UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2006 11: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:58, 24 September 2014

2006	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2008	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2009	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2010	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2011	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2012	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Q3			Q4
2013	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
Years	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019
	2020

Adbots

Report adbots here. The log of all bans is found at Block log. The list of currently blocked users is found at Ipblocklist. This space should be cleared once a day.

Cccccca Cccccca (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) - permabanned adbot.--Gage 20:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1164483075 1164483075 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) - pemabanned adbot.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 19:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Wwwdaiyang Wwwdaiyang (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) - another damn adbot--Gage 08:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Report Space

The generaI

Impersonation?--Gage 04:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Lol, no, I just made it so noone else would impersonate me. The generaI 04:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I am going to need conformation from The General since your IP's don't match.--Gage 04:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

10 bucks says it's 3 page. Cyberbob Talk 05:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

That's the best you got? 50 bucks that this is an account made just for the Devil(3pwv duh!) and Gold Blade to spam the wiki with crap. --Axe Hack 05:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll see your 50, and raise you a hundred. 3page performed a similar stunt on the SW wiki. Cyberbob Talk 05:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

This account is a sham. It is tracing to a location half a world away from where The General actually lives. Unless his "library" is actually on another continent, this account is very much a fake. I am permabanning the account, and it will be undone if The General confirms the identity of the account.--Gage 05:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

That's not me. You can tell from the way he talks, anyway, i'd be using my real ip if I was just sitting on an account.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 21:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Minority reportie

Permabanned for vandalism of DORIS + proxy use.--Gage 03:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Drewflem1

I really think this may be a total ignorance of how to edit a wiki, but I'm not taking any chances. The edit in question disturbed the Lebende Tote ad which I fixed but it just catches me as odd... Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I think a link to the edit in question would be helpful in this instance. -- ∀lan Watson ^T·RPM 02:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Considering the fact that he only has one edit, I don't think it is too hard to find. I decree this guy a noob, but not a vandal. The offending recruitment add should probably be fixed or removed.--Gage 03:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Bullgod

Chose to ignore guidelines set forth on recruitment page. Here. 275 pix is good enough for everyone else, and is plenty big enough. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

You're seriously going to call this "vandalism?"--Jorm 02:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Fix it and quit yer whinin'--Gage 02:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

half the other people that post ads there do the same damn thing. no one liked that size limitation ever since he added it out of the blue, he's only singling me out because i spoke up about it. -Bullgod 03:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

MorthBabid

Impersonation. Because I think he was trying to making NPOV that page, I recommend a unofficial warning.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 09:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure. Done. Cyberbob Talk 09:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

WiredAl Yankovic

Removed the Navagation bar from the DORIS talk page --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 22:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Hmmmm... very strange. I don't see bad faith here. I want a second opinion though.--Gage 22:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Meh, leave a note on his talk page telling him you like the nav bar on the talk page and invite him to join. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 22:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Psycho Billy

Appears to be a bad-faith edit to UDWiki:Vandalism here. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 19:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned. (and protected thanks) --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 20:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Johnnyarcher

Vandalized the DORIS page. Proof here. --_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 23:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

And here and here.--_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 23:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

And I just realized that when I tried to make his news on the Dulston page into NPOV, I accidently summed it up as "Removed NPOV". Whoops.--_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 23:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Permabanned.--Gage 00:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Tonyski

Perabanned for vandalism of DORIS--Gage 04:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

That's real fucking fair. Any warnings? Any notification on this page before? Just happens to be a group you're a member of, too. Isn't that a coincidence? --_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

That's standard operating procedure for people who create accounts just to vandalize. If there was an account with a single vandal edit to the Dead vs. Blue group page you can bet that they'd be permabanned too. -- ∀lan Watson ^T·RPM 05:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

If it hadn't been his first edit, sure. Too bad it was. He is lucky I haven't banned his IP too.--Gage 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I came into this thinking it was an account he's used before. I'm just finding out that he's trying to stir shit up so he can cry foul when a DORIS mod bans him. I retract my previous statement, and cut all ties to this childish dumbass.--_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps if you weren't so quick to defend people in cases like this you wouldn't be continually embarrassed. Cyberbob Talk 06:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps if the moderators on this wiki didn't continually act like they have an agenda, there wouldn't be a need for me to defend people.--_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 06:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

That's not what I mean. By all means, defend people who you don't think deserve punishment. What I'm saying is that by diving in headfirst without really looking at a case, you're only setting yourself up to look like a tool. What would also help is not always taking things we say in the worst possible light. We have to assume good faith. I'd like you to do the same with us. Cyberbob Talk 06:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

No further discussion will be made on this subject. Take it to a talk page.--Gage 06:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Reptileus

Restored Confederacy of Malton. Be sure to check out his statement on the now re-deleted Confederacy talk page. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 01:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

"Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through M/U."

We can get him next time.--Gage 01:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

~~Confederacy didn't go through Undeletions requests..He just re-did it. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 01:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)~~ nevermind I get it now. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 01:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The General

The General (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Um, so I created an account and went to this guy's userpage. At the top of his userpage there was a message that said you have new messages. I clicked on it and it logged me out. I don't think that having malicous logout scripts are a good idea. It would be good if this is removed (I was thinking about taking this to speedy deletions but I don't want his whole userpage deleted). Lake on wheels 17:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi three page. Yes, we missed you too. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 17:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I hope you guys know that 3PW is actually the Devil in disguise... --Axe Hack 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

ZOMGPUNZ! –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

LMAO this has made my day. Welcome back 3 page! And, in case anyones wondering, that link on my page is entirely within the rules of the wiki!--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 17:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

'Tis, for now. Anyone ban 3 Page yet? CBF. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeap, banned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The General (talk • contribs) .

why is it whenever that I do something "completely within the rules" I still get banned for it? Like the evil text thing. I think its still within the rules to do so (any new policy pass?) Free page 17:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Uh...maybe because you're the 3PWV(aka the Devil)? --Axe Hack 17:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Technically, you're using an alternate account and proxy to get around a ban, which is a bannable offense. --Blig 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Goron40

Moving people's votes on this suggestion, and altering their votes (from Spams to Kills) on a point of arguable logic. I reverted the change, which I hope was the right thing to do. --Funt Solo 14:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Editing someone else's vote unilaterally is not something permissible. If I started moving people's votes from the Keep into the Kill, or from Kill into Spam based purely on my assessment of what they "meant", I'd be crucified. Absolutely no difference here. Warned. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Fireplay259

Edited another user's userpage.--Gage 03:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 06:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Froggie

Froggie (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Voted for a policy using a confirmed open proxy. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 05:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

If it helps I know who this person is. It's Zemi. If a proxy is being used it's for a good reason, not because of past bannination. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 05:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Could you please unban Froggie? They can't access the wiki (or the rest of the internets for that matter) without the proxy. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 05:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Our policy is clear.--Gage 06:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

But she can't hlep it. It's the only way to use the internet. I think that's highly unfair. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 15:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

It's actually very fair. Favouritism != fair. Cyberbob Talk 16:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Why can't she access the internet without a proxy?--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 21:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

A likely explanation could be that she doesn't have a home connection, and uses her school (or work or whatever) internet, except that it's blocked and requires the use of a proxy to be able to get around the block. That's what I do when I'm at school. Cyberbob Talk 23:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Cyberbob, when Zemi goes into #RRF on IRC speak to her about it. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 02:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but I can't make exceptions. The n00b crowd would have my head. Cyberbob Talk 02:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

At least speak to her on a way to fix the problem. She doesn't know why she's using a proxy but it's the only way on the internet obviously. I'd like to help her so that she can access the wiki. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 02:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, seriously, this is ridiculous. These rules are in place so everyone can enjoy the wiki evenly and fairly. Not even trying to work out the issue is unnecessarily obstructionistic. -- ∀lan Watson ^T·RPM 02:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Lest we forget why the rules were put in place: their whole purpose is accountability. If we cannot reasonably verify that you are a single user making a single vote the your vote simply does not count. Reasonably verifiable meaning that you are not using an open proxy. There are provisions for allowing anonymous proxy edits through the policy we adopted here. If "Froggie" wants to she can email Kevan and ask for an exemption. If he's not inclined to give one then it doesn't happen. Case closed. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 03:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Dontaco2000

I am watching him.--Gage 01:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Wouldn't you say it's impersonation? The sig links to a different user page than his own. Cyberbob Talk 05:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Not a user that actually exists, and he changed it anyway. He is just an ass.--Gage 05:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

BubbaBuoy

Looks like they really tried to fix it. I'm going to leave a be careful message in lieu of a warning. If you could fix you comment and vote that would be cool. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 23:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Spike12

Keeps adding NNPOV stuff to the Dulston page after I keep removing it. It started with Officer_Murphy creating this, to which I removed the non-neutral statement, then Spike12 added it back twice. --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 02:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Not like commonsense is something I expect from Dulstonites, but that is ridiculous. Warned. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 02:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Gagesucksdonkeydicks

Gagesucksdonkeydicks (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Gage has a fan. Looks like Hagnat reverted everything, but it's been banned? -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 03:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

ETA: Guess I could have checked the block log. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 03:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I have lots of fans.--Gage 04:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Revival

PPPPPPERRRRMAAABAAAAAN!--Gage 02:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I salute your efforts, sir. -- ∀lan Watson ^T·RPM 02:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Wasn't that hard, just doing my job...--Gage 02:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The General

moved to talk page.--Gage 22:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Fallout10mm

Proxy alt. Banned. Cyberbob Talk 06:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Blue Command Vic

Blue_Command_Vic (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Edited the DORIS Page --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 03:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 03:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Codename C

This is my account i made a while ago. I have not abused it but apparently there's a no multi law now so I'm asking for it to be banned if the rules deem it nessecary. I was gone for a while and didn't know. I'll have him post here to confirm that it is me--Admiral Ackbar ^{U! WTF} 00:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

It's all true -sob- -sob---Codename C ^WTF 00:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I really don't see the point. Just forget about the account if you don't plan to use it again, okay?--Gage 00:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

No policy has been set about multiple accounts. One was rejected and one other might get into voting some day, but currently there's nothing. But if you really want to have the account blocked, sure, no problem. --Brizth ^{M T} 01:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Permabanned. Try to edit the wiki and I will remove the IP block.--Gage 01:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait there's no rule barring me from using 2 accounts? Meh. Even so now Codename C's mask has been removed so there's no point in keeping him.--Admiral Ackbar ^{U! WTF} 01:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Outstanding

Outstanding (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This may be "jumping the gun" a little bit but just look at his name and user page, his name is "outstanding" and his user page says "I'm simply amazing". Can we get an IP check on this guy just in case? Manattack 19:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Cant speak for the user, but the Proxy is banned. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 19:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

further conversation moved to talk page--Gage 21:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Mikoyan

Mikoyan (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Impersonation.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 18:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned.--Gage 18:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Stevecugp

All his edits are the vandalism of your page and one one-line message. Perma-ban.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 16:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I think it was someone just making an account so there main one doesn't get affected.--Cwissball 15:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, CheckUser hasn't got a clue.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 15:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Aceracer

Aceracer (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandalized the firearms page. It's his only edit.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 14:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned. Cyberbob Talk 06:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

OH NOES yeah, JUST KIDDING

I demands restamatutions!--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 06:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Don't you mean restitutions? Or retribution?--Gage 06:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Don't mahunderstands what I mahsayin?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 06:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

You are Bat Fuck Insane my friend.--Gage 06:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

IP Banned.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 14:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait, shouldn't this user only get a warning? Or did he already use up his two warnings, I didn't see him on the vandal data page... Manattack 16:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

He would if he were an actual wiki contributer. This guy is nothing more than a vandal.--Gage 17:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

From looking at what he did, didn't he vandalize and then revert his own vandalism, just looks to me like someones just never used a wiki before lol. It was probably one of those "can I really edit anything!?!" that is so famous on the real wikipedia. And he corrected his mistake like a minute or 2 later so I don't see any lasting harm done. Manattack 17:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

He corrected his mistake with another account. Also, notice the name of the accounts.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Well he could have been making a joke or something (albiet in extremely bad taste), if he was really nothing more than a vandal then why did he revert his vandalism? Thats all I'm saying, vandals usually don't undo their own vandalism. Manattack 19:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Right, and it just so happens that you made an account yesterday as well, judging by your wiki contributions. So, why make your only edits on this wiki setting up a quick userpage, and then coming to this very case to defend someone who is not you? Personally. Only a few people have permission to edit my page, you, "them", are not on that list.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 19:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Fulluphigh

Fulluphigh (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandalized DORIS. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 02:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Permabanned.--Gage 03:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Stapleballs

Stapleballs (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Edited another users signature. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 23:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 01:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Nopee

Well, it isn't technically a "proxy", but he's using his school IP to get around the ban so it might as well be. Cyberbob Talk 20:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Most schools use a proxy, in my experience, though it's not an anonymous one it's still being used to avoid a ban. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 04:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Im back or am I

Im back or am I (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Proxy using sock puppet.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 19:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Banned. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 19:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Um, what the hell? Check again xoid!!! I'm logging in from school! Also is it against the rules to have multiple accounts? I did not think it was. What do I create slashes ' ' ' ' let's find out :). Nopee 20:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Nope, I don't see any slashes. What proxy am I using then xoid? (oh, so you don't have to worry about breaking the check user rules, you have my full permision to say what proxy you claim I am using, if any. But you won't get anywhere, because I'm at school!Nopee 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for wasting that IP. Goodbye. Cyberbob Talk 20:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Tether

So what, was he banned? how do you know who he is?Im back or am I 18:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, he was banned. And you'll be banned soon too.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 19:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Why what did I do? contrary to what you think, I LOGGING IN FROM MY SCHOOL!. If I'm using a proxy then what proxy am I using? Nopee 20:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Banned.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 19:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Lud Lum

I dunno... I think this sort of thing belongs at Arby's. IIRC, General took some zombie group there after trying to report them here. Cyberbob Talk 05:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Screenshot, for some strange reason, people is more susceptible(sp?) to nude images than corpses and gore images.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 05:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This could easily get you fired if you were browsing at work and your boss showed up.--Gage 05:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Point. Warned. Cyberbob Talk 05:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Mikoyan

Mikoyan (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Looks like a tiny touch of impersenation as well. I just gave them their first warning and this was a couple of weeks ago. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 01:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Mikoyan

Damn. Er, a mod will be able to see them. Cyberbob Talk 01:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I just speedied those and they were vandalism I'm looking more of their edits as well lots are wonky I'll warn them at least. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 01:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Mikoyan

Mikoyan (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This edit. Not sure if it's vandalism. It's up to you.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 20:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Depends on the context. If it is one of his characters, then no. Someone else's? Yes. I think so, anyway.--Gage 20:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

DarkStar2374383

Right. I've had enough of his retarded attempts to be funny by going against the spirit of rulings. He's changed his signature to one that, while in keeping with the letter of my and Anti's Arb rulings, is plainly against the spirit of both. Cyberbob Talk 06:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, what is the "spirit" of a arbitration ruling? Anyways, I'm sick of this shit. Ban me here and now, indefinitely. --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 06:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm only going to say this once DarkStar, stop being an asshat. Your attempts to circumvent the arbitration rulings are bad faith, and you know it. Meaning that I can and will ban you if you persist. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 08:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Er... what's your decision on this particular report? Cyberbob Talk 08:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

That if he didn't get off his arse and fix it immediately that he'd get punished. I know he was following this, so judging by his failure to act accordingly, I'd say he has ignored the will of community once again. ~~Banned for a week. Warned.~~ No, make that a week. Sorry for the confusion. (This is technically an arb. violation, so it's considered "two levels higher" than it is otherwise.) –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 09:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

So... what do we do about his sig? Change it back to how it was before it was all spammy? Or leave it as is? Cyberbob Talk 11:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I say revert it.--Gage 14:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I just got here, and I have a few things to say. 1. DarkStar's sig fufilled BOTH arbitration rulings. 2. I made a promise to both of them outside the wiki (In IRC) that my ruling would not punish ANYONE, and this being taken to M/VB makes me look like a promise-breaker, etc. Now, on the Resensitized forums, I've gotten the two to cool down, and if this starts another war, I won't be pleased at all. They were starting to get along, but with this, I feel like the work I've done in getting the two to cool down has gone to waste. Thanks a lot, Cyberbob. Thanks a lot. --Absolution 15:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. It's your own stupid fault for making promises based on what other people may or may not do. Cyberbob Talk 00:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This looks like a group-mod smack-down to me. That guys stupidly long sig was pretty funny, as it goes, and not half as bloody irritating as the multi-coloured bs that The Godfather of Blah Blah Blah sports all over the place. Why's he allowed to push the bubble but DarkStar isn't? You could easily claim bad faith in both cases - but then I notice that "bad faith" is pulled out of the gun cabinet quite regularly when a logical argument is being lost and a targeted contributer needs to be put down. Calling it like I see it. --Funt Solo 19:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Aww, don't be sad Funty. I personally made sure that my signature violated no policies set forth by checking with mods. Heck, even the mods told me of ways to make it much much worse, but I haven't changed it, and even removed some elements that seemed tacky. My signature is legible, and attracts the eye. It isn't smushed together, nor does it blink, nor is it in binary. It is in english... just because YOU don't like it, doesn't make it bad. What is bad faith to you, is art for another, and that signature is my art.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 00:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Anime's sig is in no way as spammy as DarkStar's was. You can at least read his, and it isn't an attempt to be a smartarsy hairsplitter. Cyberbob Talk 00:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

DarkStar2374383

Violated the recent arbitration ruling with his sig. Anything other than standard lettering? I think this fits. --Gage 18:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh please. Its standard letters, I just changed it to really ugly colors. Fuck off Gage. --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 21:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

While hardly readable, I do notice that the signature is written out in normal letters, and is therefore not in violation of the arbitration verdict. --Absolution 21:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Standard lettering aligns in a linear manner. I'll give you three days to change it. --Karlsbad 00:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Karlsbad, can you point out to me where this is stated? If it isn't stated in writing anywhere, then it's invalid and DarkStar doesn't have to change his sig. It's only fair.--Absolution 00:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll wait for cyberbob to decide, because unless it clearly states on the wiki then that is your opinion on what Standard lettering is. Cyberbob told me as long as it isn't "spammy" (via IRC) then it should be okay, But again, I'll wait for him to clarify what he meant. I dont see what the big fucking deal is. Gage is a fucking hypocrite, He sat there in IRC and told people how to make them really horrible. When i told him of my intent on making my signature in binary atfisrt he "lol"ed. Fucking hypocrite. --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 00:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Eh. While it's really ugly, it isn't in violation of the ruling. Bad form, definitely. Vandalism, no. Cyberbob Talk 01:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait, doesn't "bad form" translate to "bad faith"? Just checking. --Karlsbad 02:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

does it matter? the arbitrator said its not Vandalism. --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 02:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

By the absolute skin of your teeth it isn't vandalism. By the absolute skin of your teeth. Cyberbob Talk 05:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Gage

Gage (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) impersonation --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 09:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Not vandalism. It's standard practice to do that with templates on official pages. Cyberbob Talk 09:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Ken irons

Ken irons (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Edited the wiki from a confirmed open proxy (207.234.208.245) in violation of our policy. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 04:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Proxy banned.--Gage 04:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Reptileus

Bad faith edit. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 02:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Making threats? Hmmm... I am leaning towards vandalism on this one. Can I get a second opinion?--Gage 02:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

We can't do anything until he actually commits vandalism, I'm afraid. Xoid, Bob & I ran into the same problem with Jedaz. Cyberbob Talk 02:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Well somthing needs to be done, he was on my page the other day saying things i did not like.--Apex 11:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Comite

Comite (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandalized after I told him not to. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 19:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Again --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 19:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Again --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 19:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Again --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 19:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

It looks like Conndraka has already warned him twice, any further vandalism will result in a 24 hour ban.--Gage 19:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Conndraka gave him a "first and second" warning at the same time, on the basis that Saromu's "polite request" somehow counted as a first warning. I assume this is meaningless and Comite is still on his first warning. --Thimble 19:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Hmmmm... okay Kevan, that is the way we will do it. Check User is a brilliant thing. Thanks for installing that.--Gage 19:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes. I was browsing the Caiger pages, and became a bit concerned at some of the mod behaviour related to it - I just wanted to see what the reaction to a concerned but polite mystery shopper would be, rather than wading in as wiki owner. Whether or not CheckUser would be invoked was part of that curiosity. --Kevan 20:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

further conversation moved to talk page--Gage 20:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Retracted, "Barhah Mall" removed. Here's a tip folks; the "N" in NPOV stands for "neutral" — Conn can expect a second misconduct case. I'm seriously considering whether demodding is necessary, Conn. You've been overstepping the bounds by a fair margin of late. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 03:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Kevan himself said it was ok. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 03:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Ummmm... no he did not. Read it again.--Gage 03:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Exhibit A. Kevan's sockpuppet saying he didn't care about the name. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 03:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Saying it is okay to do so, and saying "I don't really care about what people call Caiger Mall" are not the same thing. Kevan did not endorse your non NPOV bullshit.--Gage 03:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

It's not a point of view that people call it that. If a group of people call it that it isn't "I think they call it that", it's "I know they call it that." The least you can do is say "Caiger Mall, called BARHAH Mall by zombies, etc. etc." --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 03:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

By that logic, we should put Candyland on the Ridleybank page. Not so cool now, is it?--Gage 03:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

That group is dead. Dead as dead can be. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 04:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Irrelevant. Some survivors still call it Candyland. If Caiger Mall is Barhah Mall, then Ridleybank is Candyland. I'll put {{Custom Title}} there myself, so help me god. I hate Caiger as much as any zombie vet, but I'll not stand for biased bullshit being placed on one page and not on another. It's mentioned in the timeline, just like it is with Ridleybank. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 04:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Ken Irons and Alts

Ken irons (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)Ken irons
Fath0m (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)Fath0m
Witchblade (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)Witchblade
Mayor Fitting (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)Mayor Fitting
See My Talk Page... See The History of The Predators, He was warned not to Edit the NPOV section of the page. Then Check their IP addys. Ken admits to using the Proxies... following the addys we see that Fathom, Witchblade, Ken Irons and Mayor Fitting (at the very least)are the same individual. Checking back on my Talk page you'll see where Fitting even encouraged getting Banned. Most importantly, Ken Irons in the past has violated TOS by threatening electronic terrorism vrs Myself, The DHPD, and was responsible for STARS having to completely reformat their Board recently. Previously Identified alt includes g4361 as well.Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 08:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Can we get some diff comparisons here?--Gage 08:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

After wading through a majority of it I don't see anything conclusive that implicates Mayor Fitting among Ken's alts. I also do not find any vandalism by Ken or alts since his ban resulting from the page blanking incidents. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 20:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

That is why Conndraka is in misconduct.--Gage 20:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Not Vadalism Antagonizing the DHPD is not a bannable offence. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 04:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Zaine incarnate

Zaine incarnate (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandalized Caiger Mall Survivors main page. (Not 100% sure on policy on this one, but it seems the proper place and offense, perhaps vandal policy should be more clear, or more visible) --Agent White^{WTF•W!•SGP•CMS-Meta•CMS} 00:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned.--Gage 00:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Apologies, I didn't mean to upset or be considered a vandalist. Won't happen again. --Zaine Incarnate 13:58, November 11 (UTC)

Reptileus

Vandalized the page, claiming a group that doesn't exist was there. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 21:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

You can't prove malicious intent here, so don't even try. You can't hardly prove that he is lying anyway. Give it up. Not vandalism.--Gage 21:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Techincally it is a group they just don't have anywhere near the members they claim. Its supposed to be made up of serveral groups so it wouldn't be on the stats page. The NMC exists but thats not on the stats page. --Marie^{The Grove} 13:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

NQP

Appelflappenator

Actually, permabanned as a persistent vandal. In his six edits we have numerous instances of impersonation and troublemaking.--Gage 05:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

How in the heck do you get Impersonation out of that? I do see one vandalism among the other edits but shouldn't they at least get a warning? permabanned? persistent? --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 06:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Max. That comment was placed in between comments. Sure, it was horrible wikiquette, but not vandalism. Cyberbob Talk 07:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. Warned.--Gage 07:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Labine50

Banned for 24 hours. Cyberbob Talk 08:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

You are kidding, right? He probably didn't know that they were supposed to be suggested in the "humurous seggestions" place, which, honestly, kills all the humour out of it. Shouldn't it be a warning first... -Certified=Insane^☭

20:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Check Vandal Data, Certified. He's already had two warnings, so the next stage is a 24 hour ban. 'Sides, he's been around for more than long enough to know where humourous suggestions should go. Cyberbob Talk 20:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Were they related? If they were related to suggestions-page offenses, then I retract my comment, but I don't think someone should get a ban for such a minor offense, even if he has had two previous warnings for unrelated reasons... -Certified=Insane^☭

20:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

There is precedent upon precedent for warnings for humorous suggestions on the regular suggestion page. His first edit was 20:22, 27 April 2006. He was well aware of the consequence.--Gage 01:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Octi 1

Phrenis

Phrenis (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Three suggestions in a row. Strangely, it's his only edit.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I was foing to report it, but you got here first ;) I'd say he's only a newbie here and maybe had an old account and didn't see the new rule chnage as its been taken down from community annuncements on the suggestions page, but its up to you mods ;D --Marie^{The Grove} 17:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

It looks like all 3 suggestions could be consolidated into one suggestion. I don't think we can warn someone on their first edit... I will move the suggestions to his talk page.--Gage 17:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

EricHarris

Not the first time he's done this either. Warned. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 05:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

That useless little argument isn't looking any better on the talk page, you know. --Eric Harris, 7:38, 11 November 2006 (EST)

Legend X

Legend X (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Edited the Men In Flak page.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 18:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Despite the fact that the page hasn't been edited in some time (something which really should have been picked up on), a group page is a group page is a group page. Banned for a month. Cyberbob Talk 20:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

…after all the bull he's said on his own group's page, complaining at every turn when someone corrects it, he goes and does this? Hypocrite. If he had've waited a few hours I was going to nominate it for speedy under criterion 12, anyway. Sheesh. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 04:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

RSquared

RSquared (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) edit. Edited and moved someone elses vote (on his own suggestion) on an arguable point. Surely we can't let people move and edit other people's votes, unless they're unsigned or in some other way clearly invalid? I reverted the change, which I hope was an okay thing to do. --Funt Solo 22:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned--Gage 22:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Dickholeguy

Screw it, I was wrong.--Gage 03:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Foggy

Warned.--Gage 11:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! --JohnRubin 12:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

SporeSore

And a conversation from UDWiki talk:Moderation/Misconduct here--Gage 04:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Warned.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 07:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Zombie Civillian XL Dead Air Operative

Zombie Civillian XL Another page blanker. Primarily here and here, though I believe he's also blanked some Recruitment entries inappropriately. -- Alan Watson ^T·RPM 02:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Dead Air Operative This guy is blanking everything in sight. Every page in his history seems to be deletion of content from an existing page. He's removed other groups from the Recruitment page and blanked, so far, Sacred Ground Policy, Channel 4 News Team, and others. He's already done several pages in the last fifteen minutes, so rather than make a complete list, I'll get this posted for someone to see & stop. Paul Brunner 01:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I've worked through Dead Air Operative's contributions list. One edit was genuine; I reverted the rest with a note about the vandalism. The one exception is Recruitment, which Mia Kristos was editing at that moment. Paul Brunner 02:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Both Permabanned, and on a side note things must be pretty boring up in MN. Both Vandals are from the same IP. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 02:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Are you going to permaban the IP too?--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 03:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

IPs are Auto blocked in case of a single IP, but I went ahead and banned it again just for good measure. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 04:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Elias Taylor and, arguably, Crabappleslegalteam

User:Elias Taylor seems to have created Escaped mental patients as a way to bypass the repeated deletion of the Jimmy Slitter page. (It does add content and work the information into the Malton history, so it's possible this is good faith - still, it seems suspiciously like an attempt to dodge the deletions to me.)

Another user, User:Crabappleslegalteam, has been repeatedly adding a disclaimer to Escaped mental patients and to Crabapple. Elias Taylor has repeatedly removed it. The history pages are here and here.

Quite a bit of this has happened since Taylor was warned several days ago.

In the Wikipedia world they'd both be breaking the three-revert rule. What's the appropriate response here? I think I'll go add a link to the discussions pages to suggest they take it to arbitration, but should anything else be done? Paul Brunner 21:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

We don't have a three revert rule on the UDWiki. I think this is for arbitration. I will protect the page if it gets out of hand.--Gage 03:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Elias Taylor has deleted all the warnings on his user discussion page. Isn't that illegal? And, on top of everything else, worth banning him for? Crabappleslegalteam 02:11, 11 November 2006 (GMT)

Nope, it isn't. The talk page messages are only notifications. The real warnings go here. Cyberbob Talk 02:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough! Crabappleslegalteam 03:46, 12 November 2006 (GMT)

Mrmooge88

Mrmooge88 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) I don't think this was bad faith - it seems more like ignorance - but he altered the vote counts on several Peer Undecided suggestions, some of which are now archived and so I can't fix them. --Funt Solo 23:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think he may have been thinking this was how he voted. I will just roll back the page.--Gage 00:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Well someone else has edited the page since, and I am busy right now so forget I said anything about fixing it.--Gage 00:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I would first of all like to apoligise about changeing the poll. I seriously thought that was how you vote. Now that I know I was voteding incorrectly. How do you vote? I want to be a contributing part of the wiki. Once again my apologies. Can some one provide me with a link or a FAQ? --Mrmooge88 02:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:04, 8 October 2008 (view source) Zombie slay3r (talk \| contribs) m (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2006 11": scheduled [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) ← Older edit	Latest revision as of 02:58, 24 September 2014 (view source) Aichon (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
(No difference)

UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2006 11: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:58, 24 September 2014

Adbots

Vandalism Report Space

OH NOES yeah, JUST KIDDING

Ken Irons and Alts

Elias Taylor and, arguably, Crabappleslegalteam

Navigation menu

Search