UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 09: Difference between revisions
m (moved UDWiki:Administration/Protections to UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 09 over redirect) |
|
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 05:30, 3 October 2011
This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Protection Requests
All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.
In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.
Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.
Protection Queue
Place pages requiring protection here.
Requested Edits
Place pages requiring editing here.
Recent Actions
User:Akule/Defeated Groups/Zergs/Bloody Green Boyz
To make it an archive. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 06:01, 3 October 2011 (BST)
Lockettside Valkyries
Please unprotect this page for the time being so relevant information may be updated by group members. Sage of Winds 02:24, 23 September 2011 (BST)
- Done. 03:02, 23 September 2011 (BST)
- Haha I was never involved in the Izumi drama until like 6 months ago when he came back for another vandal spree. Wonder what will happen? ~ 03:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Only time will tell. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:19, 23 September 2011 (BST)
- Well, considering you more likely than not just unlocked the page for Izumi. . . --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:05, 23 September 2011 (BST)
- Oh wow, Misanthropy, I always knew you were an idiot, but... just wow.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:54, 23 September 2011 (BST)
- Haha I was never involved in the Izumi drama until like 6 months ago when he came back for another vandal spree. Wonder what will happen? ~ 03:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
You forgot the talk page. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:11, 23 September 2011 (BST)
Haha Misanthropy, you rule! From the other side, watching you aid in creating impending drama is actually pretty hilarious :D -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 00:08, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Also, while we're on the topic of impending Izumi vandalism, maybe we should try and A/DE for her! yay -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:18, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Maybe this "sage of winds" fellow could put Izumi up for a de-escalataion. She's certainly made 250 edits since she was permabanned.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:41, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- The only bad stuff I've ever seen from Izumi was years ago, and mostly over bashing skulls with Grim (who isn't around anymore). Everything else was plain ban evasion to do mundane stuff on the Valkyries page. Wouldn't mind to see her unbanned, especially as she would be eligible for being re-banned with the first follow-up escalation. -- Spiderzed█ 14:35, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Well, I pointed out that the whole "Izumi Drama" was blown out of proportion by Izumi being banned after the initial edit war had gotten to a point where both sides were willing to sit down and sort things out, and Izumi understood why her edits were a problem. If Boxy had allowed the situation to play out in A/A as Karek suggested (since both sides were willing to sit down and talk things out), Izumi would likely not have been permabanned. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 15:40, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- You know what? I'm giving it a whirl. -- Spiderzed█ 19:17, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- That's not exactly true, it just would have probably been a week later. She was pretty consistently a vandal. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 01:32, 25 September 2011 (BST)
- Well, I pointed out that the whole "Izumi Drama" was blown out of proportion by Izumi being banned after the initial edit war had gotten to a point where both sides were willing to sit down and sort things out, and Izumi understood why her edits were a problem. If Boxy had allowed the situation to play out in A/A as Karek suggested (since both sides were willing to sit down and talk things out), Izumi would likely not have been permabanned. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 15:40, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- The only bad stuff I've ever seen from Izumi was years ago, and mostly over bashing skulls with Grim (who isn't around anymore). Everything else was plain ban evasion to do mundane stuff on the Valkyries page. Wouldn't mind to see her unbanned, especially as she would be eligible for being re-banned with the first follow-up escalation. -- Spiderzed█ 14:35, 24 September 2011 (BST)
A/DM
*Uses correct heading on A/PT* Can somebody please archive the two finished demotions bids on A/DM? I tried but you need sysops powers to edit the archive.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:03, 20 September 2011 (BST)
- Got it and didn'teven have to copy/paste. Just don't ask me to cycle this request. ~ 00:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- That I can do.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 02:18, 21 September 2011 (BST)
UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive
Nothing too important, just being pedantic. my recent header should be given a (2) next to it to differentiate from the original one in case, for some odd reason, it's ever to be linked. Ty -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 15:38, 5 September 2011 (BST)
- Nobody is ever going to link to your silly demotion archive, DDR? Done. ~ 15:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I might! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:55, 6 September 2011 (BST)
- What, you mean this one?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:04, 20 September 2011 (BST)
- I might! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:55, 6 September 2011 (BST)
Blackmore 4(04)
Since I cycled this into FA a month or so ago, I forgot to add {{FA}} to it. Can someone do so for me? Thanks. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 14:50, 5 September 2011 (BST)
- Got it. ~ 15:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 15:28, 5 September 2011 (BST)
Archives
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|