UDWiki:Administration/Protections: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:17, 5 June 2024

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Protection Requests

All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.

In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.

Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here. To submit a new scheduled protection, please visit here.

Protection Queue

Place pages requiring protection here.

Requested Edits

Place protected pages requiring edits here.

Recent Actions

Special:DoubleRedirects

UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Misanthropy, UDWiki talk:Administration/Promotions/Misanthropy, and UDWiki talk:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Cyberbob240 should all be re-redirected to their real target pages. --VVV^RPMBG 06:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Should be fixed. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 02:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

The Dead

Shouldn't this The_Dead page be locked? Let The Dead rest.-- #99 ^DCC 01:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

It should be. Looks like I originally protected it in 2008, and then moved the page in 2018, which also moved the protection. Sorry about that; I've put the protection back up. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 00:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

You were always one of the good ones.--

#99 ^DCC 00:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Seriously move the fuck on. ZPatriot (talk) 21:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

It was left unlocked since 2018 since, y'know, The Dead aren't and we wanted to be able to edit the page. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉

☉

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 04:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

The page should not be protected, and should be accessible to edit as was decided in 2018.
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2018
DCC is not an active member of our team, please stop listening to him. ZPatriot (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Not this again. Sorry to step on your toes AHLG but I've unprotected it as per the 2018 request, which after much nail-pulling, finally provided a result. If the request here is functionally identical to the 2018 request, which at the moment it is, then the result should surely be the same. DANCEDANCEREVO LUTION 02:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Cycling. DANCEDANCEREVO LUTION 03:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
-Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the '''Recent Actions''' queue, where it will remain for one week.  After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag <nowiki>{{protect}}</nowiki> on the page(s) that have been protected.
+Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the '''Recent Actions''' queue, where it will remain for one week.  After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{tl|protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.
 In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.
-Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#Scheduled_Protections|here]].
+Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#Scheduled_Protections|here]]. To submit a new scheduled protection, please visit [[UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Scheduling|here]].
 ==Protection Queue==
 <!--
 ''Place pages requiring protection here.''
 -->
 ''Place pages requiring protection here.''
 ==Requested Edits==
+<!--
+''Place protected pages requiring edits here.''
+-->
+''Place protected pages requiring edits here.''
+==Recent Actions==
 <!--
-''Place pages requiring editing here.''
+''There are no recent actions to report.''
 -->
-===[[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Historical Groups|Historical Groups]] and [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Historical Events|Historical Events]]===
+===[[Special:DoubleRedirects]]===
-On both pages,
+[[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Misanthropy]], [[UDWiki talk:Administration/Promotions/Misanthropy]], and [[UDWiki talk:Administration/Re-Evaluations/Cyberbob240]] should all be re-redirected to their real target pages. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 06:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
+:Should be fixed. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 02:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
-{{Pre|'''Within''' two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No}}
+===[[The Dead]]===
+Shouldn't this [[The_Dead]] page be locked? Let The Dead rest.--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]'''  <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 01:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
+:It should be. Looks like I originally protected it in 2008, and then moved the page in 2018, which also moved the protection. Sorry about that; I've put the protection back up. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 00:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
+::You were always one of the good ones.--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]'''  <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 00:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
+:::Seriously move the fuck on. [[User:ZPatriot|ZPatriot]] ([[User talk:ZPatriot|talk]]) 21:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
+::It was left unlocked since 2018 since, y'know, The Dead aren't and we wanted to be able to edit the page. --{{User:Dragonshardz/dragonshardz}} {{Goonsig|Dragonshardz}} 04:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
-is poorly-written, confusing and has little bearing on what actually occurs in reality. Historical status for groups and events are never decided '''within''' two weeks --- that decision occurs '''after''' two weeks. The sentence should be rewritten to something like this:
+The page should not be protected, and should be accessible to edit as was decided in 2018.
+<br>http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2018
+<br>DCC is not an active member of our team, please stop listening to him. [[User:ZPatriot|ZPatriot]] ([[User talk:ZPatriot|talk]]) 21:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
-{{Pre|Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must by approved by 2/3 of eligible voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.}}
+Not this again. Sorry to step on your toes AHLG but I've unprotected it as per [[UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2018#The_Dead|the 2018]] request, which after much nail-pulling, finally provided a result. If the request here is functionally identical to the 2018 request, which at the moment it is, then the result should surely be the same. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 02:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
-which is much clearer and avoids awkward problems [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Historical_Groups&diff=prev&oldid=1869287 as seen here.]
+Cycling. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 03:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
-Why live with a mistake if you can fix it in like two seconds? -[[MHS|<span style="color: Black">'''MHS'''</span>]][[User_Talk:MHSstaff|<span style="color: DarkBlue">'''staff'''</span>]] 05:48, 5 April 2013 (BST)
-:I've already commented on this on [[User talk:Bob Moncrief#Should policies say what they mean?|my talk page]]. I actually just noticed another issue: "a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass" is ambiguous; are 15 ''total'' voters required for passage, or 15 voters ''for'' required? I would like other sysops to comment on the issue before I carry anything out. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 06:11, 5 April 2013 (BST)
-::{{Pre|Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must by approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.}}
-::Updated. It has always been at least 15 votes cast are needed (so 10-5 is ok but 10-4 is not). Obviously replace group with event for the event page. -[[MHS|<span style="color: Black">'''MHS'''</span>]][[User_Talk:MHSstaff|<span style="color: DarkBlue">'''staff'''</span>]] 06:21, 5 April 2013 (BST)
-:::I'd go for this change. No need for a full policy if we're just updating it for the sake of clarity on how it already works. In fact, looking through the older documents on the wiki, the whole point of policies in the first place were to put in writing the way that things were already working, so this is in line with that intent. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:36, 5 April 2013 (BST)
-:::Good work MHSstaff :) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 12:52, 5 April 2013 (BST)
-==Recent Actions==
 <!-- Don't remove below this line! -->

UDWiki:Administration/Protections: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:17, 5 June 2024

Contents

Guidelines for Protection Requests

Protection Queue

Requested Edits

Recent Actions

Special:DoubleRedirects

The Dead

Archives

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

General

Search

Resources

Wiki

Toolbox