UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/March-2009

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of February 2009.

---

Image:LC1.JPG

DDR found this and asked about it on my user page. It could be argued it's a scheduled deletion (porn) but it's somewhat borderline. I was going to delete it, but thought I would come here for a second opinion. Also, just to state the obvious the image is not work safe. Linkthewindow  Talk  11:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Delete - I would have found it except she took the liberty of categorizing it before anyone could search and destroy it. Anything that gets me hard shouldn't be on UDWiki. Sept Grim.D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Keep - playing by the book is all well and good, but wanting this gone is too far imho.--xoxo 12:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3. keep Not porn and perfectly safe for work use? Its a bit crap but thats not the same thing.... Oh and DDR; if that gets you hard you should be in therapy and not on the internet ;)--Honestmistake 12:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Ah! A man get get lonely sometimes. Especially if he spends most of his time on an Urban Dead Wiki. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 21:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

4. DONE This fits my definition of porn. --– Nubis ^NWO 12:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
   • that's a very odd definition of porn you have Nubis.... this had only been up for an hour and 2 of the 3 (4inc you) thought it was fine. Don't you think that maybe leaving it up for discussion for 24 hours may have been worthwhile?--Honestmistake 12:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Mah.. I'd keep or change it a bit; I find this to be much worse. :/ --Janus ^talk 14:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Don't even suggest deleting that one, it could certainly be better but it is still funny :) --Honestmistake 15:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   De gustibus... ;) --Janus ^talk 18:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

5. Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 01:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

So, speedy deleting it under crit 7? --Janus ^talk 20:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

leave it for the vote, it would give a sufficient indication of what the prudes in this community consider to be porn..--xoxo 05:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Re-deleted - scheduled deletion, both as Nubis did, and because the author wants it gone (crit 7 by proxy) and has uploaded a replacement. If you don't like the scheduled deletion of porn, please take it to a scheduled deletion vote to remove it from the list -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:55 28 March 2009 (BST)

lol the new one is hotter...so whatever....--xoxo 14:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Old Image Deletion Request

• File: Image:Feon.jpg
• Request: Please delete this as I wish it to be removed (I hope I have done this right - please forgive me if I haven't).
• Reason: Old image of mine for my profile (my own work too) that isn't used anymore. No longer needed by me and no one else uses it. Many Thanks.
• Stamp: --Feon Kensai 10:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedydelete - crit 7 -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:26 26 March 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - Not a Crit 7, another user first uploaded the image. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Ummm, don't you mean last? Andrewzz reverted it to a smaller image that Feon had uploaded before (21:07, January 4, 2008). Hardly a significant contribution... what the hell, it may as well go as a scheduled deletion (unused image) -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:48 26 March 2009 (BST)

   Perhaps you can tell me where in the following sentence the words 'significant contribution' appear? "The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count." -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Nice try. Copyright > Wiki Policy.--– Nubis ^NWO 12:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

3. Speedy - As Boxy (also, change that * to a # in your vote.) Linkthewindow  Talk  11:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Speedy Delete - As Boxy. And link, do it yourself you wimp >=[ D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Save Feon (keep)--xoxo 12:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

DONE Copyright holder requested that the image is deleted. We will honor the request of the image creator. --– Nubis ^NWO 12:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Die Angriff-Maschine

Old (Inactive) group page, blocking the ability to type DAM to get to the Danversbank Armed Militia page,. "This page was last modified 15:22, 9 July 2007." before I added the delete request at the top of the page. --Super Nweb 02:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Keep - there's enough on there for it to be worth keeping. We are looking for 1-2 poorly formatted lines of text, not a proper page + pictures. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

   That said, feel free to take over the redirect, and I'll throw up the {{InactiveGroup}} template once this vote's over. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

2. Keep - No reason to delete the page if all you want is the DAM re-direct. I believe the re-direct page is the page you ought to be requesting a deletion for. ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 08:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

   No need to request a deletion, he can just change the redirect (or create a disambiguation if the group is still active [although it's not]). Linkthewindow  Talk  08:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

3. Keep - ummm you can't just get rid of group pages coz they have your acronym. Just nick the redirect, no one's gonna complain ;) --xoxo 08:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Keep --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 08:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Keep - but can we delete the DEM pages? I'm thinking about starting a group called Dangerous Eagle Muffins, and I would like the redirect. --Blackboard 10:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
6. Keep - I would definitely join the Dangerous Eagle Muffins though. -- Cheese 12:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
7. Keep --Janus ^talk 13:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
8. Keep - Crit 12 is dead. However, if they are truly inactive, take the redirect, I doubt anyone would stop you.-- Adward  20:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
9. Keep - As above. Plus, it's fairly obvious this is directly connected with your bid for sysop. Though rather proving that you know the system well, this proves why you shouldn't be elected.--SirArgo ^Talk 20:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
10. Keep - Presently, they are inactive, just take the redirect, maybe put something on it or on your page that they did exist, a link. _■^■ 01:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
11. Keep - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
12. Keep - Just change the redirect into a disambig page. --ZsL 12:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
13. Keep - You and your group are clearly selfish arseholes. --Papa Moloch 13:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
14. Keep - Inactive you say? Steal the redirect. --The Cop 00:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
15. Keep - Durr.--ScouterTX 13:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Kept --ZsL 20:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Human Groups

Today I moved the 1000+ pages from this category to the more correct Category:Survivor Groups. I have copied the content over from the original, fixed up the pages in the category, and fixed up the links. I would move this and create a redirect though A/MV but I think the red link is a better detterent from this category ever spawning in the wiki again. Discussion?

Please note that the 30 or so pages remaining in the category are protected and thus will be moved by a sysop in due time. After that, the page will be Crit 4 worthy. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 19:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I've moved the discussion from Category talk:Human Groups to here. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedy Delete under crit 4 once the last groups are moved accordingly. --  RoosterDragon  19:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Delete - but will change to speedy once I move those last groups. Linkthewindow  Talk  22:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

   Now it's an unused category, with the protected/historical groups fixed. So Speedy Delete, crit 4. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

3. Speedy--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Speedy Deletion - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

• Killzored -- Cheese 12:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Diary Of Dan Frank

and it's talk page - Crit 9.--Nallan (Talk) 07:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedy - but fix the links on the creator's talk page (inside your comment,) first, please. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Speedydelete - links fixed, content at Journal:Diary Of Dan Frank -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 14:33 6 March 2009 (BST)
3. speedy -- crit 9 Asheets 20:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

• Deleted -- Cheese 21:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

STARS Radio FM

Not updated in a long time, looks unused to me (and I've never heard of it)--ScouterTX 07:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

1. Delete --ScouterTX 07:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Keep Delete -- There's enough on there to make it worth keeping (although if the STARS guys come over and want it nuked, I'll happily change my vote.) Linkthewindow  Talk  07:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   "There's enough on there to make it worth keeping" ... like what? (Most of the people mentioned aren't even in the group anymore BTW. Actually, the cop is the only one)--ScouterTX 09:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   Vote Changed - Group wants it deleted, it should go. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

3. Keep - As Jorm. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
4. Keep - Put some more evidence forward first Scouter, do some more research.--DiscoInferno 11:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   I've been part of that group for over one year and I know what went down, thank you.--ScouterTX 11:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

5. Delete - Abandoned, nothing really interesting or important there. --ZsL 02:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
6. MergeDeleteMake it a group sub-page. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 08:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
7. Baleet. Useless, abandoned, potential-free. --Blackboard 15:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
8. Delete Part of an old group. We don't use it no more. Feel Free --The Cop 23:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
9. Delete - As above.--SirArgo ^Talk 06:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
10. Delete - per group's wishes. --  RoosterDragon  23:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
11. Delete - Group wants it gone. --Johnny Bass 19:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
12. Delete - As above. --Janus ^talk 19:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
13. Delete - We don't use it. --Kewabara1 14:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
14. Delete - That is incredibly old, and the new group leaders have voted on this too, so I vote with them. No I have no free will. Elven2006 22:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleted --ZsL 01:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)