Clothes/Suggestions/Neck

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Clothes
Clothes • Clothes Codes • Suggestions • Implemented Suggestions
Face • Head • Neck • Shirts • Jackets • Coats • Trousers • Footwear
Clothes Suggestions Archives
Face • Head • Neck • Shirt • Jacket • Coat • Trousers • Footwear • Other


Capes (voting ends 12th June)

Able to be found in malls and it might be possible to find them in theaters. Capes would go into the neck slot and can be a variety of colors. Why, because capes are cool and now people can pretend to be a superhero.--Leonidas 15:56, 5 June 2007 (BST) EDIT: Capes can only be found in specific mansions.

Yes

  1. I wrote this.--Leonidas 15:56, 5 June 2007 (BST)
  2. Absolutely, all; unlike the many variations that populate this page, capes are not replicated in other items, and while an idea that doesn't totally stick out (pimp hat/trenchcoat) is humorous and unique.--thegreathal read the Gazette! 04:44, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  3. Capes aren't always silly, you know... just, most of the time. --SgtBop 08:49, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  4. Wow, people are quite split over this one. I think they would compliment the dinner suits, top-hats and the like. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 15:08, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  5. If you can find them near the costumes, I'm in. --1337p5yc0 18:08, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  6. Changed vote to reflect the recent edit. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 01:36, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  7. A nice fancy cape to go with the monocle, top hat, and other mansion stuff? Yes. Now all I need is a zombie butler. :D -Zed Ed 03:52, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  8. Works for me know that they can't be found in malls.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 05:28, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  9. yes, I would so love to see a cape in this game, cause capes are awesome.--Game Master
  10. You get a yes, but Lord Evan makes a good point. Have 'em found in malls and mansions and the deal is sealed. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:52, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  11. yes, mansions need more odd things.
  12. I'm going to go against Edna Mode and say "YES CAPES!" Daniel Hicken 03:50, 8 June 2007 (BST)
  13. Clothes are clothes, but these should be on the hard side to find, like only in one or two places in the suburb, after all you don't see many capes unless at a theater.--karek 06:31, 10 June 2007 (BST)
  14. Nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-Batman! Go capes! --JudeMaverick Talk +1 Jobs 07:40, 16 June 2007 (BST)
  15. YES! Phantom of the Opera baby!!! --Ulysses Black 02:31, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  16. keep/Change? Snouldnt capes be item for coat slot? Wearing a necklace and a cape is ok, but wearing a coat and a cape looks pretty wrong for me. I know that voting ended, but i couldnt find this suggestion before cuz i was looking for it in the coat slot archives. --KiT 16:07, 22 June 2007 (BST)
  17. Well it is good cape weather. --EMAG TRESNI 02:28, 1 July 2007 (BST)
  18. Yes, capes are fancy clothings and it makes a bigger variety of fun in RPing.--RayHanley 11:58, 6 July 2007 (BST)
  19. yes please it has been a piece of clothing for over a thousand years it should be implementedTony Darkgrave
  20. D. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 20:13, 22 October 2007 (BST)
  21. If and when I jump off a tower, you KNOW I'll need one of these. --JAston 09:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  22. Why does voting end on June 12th? -- Diano 05:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No

  1. Eh... as much as I love capes... How realistic is it that we'd find them lying around after a zombie apocalypse? It's not like they sell capes at the Gap. Vandr 16:32, 5 June 2007 (BST)
  2. sorry, no caped crusaders.-- Vista  +1  16:53, 5 June 2007 (BST)
  3. Change Good idea, but they shouldn't be available at malls. They should only be available in rare locations, like mansions perhaps.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:26, 5 June 2007 (BST) works now--Wee Sonny MacGregor 05:26, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  4. Nay -- Dance Emot.gifTheDavibob T 21:47, 5 June 2007 (BST)
  5. No --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 15:20, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  6. I'm w/ MacGregor--Mansions instead of Malls, and only in colors like black or grey (to match the swallow-tailed coats). --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:34, 6 June 2007 (BST) Vote changed after editing of suggestion.
  7. Change Find in mansions only. --Sgt Cannon 20:27, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  8. Superheros = No. Lords/Dukes/Draculas = Yes. Mansions, and perhaps graveyards, Right? --Lord Evans 21:38, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  9. No capes please. --Sonofagun18 10:07, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  10. Not feeling it. --RCJ 20:45, 17 June 2007 (BST)

Stethoscope

Found in hospitals, to be worn around the neck. --Sgt Cannon 20:34, 6 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

  1. Author vote. --Sgt Cannon 20:34, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  2. Hell yes!--Seventythree 20:46, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  3. Big yes. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 20:49, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  4. Just what I was thinking --Werewolf32 20:49, 6 June 2007 (GMT)
  5. good one, makes sense-- Vista  +1  21:03, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  6. Ugu --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 21:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  7. works for me.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:47, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  8. Sounds good to me. -- Gunstar 22:23, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  9. Classic doctor.--Leonidas 22:48, 6 June 2007 (BST)
  10. I can't imagine seeing a real doctor w/o one. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 00:44, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  11. sure, makes complete sence--♠ Che ♠-T GC X 02:27, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  12. -Seal of Approval---Brashnard 03:21, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  13. First thing I looked for in my local hospital. Please add! --Natalya Zveda 05:09, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  14. Sounds good. --Sonofagun18 10:22, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  15. Of course! --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 13:49, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  16. simply je. --/// goebiTalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/MWP /// 15:57, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  17. Now why didn't Kev put it in in the first place? A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:57, 7 June 2007 (BST)
  18. Duh. I'm MSG. Daniel Hicken 03:51, 8 June 2007 (BST)
  19. Yes --Hejsa 06:24, 10 June 2007 (BST)
  20. Doesn't exist already?--karek 10:25, 10 June 2007 (BST)
  21. Doctors need this! --JudeMaverick Talk +1 Jobs 07:39, 16 June 2007 (BST)
  22. Good job! --Ulysses Black 02:32, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  23. yes. they're common doctor gear. and theres lots of those in Malton. ~'~,Emily Briar`~,♥, 11:09, 21 June 2007 (BST)
  24. Absolutely, though I would think that they could also be found in NecroTech facilities. There are a ton of doctors roaming Malton-it only fits. Chris Retnam 20:20, 21 June 2007 (BST)
  25. Hell yes! --DrBowman 17:52, 29 June 2007 (BST)
  26. We really do need more doctor/nurse stuff --EMAG TRESNI 02:29, 1 July 2007 (BST)
  27. Yes! --Penny Painkiller 10:26, 22 August 2007 (BST)
  28. Of course. --Clay5x 09:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  29. Druuuuu 00:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  30. All the way yes. -- Diano 05:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No

Badges

I suggest implementing badges i.e. police badges and Firefighter Badges.

Badges either on thin neckchains or stated as just "Is wearing a XX badge". To be worn in neckslot.

Varieties:

The Obvious ones:

Police Badge - Found in Police Stations

Firemans Badge - Found in Firestations

Other badges than the obvious ones:

NT badge(Might be ooc, since NT seems to want to be kept a secret, but what the hey.)- Found in NT buildings.

Zookeepers Badge - Found in Zoo's

Museum Staff Badge - Found in museums.

Forensics Badge - Found ?

Medic Badge (think ambulance personell) - Found in Hospitals


Uses:

RP only.


Thoughts:

-Might want to call some of the above "patch" or "emblem" instead of badge (like NT and Zookeeper)

-Maybe even adding rank on some of the badges. (i.e. A police inspector badge and so on)

- As per idéa from Seventythree, this might be best as an donator only item. (It might give Kevan the money to get the servers needed for the new serge of newcomers. ;) )


This is my first own addition to the suggestions, so please mind if the code isn't where it's supposed to.

I don't think it's a dupe, I searched for badges and didn't find any suggestions in the "Clothing" part of the wiki.


Think it over.

--Dex Frivolous 03:47, 19 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Badges)

Votes for go here

  1. Authors vote. --Dex Frivolous 03:47, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  2. Maybe a little overkill and I'm not sure what slot this should go in but, I like it none the less. --Sonofagun18 11:55, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  3. Yes for the police badge, no for the rest (as badges). I'm okay with some of those things being made into patches. --Uncle Bill 12:37, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  4. Sure. Bounty Hunter badges would be great.
  5. This would be another nice item to have. --Happy 21:10, 20 July 2007 (BST)
  6. Nice little thing to have--Zach016 01:30, 21 September 2007 (BST)
  7. Sure, we all deserve a medal now and then. XD --JAston 09:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. I actually like this idea. -- Diano 05:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
  9. I like the RP aspect. It doesn't seem necessary to have quite so quite so many kinds, but it would be great to have police and mall security (rent-a-cop) badges. I don't know if firefighters wear badges, and I definitely don't think the rest are remotely necessary. -- William Told 12:24, 9 May 2008 (EST)

No(Badges)

  1. A reluctant no. Only because, although it's a nice idea, it seems like a bit of information overkill. We already have Fire-fighter's/Police officer's helmet/cap, jacket, trousers, do we really need another item with a prefix? I do like the rank idea, but believe that's something best left to the descriptions box instead as individual factions sometimes give ranks out, rather than letting anybody run around with a Captain badge with no legitimacy. --Ulysses Black 04:13, 19 June 2007 (BST)
    RE:-Not all Fire-fighters/Policeofficers wear uniform, at least not higher up in the ranks and especially not during a citywide zombie infestation. This is where the badges would be best implemented. On another note I think the factions would be able to convince their members not to wear a different ranking badge than expected of them. Thank you for your feedback! --Dex Frivolous 05:57, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  2. This would be information overkill. Have you thought about giving badges as donator only items of clothing? --Seventythree 07:47, 19 June 2007 (BST)
    RE: Good idéa! I'll add it to the "thoughts" section for good measure. --Dex Frivolous 14:52, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  3. As 73 --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 08:41, 19 June 2007 (BST)
  4. Nah, write it into the profile. I always think that minor descriptive things should be written into the profile. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 05:06, 29 June 2007 (BST)
  5. As above; better left to profiles. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 21:28, 3 July 2007 (BST)
  6. Better to make our own... via profiles. --Private Mark 05:10, 17 October 2007 (BST)
  7. Pass. -Druuuuu 00:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Swanky Scarves and Ties

Silk scarves / ties. Found at only one mall. Specialist shop maybe. All colours, but with the prefix 'silk'. Sounds cool, hip and expensive, right? Yes, something like this has been suggested before, but I'm trying to iron out some of the problems people had with it. And for those who bitch about putting the prefix description in your profile, why then do we have sunglasses and mirrored sunglasses? Hmmmm? --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 08:56, 2 July 2007 (BST)

Yes (Swanky Scarves and Ties)

  1. My damn suggestion, my damn vote. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 08:56, 2 July 2007 (BST)
  2. mheh.-- Vista  +1  10:00, 2 July 2007 (BST)
  3. A shiny scarf! Ingenious!--Lachryma☭ 17:37, 2 July 2007 (BST)
  4. Silk ties are common, silk scarves not so much(due to it not being the 1970s anymore.)--karek 21:45, 2 July 2007 (BST)
  5. I wasn't alive in the 70's...:(-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 09:59, 3 July 2007 (BST)
  6. Because it's not about the effect, it's about the style. —Revenant talk 14:08, 3 July 2007 (BST)
  7. We need more Mall-specific items of clothing. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 22:09, 3 July 2007 (BST)
    Exactly, I think it will give the malls a little flavour to distinguish themselves from each other. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 02:24, 4 July 2007 (BST)
    There are still places with absolutely no clothing items. And not there are two unique mall items and a set of semi unique museum items.--karek 02:28, 4 July 2007 (BST)
  8. Maybe have one item of amazing qualtiy clothing in each mall, so to complete the full set you have to make a bit of a mall-tour.--Seventythree 12:11, 4 July 2007 (BST)
  9. Variety is always good. And uh, yes, silk scarves are available by the hundreds now, just look on the web. Women wear them. --Queen Mum 18:29, 5 July 2007 (BST)
  10. Could Ascotts be added to the list of available neck-ware? I am dissapointed with the current neck selection in the game so this is something I really want. --EMAG TRESNI 21:51, 5 July 2007 (BST)
  11. Also cravattes for the discerning gentleman. --DrBowman 19:08, 7 July 2007 (BST)
  12. Meh. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 20:15, 22 October 2007 (BST)
  13. Yep. --Clay5x 09:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  14. I agree with this. -- Diano 05:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Swanky Scarves and Ties)

  1. meh--Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 21:18, 2 July 2007 (BST)

New Kinds of Necklaces

I met someone in game that was fanatical about getting more kinds of necklaces into Mansions and I'm here to please.I think that there should be sapphire necklaces in Pitman Mansion and ruby ones to be found in Kersley Mansion.And as per a good suggestion from a Mister Seventythree who voted yes on my suggetion,yeah why shouldn't goths get stuff too?I think in Hotels/Motels,Buildings,Towers,and Malls you should find those necklaces he menstioned as well.

Yes (New Kinds of Necklaces)

  1. Author's Vote Chill 18:27 BST July 9,2007
  2. Ooo, how very shiny and expensive!--Lachryma☭ 00:14, 10 July 2007 (BST)
  3. zeds decked in gems? nice--Dragon fang 04:30, 10 July 2007 (BST)
  4. Can we have some goth pendants please? Like obsidion crosses, skulls or bat wings? That would be cool. Maybe something for the pagans too....--Seventythree 08:04, 10 July 2007 (BST)
    Response:I don't kmow about the last two,but obsidian crosses I definitely like!
  5. Neckwear for everyone! --EMAG TRESNI 20:52, 11 July 2007 (BST)
  6. Sure. I think every building within a type should have distinguishing clothes. The forts have, the power stations and malls have named shirts, why not the mansions? Gives a good reason to travel. I recently did a 5 day round trip to Lockettside for a hat! --Ulysses Black 01:33, 12 July 2007 (BST)
    Comment ...and so do the stadiums too! Just checked, Kersley and Pitman DON'T have unique necklaces, the other three do, so this makes snes to give all the mansions a bit of love.--Ulysses Black 01:37, 12 July 2007 (BST)
    Reminding - Pitman has a love with Kilts. --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 09:24, 13 July 2007 (BST)
    Sounds reasoning--Lock 15:21 July 13 2007 (BST) Alt of Chill -- boxy T Nuts block it! DA 01:23, 27 July 2007 (BST)
    Surprised it wasn't added in the beginning--jigsaw 15:44 July 15 (BST) Alt of Chill -- boxy T Nuts block it! DA 01:23, 27 July 2007 (BST)
  7. I'd always be wearing a Jade or Ruby necklace thats for sure--Sharline Jade 00:57, 20 July 2007 (BST)
  8. You have my vote on this little bro, I say it should be made so! --Zigs 14:15, 23, July 2007
  9. Yes. --Clay5x 09:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  10. Yea. -- Diano 05:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (New Kinds of Necklaces)

  1. No - Kinda already exists, both mansions have unique can only be found there necklaces.--karek 10:33, 10 July 2007 (BST)
    Actually, you're wrong. Kersley mansion doesn't have unique necklaces. Neither does Pitman, however it is unique by having kilts. --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 12:01, 10 July 2007 (BST)
  2. Too much on the bling, bling. more regular (cheaper) necklaces would be better for flavor reasons.-- Vista  +1  11:37, 10 July 2007 (BST)
  3. Not really needed --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 12:01, 10 July 2007 (BST)
  4. I think that a few special kinds is enough. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:10, 10 July 2007 (BST)
    Response:Well now,why can't all the mansions be special in some way?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chill (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
    I'm not saying they can't. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 03:43, 19 August 2007 (BST)
  5. already enough found in mansions --WanYao 21:40, 29 July 2007 (BST)

NT ID Tags

I suggest that people be able to wear Necrotech ID tags. They will be worn around the neck, and you can only find them in NT buildings. --Modernplague 21:20, 1 August 2007 (BST)Modernplague

Yes (NT ID Tags)

  1. Author Vote-This would be best, of course, to sort out us Necrotechies from everybody else.--Modernplague 21:24, 1 August 2007 (BST)
  2. Yeah, I like. Maybe 'a [insert necrotech building name here] ID tag'. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 00:37, 2 August 2007 (BST)
  3. I agree with Dux here.--Big Bur 06:01, 2 August 2007 (BST)
  4. Yeah. What's not to like? --Seventythree 13:07, 2 August 2007 (BST)
  5. Sounds good to me,a lot like Fort Creedy or Perryn dog tags. It will also be useful for groups that operate out of necrotechs ie those bastards in Blackmore. --The'Joker The Watchmen|RHA 15:00, 2 August 2007 (BST)
  6. Keep Excellent idea! Doesn't need to be building specific, just an NT Ident/Security card. Those swipe cards are part of the office / call-centre worker's "uniform", I actually call them "corporate dog-tags", every NT worker should have one so he can look the part of the corporate drone! ;) --WanYao 03:03, 3 August 2007 (BST)
  7. Sure. And Wan, you don't need to write keep in this kind of suggestion.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:59, 5 August 2007 (BST)
  8. sdfsdf--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:53, 5 August 2007 (BST)
  9. I guess...Chill 01:12, 7 August 2007 (BST)
  10. Fine by me. --Sonofagun18 06:42, 30 August 2007 (BST)
  11. same as above--Zach016 01:33, 21 September 2007 (BST)
  12. Sure. --Clay5x 09:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  13. Why not. Sounds like RP material to me. --JAston 09:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  14. Yea. -- Diano 05:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (NT ID Tags)

Noose

Found in Wasteland, Park or random; to be worn around the neck; options: no additional description, neatly tied, with 13 coils, make shift; Hung Henry 07:37, 31 August 2007 (BST)

Yes (Noose)

  1. Me likey this one! Good for those zeds who killed themselves as living during the outbreak! --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 11:32, 31 August 2007 (BST)
  2. Good idea. Would give zombies something new & interesting to wear. --Sonofagun18 15:39, 31 August 2007 (BST)
  3. Starting as Zombie only --~~~~T''' 09:20, 1 September 2007 (BST)
  4. it would be funny as hell to see that but shouldnt it be " Cut Noose " rather than a noose because if a human Committed suicide they would be nothing more than a hanging zombie. I think it should say cut noose yea know like the human committed suicide and somebody cut there rope after they died and they turned into a zombie with noose still on there neck--Johnny Reb 17:20, 4 September 2007 (BST)
  5. Keep - Hey people did all kinds of crazy stuff when the outbreak occurred.. MrAushvitz Canadianflag-sm.jpg 11:24, 23 September 2007 (BST)
  6. Keep - It wouldn't have to be cut. Maybe the struggling zombie broke the rope himself. Maybe it rotted through. Maybe the branch (or whatever) broke. It's even funnier to imagine the long rope trailing behind as the zombie wanders around. --Steakfish 03:28, 10 October 2007 (BST)
  7. Now that I like. Sockem 07:31, 15 October 2007 (BST)
  8. *Chokes* ~A`Blue`JellyTME*V*I*L*? 04:47, 17 October 2007 (BST)
  9. I like this... this would definitely go well with zombie attire. It's too bad there can't also be an action connected with this object like "Commit Suicide by Hanging" available only to people wearing this object (but that may be going a bit far). Love this clothing idea though. Kai Tan Sying Malton Rangers 06:20, 17 October 2007 (BST)
  10. Yes - Morbid? Out of place? Silly? What is morbid is the bare fact that these are actually used in the real world, both inflicted on self and others. A zombie apocalypse game is one of the most morbid, wrong things one can play (which is great). What place is better suited for wearing a noose than a zombie apocalypse? It's as silly as a toe tag, or any number of other clothing items - which is to say, not very. It fits the genre. There is already a neck slot. It should be included. I love the locations suggested. I would also add it to cemeteries, banks, mansions, factories, police departments and hotels. Clay5x 08:06, 27 October 2007 (BST)
  11. Actually, it sounds kind of funny to me. KamikazeRomantic 14:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  12. I don't think I'd ever wear one, but even so, it's so easy to make one. It seems too plausible for me to vote it down based on matters of taste. -- Diano 05:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Noose)

  1. No chance, it's too silly, sorry. --WanYao 22:03, 31 August 2007 (BST)
  2. So a pair of earrings are too stupid but a noose isn't?!?NO.Chill 23:59, 31 August 2007 (BST)
    Heheh... I don't think earrings are stupid, I just think they're minor, and what slot would they go in? But you know what? Ultimately, Kevan looks at these suggestions and decides what's "cool" and what's not... --WanYao 06:43, 1 September 2007 (BST)
  3. I can see why this'd be cool, but it's a bit morbid, even for UD. Last thing we need is all the parinoid parents getting on us for "endorsing suicidal tendancies". --Hhal 22:32, 2 September 2007 (BST)
    but you can jump out of windows. --Fingerlessbob 13:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Sorry, but no. -- Pavluk 23:58, 3 September 2007 (BST)
  5. -- Vista  +1  09:21, 7 September 2007 (BST)
  6. I agree with Hhal. It's morbid. --Stark Senap 14:47, 14 September 2007 (BST)
  7. Not morbid or anything like that, but still kind of out of place.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:53, 21 September 2007 (BST)
  8. Toetags are enough, dont encourage the stenchcoaters. --Slightly Lions 13:14, 15 October 2007 (BST)

Bolo Tie

For the cowboys out there.Sheltie 06:20, 2 September 2007 (BST)

Yes (Bolo Tie)

  1. Hell yeah. Cos cowboys are cool, and I've just rewatched my favorite episode of firefly.--Seventythree 22:42, 2 September 2007 (BST)
  2. For two reasons, 1) Malton is not in England, there is no real evidence behind those claims. and 2) It's reasonable, just stick it in a mansion if you don't want it to be common.--Karekmaps?! 13:22, 3 September 2007 (BST)
    But a mansion is in no way a logical place to find a bolo tie, not in the SLIGHTEST. And... re: Malton being in England: "A general consensus on the unofficial forums, along with some confirmation early in the game's history from Kevan regarding time zones, is that although Malton is US style in layout, it is actually located in England". Source: the Malton page... --WanYao 13:46, 3 September 2007 (BST)
    1) user written page where they try and locate it. 2) games time zones are based on the admins time zone or the servers time zone 3) Cities design has to be based on what Kevan knows, doesn't mean that it has to be where he is. 4) Mansion is a logical place only for the fact that there are a lot of very rich eccentrics who may have a passion for playing cowboy.--Karekmaps?! 14:24, 3 September 2007 (BST)
    I live in England, in a pretty small town (about 40000) and I could go down town and pick up one of these to-morrow if I realy wanted to. We do have clothes other than tweed suits in England, honestly!--Seventythree 00:01, 4 September 2007 (BST)
    Lies!!! --WanYao 05:42, 4 September 2007 (BST)
    Damn! foiled again! I must head off now to drink tea while I reorgonise my tweed jackets.--Seventythree 14:00, 4 September 2007 (BST)
  3. Malton is in South Africa. Yes for bolo ties because i don't care --~~~~ [Talk] 15:36, 3 September 2007 (BST)
  4. For all those guys who are saying these aren't in england, check the wikipedia.--Sonofagun18 16:55, 3 September 2007 (BST)
    Malton is a fictional city. But if it were real, it'd be in England. Or possibly a suburb of Toronto... which makes a lot of sense... have any of you ever been to suburban Toronto??? :D --WanYao 05:37, 4 September 2007 (BST)
  5. Awesome for Cowboys and Outlaw vigilantes alike yeeehaw --Johnny Reb 17:27, 4 September 2007 (BST)
  6. i'm allowed to change my mind. but they should be at malls, NOT mansions... --WanYao 01:05, 7 September 2007 (BST)
  7. Yeeee-haaaa _Thragnor 04:38, 13 September 2007 (BST)
  8. LOL! I just find it funny, and funny is good. (I want to see cowboy-trenchies! haha) --Stark Senap 14:50, 14 September 2007 (BST)
  9. Sure. Suit many gun-totting types! --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:23, 17 September 2007 (BST)
  10. -- goebi oo ooooooo 20:48, 29 September 2007 (BST)
  11. Yes. Sockem 07:33, 15 October 2007 (BST)
  12. Yes - I hate these things, but if people want to wear them, let 'em. Clay5x 15:07, 27 October 2007 (BST)
  13. Yes. You can find these everywhere, even if Malton is in England. -- Diano 05:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Bolo Tie)

# I almost voted yes... because, as much as I loathe cowboys and cowboy paraphanalia... I actually can't see why not. Except... Malton is in England... And how common are these in England? Where would you naturally find them, where are the open ranges? :) If it were Texas or Alberta or even Mexico well, yeah... --WanYao 17:54, 2 September 2007 (BST)

  1. Malton is in England, not the Big West. --Hhal 22:34, 2 September 2007 (BST)
  2. Would open up a whole can of fancily-dressed worms. -- Pavluk 23:57, 3 September 2007 (BST)
  3. I don't think this worked in Blazing Saddles... And if it did, it shouldn't have... ~A`Blue`JellyTME*V*I*L*? 04:46, 17 October 2007 (BST)
  4. Two words: Brokeback Mountain. Haha, but still, no. --JAston 09:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Towels

Towels could be found in towers for the most part, or else malls. As with the hitchhiker's guide, if one can find a towel and remember where it was in the middle of a zombie appocalypse, they sure as hell know what they're doing. Keep it around your neck as a makeshift scarf or balaclava, turban, or even just on the shoulders (yes I'm not sure where else to put it.) They would come in brown, pale blue, pink and white. Perfect with a bathrobe and slippers neh? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Corgano (talk • contribs) 05:15, 9 September 2007.

Yes (Towels)

  1. sure why the hell not--Johnny Reb 19:14, 10 September 2007 (BST)
  2. Yes - Always remember to bring a towel. (Besides, it would be cool to have a character wearing "only a towel." --Uncle Bill 23:18, 10 September 2007 (BST)
  3. Yes - I like to wear a towel to work on days I am feeling overly modest. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 23:32, 10 September 2007 (BST)
  4. You are one hoopy frood :> --Stark Senap 14:58, 14 September 2007 (BST)
  5. --Toejam 04:17, 19 September 2007 (BST)
  6. Is May 25th marked on your calendar?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slightly Lions (talk • contribs) at 11:50, 23 September 2007.
  7. Yes/Conditional - Only if towelheads have an action that they can "Towel Fight" (not to lower HP just to have fun) with someone. LOL! Kai Tan Sying Malton Rangers 06:26, 17 October 2007 (BST)
  8. Yes - One should be able to wear them around the neck, around the waist (trousers slot), and on the head. There is no good reason not to let people do this. It is entirely possible, just not socially acceptable - and in a zombie apocalypse, people will have more dangerous things to worry about. Locations: Hospitals, Hotels, Malls, Mansions. Clay5x 15:26, 27 October 2007 (BST)
  9. Towels are essential -everybody needs a towel if only because they can become an excellent provider of protein (nutritious stains etc.) --Wasted wallaby 18:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. Yes - As Wallaby, he said it perfectly. --Adobewedge 00:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. yesh -to even up the votes! --RobotUtron 11:06 14-nov-07 (UTC)
  12. yes - because towels pwn--Rictor Stilwell 00:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  13. Hellz yeah -Should I even need to explain? --Elbowhead 16:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  14. A towel is just about the most massively useful thing a pan galactic hitchhiker survivor can have. I also think that it should be added to different slots as Clay5x said, with the addition of a jacket/coat towel slot for women who want to cover their naughty bits. -- William Told 12:04, 9 May 2008 (EST)

No (Towels)

  1. --~~~~ [Talk] 09:58, 9 September 2007 (BST)
  2. The last thing we need is a bunch of towelheads running around. Sorry, didn't mean for that to come out racist, but my vote is still no to towels. But seriously, I apologize. --Sonofagun18 05:57, 10 September 2007 (BST)
  3. Ignoring the above mildly racist comment, just get the clothes you listed, there is no need for this.--Karekmaps?! 23:16, 10 September 2007 (BST)
  4. Urgh, I don't want nudists in disguise running around thanks. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 11:00, 11 September 2007 (BST)
    "nudists in disguise".... heh... TheUncleBob 17:06, 13 September 2007 (BST)
  5. Dupe? Does this count? Clothes/Suggestions/Coat#Bath_robe--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:27, 13 September 2007 (BST)
  6. No, that's bathrobes, not towels. different piece of clothing.-- Vista  +1  17:19, 13 September 2007 (BST)
  7. Change - Towels should be actual items... You steal 'em from hotels. DUUUUUUUUUUUUH... --WanYao 03:41, 14 September 2007 (BST)
  8. I leik mah batrob vry much.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 02:05, 21 September 2007 (BST)
  9. I don't beleive in towels.--Seventythree 08:58, 25 September 2007 (BST)
  10. Im anti-towels. Sockem 07:36, 15 October 2007 (BST)
  11. Sorry, but I prefer to stay IN the pool... Despite the state of my fingers... ~A`Blue`JellyTME*V*I*L*? 04:39, 17 October 2007 (BST)
  12. Not really a standard clothing item. -- Diano 05:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Cravat

Start quote rb.gif The cravat is a neckband, the forerunner of the modern, tailored necktie. From the end of the 16th century, the term "band" applied to any long-strip neckcloth that was not a "ruff"; the ruff — a starched, pleated white linen strip — started its fashion career earlier in the 16th century as a neckcloth (readily changeable, to minimize the soiling of a doublet), or as a bib, or as a napkin. A "band" could indicate either a plain, attached shirt collar or a detachable "falling band" that draped over the doublet collar.  End quote rb.gif

This could also include variations like the ascot. Feel free to comment similar things that could be added on to this. It would be for the neck slot, found in few museums (or just 1 would be ok), possibly a mansion or 2 as well. White only, but let me know if there were actually other colors. Not up to speed on cravat colors.

And before anyone howls dupe, I checked and this was the only reference I could find for such an item, so it doesn't seem that it was ever formally suggested. --Slightly Lions 14:56, 8 October 2007 (BST)


Yes (Cravat)

Votes for go here

  1. Author vote yes. Booyah, Granma! Booyah. --Slightly Lions 15:02, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  2. Yes Indeed - I will also be expecting monacles, dueling pistols, top hats, pocket watches and tail-coats to be implemented. If they havent already.--SeventythreeTalk 22:47, 8 October 2007 (BST)
    Monocles and top hats are definitely in-game. I'm pretty sure tail-coats are too.--Pavluk A! E! 23:10, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  3. Spiffing --Pavluk A! E! 23:10, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  4. it's more classy than an ordinary tie --~~~~ [talk] 18:35, 9 October 2007 (BST)
  5. Yeah, I'll give this a vote. I like cravats. But I almost had to vote "no" because then I could have quoted Malfunction Junction in response to you... :P --Psiborg 14:45, 22 October 2007 (BST)
  6. Quite so. - Most definitely, please. Not just white, though. At least in black as well, but as many colors as ties would be nice. Oh, and monocles and top hats have been added, thank goodness. Clay5x 15:35, 27 October 2007 (BST)
  7. Absolutely - cravats are essential apparel. Michael McInlay 05:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. I'm into it.-- 05:01, 25 November 2007 (CDT)
  9. I'm with this. -- Diano 05:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Cravat)

Good day to you, sir! I said "good day!"

  1. Come into the now, stop living in the past.--Karekmaps?! 04:10, 9 October 2007 (BST)
    Vote against me all you want, but don't pooch my titles. Unsportsmanlike Conduct. --Slightly Lions 08:08, 9 October 2007 (BST)
  2. I'm gonna have to go with Karek on this one. --Sonofagun18 06:04, 10 October 2007 (BST)
  3. BOOOOOOOOOORING. Sockem 07:38, 15 October 2007 (BST)
  4. Enough old-time clothes. We have enough 19th century crap from the mansions. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 01:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
    • 19th century ≠ 16th century. C'mon, if Kevan's going to let players play faggy goth/emo/screamo cut-yourself dressup, and others do the trenchcoat-with-mirrored-sunglasses thing, why not let some of us play the part of refined gentleman? --Slightly Lions 10:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. nay WTF is a Cravat anyway? --RobotUtron 11:21 14-Nov-07 (UTC)
  6. No, but only out of spite for certain fans of Anne Rice. -- William Told 12:13, 9 May 2008 (EST)

Headphones and Ear Buds

There are currently no clothes to be found in clubs. And now-a-days, you see people walking around with iPods and MP3 players and whatnot. And you sometimes see their ear buds or headphones hanging around their necks. That's what this suggestion is. 2 new pieces of clothing for the neck slot, but only found in clubs and malls. The Ear Buds are like those iPod ear buds. They'll come in white, black, green, pink, and some other colors. The Headphones are slightly bigger then Ear Buds, but who cares? Size doesn't matter here. They will come in blue and black, and maybe some other colors. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes (Headphones and Ear Buds)

  1. My suggestion and I'll vote no yes. At least the clubs will have a piece of clothing in them now... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. One of my characters carries an MP3 player (as do I in real life) and I think this would be an interesting new piece of clothing. --Hhal 17:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. I don't really see the harm in this, as there can be no reasonably-expected in-game effect from this. --Diano 17:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Why not? I thought this might be one of those military headset ideas, but I like this.--SeventythreeTalk 21:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
    Not military. But your regular iPod/MP3/CD player type headphones/ear buds. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Yes please. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
    Next thing you know, somebody's gonna suggest having iPods in this game... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
    Well, it's not clothing. An ipod suit? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
    Not quite what I meant. I'm thinking someone's gonna suggest those iPod armband carrying case thingies with a virtual iPod inside. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Not bad. I want my PKer listening to come nice music while he does his slaughtering. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 03:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. Yes, please. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. Yes - Makes sense, nice touch of reality. Acoustic Pie 22:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  9. Yes - (1)HeadNeck Slot already exists, (2) I hate people who wear headphones/mp3 players all the time, and (3) this supports the POWER TO THE PKER policy and this would give me a greater variety of targets.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  16:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
    Uh....Are you sure you read the entire suggestion? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 16:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
    Happy now?  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  18:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
    By the way...If you do PK somebody with earbuds/headphones, just try not to shoot at friendlies... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  10. I hate when people wear earbuds in real life, but any time you look around in a crowded place there's at least one person wearing one. Realistic and adds to roleplay. --└Frozen┘┌Flame┐ 20:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  11. Fuck yeah.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  12. Cool--Jamie Cantwell3 01:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  13. Yes, but only if zombies can take them away when they attack with claws. So we can hear newbies crying in the malls saying the bad zombie took their headphones away. :'( --Aeon17x 09:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
    Oh God...I just pictured a zombie choking someone with the headphones... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 19:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
  14. Yes - I assume a black jumpsuit is next to complete the iPod ensemble? --Amanu Jaku 07:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  15. Yes sure Clubs are too worthless as it is, let's make them fashionable. --Vandurn 14:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  16. Yes. Too busy listening to my cyber-music to explain why i like this suggestion, but yes. Yeeth 11:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  17. Chocolate. --LH779 13:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  18. Yeah! - My character is a radio host, and he wears headphones around his neck. This is a definite yes from me! --The Wolf 18:03, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  19. Might be a bit late, but I think clubs do need clothing. -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 17:20, 13 May 2008 (BST)
  20. Keep - I think this a great addition for role playing and UD fashion in general. If you want to make a character look aloof and antisocial, you gotta give him the headphones!Lbgrowl 22:23, 8 July 2008 (BST)
  21. Keep My Dual-Natured PKer needs to be listening to Ludwig Van To really get ii the killing mood. --Nny The Person 00:53, 21 July 2008 (BST)
  22. Keep - You strangle the survivor with his iPod headphones for 5 damage. --JaredTalk SPA CK 18:12, 27 July 2008 (BST)
  23. Yes 1)Theyd be badass on just about anyone 2)If you really want to get into it, your character charged his MP3 player in a wall outlet the last time he was in a power generated building. --ChiTownBear 11:02, 29 July 2009 (BST)

No (Headphones and Ear Buds)

  1. Expected Effect, mute groans and speaking.--Karekmaps?! 23:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
    Pretty lame excuse for an expected effect. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 03:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
    If I wanted it to have an effect, I would have put it in the face slot (since there's no ear slot) instead of the neck slot, where it just hangs around your freakin' neck! --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. No - We don't need to be *this* specific in clothing. --Pgunn 15:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
    OK...so a little too much reality details, who cares? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 16:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Uhm. So we have generator powered Ipods now? When did Kevan make those? xD Mikhos 00:56, 15 May 2008 (BST)
  4. However much of a fashion accesory they have become, anyone who wears a headphones not plugged into any device would be a right idiot. And no - I don't think there should be music devices! Zig13 - 16/06/2008 at 12:41(BST)
    Who says they're not plugged in? They're plugged into a dead MP3 player, which is hidden away in their pocket. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:16, 21 July 2008 (BST)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=Clothes/Suggestions/Neck&oldid=1526572"