UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2007 06: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:49, 16 December 2008

2006	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2008	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2009	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2010	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2011	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2012	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Q3			Q4
2013	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
Years	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019
	2020

Jorm

here he undid the news I placed and then undid the archiving of a month old news which I did.

He claimed that his group where no where near the suburb yet I have scanned more than 5 zes with this groups tag and 3 of his group told me they were in there as of the earlier wiki dispute.I was even alerted of his planned attacks of Club Cummings.

When I informed him of this I was charged with a warning.When he is the one that should be charged.I noticed earlier he told you I have a problem with him when he is the one.He also in the summary called me a FuckChimpet.

Also I do not wish for this case to be handled by Hagnat as I do not trust his judgment and he does unfair actions. Seloth 00.19, 30th June 2007 ((GMT))

I rolled back his asshattery (identified as a bad-faith edit). This guy doesn't know how to edit a wiki and stacks five or six edits (usually about his signature) on top of one another; I rolled back to where he started. If something else got nuked in the process, I didn't see it (I did see that he *archived* something, but the rollback just restored it). Seloth has been harassing me and my horde for about a month now and was warned for doing so (see below).

What's awesome about this is now Celsius can step in and we can make selothgate about it.--Jorm 00:43, 30 June 2007 (BST)

I'd like to point out what he calls harassment is me posting the the Arbitration case and three messages which I sent to him via the wiki about how he lost the case and should'nt act so childish about it((Even though I was by doing that my self)).Seloth 00.51, 30th June 2007 ((GMT))

You dont want me to rule on this case Seloth ? That hurt my feelings :( --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 03:11, 30 June 2007 (BST)

Complaint dismissed, Seloth has been repeatedly instructed to stop making these edits. --LibrarianBrent 05:57, 30 June 2007 (BST)

That is a unfair judgment,The only person who told me to stop was Jorm on the Shackelville news page.He is not a mo and a portion of his group are/were there recently..Several of his groups members told me and I have scanned 5 zeds with his group affiliation.Seloth 13:48, 01 july 2007

The Malton Mob believes the Militant Order of Barhah is working in this suburb. Beware.= NPOV.

pathetic revnegeand will note the minimum damge done etc. is highly POV and aimed at an user you were already asked to leave alone. Jorm was right to undue the edit in question. Not vandalism.-- Vista +1 14:04, 1 July 2007 (BST)

Additional comments on the case moved to the talk page. The case has been dismissed, please move on. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 21:35, 1 July 2007 (BST)

Pennycube

Permban -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 10:24, 29 June 2007 (BST)

Seloth

not really vandalism. maybe he say one zombie with your groups name and figured you attacked. still he should check things out before posting warnings.--'BP^Tmz 22:59, 28 June 2007 (BST)

No, he's being an asshat. He knows exactly what's up; he's just pissed because he lost an arbitration ruling. This (in my opinion) violates my request to have him stop harassing me on my user page.--Jorm 23:06, 28 June 2007 (BST)

unfortunitly i dont think it's vandalism. asshatery yes, vandalism no.however if he posts it again, now that you have made it known it's not true, it would be vandalism.--'BP^Tmz 02:07, 29 June 2007 (BST)

If you think it's a violation of an arby case, a link would help, but it just looks like the normal POV bull that happens on suburb pages -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 03:17, 29 June 2007 (BST)

here is where I reported him for continually harassing me on my user page; it did not go to arbitration because Vista said he'd deal with it (here); apparantly that didn't do fuck-all. Now I'm actually pissed about this little asshat, and I'm in a *seriously* foul mood because of some rather significant "real world" issues. Ergo, I am going to push this as far and as fast and as hard as I possibly can and make life as irritating as possible for everyone until this little shithead is either banned or forced to never, ever, speak to me, about me, to my horde, or about my horde, ever again.--Jorm 03:44, 29 June 2007 (BST)

i dont think you can stop him from talking about you.....to you diffentitly, but free speech and all that.--'BP^Tmz 03:55, 29 June 2007 (BST)

When he is doing it in a blatant attack on Jorm and his group for the sake of being a dick then yeah, you can cause that is Vandalism. This is obviously bad faith and it is covered under the vandal rules.--karek 16:46, 29 June 2007 (BST)

Hey look. He's continuing to post on my talk page. Is something going to be done about this OBVIOUSLY FUCKING BAD FAITH editing that he's doing?--Jorm 16:42, 29 June 2007 (BST)

And he put back the bad-faith lies about the Mob. We are obviously in Tapton; this is public knowledge.--Jorm 16:44, 29 June 2007 (BST)

warned for once again editing your user page. As for the second, its a POV statement, and should not be put inside the news header of a suburb page. If he wishes, he can leave such comments in his own user/group page, but that thing doesnt belong in a community page. If seloth add that comment, or any other comment citing the MOB or any other group he might antagonize with, he will be warned. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 16:51, 29 June 2007 (BST)

He put it back. Again.--Jorm 01:16, 30 June 2007 (BST)

And again.--Jorm 02:13, 30 June 2007 (BST)

User banned for 48 hours for repeatedly persisting in vandalism and bad-faith editing. --LibrarianBrent 05:59, 30 June 2007 (BST)

Hold on there Brent! You can't give a 48 hour ban after only the first warning.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 10:06, 1 July 2007 (BST)

Unbanned. Warned.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 10:17, 1 July 2007 (BST)

Todd Lafferty

Vandalized my wiki wiki profile and my group page:

but it makes you want to download a php file. when I get confirmation about his banning I will will restore the pages --ORCACommander ^{GDI-P UDA | CNC Modder} 02:10, 28 June 2007 (BST)

Permaban, there were more unreported vandalism of your pages too. They've all be reverted now. Next time don't worry about waiting until he's banned. The evidence is still there in the page history -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 09:52, 28 June 2007 (BST)

Thanks. Those 2 I didn't find out about till this morning--ORCACommander ^{GDI-P UDA | CNC Modder} 14:06, 28 June 2007 (BST)

Sterling Wolf Sucks

Made this vandal edit. this and this --Sir Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 18:49, 25 June 2007 (BST)

Permabanned. (7 edits none are in good faith). --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 19:06, 25 June 2007 (BST)

Stuartbman

He has replaced my comments on him to leave me alone about how i use the wiki, and has threatend and inacted a plan to repalce all my wiki comments with his own, removing any trace of me from them. heres a edit on his page and the threat to the changing is on my talkpage. However, you have refused,again and again, to put your posts in an NPOV style. The Yagoton Wiki does not follows your style. If you look at the top of the page, it says so itself. Now I will edit all of your future posts into NPOV style, and label them as my own, if you cannot use: he means well, but he is breaking rules.--Darkmagic 18:40, 24 June 2007 (BST)

For the edit you pointed out Stuarbman gets warned, but about the replacing of your comments in order to follow a NPOV syle on the wiki, I can't rule for or against you: you have been told by several users (including me) to follow a more NPOV style in your edits to suburb and community pages in general... If you feel there's the need, take this to Arbitration. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 20:39, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Do I get a say in this? If you examine the style he writes in the wiki with, he uses "lolspeek" instead of fully formed words. Now a few spelling errors are fine, but "wtf" and "lol" are not. After all, not many newspapers (The Sun barred) type like that. I did edit my talk page with his comment, for some fun. After all, when i examined vandalism definitions, it said that a user's talk page is the property of that user. I did threaten to edit his posts, as they were neither NPOV nor grammatically correct. If you want threats, try his and my talk page, which contains various insults and threats to me far exceeding "n00b". I don't see why i should get warned, I'm just upholding NPOV. I did not say I would wipe his signature off his postings- and I have not done, if you examine the Yagoton page, under the news headlines.--Stuartbman 22:29, 24 June 2007 (BST)

hello stuart. The guidelines you read that state that your user talk page are yours and that you can do whatever you want were written a long time ago, and since then some rules have changed. To edit other users comments is considered vandalism, even if it is in your user talk page. But, if you remove the signature, its ok to edit the comments. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 22:35, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Yeah, fething around with other people's comments is impersonating them. And, Stuart, you wouldn't want Darkmagic changing your comments into his version of English, right? And hagnat, one can just remove a sig and then edit the comment all you want? "Ridleybank has zombies in it, and is dangerous.--~~~~" --> "Ridleybank is a great place for new survivors! Stop by!"?--Lachryma^☭ 22:42, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Well, that might be vandalism, but not for impersonation. ;) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 23:29, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Well, my bad. I guess that I haven't been keeping up to date enough with the rules. But thanks for informing me of the loophole. He he he...--Stuartbman 17:04, 25 June 2007 (BST)

I wouldn't use the loophole, mostly because i can easily change it back, and, because I will go out with my retaliation plan i made up for when you decided to threaten me.--Darkmagic 20:19, 25 June 2007 (BST)

And what is that? Spam me with bad grammar? Throw dictionaries at me? Or, goodness no, perhaps PK me?--Stuartbman 20:44, 25 June 2007 (BST)

Stuart, Darkmagic, this is not your grandma's house. Go play somewhere else. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 21:02, 25 June 2007 (BST)

Yeah, we're moving this to Arbitration.Pick a third party.--Stuartbman 21:09, 25 June 2007 (BST)

Nutemo

Decided to be an asshat on the SARG page.

Deserves a warning at most. --User:Axe27/Sig 05:25, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Warned. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 05:50, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Malax001

Decided to erase the Profile Police page section by section for some strange reason. And he also threw in some words of praise for them too.--Lachryma^☭ 22:05, 22 June 2007 (BST)

Warned -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 01:02, 23 June 2007 (BST)

Montana8

Here is a close call. Even though the intention is to move away from the vulgar. I don't know if you can do that without being impersonation. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 19:45, 21 June 2007 (BST)

for such a small thing you cant merely ask him not to edit other people comments whitout giving a warning. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:48, 21 June 2007 (BST)

OK I did just that. Thanks hagnat! --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 20:14, 21 June 2007 (BST)

Don't mean to butt in here, but I had to point out the apparent hypocrisy of removing vulgarity from one person's comment, but adding vulgarity to another's in this edit (for which Montana8 was indeed warned). -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 03:49, 22 June 2007 (BST)

And this edit, and maybe this edit and this edit as well. He's done this a lot; now he's just flipped his MO. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 03:54, 22 June 2007 (BST)

Master c

2 edits only. This ~~and this~~. The second one is not ~~specifically~~ vandalism, but the firs one so much the more. -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_{_MWP}} /// 11:11, 21 June 2007 (BST)

Seeing his contributions, I think that he fills perfectly a Criterion 3 of "When an user may be warned or banned" on the Guidelines, thus permabanned. Please correct me if I'm wrong. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 05:58, 24 June 2007 (BST)

SooP

Edited my talk page after being told not to. I should also be noted he thought it would be funnay to say this after I pointed out on the group's talk page that there was a discussion on Brainstock regarding their many zerg alts. I would also report his friend who un-did edits made by myself on my own talk page, but I'd like to take this one at a time.--Labine50 ^MHG|^MEMS|^DHPD 00:33, 21 June 2007 (BST)

Take him to arbies -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 02:16, 21 June 2007 (BST)

I would have, but I thought this could be considered vandalism... Ah well. Arby's it is.--Labine50 ^MHG|^MEMS|^DHPD 02:33, 21 June 2007 (BST)

Well it could be, but it takes more than 2 edits of your talk page -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 02:41, 21 June 2007 (BST)

Right, seeing as arby's failed miserably, he gets an unofficial warning (already handed out), any more edits of Labine's talk page that arn't in complete good faith will be considered vandalism -- boxy ^{T Nuts2U DA} 09:31, 2 July 2007 (BST)

J3D

This guy felt the urge to out his frustration through a bad faith edit on a group page, in which he is virtually impersonating me.--Finis Valorum 17:59, 20 June 2007 (BST)

warned.-- Vista +1 18:05, 20 June 2007 (BST)

Finis Valorum

Deleted Hagnat's moderator warnings and undid a moderator change. The moderator warnings were in response to Finis' linking porn from the wiki. --Goolina _{Gore Corps} 08:58, 17 June 2007 (BST)

Not Vandalism. It's his talk page -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 09:08, 17 June 2007 (BST)

Master fuzz

Edits to Malton Death Dealers.--Gage 19:53, 16 June 2007 (BST)

Warned. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 20:26, 16 June 2007 (BST)

Mold

Warned for re-uploading Finis Valorum photo. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 23:15, 15 June 2007 (BST)

Banneed for 24h, for posting an edited version of Finis Valorum. Can i have the raw picture ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 23:21, 15 June 2007 (BST)

Shouldn't this be a second warning? --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 00:16, 16 June 2007 (BST)

No. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 00:18, 16 June 2007 (BST)

If someone shows every sign of continuing an edit/deletion war after an official ruling by the mods, then a short ban is in order, Matt -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 02:21, 16 June 2007 (BST)

It's ok and a good faith ruling, but may I point at a policy that specifically deals with this?. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 02:47, 16 June 2007 (BST)

That deals with restorations of deleted material in instances where the editor may not realise that they doing wrong. In cases like these the intent to defy the sysop ruling is clear -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 02:52, 16 June 2007 (BST)

Good point; I'm just worried that our old rules are getting underused or just ignored, but I did note that this guy bad faith was clear since his first recreation. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 02:55, 16 June 2007 (BST)

Is being banneed anything like being banned? Also would I get banneed again for linking that original Hagnat asked for? --Mold 23:48, 16 June 2007 (BST)

meeehhh... dont joke with my typo :P and if you link it on my talk page it would be ok. Remember to put the gold in the basket on your way out. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 23:54, 16 June 2007 (BST)

Panda1

Banned as a sockpuppet of Kirk Douglas below. Same vandalism, same image manipulation -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 03:56, 14 June 2007 (BST)

Kirk Douglas

Edited the Wolf Pack group page again. I'd give him the benefit of the doubt, if it wasn't for his last effort (reported below), and the fact that he's probably a muppet -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U [[Dead
Animals/Redux|DA]]} 08:58, 13 June 2007 (BST)

Bann- oh yeah. I can't help you guys out any more. Whups. --Cyberbob ^U! 09:13, 13 June 2007 (BST)

Perma-banned.-- Vista +1 10:15, 13 June 2007 (BST)

Seloth

Seloth cannot seem to get the hint that I don't want any of his poorly speld garbage on my talk page. I can't believe I'm actually doing this, but I told him I would if he didn't stop pestering me. Yet he continued to do so (ergo it's bad faith, yadda yadda). I wouldn't normally do this but I'm a man of my word and I said I'd escalate.--Jorm 19:55, 12 June 2007 (BST)

i could warn him, but since ~someone~ will bitch about me doing favors to you, i'll let another mod rule on this. sorry. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:01, 12 June 2007 (BST)

"Please stop talking to Jorm, as he's a more important person then you, since you're a filthy bum. Also, do not talk to me or other people, or your own family, as that's harassment." ;)--Lachryma^☭ 20:04, 12 June 2007 (BST)

We don't use vandal banning for escalations. However I will ask him politely to stop annoying you. If he doesn't you can go to arbitration to get a gag order for him on your talk-page.-- Vista +1 20:28, 12 June 2007 (BST)

I honestly don't give a shit how it happens; I just want him to stop talking to me.--Jorm 20:33, 12 June 2007 (BST)

I've left a comment on his talkpage, and lets hope that is the end of it.-- Vista +1 20:43, 12 June 2007 (BST)

TexasXdooM

Edited a comment on his talk page. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 03:01, 12 June 2007 (BST)

his user page == he can do anything --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 03:04, 12 June 2007 (BST)

Even editing another's comments? Never knew that... sorry for the trouble. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 03:08, 12 June 2007 (BST)

Poor form, makes him the loser of the discussion, but legally is on his rights to change things at will in any page under his user name. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 03:13, 12 June 2007 (BST)

No fucking way! Hagnat, where's the precedent for impersonating someone, even on your own talk page? -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 04:09, 12 June 2007 (BST)

There is so plenty precedence that i am not going to get in the trouble of finding them... but most of them are in the Amazing Era, so i guess things could have changed a little and this kind of thing is no longer acceptable. I be Old School, i dont understand your young ways. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 04:17, 12 June 2007 (BST)

>:) Well, as far as I'm concerned that edit there is the definition of bad faith. Removing the whole post is fine, editing it to make it look like the person said something completely different is impersonation. I'll warn him when I get back, if no one comes up with any convincing arguments against it -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 04:28, 12 June 2007 (BST)

Impersonation has always been a warning on talk pages. Even when it concerend user pages themselves we've given warnings. Amazing gained a few warning himself for what he had on his actual userpage. -- Vista +1 20:10, 12 June 2007 (BST)

Warned -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 08:46, 12 June 2007 (BST)

DqgP56

Put a whole bunch of shit on the this page. I removed the shit. --User:Axe27/Sig 20:02, 10 June 2007 (BST)

please report adbots in the section above. And remember not to welcome them. ¬¬ --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:38, 10 June 2007 (BST)

Dragon fang

Warned for vandaslim, mmkay. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 07:21, 10 June 2007 (BST)

PKAssasin

This user only has three contributions, all of them on the PKer page, in which the I.U.S.S. were added to the list of supporting player killing here, here, and here. After contacting the I.U.S.S. on their talk page, I was assured that the information added was incorrect, and so I removed it. By the inexperienced edits, I assume that this was just someone that had been offended by the actions of the I.U.S.S. and was trying to discredit them. As such, it was made in bad faith. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 21:48, 9 June 2007 (BST)

Seeing it's his only contribution to the wiki, warned -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 09:06, 10 June 2007 (BST)

Wwwzhudan

Only contribution is a piece of spam--perhaps this should be under adbots? Anyway: here's the vandalism --Barbecue Barbecue 19:32, 9 June 2007 (BST)

Adbot blocked by Hagnat. --

^T 17:06, 19 June 2007 (BST)

Kirk Douglas

Only contributions are vandalism of The Wolf Pack, and their image -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 05:14, 9 June 2007 (BST)

warned.-- Vista +1 14:39, 9 June 2007 (BST)

DonTickles

URL
why is this RFF Member adding a email contact on our group page?
I reverted back how it should be. please look in to this matter----Sexualharrison ^{MR• ה •T} 12:49, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Warned -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 13:23, 8 June 2007 (BST)

A copy of my response on the RRF talk page - Umm, because I had an alt in the Rangers who made a suggestion about adding an email address to the contacts page to help give previously non-metagaming players another avenue of contact to the group. It was OKed by Ian and Mel, I set up the account and gave the username and password to her, who said she passed it along to Ian and the squad leaders. I never hid my alts, my profiles were in every signature when I posted. I even pmed Ian before I joined to make sure it was ok and that there would be no conflicts. When I gained a leadership position in the RRF I left the Rangers to avoid alt conflicts and left a goodbye message on the board to that effect. I have not visited the NMC boards since then and you'll find the date of the wiki edit to be while I was a legitimate member. If I recall the thread where this started was the "We are Rangers" thread. If you wish I will log back into the board and forward the PMs between me, Ian, and Mel to you. A little quick to jump all over my ass don't you think? --DonTickles 14:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Warning retracted. Don't Rangers talk to each other, or summit? -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 01:31, 9 June 2007 (BST)

sorry about that. no harm done now.----Sexualharrison ^{MR• ה •T}

06:03, 9 June 2007 (BST)

Eb2Sft

I didn't welcome him this time =D. His only edit was reverted, now ban him please. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 00:17, 8 June 2007 (BST)

I banned the first two. Maybe another ~~mod~~ admin will vote to ban the two that provided good edits. ?Why make a wonky named one edit wonder to actual fix a couple of random pages? Ha! --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 05:45, 8 June 2007 (BST)

It's odd, the half dozen vandal also shows up on the SW wiki as well (even though it's dead). Although, to be honest, he hasn't been helpful on the SW wiki yet =P The IP he most recently used was 194.170.32.252, although that leads to a proxy (which has pings disabled by the looks of things). Hmm.. just though I'ld you know if you wanna ban it or something. Of course it probably won't be of any help because he uses different IPs each time. - Jedaz

ΣT MC ΞD CT SR

05:19, 8 June 2007 (GMT)

It isn't a vandal but a roque chinese spam bot that no longer has any links in it's to add list. Normally he would just cut the text off after a certain amount of space. But When it encounters certain signals Like "?" or + it replaces or removes them and starts counting from that. some of Kevans other wikis have the same problem.-- Vista +1 08:58, 8 June 2007 (BST)

I added a CAPTCHA to the wiki's account signup last night, so hopefully we won't be getting any more of these. --Kevan 09:32, 8 June 2007 (BST)

JuyLo0

He completely destroyed] Swiers... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 00:44, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Stuff reverted. All that's needed is the ban... Mods? Care to do the honor? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 00:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Banned, along with QenOl6 and EjuDz6 -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 02:41, 7 June 2007 (BST)

KbfY56

Banned (do we have to report every one of these?) -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 16:27, 6 June 2007 (BST)

I don't see why. We don't report every 3pwv alt. we just note it in the log. They're not like regular user who have to be put into vandal data either...-- Vista +1 09:59, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Spence thomspon

One and only contribution -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 15:37, 6 June 2007 (BST)

Never mind. Permabanned after futher posts -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 15:56, 6 June 2007 (BST)

Dinmoddd

I don't read Chinese, but his contributions look like spam to me, pages full of hundreds of links. Would like a second opinion... perhaps forum links... seems over the top to me if so -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 13:17, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Chinese? Don't ask me...I may be Chinese, but I really suck at the language itself... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 13:25, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Banned and deleted. If not spam, then it still was bad faith editing.-- Vista +1 15:12, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Motherfcking Shit

He attacked this page. And there's more in his contribs that we seemed to have missed. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 13:15, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Yeah, he just did a bunch of crazy and disgusting redirects...You know, real classy stuff.--Lachryma^☭ 13:21, 5 June 2007 (BST)

1 reverted...few to go... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 13:19, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Banned. Put the redirects up for speedydeletion I guess -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 13:23, 5 June 2007 (BST)

It's not needed to go to speedydeletions, Vandalism may be deleted outright. So, I already took the liberty-- Vista +1 13:31, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Yes, you took the liberty to delete 3 of them...but there's still 4 more...if you look at the vandal's contribs... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 13:33, 5 June 2007 (BST)

That's my fault, I was too lazy to post links to all of 'em.--Lachryma^☭ 13:36, 5 June 2007 (BST)

All cleaned up now -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 13:36, 5 June 2007 (BST)

My bad... Should've checked the history.-- Vista +1 15:13, 5 June 2007 (BST)

PgdG9i

another "ransacked" page -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_{_MWP}} /// 11:45, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Banned.-- Vista +1 13:19, 5 June 2007 (BST)

KqcMp4

the coordinated vandalism go on... -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_{_MWP}} /// 01:52, 4 June 2007 (BST)

banned. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 02:27, 4 June 2007 (BST)

Naomi

Wiped out the Welcomenewbie template. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 00:08, 4 June 2007 (BST)

it seems to me he/she made a minor mistake, and tried to remove the welcomenewbie from his/her talk page. Not vandalism, just noobism. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 02:20, 4 June 2007 (BST)

Whoops, my bad. I see now. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 02:23, 4 June 2007 (BST)

Gi6Z0n

banned --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 02:28, 4 June 2007 (BST)

Montana8

Cleared Tikhon Medical page.entry -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_{_MWP}} /// 11:55, 3 June 2007 (BST)

Banned for 24 hours. This Montana8 should really be monitored. I've reverted a lot of edits made by him that can only be qualified as vandalism. He would've been on his perma ban right now if everything had been reported.--Vista ⁺¹ 12:34, 3 June 2007 (BST)

He also cleared a lot of pages belonging to Legion of the Octopope.

Cannywizard 13:33, 3 June 2007 (BST)

Yes, that's what Vista was talking about... they should have been reported here long ago so he could have been warned early. As long as they're fixed up, there's nothing more we can do about that now. Just report any vandalism from him in the future please -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 13:56, 3 June 2007 (BST)

???? They were done less than 4 hours before they were reported. How fast do you need? Cannywizard 14:57, 3 June 2007 (BST)

You are right, it's less applicable in your case. But when I scanned his contributions I also found old vandalism that was simply reverted without comment. False reports on suburb pages. Him changing other people comments, etc. Almost non of which was reported. That makes us feel a bit powerless. We can't check everything ourselves, (we do try) and to see that much vandalism go unchecked is disheartening. but in this case that wasn't your fault.--Vista ⁺¹ 15:15, 3 June 2007 (BST)

I don't think that people want to report minor stuff like that. It's when it steps up a level that it goes this far - Cannywizard 18:15, 3 June 2007 (BST).

A lot of minor stuff is generally an indicator of mayor stuff. Besides false reports might very well have more severe results then blanking a group page. Blanking a page is the most simply fixed vandalism of all. It cost more time to do then to fix. A lot of the minor stuff causes (for us at least) a lot more headaches.--Vista ⁺¹ 19:57, 3 June 2007 (BST)

I suppose a lot of us don't really mind the minor edits and just see them as little childish actions, but we tend to get more upset at something like our page being wiped clean because it represents a perceived insult. <Shrug> I get that from an admin standpoint the smaller things are harder to catch and therefore more dangerous though. Anyway, the problem seems to have passed for now: Montana8 has moved on to different pastures, vowing to return and eliminate us all from the face of Malton later. -Gofqua 22:15, 3 June 2007 (BST)

GreyIyn

vandalised entry GreyIyn is a "spoofed" name of one of our members. Obvious by the use of an "I" instead of an "L". We have taken steps to revert the changes.--Wugmanmax 20:05, 2 June 2007 (BST)

warned. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.--Vista ⁺¹ 20:48, 2 June 2007 (BST)

Tanner Bivens

Deleted comments made by myself, Mold, and Tigerfangred on the Raines Hills wiki. --Goolina _{Gore Corps} 05:37, 1 June 2007 (BST)

The guy saw somebody else was getting mocked, and he stepped in to protect them. Now, he shouldn't have deleted the comments, and the teasing was gentle, so he did make a mistake, but I don't think this guy's a vandal trying to harm the wiki. He's more likely to be a good faith editor who made a mistake. Better to give him a quiet word on his talk page than to do anything more serious. --T oejam 14:49, 1 June 2007 (BST)

Well, that's what warnings are for, I guess. Yeah, warned -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 14:59, 1 June 2007 (BST)

Hmmm.....I wasn't really suggesting the guy gets a formal warning. Honestly, I just don't see any bad faith from him, and because of that, I don't think this is vandalism. --T oejam 17:46, 1 June 2007 (BST) Edit. Look at the emphasis UDWiki:Vandalism puts on intentions.

Agreed. I believe this is good faith and, therefore, it is, by definition, not vandalism.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 18:56, 1 June 2007 (BST)

OK, maybe. I'll remove the warning from A/VD, but he still gets to keep his one on the talk page. I've reverted the discussion back before the deletion, or Goolina's hooked on phonics crack -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 01:01, 2 June 2007 (BST)

Imperial War Machine lick balls

Edited another group's page of which he/she is not a member. --^T 01:18, 1 June 2007 (BST)

Warned.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 01:25, 1 June 2007 (BST)

He doesn't seem to have got the message, that edit is coming close to impersonation.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 01:30, 1 June 2007 (BST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{|align="right"
+|
+__TOC__
+|}
+{{VBarchivenav}}
 ==={{usr|Jorm}}===

UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2007 06: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:49, 16 December 2008

Navigation menu

Search