UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2009 05: Difference between revisions
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===[[User:Turkmenbashi|Turkmenbashi]]=== | ===[[User:Turkmenbashi|Turkmenbashi]]=== | ||
{{vndl|Turkmenbashi}}{{verdict}} | {{vndl|Turkmenbashi}}{{verdict}} | ||
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:Dulstongroups&diff=next&oldid=1450758 Removing] | [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:Dulstongroups&diff=next&oldid=1450758 Removing] most groups from the Dulston listing. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:44, 13 May 2009 (BST) | ||
===[[User:Dante Sterling]]=== | ===[[User:Dante Sterling]]=== | ||
{{vndl|Dante Sterling}}{{verdict|Not Vandalism|None Required}} | {{vndl|Dante Sterling}}{{verdict|Not Vandalism|None Required}} |
Revision as of 12:44, 13 May 2009
Vandal Banning Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is for the reporting of vandalism within the Urban Dead wiki, as defined by vandalism policy. On this wiki, the punishment for Vandalism is temporary banning, but due to security concerns, the ability to mete out this punishment is restricted to System Operators. As such, regular users will need to lodge a report for a Vandal to be banned from the wiki. For consistency and accountability, System Operators are requested to note on this board their actions in dealing with Vandals.
Guidelines for Vandalism Reporting
In dealing with Vandalism, time is often of the essence. As such, we ask that all users include the following information in a Vandalism report:
- A link to the pages in question.
- Preferably bolded for visibility. If the Vandalism is occurring over a sufficiently large number of pages, instead include a time range of the vandalism attempt, or alternatively, a link to the first vandalised page. This allows us to quickly find the damage so we can quickly assess the situation.
- The user name of the Vandal.
- This allows us to more easily identify the culprit, and to check details.
- A signed datestamp.
- For accountability purposes, we ask that you record in your request your user name and the time you lodged the report.
- Please report at the top.
- There's conflict with where to post and a lot of the reports are missed. If it's placed at the top of the page it's probably going to be seen and dealt with.
If you see Vandalism in progress, don't wait for System Operators to deal with it, as there may be no System Operator online at the time. Lodge the report, then start reverting pages back to their original form. This can be done by going to the "History" tab at the top of the page, and finding the last edit before the Vandal's attack. When a System Operator is available, they'll assess the situation, and if the report is legitimate, we will take steps to either warn the vandal, or ban them if they are on their second warning.
If the page is long, you can add new reports by editing the top report and placing your new report above its header in the edit screen.
Before Submitting a Report
- This page, Vandal Banning, deals with bad-faith breaches of official policy.
- Interpersonal complaints are better sorted out at UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration.
- As much as is practical, assume good faith and try to iron out problems with other users one to one, only using this page as a last resort.
- Avoid submitting reports which are petty.
Vandalism Report Space
|
May 2009
Turkmenbashi
Turkmenbashi (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | {{{1}}} |
---|---|
Action taken | {{{2}}} |
Removing most groups from the Dulston listing. Linkthewindow Talk 13:44, 13 May 2009 (BST)
User:Dante Sterling
Dante Sterling (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Not Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | None Required |
Editing another user's page. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:31, 13 May 2009 (BST)
- Not Vandalism - Simple newbie mistake. Again, I ask you to talk to the user before bringing stuff like that here. I also notice that you haven't bothered to revert the "vandalism". Either do it properly or not at all. Thank you. -- Cheese 12:09, 13 May 2009 (BST)
User:Omega314
Omega314 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Ban circumvention |
---|---|
Action taken | Permban |
It would appear that someone is trying to circumvent their wiki ban. Could it be User:Omega123? Lets see. Call me paranoid but when all his edits are to User:Omega123 is seems a good bet. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:56, 9 May 2009 (BST)
User:Omega123
Omega123 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | Permabanned |
Seems to be involved with the incident below. --Midianian¦T¦DS¦SP¦ 22:07, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Checkuser doesn't show them up as alts, but still permabanned under the three-edit rule. Linkthewindow Talk 22:10, 7 May 2009 (BST)
User:Dragoneternal
Dragoneternal (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | Permabanned |
Constantly spamming both User:Sister Rita and M.E.R.C.Y. with inane rubbish and text blanking. Nothing of any use. I aked him to stop yesterbay. No helpful contributions. Perma anyone? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:07, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- And is probably using User:Omega123 as an alternative account. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:41, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Wow, he went on a spree. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and maybe more that I missed. I think it's hammer time. --Pestolence(talk) 21:06, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Good work pest. Keep this up and you could be a sysop. Talking of which, anyone? Permaban request? Hello? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:15, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Banhammered. Linkthewindow Talk 21:59, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Good work pest. Keep this up and you could be a sysop. Talking of which, anyone? Permaban request? Hello? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:15, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Wow, he went on a spree. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and maybe more that I missed. I think it's hammer time. --Pestolence(talk) 21:06, 7 May 2009 (BST)
User:Imthatguy
Imthatguy (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | Warned |
For these edits to another user's subpage. --Pestolence(talk) 02:59, 6 May 2009 (BST)
- Vandalism - warned. He's on his last warning now. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 6 May 2009 (BST)
Oh, the drama! | |
This issue should be a soap opera! |
sums up my stand-point --Imthatguy 19:04, 7 May 2009 (BST)
- Um, no, sorry. This isn't even close to drama. --Pestolence(talk) 20:38, 7 May 2009 (BST)
User:Happykook
Happykook (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | Warned |
Impersonation. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:28, 5 May 2009 (BST)
- Vandalism. Warned. I notice you haven't bothered to revert it. Would you like chips with that? -- Cheese 21:04, 5 May 2009 (BST)
User:DTangent
Verdict | Not Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | None required |
DTangent (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
For this edit to someone's signed comment on a suburb page. --Haliman - Talk 20:52, 4 May 2009 (BST)
- You do realise that he puts his own signature on it, so he's not impersonating anyone at all?
- The most you could try here is improper removal of a comment from a suburb page, but first you'd have to show that the original post was factual and his comment is not factual and/or POV. That's arbitration to you. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:23, 4 May 2009 (BST)
- He has just undone your undone edit to his edit. I have now undone his edit again. Still following? On the point: He basically disagrees with what Leon wrote, however his comment's he places are pure griefing. Anyway I am fairly active tonight so I will simply keep undoing his edits until a sysops steps in.--Thadeous Oakley 21:55, 4 May 2009 (BST)
- Oh yeah, just realized some people have an obsession with moving everything here to the talk page. I am actually involved here, so remove my comments and I will just put them back.--Thadeous Oakley 22:03, 4 May 2009 (BST)
- Alright, thanks Thad. --Haliman - Talk 22:21, 4 May 2009 (BST)
Not vandalism - take it to arbies -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:38 4 May 2009 (BST)
- However his second contribution to the page (which you didn't link to) is getting very close. Any more insults on the page will be a warning -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:42 4 May 2009 (BST)
User:DanceDanceRevolution
Verdict | Ban request |
---|---|
Action taken | 5 days |
DanceDanceRevolution (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
I am requesting a 5 day ban. I need a small amount of time to focus on some issues. I'll be back trying my hardest soon enough. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:41, 4 May 2009 (BST)
- Done. Linkthewindow Talk 11:45, 4 May 2009 (BST)
User:Gamegarro
Gamegarro (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Spambit |
---|---|
Action taken | Permaban |
Spambitbot. http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Special:Contributions/Gamegarro --Janus talk 00:09, 4 May 2009 (BST)
Cheese got him. Permaban. Linkthewindow Talk 08:09, 4 May 2009 (BST)
User:Thescaryman
Thescaryman (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Verdict | Vandalism |
---|---|
Action taken | Warned |
For these edits to the Samhain Slaughter page: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Samhain_Slaughter&diff=prev&oldid=1443747 http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Samhain_Slaughter&diff=prev&oldid=1443746
Note that Thescaryman styles himself as quite the linguist and author; I was impressed by his subtle prose and cunning wordplay.
Also, I rather hope I did this in the proper format. I would be most distressed if this suddenly broke the page or is in the worng section.
--DTPK 04:54, 2 May 2009 (BST)
- Vandalism - warned. Linkthewindow Talk 05:14, 2 May 2009 (BST)