haters (gonna hate) would try that case on for size. --Cyberbob 07:52, 30 July 2009 (BST)

sigh. was a joke nvm --ϑϑℜ 07:54, 30 July 2009 (BST)

If you're going to nitpick me...

I'll be happy to nitpick you back. In reference to your statement: "I respect it. Unlike Giles, he had the decency to go against, rather than persistently complain and then vouch." I didn't persistently complain and then vouch. In fact, the precise order of my statements was - question, complaint, vouch, complaint.
Your pal,
--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 21:15, 31 July 2009 (BST)

Exactly. If all you are going to do is criticise him, then why not just go against? If your comment isn't supportive in any way, it doesn't say much for your vouch, and it's obvious you don't want to vouch, and if you do, it's near impossible to tell. You might want to add something decent on besides all the negativity or your vouch is more or less meaningless. --ϑϑℜ 01:51, 1 August 2009 (BST)

And you were hardly nitpicking, as I was hardly nitpicking you in my initial comment, because there is quite a bit that would have to be said about your a/pm vouch in the first place, if one were so inclined. The problems with it are so obvious, though, that there is no reason for me to go into it. Unnecessary arguments aren't in anyone's interests just now. --ϑϑℜ 02:05, 1 August 2009 (BST)

Except for me. I'm bored and an argument would be fun to watch.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:05, 1 August 2009 (BST)

You are admin sa shame on you. --ϑϑℜ 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)

I'm really wishing we didn't already wear out the quote joke right now. Cyberbob  Talk  04:30, 1 August 2009 (BST)

Yeah...:( Oh well. Battle for Wesnoth, here I come!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:36, 1 August 2009 (BST)

Wesnoth is pretty fresh but I burned out on it. Anyways. I don't see any problem with criticizing someone and still agreeing with them in other areas or seeing merit in their overall performance. Perhaps you interpret honest critique as a slap in the face but I don't and from what I gather SA didn't either. I said in my vote that SA is "honest and fair" and that's why I vouched.
Do you read my posts before you huff and puff or do you just look for one thing to disagree with?
After confronting SA and looking at their contributions, I do feel he/she is coming from a good place in their decision making, and to me that's the most important trait in a crat. But I understand how you could view my vouch as being vague. Is a more glittering bit of praise in order?--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 16:57, 1 August 2009 (BST)

I'd never question DDR. He is a God among Men. -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 20:16, 1 August 2009 (BST)

Yes, my fragile female psyche needs to be complimented.-- High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion. Want help? 23:41, 1 August 2009 (BST)

Don't actlike you don't like it.--xoxo 01:15, 2 August 2009 (BST)