This page is for the requesting of page moves by normal users. The average user's ability to move pages has been rescinded due to frequent abuse by vandals; as such, users will need to submit requests (similar in nature to those on Speedy Deletions and Protections) for pages to be moved by a sysop.
Guidelines for requesting a Page Move
Copy the template below (Or just type it), replace the text in red with the relevant details, and paste the template under the Move Request Queue heading. A day after a sysop has taken action on the request, move requests should be moved to the Archive.
===[[PAGENAME]]===
*[[MOVE TO HERE]]
*~~~~
|
New Requests
Recent Actions
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and Speedydeleted by Cheese :) --Janus talk 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Resubmitted at Cheese's request. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dun. -- Cheese 21:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Resubmitted at Cheese's request. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dun. -- Cheese 21:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Resubmitted at Cheese's request. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dun. -- Cheese 21:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Resubmitted at Cheese's request. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dun. -- Cheese 21:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done. -- Cheese 20:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Since when do these get done and the ones I requested don't get done? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Because you smell. =p -- Cheese 21:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- If that's an official sysop response I feel a misconduct case coming on for moderation. Is it? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yes. That is an official response. As the =P clearly shows -- Cheese 21:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, your lack of wit proves why no-one takes sysops seriously.... Go to this entry, review and shift the pages accordingly. It did originally have all the destinations, but Nubis decided to edit my post. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Please resubmit the list under the above heading providing links to the correct destinations. =) You wouldn't want me screwing up your lovely Recruitment page would you? -- Cheese 21:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- If you want me to do that I'm A/VBing Nubis. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Threatening me isn't going to change my mind. Please follow procedure. -- Cheese 21:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moar done. -- Cheese 20:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moveded. =) -- Cheese 23:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Already moved? Thanks! --Janus talk 23:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done.--Karekmaps?! 00:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Looks like it's been moved to Template:501stAlly -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:06 22 December 2008 (BST)
Page has been wiped by author -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:06 22 December 2008 (BST)
Done, and turned into a diambig -- boxy talk • teh rulz 04:25 21 December 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
--Janus talk 16:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
There's this page and they spell it Dunédain, without the 'n'.
|
Destination: |
The Dunédain
|
Done -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:01 20 December 2008 (BST)
Navi done, and Leighton put up for speedydeletion -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:01 20 December 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Worthy of deletion, I think. It's made by a member of the Regulators Alliance, but he seems to be quoting something that a Shiro Tagachi member may have said about being at war with the RA. In any case, it's all long in the past, and incomprehensible, and not linked to or from anywhere -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:40 20 December 2008 (BST)
- But I'll move it anyway -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:51 20 December 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
■■ 00:10, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
Because I fail.
|
Destination: |
Har.
|
- Also move the talk to the appropriate page too.
Moved, although it wasn't really necessary, as long as the suggestion is withdrawn as described here, it could have stayed there -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:29 20 December 2008 (BST)
- User recreated his own page in the proper space. Deleted the old one.--– Nubis NWO 13:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- There is at least another PK Guide of sorts in main space. Siege PKer Guide These two are different. It might just need the guide category (or resource whatever) put on it instead. It has content and doesn't seem to be just a Shadow Legion ad. I'm open to other opinions on this one for now.--– Nubis NWO 19:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Nubis, there are precedents for successful guides in user spaces. This would give them page ownership rights that they don't currently have, and it's kind of implied by their credits and ad at the bottom of the page that they want final edit privileges. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- We made the Guide psuedo-namespace to solve this problem. That's where it goes.--Karekmaps?! 22:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Karek moved it to here -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:28 14 December 2008 (BST)
- And by doing so removed the group's ownership and final edit privileges as per Category:Guides. Well done there, taking a group's work off them when even the policy that establishes the namespace mentions that users are preferring and allowed to have such things in their own namespaces. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Stop making drama, please. The earliest edit to the page (showing) was Cheese in July. The user Mureth (that is listed first on the Shadow legion page - there is no leader listed) was last active in September. Someone posted on his talk page in July about the guide (and errors that should be corrected) and he didn't respond to them at all. The page really seems to be abandoned for the most part. The group doesn't even show up on the statistics page. We aren't "taking away final edit" rights. If a member of the group came forth and asked for the page to be put under their group space due to editing issues I doubt any of us would deny that request. As it is now the page was made as a guide and should be in guide space. --– Nubis NWO 13:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved and links fixed.--– Nubis NWO 19:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are 3 other pages - Suburb Outbreak,Martial Law, andSuburb Quarantine which may need to be moved in the future. The pages have some decent information and with the exception of having the RCEM category on them could be useful as glossary/resource pages since they aren't overwhelming POV/groupcentric. I'm leaving them in main space for now until I get a chance to see if they are duplicated in the glossary.--– Nubis NWO 19:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- You've moved it to a sub page of a non-existent group, it sould be in the location that Janus provided -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:31 14 December 2008 (BST)
- Red Crescent is the name they are using for their links. If that page should be under Red Crescent Research Facility/Protocols then several other links on their page will need to be moved, too. Actually, every link on the page will need to be moved. Maybe we should ask the group if they want it under Red Crescent or Red Crescent Research Facility. Janus, you are getting sloppy.... tsk, tsk :) --– Nubis NWO 14:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I left a note on the group talk page asking them what the official name is and to reply here. I'll keep an eye on it.--– Nubis NWO 14:08, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Red Cresent will do fine, although im sorry for the mess I've caused. Never saw anything about naming conventions for group pages since I started here..., where was that information located? As well if its easier feel free to delete the pages instead. Groups gone inactive and you have my permission. No use fixing something thats broken to begin with.--G-Man 16:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've seen information on naming pages spread out all over the wiki. I understand that makes it hard to know what to do. If we included any more information in the welcome newbie template it would get even less reads. :). We don't normally delete pages for inactive groups (no Crit 12) and they did put content and thought into the pages. I will go through them and move them to Red Crescent name space (including the Facility one). If there are any that lack content I will put them up for deletion noting your comment here. Sound fair? Thanks for replying.--– Nubis NWO 19:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- On second thought, I might do some merging, too. I think a few pages can share space. If your group has any problems with my edits let me know. --– Nubis NWO 19:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved, merged, and will now post for speedy delete on the ones I gutted. Hopefully I caught all the links.--– Nubis NWO 20:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Haha All of that and I still missed the one posted here. Gah. --– Nubis NWO 20:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Red Crescent is the name they are using for their links. Oops, stupid me. Sorry :) --Janus talk 20:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I moved this and a few others I found working from the bottom up. Hopefully this will save some time.--– Nubis NWO 18:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Moved to User:Barney trubble/A broken city -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:29 12 December 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
Janus talk 23:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
Provide a brief explanation of why you want the page moved.
|
Destination: |
User:Mercinus3/Journal
|
Moved to User:Mercinus3/Rise of the fallen warrior. -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:29 12 December 2008 (BST)
Moved to User:Jim Callaway/The Infestation (overwriting a less complete version of this one), along with User:Jim Callaway/The Infestation2 -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:29 12 December 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
Janus talk 23:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
Provide a brief explanation of why you want the page moved.
|
Destination: |
User:Carfan7/Journal
|
Moved to User:Carfan7/The Canadian Side -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:29 12 December 2008 (BST)
Moved to User:Cpl_attari/The_Generator_Society_pt1 -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:29 12 December 2008 (BST)
Moved to User:Cpl_attari/The Generator Society pt2 -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:29 12 December 2008 (BST)
- This request is a bit more complicated. Did you look at the links on the 2nd Squad page? This needs to be moved, but so do all the individual journals it links.--– Nubis NWO 00:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Requested page moved to 2nd Squad/Stories. The journals were moved to Journal:(journal name).--– Nubis NWO 01:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:15 11 December 2008 (BST)
Moved, but I'll leave the redirect in case they link to it ingame -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:15 11 December 2008 (BST)
Template:Inq/recruit
Template:Valorous Heart/recruit
Template:Mechanicus/recruit
I honestly don't think these are hurting anything by being under the template name space. They are not clogging up the category:template, they were clearly intended as recruitment templates, rather than move them why not put them up for deletion as unused in the cases of the ones that are? --– Nubis NWO 14:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Move them or don't. I couldn't care less, I know you're always looking to do less work for the community and all....
- If you don't move them then I'm taking the recruitment category off them as they're despoiling my pretty recruitment page list and we'll see what drama erupts. Sure, go ahead, don't move them. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 14:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- If they aren't being used as recruitment ads then they don't have to have the category on them. Take it off. And your little snarky comment about "looking to do less work" is quite laughable when you actually look at what I have done.--– Nubis NWO 14:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- My comment about less work is sarcastic when you shortened the multiple requests to one so you'd have less to copy and paste? Irony is just a five letter word to you isn't it? And as for what you've done, what? Removed escalations in clear violation of policy? Shall I take it to misconduct for the backscratching club to kick in again? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- I put them all under one because the reply is the same for all of them. The original requests are clearly in the history should someone decide they need to see them.
- I just finished all the locations that needed blocks (except for Monroeville). This included 23 streets on one page alone. As for the other, the only de-escalation that was really on the cusp was probably yours. Put you know what, I don't fucking care. If you feel the need to take it to misconduct be my guest. As a matter of fact it might be interesting to get the opinions of the new sysops on certain matters. But until then shut up. Your little threats are childish and wasted on me. --– Nubis NWO 16:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- So, are you admitting that you did de-escalations without conforming to policy? Or are you saying that you just couldn't be bothered to check what you doing and didn't give a damn about the trust the community places in you to do the job correctly? It might be interesting to get the new opinions, but two versus the old boys club is hardly going to work is it? Or are you saying you'll leave the decision entirely up to them? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:34 11 December 2008 (BST)
Nope, this is supposed to be a group page, not a user sub page. I'd give it a few more weeks (it's fairly new), and then put it up for speedydelete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:34 11 December 2008 (BST)
- Okay :) --Janus talk 13:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Done, i killed User:Baltorn too. Had the same content.--xoxo 02:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
done and speedied.--xoxo 02:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 21:35 10 December 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
Stahl
|
Reason: |
I'm sorry, I didn't know where else to post this (the Wiki wasn't clear on changing titles of articles). But Club MacKerel is an erroneous spelling; in the game it is spelled as Club Mackerel. Could you change the name of the offending article into Club Mackerel, and redirect all references of Club MacKerel to the newly changed, correct title? Thank you in advance. :)
|
Destination: |
Where do you want the page moved to?
|
Yeah you brought it to the right place. How very odd that no one's bothered with that before...--xoxo 08:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
To Pitneybank Police Departments. Both because I'm a grammar Nazi, and that there is no PD called Pitneybank Police Department.
-- Linkthewindow Talk 23:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- It is the police department of the suburb, so I don't think it should be plural. And if you look under the * in Category:Police_Departments, all grouped suburb PDs are presented this way -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:37 7 December 2008 (BST)
- They should be split off into separate pages. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll split them off later and turn the main page into a disambig? Linkthewindow Talk 01:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Split them and delete the mian page. I hate these stupid grouped location pages...--xoxo 02:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Get to it then -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:06 7 December 2008 (BST)
- Weren't we getting rid of them anyway? Check the LSG.--Karekmaps?! 06:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes... except it was left up to the poor smucks who were following the old LSG to undo all the pages they'd put so much effort into... pity the complainers didn't make the changes that they so desperately wanted -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:06 7 December 2008 (BST)
- Any suburbs particularly bad? I don't mind ripping the place up a bit! --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Just follow the categories (like the one I linked to above), you'll find them easy enough -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:28 7 December 2008 (BST)
- Separate pages completed, no talk page to speak of all redirects returned to each individual page. To quote grim "What we have here is an orphan. Lets kill it." --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Boxy deleted it. Linkthewindow Talk 11:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Some MCM pages
Finally, Category:MCM-Category:Malton College of Medicine, if it's possible to move categories.
Sorry for the large move request, just want all MCM pages under the one namespace (cleared past leader.)
Please leave the old pages as redirects
Thanks. Linkthewindow Talk 05:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- All moved, except the category. Moving categories still leaves the pages being categoriesed in the original, so it's pretty pointless. You have to manually change them to the new category, however there is no need to change the category, as it doesn't have to comply withh group sub-page considerations. MCM is descriptive enough (as long as there isn't another group wanting to use the MCM acronym -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:50 6 December 2008 (BST)
- Moved. Easy. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
This is copied from Reklawd's page. ■■ Dr Cory Bjornson 18:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:42 4 December 2008 (BST)
Done -- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:09 3 December 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
Janus talk 15:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
Gibbz is a member of the AZS, so that page should be moved to "User:Gibbz". Thanks.
|
Destination: |
User:Gibbz
|
There is no wiki user by that name, so the page is better off as a group sub-page -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:44 29 November 2008 (BST)
- And neither is there a User:Apekut on the wiki. Please don't create user pages for people/characters who don't have a wiki account -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:47 29 November 2008 (BST)
- I created User:Apekut because he didn't know how to create the page. I didn't know it was against the rules, so I apologies :) --Janus talk 14:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- These people might have accounts and just not made edits, unless there's some sneaky sysop way to find that out --xoxo 21:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- They'd have a block user link and User contribs link, but there would be nothing in it. That's the difference between a made-up user and a real one. Compare User:Apekut with User:'Poe and look at the toolbox on the left margin. -- Cheese 22:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Could you guys move User:Apekut to Anti-zombie squad/Apekut? Or do I have to make a new move request? --Janus talk 19:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've moved it. If you fix up the links to the old page, we can delete it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:55 2 December 2008 (BST)
- Fixed. Thank you! --Janus talk 13:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Done -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:41 25 November 2008 (BST)
- Thanks. I've posted a note on their talk page, explaining why it was moved. Linkthewindow Talk 10:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Requester: |
Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 00:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
The preference of the people is to have this be an open discussion instead of a policy.
|
Destination: |
UDWiki:Open_Discussion/Administration_Archives
|
- Done-ed. -- Cheese 00:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Done -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:25 13 November 2008 (BST)
Moved -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:46 12 November 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
xoxo 10:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
This page should have info about Useful Items#Radio or at least be a disambig between the two. I'm open to any solution really this just seemed the most viable to me.
|
Destination: |
Frequencies or Radio Frequencies
|
Given that this link is in the first paragraph, along with other related links, this page seems fine to me. In fact the Useful Items#Radio section should probably link back to it. It's a necessary expansion on the minimal information provided on the Useful Items page. If you want it split up into frequency information and the expanded radio information put onto Useful Items, I'd suggest a discussion on Talk:Radio first -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:51 6 November 2008 (BST)
Pretty much what Boxy said. Perhaps add a WP-style Where you looking for Radio (Item) at the top of the page. I would guess that Radio (the page) would have much higher traffic then Radio (item,) so adding a disambig=annoying. Linkthewindow Talk 11:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Aight, i made the top heading more sensical instead of 'network information', the page is a bit too texty but mehvs.--xoxo 11:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- That's a start, it should probably be split; moving the channels lists and such to a page called Radio Frequencies or Radio MHz.--Karekmaps?! 16:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'd support that if you felt so inclined.--xoxo 01:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Done, also Field Reports Archive moved to Malton Rangers/Field Reports Archive.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 20:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Requester: |
■■ 20:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
I'm not using there, So move it here.
|
Destination: |
Har
|
- Moved.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 14:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Moved. --ZsL 21:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Requester: |
Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 00:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
|
Reason: |
It's a group page masquerading as a category page. He should have put it under the group page he made.
|
Destination: |
..And The Dead Shall Walk The Earth!!!
|
Impossible. You can move the content manually, if you like. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Moved =] DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Done -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:21 26 October 2008 (BST)
- ty.--Nallan (Talk) 02:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it wasn't deleted when it was put up on there. I don't see it getting moved either. I'm not sure I see the point in having a talk page for a talk page.--– Nubis NWO 14:43, 14 October 2008 (BST)
- The point?
From Talk:Suggestions#Discussion (Suggestion A/S/L):
- There are things that occasionally need to be discussed about Talk:Suggestions, like format, how long the suggestions stay on the page, what kind of suggestions are allowed etc. Like I said, the page is complex and big enough to warrant its own page, with a dedicated talk page. Normal talk pages are much easier to follow because they're automatically included in the watchlist if the main page is. Then there's the natural way of just clicking the "discussion" tab when you want to, you know, discuss things about the page. Where should you discuss things about a discussion page? It's very unclear and confusing, especially to newbies. I'm pretty sure Talk:Developing Suggestions would get more traffic than Category_talk:Suggestions#Discussion_About_Talk:Suggestions, which would mean that you wouldn't have to post things on Talk:Suggestions that do not belong there. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 15:24, 14 October 2008 (BST)
- I think this is a good idea. The Suggestions pages are confusing enough without having a talk page be used in such a manner. --PdeqTalk* 23:06, 14 October 2008 (BST)
It's probably a good idea, but such a major move should be discussed within the community before bringing it here. Ironically that would be on Category Talk:Suggestions -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:09 16 October 2008 (BST)
- Which is why I brought it here. I didn't think it would get moved right away and it most likely gets more discussion here than there. though this page doesn't really get much traffic either... --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 13:23, 16 October 2008 (BST)
- I agree. Ironically (compared to my above statement) if this notion gets enough support here, it should probably be posted on Talk:Suggestions, so the mob there can decide. Linkthewindow Talk 11:54, 17 October 2008 (BST)
Anyone who is actually involved with the suggestions system has Category Talk Suggestions watched, the only people who aren't are arrogant trenchies who want to post their latest railgun suggestion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:53, 17 October 2008 (BST)
- Even if that were true (which I don't think it is), it's still big and complex enough to deserve its own page & talk page. This makes it at least a little easier to find the first time and it's easier to reach on the following times (just click the "discussion" tab like everywhere else). Category_talk:Suggestions is a mess with discussion for Talk:Suggestions and the category page, discussion of the suggestions system in general, and discussing and voting on suggestion policies on it. This makes it a little cleaner. Yeah, sure, they're not very big advantages but if there aren't any downsides to the move (and none have been mentioned yet), why not move it? --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 13:22, 17 October 2008 (BST)
- This is sorely needed. We need some system which doesn't blow our minds every time we load that dreaded page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:16, 18 October 2008 (BST)
I've read through the arguments above and I'll carry out the request. I'll also make sure that all the links into Talk:Suggestions (itself becoming a redirect) are changed accordingly. -- Cheese 19:55, 20 October 2008 (BST)
Thanks for the move, Cheese. But, you missed this overflow page. I've already changed the link on the new overflow page (Developing Suggestions/Overflow1), but the old overflow page needs to be moved. Thanks. There are also various old links that I'll go through and weed out (ie: the page linking to a "discussion" still links to Cat. Current Suggestions.) Thanks. Linkthewindow Talk 21:41, 20 October 2008 (BST)
- Dun!! -- Cheese 21:45, 20 October 2008 (BST)
- I worked so hard on the article on that Overflow page, too. *sigh* --– Nubis NWO 19:01, 23 October 2008 (BST)
What about this page? --Midianian|T|DS|C:RCS| 20:31, 23 October 2008 (BST)
- Well, technically it only got 2 keep votes so wouldn't that make it Peer Rejected? :D Actually, since the Overflow page is the main page (and not a talk page) that can just stay there. --– Nubis NWO 01:51, 24 October 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:16, 15 October 2008 (BST)
|
Reason: |
Please move group-owned page to group subpage and redirect, so as to preserve edit history.
|
Destination: |
Militant Order of Barhah/Locator
|
- Moved. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:25, 15 October 2008 (BST)
- 9 minutes? Not bad, not bad at all! :D ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:31, 15 October 2008 (BST)
- Done. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:25, 15 October 2008 (BST)
- Fixad.--– Nubis NWO 04:33, 11 October 2008 (BST)
Requester: |
WanYao 11:26, 2 October 2008 (BST)
|
Reason: |
I'm not sure how Moves work... but the reason I'm asking for a move, instead of a simple cut 'n' paste edit is because I'd like preserve the orginal page's edit history. If Moving the page allows this, please make it so; if it doesn't, I'll do it the old fashioned way. (And if the new blank "Gallery" subpage needs to be speedydeleted and re-created to transfer the edit history, do so, you don't need my seperate permission.) Thanks.
|
Destination: |
Template:ExtremeRepair/Gallery
|
Yeah, page moves preserve the edit history, but do you want it moved to a template sub-page (which means it's a template itself), or to the talk page sub-page, so it's just a record of images? -- boxy talk • i 12:33 2 October 2008 (BST)
- Yeah, make it a subpage of the Talk Page, please (call it "Gallery"). That's the least problematic solution. I thought of just giving it its own own page, but it's both a "gallery" and a "reporting thread" for users of the template -- so it's best it be connected to the template, I think. Thanks. --WanYao 12:58, 2 October 2008 (BST)
- Gah, and I need to speedy the page I created, sigh. --WanYao 12:59, 2 October 2008 (BST)
Moved to Template talk:ExtremeRepair/Gallery -- boxy talk • i 13:08 2 October 2008 (BST)
Moved, but capitalisation is important -- boxy talk • i 12:35 2 October 2008 (BST)
Done, please put it up for speedydeletion when you fix up the links to it -- boxy talk • i 13:41 29 September 2008 (BST)