UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06: Difference between revisions
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
#'''Keep''' - Fuck off with trying to crit 12 things. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | #'''Keep''' - Fuck off with trying to crit 12 things. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Keep''' - As boxy 100%. As Iscariot 100%. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | #'''Keep''' - As boxy 100%. As Iscariot 100%. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
#:HOW WHOS THE FUCKING SHEEP blah blah blah STFU cyberbob no one cares {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
#'''Keep''' Somehow, I don't think someone would have went through all that effort for something lasting three days. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 17:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | #'''Keep''' Somehow, I don't think someone would have went through all that effort for something lasting three days. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 17:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Keep''' - That's a bad ass page. Also, I think SA probably nailed it.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 12:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | #'''Keep''' - That's a bad ass page. Also, I think SA probably nailed it.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 12:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:03, 9 November 2009
This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Deletion Requests
All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie
[[:Category:Category]]
and[[:Image:Image.jpg]]
). - A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.
Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.
Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, go to UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.
Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Eligibility
To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:
- No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
- Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
- Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
- Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
- Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)
- As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.
- Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
- Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
- User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
- Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.
- As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.
- Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
- Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.
- As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.
Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.- As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.
- Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).
A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.
Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests
- One vote per user.
- Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
- There are four vote types:
- Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
- Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
- Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
- Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.
- The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
- At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
- If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
- If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.
Deletion Queue
D.o.W.
A horrid attempt at making a survivor group. I think it lasted all of three days. No point in keeping it around as no one heard of it and has no real meaning for historical purposes.Matt Aries 17:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Not a stub, not an orphan, not pure coded vomit. Not a pow, pow, pow.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Why do I want to say he's only doing it to steal the name? :/ -- SA 17:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)- No bolded keyword as per the above guidelines -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Nope, sorry --Thadeous Oakley 19:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)- No bolded keyword as per the above guidelines -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - and fuck you two above... bold a keep or delete vote, ffs, so that the serving sysop doesn't have to read through your vote in the fucking edit box to work out which way you're voting. Slack pricks -- boxy talk • teh rulz 06:48 8 November 2009 (BST)
- Keep - Fuck off with trying to crit 12 things. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - As boxy 100%. As Iscariot 100%. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Somehow, I don't think someone would have went through all that effort for something lasting three days. -Poodle of DoomM! 17:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - That's a bad ass page. Also, I think SA probably nailed it.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 12:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Does this make my vote valid without having to bold anything?-- SA 12:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to delete that page. --Papa Moloch 14:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Category:Confirmed Groups
Category:Confirmed Groups has become redundant now that Crit 12 (outdated group pages) has been removed from the speedydelete criteria. Groups, as long as they have suitable content (enough to avoid crit 1), are no longer subject to automatic deletion. This category has, historically, been woefully out of date, and to keep it updated, a constant effort is required to go through the stats page to confirm that groups are in fact confirmed, despite anyone being able to add the category regardless of actual group numbers. Even when it was cleaned out, there were still groups disputing it because they claim that their members don't show their group name in their profile. I've discussed this with others in the community, and it has been open for discussion on the talk page here for quite some time, and I've yet to hear any opposition to it's removal, let alone convincing argument against it. It is a category that has no purpose any more, apart from boosting the egos of 'borderline group' leaders -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:15 5 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete - no longer needed -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:15 5 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete - No purpose, no need to be on the wiki.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Seems fair. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- yo dawg. shit be wack yo-- SA 16:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- delete this and remove the indent when you make a valid vote -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:12 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Oh what the fuck. I said that the category sucks. That's close enough to a fucking delete vote boxy. Are you going to go strike cheese's vote because nukimilation isn't a valid vote either? Sure, he explained it, but I explained mine too. >:| -- SA 13:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hell, I see quite a few examples in october alone where you used invalid votes to speedy delete shit. Or left them and didn't bother them. So, what, bolding "pow pow pow" is a valid vote, yet me saying what amounts to "shit sux delete it" isn't?-- SA 13:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nuke is close enough to delete, it was bolded. Yours had no such qualifier, and the shit that could have been wack (yo), could well have been the deletion request. I'm not a mind reader. Just make it clear, please... because cool is overrated -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:25 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Only if you just let my votes sit there next time instead of making your self look bad. I mean seriously mate, you even voted after Yonnua's invalid vote. VV -- SA 13:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nuke is close enough to delete, it was bolded. Yours had no such qualifier, and the shit that could have been wack (yo), could well have been the deletion request. I'm not a mind reader. Just make it clear, please... because cool is overrated -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:25 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Hell, I see quite a few examples in october alone where you used invalid votes to speedy delete shit. Or left them and didn't bother them. So, what, bolding "pow pow pow" is a valid vote, yet me saying what amounts to "shit sux delete it" isn't?-- SA 13:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oh what the fuck. I said that the category sucks. That's close enough to a fucking delete vote boxy. Are you going to go strike cheese's vote because nukimilation isn't a valid vote either? Sure, he explained it, but I explained mine too. >:| -- SA 13:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- delete this and remove the indent when you make a valid vote -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:12 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete Not needed --Thadeous Oakley 16:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nukumilation - Not needed. -- Cheese 19:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - It also rewards multi-abuse. Ix-nay it. --WanYao 03:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - It was never a good category. Cyberbob Talk 03:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I tried cleaning it up over the summer (blame boredom), and it was out of date the next week. A waste of time in retrospect,--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 03:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Just change the criteria required for a group to be considered confirmed. -Poodle of DoomM! 04:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Linkthewindow Talk 07:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Useless category is useless. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 14:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Doesn't the great suburb massacre fulfil this role now? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Recent Actions
Trenchcoater Liberation Front
Useless page that has been orphaned since I-don't-know-when. As the author, I would like to kindly ask for the page's deletion. --Chekken 17:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy per author's request.--Thadeous Oakley 17:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- SPEEDY per above..... Chekken,... your vote would get it deleted right away. -Poodle of DoomM! 17:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Pow, pow, pow!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy - Page creator and group leader. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, along with talk page -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:36 9 November 2009 (BST)
La Révolution
Done trying stuff now Ross? -Poodle of doom 23:14, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - unless the ghost issue is cleared up, it should be kept, so that it doesn't end up on the uncategorised list -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:27 22 October 2009 (BST)
- What's the ghost issue? -Poodle of doom 00:37, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - Because of the Ghost issue, they'll always show up on every Special Page you can see them on now (except shortpages I think, but thats the only one)- the only difference being now you can see what the problem is and be informed about it. I don't mind if these do get deleted, but I think it's a little more helpful this way. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:21, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - Don't ask people if they're finished with a page by putting up for deletion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 02:23, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --WanYao 02:36, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - I don't think Wan quite gets what ghost pages and images are. Cyberbob Talk 06:29, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- I don't think you quite get how stupid you look with your pettiness, bob. You think that because a bug tells me I can't delete a page, that should influence my vote that it should be deleted? I voted correctly, according the content of the page. Unlike everyone else.
- Seriously... is your life really that empty that you need to fill it with lame attempts to insult me? Or are you just out of your meds? --WanYao 14:25, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- I don't like Bob whatsoever but srsly Wan, you just lamely insulted him in a more lame way than he first lamely insulted you in the first place. Lame. Also you're a cunt.--CyberRead240 15:29, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Whoa, the Meds Insult... I haven't seen one of those in minutes Cyberbob Talk 15:34, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- You get those comments a lot, I take it. --WanYao 15:55, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Nooo....maan seriously, that isn't even remotely witty come on--CyberRead240 18:26, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- You get those comments a lot, I take it. --WanYao 15:55, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Your second line is especially ironic. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:38, 24 October 2009 (BST)
WHOA!!! I made drama!!!! -Poodle of Doom M! 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)- Multi-vote struck. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)- Multi vote? -Poodle of Doom M! 16:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - You can't kill a ghost.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:54, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep Because its a ghost image. Good try though poodle. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)
Keep - Although, I wouldn't care if it was deleted.Remove the strike and this comment when you sign your vote. I also recommend that you take the time to read up on what ghost images and pages are. Cyberbob Talk 03:51, 23 October 2009 (BST)- Keep - --KNITKNITINSTITUTION 12:09, 23 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - eep! Nice article on ghosts, bummer.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 11:56, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep Let's see how many of you notice my vote,... and find humor in it. -Poodle of Doom M! 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keepzorz - As above. -- Cheese 19:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Linkthewindow Talk 07:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
keeped.-- SA 11:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
A Quick Zombie Guide
A "guide" of horrid quality that hasn't been added to since 2007.--Teln 20:36, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete As Teln said above. -Poodle of doom 02:25, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - We don't delete guides that are bad, that's what Guides/Review is for, of which this has already been put through. Most guides haven't been touched since 2007. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:16, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - It's not a guide, it's pure coded vomit. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:56, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - It doesn't matter if the guide sucks or if you disagree with it, there's no reason to go deleting articles all willy nilly.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 16:01, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete -- RoosterDragon 16:19, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - As DDR. -- Cheese 20:34, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep though more folk should point out how bad the advice is! --Honestmistake 23:23, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Merge - into subpage of user who wrote it. Otherwise delete it. --WanYao 01:51, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - As DDR --Haliman - Talk 01:54, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - no signal, just noise -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:30 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - As DDR. I'm loving the role reversal though.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:38, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - It's not a group page, it's pure coded vomit. Cyberbob Talk 07:44, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - As Iscariot. That guide is pure shit. It tells you not to get Ankle Grab until later? AG is almost a REQUIREMENT to be a zombie.-- SA 12:01, 23 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete--Winman1 15:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Zaphord 06:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
The Southern Cross Club
Just J3D making yet another wiki "group" to annoy people who have no interest in being in it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete Cyberbob Talk 07:09, 17 October 2009 (BST)- Keep - eh, fuckit Cyberbob Talk 09:56, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- As long as it means you will let your name on the list though, tbh making fun of hating each other really isn't that bad.--CyberRead240 15:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - eh, fuckit Cyberbob Talk 09:56, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 09:27, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:33, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete--Teln 17:14, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete --Bob Boberton TF / DW 17:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - you guys are no fun.--xoxo 06:20, 18 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete .... and you're not funny --WanYao 06:47, 18 October 2009 (BST)
DelKeep!--Nallan (Talk) 10:49, 18 October 2009 (BST)- Keep - Okay, so... it's a list of users from australia. Not very interesting. But the reaction to the list is entertaining and worth preserving. Also, what sexylegsread said.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 11:22, 18 October 2009 (BST)
Delete - If and only if DDR's stance on it is actually the majority stance in Australia. Though in my time there I never once heard of anyone considering a symbol of hatred, and it's pretty much the only symbol of Australia (other than kangaroos and those silly corks-on-strings hats) that the majority of the world would recognise at a glance.- Keep who cares if your name is on a mainspace list of people from down under that is obviously not serious. Have a bit of humour instead of blindly saying OMG NO WAI to everything your "enemy" says OMG YES WAI to. Idiots, the lot of you.--CyberRead240 09:52, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep --Shakey BBK 11:21, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - The hideous urge to nullify Shakey's vote has overcome me. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - The Southern Cross is not isolated to just Australia so I believe this club is a misrepresentation of Australia and needs to be culled. Also, Shakey is always wrong so... --Guy.The.Firefighter 09:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wow should've read the page first... still delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Guy.The.Firefighter (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
- discussion moved to talk page --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 16:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wow should've read the page first... still delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Guy.The.Firefighter (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
- Keep i lieks it --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 16:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep -J3D's douchery amuses me.--GomerPyle41 08:33, 1 November 2009 (UTC)voting ended. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 08:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 08:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- suck on dat biatch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by J3D (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
Archive
Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|