UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2008 03: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 03:00, 24 September 2014

2006	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2008	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2009	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2010	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2011	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2012	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Q3			Q4
2013	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
Years	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019
	2020

March 2008

User:Anal Spermbank

I should also not I reverted this addition of his to the A/VB talk page, it served no purpose other than trolling Conndraka and pushing for a ban of his own due to his name content.--Karek^maps?! 02:25, 1 April 2008 (BST)

User:Timmydatim

For this edit to the Second Big Bash. Classy... --WanYao 10:26, 31 March 2008 (BST)

Permbanned, the gnome already got him -- boxy ^{talk • i} 10:35 31 March 2008 (BST)

User:Dudeguy

Dudeguy (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Finis_Valorum&diff=1088952&oldid=1076967 I don't like Finis(the asshat Pked 5 five times in a row), but this looks like a vandalism case to me... --TerminalFailure 05:08, 31 March 2008 (BST)

and this from earlier tonight: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Finis_Valorum&diff=1088948&oldid=1086618 --TerminalFailure 05:09, 31 March 2008 (BST)

then why report it here terminal? Dudeguy is doing us all a great service, and a banning is the last thing we want for him :P--x o x o 09:12, 31 March 2008 (BST)

Warned. He's a jerk, but as long as he keeps it on his own pages there's not much we can do -- boxy ^{talk • i} 10:31 31 March 2008 (BST)

User:TerminalFailure

Broke another ruling here when he was told to remove it. All he has done was reword it with the same message. here "You will also be required to remove any untrue statements from your userpage and talkpage that was not directly involved in comments issued back and forth by both parties: IE statements of zerging, and sucking." --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 15:35, 30 March 2008 (BST)

Does anyone else know what I'm thinking? No. So unless Saromu knows ESP, that's true.--TerminalFailure 15:43, 30 March 2008 (BST)

You changed it from opinion to claiming it as a fact and the ruling says to remove untrue statements. You're digging yourself a deeper grave. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 15:45, 30 March 2008 (BST)

It is a fact that I feel that way, so it does not have to be removed.--TerminalFailure 15:50, 30 March 2008 (BST)

If the world ran on logic like that we'd still be searching for the wheel. Too bad it doesn't, too bad you broke a ruling. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 15:52, 30 March 2008 (BST)

It is a fact that I feel that way, so Saromu is incorrect. --TerminalFailure 15:56, 30 March 2008 (BST)

...wow... just wow. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 15:58, 30 March 2008 (BST)

Saromu has also failed to present a valid response.--TerminalFailure 16:02, 30 March 2008 (BST)

In light of AnimeSucks obviously not having been acting to settle the dispute enforcing punishments set on a user based off of an arbitration case where the arbitrator is the cause of the biggest portion of the problems is completely foolish. As such I can not in good faith rule vandalism here because there has been no attempts to settle the dispute beyond attempts to use Vandal Banning to further it. Not Vandalism, and if the case ends up overturned I'd recommend the arbitrator move to request Terminal's warnings for it's violation struck from A/VD.--Karek^maps?! 16:37, 30 March 2008 (BST)

User:Saromu

"Both of you will refrain from commenting directly to eachother on the entire wiki also for a period of six months" Violated by Saromu 1 line below. Bye bye!

"Both of you will refrain from commenting on eachother's talk page for a period of six months." Learn to read. It says TALK PAGE here. You lose. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 15:28, 30 March 2008 (BST)

Past precedent and common sense lay out anything in the UDWiki:Administration and/or UDWiki namespace period to be unrestrictable through the means of an arbitration ruling. You can't force a user not to comment on vandal cases against him and you can't punish a user for commenting on policies that concern him. Not Vandalism.--Karek^maps?! 16:37, 30 March 2008 (BST)

User:TerminalFailure

User was given 48h to comply with this arbitration ruling. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 02:04, 30 March 2008 (BST)

Links to where he isn't in compliance please. Don't make us all go trawling to find what you're talking about -- boxy ^{talk • i} 02:18 30 March 2008 (BST)

This header, which caused him to be banned for a week for not complying with the arbitration ruling. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 03:15, 30 March 2008 (BST)

Also this false header--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 12:10, 30 March 2008 (BST)

I ask that you give the guy abit more time than 48 hours if the banning is for one month, perhaps fourty eight hours starting from his next contribution. I often don't log into the wiki for several days and would hate to come back and find I had been hang drawn and quartered when I was away.--Thekooks 12:41, 30 March 2008 (BST)

He was banned for one week and then after 10 edits he was told he has 48 hours to remove it. If he fails to do this he will be banned for one month. I think you got it mixed up. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 15:22, 30 March 2008 (BST)

In light of AnimeSucks obviously not having been acting to settle the dispute enforcing punishments set on a user based off of an arbitration case where the arbitrator is the cause of the biggest portion of the problems is completely foolish. As such I can not in good faith rule vandalism here because there has been no attempts to settle the dispute beyond attempts to use Vandal Banning to further it. Not Vandalism, and if the case ends up overturned I'd recommend the arbitrator move to request Terminal's warnings for it's violation struck from A/VD.--Karek^maps?! 16:37, 30 March 2008 (BST)

User:Lektroluv

Repeating Scoobies vandalism -- boxy ^{talk • i} 12:14 29 March 2008 (BST)

Warned for impersonation and what not.--Karek^maps?! 12:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

User:The_man

For his repeated edits shown here [1] of a group subpage that he is not a member of. I really think a warning would suffice as he may not have been smart enough to realize that it was indeed a subpage even though he did have to click the link to get to it.--DCC 12:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism, see above -- boxy ^{talk • i} 12:14 29 March 2008 (BST)

discussion moved to talk page

User:Oliver_Sykes

For his edit of a user group sub page here [2]when he is not a member of that group. Again, I hope that a warning would be enough to put them on the path to righteousness.--DCC 12:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

His edits amounted to nothing. Stop spamming up admin pages with crap, DCC -- boxy ^{talk • i} 12:16 29 March 2008 (BST)

Not Vandalism - The guy made a mistake by editing the wrong page then undid it himself. --Karek^maps?! 12:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Skritz

For this revenge attack on Ioncannon's group page -- boxy ^{talk • i} 11:52 29 March 2008 (BST)

pssst, a ruling please mister moderator, sir -- boxy ^{talk • i} 02:19 30 March 2008 (BST)

Vandalism Boxy could you take of the Warning though? Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:59, 30 March 2008 (BST)

Warning given -- boxy ^{talk • i} 12:51 30 March 2008 (BST)

User:Azombielol

Most contribs vandalism. They include This, this, and this.--Karek^maps?! 11:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I lol'd--CyberRead240 11:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

3 acts of vandalism, no constructive contributions = permban -- boxy ^{talk • i} 11:45 29 March 2008 (BST)

User:NIGGERS MALONE

Name disallowed for being blatantly racist, IP also blocked because it was an open proxy. This is simply to note action already taken.--Karek^maps?! 11:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

User:ScoobyDooDoobie

For this. Impersonation.--'BP^Tmz 01:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned -- boxy ^{talk • i} 03:24 28 March 2008 (BST)

User:Ioncannon11

This series of edits to the The Northern Regiment page. As you can see here, they don't like his edits much. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 23:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism - He's barely back from a 24 hour ban (23rd Feb) and now it's being escalated to a 48 hour ban. He'd better get his act together or he'll be out of here permanently. -- C h e e s e 23:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

They claimed they had MUCH more members than they actually did, so I changed it to stop them from lying. Is that wrong, now? Oh and no, I was never given a 24-hour ban...EVER.Ioncannon11 00:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes you were, now leave their pages alone -- boxy ^{talk • i} 02:16 30 March 2008 (BST)

No one ever told me that...Why didn't it go on my talk page? -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ioncannon11 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 30 March 2008 (BST).

I thought the wiki sent an email when you were banned. You get a notification when you try to log in -- boxy ^{talk • i} 05:58 30 March 2008 (BST)

Maybe, but we do have {{Banned}}, should probably use it.--Karek^maps?! 00:11, 2 April 2008 (BST)

User:Sergeant Hastings

He's at it again. Changing bazillions of suburb danger levels.

[3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

These are only a few of his edits. There are about 20 of the same, in total. None of them backed up, nothing. This ain't an edit war, it's just vandalism when you go this far... --WanYao 06:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

What the hell? http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Special:Contributions/Sergeant_Hastings Please permaban this moron already! This is pure vandalism! I've corrected whittenside's danger level. the rest is up to you. The man 08:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please, refrain from telling the administration staff how to punish reported users. I don't see any vandalism in here, just edit conflicts. And strangely enough, it's more than 7 hours since he changed the danger levels to danger and they haven't been changed by anyone else but in two of the burbs he changed it. If it was actually vandalism, if it was misinformation, this burb's would've returned in a blink, like what happened to ridleybank. Talk with the user, and solve this on arbitration if not possible. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 13:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Anyone been to arbies yet? No? How about his talk page? No? Not vandalism. He's right about this one, at least -- boxy ^{talk • i} 08:52 27 March 2008 (BST)

That was for the last case. His reponse to the warning was to go and edit the danger level pages of all those suburbs. The man 13:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

He was warned for impersonation in the last case, not for changing danger levels. If you want to show that he's deliberately doing something that he knows is wrong (necessary to show bad faith in a case like this), you've first got to show where you've explained it to him... on his talk page -- boxy ^{talk • i} 13:51 27 March 2008 (BST)

This is ridiculous. Firstly, hagnat I wasn't actually telling you what or how to do your job, I was saying what I desired to be done... but maybe I ought to have been.... And Sgt H's first warning was for impersonation WTF??? That's not what I reported him for, I reported him for malicious edits to the Ridley and Daker Danger levels. And the reason all his edits haven't been reverted is because there are so effen many of them -- and us non-sysops don't have rollback, remember???

Bad faith = 20 odd edits to the danger levels without ANY evidence. That is wilfully trying to make trouble... What if the Man or Funt Solo did this?? There'd be an UPROAR. But.. whatever.... --WanYao 14:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hagnat was talking to The man. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 14:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

First, i was addressing the man comment, asking to perma this user. Second... yes, sysops do have the rollback function, but users have the undo option... it's not that quick, but allow you to easily revert an article to it's previous state. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 14:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I guess considering I still needed coffee ;) and that The man echoed my own feelings so perfectly, I didn't realise... But you have not addressed the issues I brought up. I explained, at least very briefly, why I think it's vandalism and NOT a mere edit conflict. I also asked WTF do you mean he was warned for impersonation ... it wasn't for MALICIOUSLY editing the Daker and Ridely danger levels, which I reported him on?? This guy is trying to create trouble.. plain and simple.. can't you see that? Oh... wait.. I can smell the coffee, I'm getting a cup. Want one? --WanYao 14:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Not that much into coffee, i am more of a tea guy myself. About the issues you brought in... danger levels are something so trivial, and can be edited by anyone. Even if he did acted in bad faith, there is no reason to punish him for them. If you feel any of the burbs he updated is wrongly rated, be bold and change it back. Unless he furthers this into a edit war conflict, there is no reason to warn anyone on this matter. Now, three sysops have already asked you to talk with the user and get the facts right. Be polite, and you won't be creating a troll. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 15:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

This case becomes moot, the user has been banned as a vandal alt, and the main account escalated to a 24hr ban because of the case below -- boxy ^{talk • i} 04:05 28 March 2008 (BST)

User:Jorm

Jorm (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) For ruling on the current Hagnat case when he does not have the authority to do so. People have been warned in the past for this. Any deviation from this is clearly a double standard and a break in precendent. Pirate dude 01:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

The case had already been ruled on and closed. when When Jorm commented. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 01:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

False, He was the only one to make a ruling. And Hagnat cannot make a ruling because its about him. Pirate dude 02:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Look Here [9] Pirate dude 02:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism, Although The A/VB page is not a place to make a point, Jorm. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism, Jorm was being a sarcastic dick to make a point, it's what he does, and I agree with Conn on this.--Karek^maps?! 02:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Pirate dude

Spamming up the vandal reporting page. User has been around for two weeks, knows the rules and is making the edit intentionally. Clearly bad faith. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Also backseat modding. --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 02:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope, just explaining what I'm sure was a misconception. I'm pretty sure he was refering to the misconduct case. I was refering the vandal case. Misconception cleared up. Pirate dude 02:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

backseat modding is only an punishable act when the user have been asked several times not to do the work of the administration team. If for something, pirate dude should be warned for the joke cas he created against me and jorm. It was a little fun at least... --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Its not a joke case. This is all following precendent. Why do you make precendent if you don't plan on following it? Or do you only follow it when it suits you? Why not just get rid of all the rules and all the precendent if that the way you want to play it. Pirate dude 02:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Spamming the A/VB page with obviously bogus "charges" is bad faith and not to mention, ridiculous. Will be warned as soon as I can quit edit conflicting...Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

This is just like watching a tag team wrestling match I swear! The precent that I am refering to is the misconduct case that just got finish. It was ruled that any edits that do not specifically improve the wiki are bad-faith and therefore agains the rules. Pirate dude 02:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - I doubt you know better but, if you continue to push the point and/or do this kind of thing again I will change this to a ruling of vandalism. This is not the place to make a point.--Karek^maps?! 02:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

this user is a sock Puppet. But I can't remember what other Vandal was based out of the same location. Other Sysops with Checkuser will have to double check. I'm done with this one. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry to dissapoint you but I've never done any kind of theater in my like, let alone something so obsure as a sock puppet theater. I'm really not sure how you would know that either. Nor what location I supposebly perform at. Pirate dude 02:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - But if he continues to spam up the A/VB now that he has been notified not to do so, I will happily rule vandalism next time.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 14:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Nobody ever unwarned me... Pirate dude 02:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Consider yourself unwarned, but warned that a warning will result if you ignore this warning ;) -- boxy ^{talk • i} 03:18 28 March 2008 (BST)

User:hagnat

hagnat (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) How does saying thank you on a wiki talk page in any way improve the wiki? Obviously bad faith, since precendent has been set. As per the rules, people are only allowed to make edits that improve the information on the wiki and this does nothing of the sort. In fact, his ENTIRE talk page is FILLED with edits that don't specifically improve the wiki. He really needs to just be pushed up to permaban status because of all the nonconstructive, bad-faith edits. Here is the edit in question[[10]] Pirate dude 01:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

You make me want to cut myself. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 01:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

So, hum... you could've pointed to the page i ask Krazy Monkey to drop dead for grammar patrolling me... that sound a little more bad-faith than thanking him for it --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Both are equally bad faith. Neither attempt to improve the wiki. As per the new precent, any edit that does not attempt to improve the wiki is bad faith. There are no shades of gray. Pirate dude 01:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Well.. i did said there is no gray faith, but i never said anything about the other colors in the rainbow ;) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion moved to talk page -- boxy ^{talk • i} 08:59 27 March 2008 (BST)

Not VANDALISM And considering the reporters edit history, sheesh. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Just the person I would expect to rule on such a case. Always coming to Hagnat's rescue aren't ya? Totally profesional and appropriate. Pirate dude 02:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Then how about this. Not Vandalism, don't disrupt the wiki to make a point, people have been punished with vandal escalation for purposely filing cases they know aren't valid to make a point, it's a waste of our time, your time, and everyone else who reads this page's time.--Karek^maps?! 02:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

A third Not Vandalism, don't disrupt the wiki to make a point.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 14:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Timmydatim, User:Timmydatim2!

I have banned these users in accordance with the guidelines. Claims to be tomer if anyone wants to bother. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 17:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I just spent 5 minutes typing the report out on this guy before you conflicted me, git!

Let's see:

Editing a group page without being a member of a group and again and again.

Deliberately adding false information to a community page and again and again and again.

Seven edits, all vandalism.

Perma please. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I got him, no worries. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 17:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I know that, you conflicted me, so after so much work I just C+Ped it. Cheers though. --

.

. <== DDR Approved Editor 17:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Saromu

Repeatitively reverting edits made in "greater ridleybank" to red just because he "feels" it should be red. His actions have provoked edit wars on 2 suburb/danger level pages (ridleybank and standbury village) so far. The man 08:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Did you ever consider arbitration? No, of course you didn't. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 08:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Arbies. Stop spamming A/VB with edit conflicts. This is for vandalism, not edit conflicts. Same goes for the start of the case below too. If you want pages protected because of edit wars, go to the protections page -- boxy ^{talk • i} 08:32 26 March 2008 (BST)

Arbies = Bureaucracy. I hate bureacracy, hence I refuse to start a case there when it can be resolved over here much more quickly. As a responsible wikizen I will continue to report anything I view as vandalism, its your choise whether you wish to consider it an act of vandalism or not. The man 10:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism - It's an edit conflict regarding danger levels on the suburb map. I don't see how this comes under a bad faith edit. Take it to Arbitration if you realy want somehting done about it, and remember, try to sort things out with the user in question before resorting to vandal banning or arbitration. Not many people remember to do that, and consequently cause a lot of problems and drama.--Seventythree^Talk 10:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

You mean, you'd rather just spam the system until you finally get them banned rather than actually having to, *gasp*, present actual arguments. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 10:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Sonny Corleone is in Ridleybank. I know what is very dangerous. Just the other day I opened a building that was QS and attacked the guy inside, he later died of AIDS, but that's a different story. The man has no idea what he's talking about and should stop trying to control the media. Power to the people! Down with The Man! --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 01:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Sergeant Hastings

Changing Ridleybank and Dakerstown to Safe. [11][12][13]

--WanYao 06:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

He did it again. To my valid edit. [14]. Ridley is not Moderate. It's a Ghost Town, technically; borderline Very Dangerous, maybe, but arguably. And he knows it. --WanYao 06:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Oooooooh noooez, now Ridley is safe!!! [15]... --WanYao 06:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Ridleybank has been protected as it was already subject to an edit war. I've also asked another user to check it out too through IRC so as to give a sort of verification of your information and settle the already active dispute or at least allow it to be begun to be settled. I'll give a ruling in a bit, once I've had more time to look at his involvement, if someone else hasn't already.--Karek^maps?! 06:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Now actively posting crap to the News. [16] This actually the 2nd POV edit I deleted. Please protect the Ridley wiki. Thanks. --WanYao 07:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Here is the other one. I need to go to sleep, not chase vandals. ciao. --WanYao 07:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I've given him a temp ban(2h) for active impersonation(he's signing as nonexistant users and has, at least once, signed as an existing user see the diff above), I'm also ruling Vandalism on the edits because of the manner they were done, the Ridleybank one was involved in a current and active Edit War including his edits before my protection of the page.--Karek^maps?! 07:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I thought Karek had ruled on this, and warned the bloke, but I can't find the vandal data entry. Anyway I agree, and further, Sergeant Hastings is an alt account of Sgthastings. This alt will be permabanned, and the main one escalated to a 24hr ban -- boxy ^{talk • i} 03:55 28 March 2008 (BST)

I did, I just didn't get to the A/VD stuffs and now it's unimportant.--Karek^maps?! 17:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Headshot Hal

This user has 48h to change his signature or be warned for vandalism. Signatures MUST point to its user page and/or its user talk page. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 00:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Dumb, just tell him on his talk page, resolve it outside of A/VB.--Karek^maps?! 01:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

We both did, a while ago. You know what his response was? To turn his blank sig into a sig thats just a picture of the eye roll smiley. It's officially vandalism to have your sig like that, he knows it, and now he's being punished for it. If I wasn't so conceited and vain and all those fancy "self-liking" words, I'd remove everything from mine to prove a point, but alas, I like seeing my name in odd, random places. :D -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

It does not help that you didn't link him to the policy as that is easily misinterpreted as it needs to be a visible sig that shows the replies are by the same person, not something that shows who that person is, and as he is on strike it's very doubtful he got anything past your first comment. However I have not and have no intention of ruling myself.--Karek^maps?! 06:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

....Damn it. I knew I had a link to the policy in my clipboard for something....-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 13:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

He has changed his sig now, anyways... -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 16:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I changed it, unless he changed it after.--Karek^maps?! 02:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Saisfun

Changing the entire top row of the suburb map to safe. Pretty sure it was intential just to peeve everyone off. Took me 10 minutes to revert it all because my computer's being a right bastard tonight. -- C h e e s e 00:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Permabanned via the 3 edit Vandalism rule. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 00:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

And once more the just are brought to injustice. Illusionist 01:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Private Mendoza

Page clearing of Columbine Kids.-- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't appear to have any affliction with the group whatsoever so Vandalism and warned as a result. You can warn him you know Gnome. :) -- C h e e s e 22:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I know. I'd rather have someone double check it, just in case. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 23:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

No probs. :) -- C h e e s e 23:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Godhusband

Perma'ed for vandalism against the MIC, The Dead and the Channel 9 (and it's talk page). --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 14:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Cymoro

Impersonation and another. He has done nothing but troll, there is not a single contributive edit. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

vandalism. You can warn him --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I, and others have talked to him. It is an account used only for trolling and vandalism, I don't see the point in a warning. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

why wasnt he brought to A/VB before ? anyway, looking at his contributions i can't help but agree with a perma. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll take it. Permabanned Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 23:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

User:CunntLikka

I think you can guess my concern without me pointing it out. If this is allowed, it shouldn't be. And if thats not enough his one edit probably should be...--x o x o 11:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the user, ~~but the proxy he used has been permabanned.~~ (my initial IP search misidentified the IP as a proxy out of Amsterdam. Unblocked until determination on name can be made) I don't have the time at the moment to research whether offensive names are inherently bannable or not. I think so but I'm not absolutely sure. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 14:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

BT Internet is a proxy site now? It looks more like a SomethingAwful user to me, lord knows they hate you.--Karek^maps?! 14:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh forgot a ruling, I don't like the name, I wish we could block certain names(specifically racial slurs), but I'm pretty sure we can't without attempting to create a civility policy out of thin air. The only time I can see banning a user for a name under the current policies and rules is in the case where the name itself is an attempt at impersonation(see Keven). Not Vandalism--Karek^maps?! 15:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Incorect. There is something metioned in the TOS but I can't go digging right now. No its not vandalism, probably untrue but still not vandalism. And what the hell does the possibility of this user being from SA have to do with anything? Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 15:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

It's simply to put the name being chosen into context, they bash you a bit over there from what I've seen and I know a lot of them dislike DHPD because they're "leaders" tell them to. It's also because of the assumption of it being a proxy, I was covering why they might chose a name and not be another user hiding behind a proxy(although CheckUser does/did that).--Karek^maps?! 15:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Hold on to your hemeroids... Per these guidelines I am using my good faith judgment. Since the UD wiki does not have a policy regarding inappropriate or disruptive user names, I consulted the primary Wiki documents that does have a policy here. The Name, but not the IP will be blocked. And I will do the same to any account until the community passes a policy that says different. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 23:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Flipping

Blanked a X:00 redirect and replaced it with his own group page. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 17:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm...this is confuddling. He claims on the talk page that his group is new and called 20:00. Yet, the content of the page is exactly the same as Evil Avatar. Ask him on his page to get him to come here and explain his actions. -- C h e e s e 18:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hang on. :O Checkuser says it's kooks. Wtf? -- C h e e s e 18:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

AOL? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 18:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe...I know Kooks from IRC (he was in the Randoms for a while) but can't remember him saying anything about using AOL. I'll check the forums. -- C h e e s e 18:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Tis kooks but shhhush it is my other alt. And yeah I'm borrowing the code from EA :P . My new group is gonna be called 20:00 so I think its fair enough I have 20:00 or we could create a disambigation page, I'm not fussed. --Flipping 18:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Erm...I think a disambig page would be best. One page redirecting to X:00 and the other to 20:00 (Group) or similar. Either way, Not Vandalism. -- C h e e s e 18:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Jordan Salafack

For the JR Streets vandalism. Linky. Add his escalation from that case.--Karek^maps?! 04:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Its none of my business, but I would like to mention that he has already been reported for vandalism for creating those sock puppet. In fact the report is a few reports below this one and that the edit he made as JR streets2 in the link you provided cannot possibly count as further vandalism since all he was doing was explaining his actions and apologizing and because he already got punished. On a different note, karek, just because he has a sense of humor and you don't have one, this does not give you any excuse to go cyberbulling him. The man 17:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Wait, hold on, am I misunderstanding something here? Are you telling me that Jordan is NOT JS streets? If that is the case I retract my previous comment. The man 20:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

He is JR streets and JR streets 2. Dunno what this reports for though. I'll wait for Karek to explain more. -- C h e e s e 20:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

It's escalating him for his first piece of vandalism, the JR Streets one, something that should have been done as soon as you verified that he was JR Streets and that only someone who tested the password can justifiably do.--Karek^maps?! 01:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

If Jodan Salafack is JR Streets, then feel free to escalate. The Gnome has no mercy for these things. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 01:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

If Jordan is Streets, then you might want to get him for this as well, seeing that he signed the petition to unban himself. Unless, that is legally allowed. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 01:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

If I may interject - the petition was not a valid policy vote in the first place. --Funt Solo ^QT

09:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed and I'm not suggesting an escalation for that, aside from Funt's point it's his main account, he didn't vote with a sockpuppet there.--Karek^maps?! 09:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

This still needs doing.--Karek^maps?! 17:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Your mom still needs doing! ZING!

» JS talk contribs » 04:25, 31 March 2008 (BST)

~~Warning~~ for sock puppet vandalism -- boxy ^{talk • i} 00:06 2 April 2008 (BST)

No, wait a minute. He can't be warned for impersonating this guy, if he was his own sockpuppet. Karek, you've already warned him for this mess, that is enough. Vandalism, but he's already been dealt with -- boxy ^{talk • i} 00:10 2 April 2008 (BST)

Just to clarify, he did create a sockpuppet for vandalism, which was banned, and then he created another that got done for impersonating the first (when it was the same guy). His warning for impersonation should really be struck, and a new one added... but meh, it all evens out -- boxy ^{talk • i} 00:14 2 April 2008 (BST)

User:A jester

Vandalizing Mr. Burgundy's user page. --Druuuuu ^OcTRR 00:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Permabanned: As the user is also responsible for This this this this and this with no discernible contributive edits. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 04:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

User:TerminalFailure

Continues to ignore the arbitration ruling (here) and the VB case below by expanding the heading on his Talk Page to this. He's as stubborn as a deaf and blind donkey. -- C h e e s e 21:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I like how Sonny is my minion--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 22:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Con got him. 1 Week Ban. -- C h e e s e 22:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

More like "as retarded as a deaf and blind jackass"--/~Rakuen~\^Talk

I Still Love Grim 23:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Banned Indeed... Now can I be a minion? sheesh It don't take much to follow an Arby ruling. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 22:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm gonna add Akule's template to my page now. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 22:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

And how, may I ask, did my actions violate the piece of trash that was Anime Suck's ruling? --TerminalFailure 15:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

You are still in violation of them, as you still have libelous remarks against Sonny on your userpage, and talkpage, plus the fact that you have not made an apology and don't try to say that what you put on your page is an apology. Like Conndraka said, it's not hard to follow an arbitration.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 18:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

No matter how much of an arse TF has been Arbies has never had the power to enforce an appology... thats not what its for and not what it should be for!--Honestmistake 20:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

So you are saying that someone should never have to come out and say they were wrong for spreading lies and trying to besmirch a player's reputation by making false accusions such as calling them a zerger? Aside from that fact. He STILL hasn't removed the libelous stuff from his userpage and talkpage.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 20:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Goon13

This is Vandalism, no? --Seventythree^Talk 15:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it is Vandalism. It's an intentional Bad Faith Edit. However, it is a community talk page so I'd like opinions of other Sysops please as I'm not 100% sure if it can be ruled as such (see previous case against this user below which involved a bad faith edit on the same talk page) -- C h e e s e 18:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Ain't this fun... You see, I'm going with Vandalism too, the guy deleted an entire talkpage. But as I reported on it, and I'm pretty new to this, I'm not taking any definate action--Seventythree^Talk 21:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

You need a Spell checker too. :P Go to the Mozilla Add ons site, there's a few good ones on there for Firefox. That's why my spelling is always so ace now. -- C h e e s e 21:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes it's vandalism. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 21:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

That's 3 yes's. Anyone else want to give their opinion? -- C h e e s e 22:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

vandalism In thought, word and deed. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 22:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned for blanking the SGP Talk Page. -- C h e e s e 22:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Rogue Sergeant

Rogue Sergeant (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Aren't malicious links as part of those fake "You have new messages" messages against the rules? --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 07:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

If it's on the user page, I believe that it's ok. Poor form but not vandalism. I'd like to see these annoying logout links banned from the wiki, though. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 15:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Goon13

Warned for vandalism. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I await your Misconduct case with great anticipation. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 07:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - People can say whatever they like on a talk page so long as it doesnt breach an arb ruling, existing policies, and isnt impersonation. This is blatant censorship. Im removing the warning and reporting you for misconduct. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 09:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism - Bad faith edit in no way expressing an opinion or contributing to the Wiki. Only purpose is for flame baiting. -- C h e e s e 22:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism-As Grim--Karek^maps?! 03:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Not contributive. Putting my official statement here just to make sure everybody is clear. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 05:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe not that edit so specifically, but he's been spamming insults on various talk pages. Users already get warned for spamming talk pages, regardless if it is an insult or not. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 05:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

And we have very set in stone type rules as to when a user can be warned for that, it involves the number 20.--Karek^maps?! 05:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't give a crap if it hit 'teh magik 20'. Although I agree that the edit is not contributive, it's really just poor form and not vandalism. That said, I would be inclined to warn users who spam that crap on talk pages, like this user. Who here enjoys seeing "Gay gay gay This is a stupid faggot pubbie idea" everytime you look at a community talk page? -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 16:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The "magik 20" is simply a guideline to give an obvious example of what is meant by spamming, specifically it's not about the content but the sheer amount.--Karek^maps?! 07:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

User:TerminalFailure

Was given 24 hours to remove on flamebaiting jabs against Sonny from his userpage and talkpage, as per this this section of the ruling in Sonny vs TF to which he has not only refused to do so on my talk page he has expanded on the personal insults. --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 05:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Per Ruling... Damn it. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 05:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Can we expect a case against Sonny for likewise ignoring this stupid ruling? His flamebaiting still remains http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Saromu#TerminalFailure_is_a_Faggery_Daggery_Doodoo_Head and yet i see no pending vandal case. --Honestmistake 10:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, that should have been removed, certainly, but there is a difference between leaving a header up that was there before the case, and actualy changing a header to be more insulting after the case. According to this, however, it should have been moved. I don't know, it's a little too ridden with drama for me to want to rule anything, but there might be a case. I guess it would depend on how long he should reasonably be given to move it.. --Seventythree^Talk 16:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I baleeted it. I was going to do it earlier today but I didn't get the chance to before I went to work. I don't want it on my archive page as it'll still be there as flamebait. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 02:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Jordan Salafack

Created sockpuppet account User:JR streets2 and used it on Policy Discussion to impersonate banned vandal User:JR streets.- Vantar 00:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

You IP checked him, no? -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 00:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

You can see that yourself instead of having to ask him. And yes, they are the same user Vandalism, warned, permabanning puppet as it exists soley for vandalism.--Karek^maps?! 00:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

User:JR streets2

Sockpuppet controled by User:Jordan Salafack see above case. I have given this account a tempoary 2 hour ban as perminted in the guidlines. - Vantar 00:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Perma'd - all edits are impersonation unless Jordan wants to admit to being JR Streets so we can punish him for that too.--Karek^maps?! 00:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

He must be. He gave the correct password to the account which I checked myself. -- C h e e s e 15:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Where did he provide this information?--Karek^maps?! 04:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

On the Talk Page of the Petition. I removed the password from the page after though. Stop someone going in changing it. -- C h e e s e 12:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC) EDIT: Edit is this one [17] -- C h e e s e 12:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Krazy Monkey

This isn't about faith, it's about him editing another users Signature and thus impersonation, [18] Yes TerminalFailure is being a dick but, he chose to to be a dick, which is still allowed on this wiki. Changing the signature completely changes at least a portion of Terminal's message.--Karek^maps?! 02:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism Terminal's Sig was obviously a bit of flamebaiting that doesn't need to be in an arby presentation, and I would lay odds that sig is not the default from his account creation since the first bit isn't altered. It's only impersonation if the edit creates a situation to where the actual signer of the post is obscured, this was to 1. eliminate the bait and 2. clarify the sig. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 02:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Furthermore Cheeseman/Krazymonky even notified Terminal of the edit to the sig on his talk page, obviously not a bad faith edit. And Sonny, the comment below this one doesn't help matters much man. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 03:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

TerminalFailure being a dick?! That's unpossible! --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 02:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

That's crap and you know it Conndraka, there is nothing positive that can come from changing his sig beyond changing his sig. He's signed the same elsewhere before and the whole post is "bait" all Krazy Monkey did was change the sig, which doesn't clarify anything because it's in the section entitled "TERMINALFAILURE". It's impersonation if the edit changes what the original author said, their message, this one does. It's also impersonation if I went to every time Krazy Monkey signed as Cheeseman and changed it because I think it's a dumb moniker, this is not different, it's forced civilty, which has been shot down in policy many times before.--Karek^maps?! 03:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Furthermore because he wants to diffuse and argument isn't good faith or justification for the action.--Karek^maps?! 03:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I havn't got time to argue this, but this should be vandalism. FFS, don't go around changing little things like that. He's being dick, yeah, but he's in an argument with another dick (sorry sonny, but you can be "at times"). Let them go for it, and let the case be settled by the arbitrator. He won't help his chances, being a jerk like that. Cheeseman, you are a sysop, not a moderator. Step very carefully, being a sysop doesn't give you any more power to change other people's posts than you had before. Anyone here can change others posts, but they'd better be prepared to justify it -- boxy ^{talk • i} 03:27 18 March 2008 (BST)

I am a dick. I know that. Tell me something I didn't know. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 03:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Sorry, but I don't see how removing an insult is vandalism, or bad faith for that matter. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 03:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Because insults are allowed... shit for brains ;) -- boxy ^{talk • i} 03:31 18 March 2008 (BST)

But is it baid faith? This, surely isn't, still an edit to my sig which I didn't say "go ahead" (although I would've). Perhaps not the same thing as this, but both are edits to sigs that are clearly not bad faith, so I assume good faith. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 03:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Your sig was making the wiki hard to read, something I doubt you intended. Terminal obviously intended his, and it inconvenienced no one -- boxy ^{talk • i} 03:48 18 March 2008 (BST)

I for one view this as an outragee by one of Saromu's thugs. Please undo it, Cheeseman. I will stop doing that but it's the principle of the thing. TerminalFailure 03:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I can has thugs? --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 03:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I did not intend it :). What about this? Removing insults here. Same thing here, except edits to the comments. Not something I would call bad faith. I could really go on with these links, you know.
-- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 04:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Matthew occasionally uses a computer (work or something) that edits out "inappropriate" words and phrases. I'd guess this was one of these times. He edited the suggestion to fix the date, and the computer automatically "fixed" the swearing and funnily enough "kill them" phrase. I've had a go at him a couple of times about it, and he's even been reported here for it as well -- boxy ^{talk • i} 04:14 18 March 2008 (BST)

There's a few differences Gnome, the biggest one being in the example of your sig is that your sig was actually breaking pages and covering up portions of text on lines before or after it, in the edit of Terminal's sig it was censorship done with knowledge and on purpose.--Karek^maps?! 04:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism - As boxy. Impersonation is not subject to good faith/bad faith judgements and never has been. If a person wants to sign their post, so long as they arent pretending to be someone else or breaking the wiki, its their own business. No one has the right to change that. Both Conna and AHLG are extremely inept when it comes to A/VB, and this mess just highlights thier ineptitude. Blame karek for calling me back for this one. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 04:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and discussion moved to talk. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 04:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Right, I've been sleeping for the past 10 hours so I think it's probably best I come and make my case. 1) I edited the signature because in my opinion it would just make things worse and just infuriate things further. 2) If you look closely at the edit history, in some places ([19]) you will see that it's not his signature. He had it as the usual Terminal Failure one when he posted and then went back and changed it to something involving Saromu which, again, in my opinion is taking things way to far. 3) I accept that changing his sig can be viewed as Impersonation but I'm going to argue against that. In most of the posts he used that signature (for example [20]) he was not referring to Sarmou/Sonny at all. Therefore, I did not "change his message" as Karek put it, because a) The message wasn't there to begin with, he edited it to say that, and b) Even then, his sig had nothing to do with the message he was posting. 4) Another way I argue against Impersonation is that I did not change the context or content of his post or changing any major part of his sig, i.e changing the link to redirect to another user. That would be impersonation. All I did, was remove a rather flamebaiting name and replace it with his real one. I left him a note on his talk page so if he felt he should, he could revert them himself. Oh and one more thing: I for one view this as an outragee by one of Saromu's thugs. I am not one of Saromu's thugs. The only contact I have had with him are a few polite conversations here on the wiki and on Brainstock. I am in no way afflicted with Sonny and I take offense at being called as such. (No offense Sonny) Also: It's also impersonation if I went to every time Krazy Monkey signed as Cheeseman and changed it because I think it's a dumb moniker The reason I use Cheeseman as a signature is because that is what I'm known as in-game. I created this wiki account way back when I started playing UD and realised I couldn't change my name so I used that as signature. Therefore, there is a very big difference between my sig and his sig. Mine: Identifies that I am Cheeseman from the Randoms. His sig: An Inflammatory statement to try and force a rise from the person he is baiting. Ladies and Gentlemen, I rest my case. -- C h e e s e 10:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

It was me making a point it has nothing to do with what I may or may not think of the moniker Cheeseman, but no, there is no difference between you wanting to be known as Cheeseman and him wanting to be known as SonnySucks other than he's doing it to express his frustrations with Sonny.--Karek^maps?! 20:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism - but punishable only with a soft-warning: Dont do it again. If a user want to be an arse, let him be an arse. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 12:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

User:AAA

AAA (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Headless_gunner&diff=960268&oldid=958249 There may be many things people would like to say to Headless Gunner, but this is not how it should be done. Other ways of saying "happy new year!" would be much more desirable (the day of the edit). Blatant offense and vandalism are shown here, 'Permabanning' or a 'ban' should suffice.

-- Dirk tiggerfinger 18:03 17 March 2008 (GMT)

Interesting...It was Nali who reverted the vandalism, yet didn't report it...hmm...I shall investigate this. -- C h e e s e 18:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Look at AAA's talk page. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I know...how many other times has Nali played unofficial sysop? -- C h e e s e 18:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

It's odd that no one reported this. Looks like a one time vandal. Hasn't been around since Jan 1st, the time that he vandalized. A warning would be useless, anyone disagree?-- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I concur. Looks like CheckUser doesn't go that far back so we can't find out if he's a sockpuppet. -- C h e e s e 18:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Well I say don't bother. A banning would be useless too. I'd rather not get in the habit of punishing someone for something they did months ago, because that's what we'd be doing. It's not like we're stopping him, he hasn't made any edits in months. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I agree. He's probably forgotten about it anyway. Question we need to ask is how many times has Nali reverted vandalism and not reported it? -- C h e e s e 18:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Meh, not a problem. Sometimes intervention from sysops isn't necessary. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair point. :P Oh, we need a ruling. Vandalism - Punishment is being ignored until the end of the wiki, existing only in the March Archive of the Vandal Banning page and in the History of Headless Gunner's User and Talk pages. Rest in Peace, Vandal n00b. -- C h e e s e 18:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

It either is or isn't vandalism, if it is you can't choose to avoid escalations. Just give him a warning on his talk page(as it seems a permaban is not needed).--Karek^maps?! 04:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

User:JR streets

Vandalism - Three edits, all vandalism. Therefore its a nice loverly Permanbanning for him. :) -- C h e e s e 15:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Moved to talk page Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Dedling

Editing a group page without being a member of that group. -- Iscariot 01:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - I don't see any bad faith in that so much as a misunderstanding, or rather a few misunderstandings. Specifically it looks like he believes that that profile is still alive(I assume he doesn't know that Class doesn't change to Zombie until you Stand Up), and it looks like he doesn't know he's not suppose to edit group pages.--Karek^maps?! 06:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Have the rules of that section, This area is for official announcements, please refrain from commenting here unless you are a representative of Walk The Earth. been taken into consideration in this ruling? -- Iscariot 16:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't see how that alters anything significantly, it's still just him attempting to comment on the comment.--Karek^maps?! 17:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Horcoff

Blatant vandalism of a group page here. --Pdeq^Talk* 21:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, this and this. --Pdeq^Talk* 21:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism - Warned. -- C h e e s e 21:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Looking through his contributions, there's a few other questionable edits, like this possible impersonation, that could use some closer scrutiny. --Pdeq^Talk* 21:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

From what I can tell, Danny Burke is not a user of the wiki. :S It's quite possible that he tried to make a signature with that displaying rather than his own name, similar to my Cheeseman one. I'll have a bit of digging in his contibs. See what I can find. -- C h e e s e 21:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Jack Neon

Turning into a repetitive nuisance vandal, breaking several rules:

Alteration of the Malton Medical Staff group pages (which he does not belong to and that are not his), resulting in an "Edit War" (link) between 27th December 2007 and 3rd January 2008
Deleting other people's entries on my (Sunil) Talk page (entries that were not his) between 3rd January 2008 and 17th January 2008 (multiple undo/redo revisions - (link))
Spreading mis-information about the Malton Medical Staff (a group to which he does not belong) on the Roftwood suburb page under the "News" section (namely group disbandonment), again, with several repeat entries, beginning 10th March and still continuing.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sunil (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

evidence 1 - removing a header from sunil's talk page
evidence 2 - substing the content of the same header with nonsense
Evidences 3, 4, 5, 6 and http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Roftwood&diff=prev&oldid=1060825 7] - Spreading mis-information about a group he doesnt belong to.

More evidence can be seen in his contributions...

Sunil, you are a great artist, but you seem to lack on wiki skillz. Next time someone vandalize your user/group page, report it ASAP. This is a case that have been happening for almost two months. There is no way a single warning should suffice enough for all the damage this user have done. Vandalism BTW, and i'd appreciate the input of others on how should we punish Jack Neon. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 21:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

(sorry - I'm butting in). I didn't report him earlier because he made small transgressions and I mentally filed them under "n" for "nuisance" (or "j" for "jack ass") and "vandalism" seemed to strong a word, but then he got to be a pain with the news edits and I finally got round to reporting him here. Thanks for the verdict, I wonder if he'll be back..? (he has a habit of doing so, especially in-game).--Sunil 15:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If he does, let us know here striaght away. Its a straight ban if he does. -- C h e e s e 15:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I reckons he deserves at least a week ban for that lot. :S That's a serious vendetta he's got there. -- C h e e s e 21:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Meh, Like I said on IRC, a quick skim through his contribs shows nothing even close to contributive, most all of his edits have been harrassing other users. Just perma him and be done with it, he meets the qualifications.--Karek^maps?! 21:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Agree with perma. And i agree that my english skillz have been deteriorating over the past weeks... just look at what i wrote above, damn... --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Permabanhammered Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 04:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Velo2

Vandalism. The continual vandalism of my page after reverted several times, warned twice, and not stopping. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 19:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I asked him to stop changing the header. If he doesnt stop, then we can assume bad faith. You could end this whole story by simply changing that header, you know ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I try not to say uncle everytime someone tries to bully me. The sysops should adopt that policy too. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 19:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, before I get started I'm gonna say, I don't like this, I don't like any of it, I like what I'm about to do least of all but, I feel it is very much necessary in this case, we can't force you to go to arbitration(although I considered it for a bit) we can't force you to get along and so I'm stuck with this, as I think it's the only practical way to settle this from our position without A/VB being used as a method of personal escalation.

First thing first, there are limits to what can be done in owned pages, Hagnat keeps bringing up the Amazing case but there's a much more recent example of this, and a better one considering that the Amazing case was completely and solely dependent on an Arbitration ruling and that has led to many recommendations on it being revisited. The more recent DCC & Laughing Man cases, however, do show more completely what the current position is on the "sanctity" of owned pages.
- Second, That header does fall under the same kind of harassment as the subpage name, there is no good faith reason for the change and when Velo2 did show he had a problem with it constant revisions were done, the only reason for that is stubbornness.
Changing the header to something that changes the content is borderline vandalism(impersonation) itself.
Users can remove their own contributions to talk pages when it's not a significant discussion. If I were to post on some talk page and decide I didn't want to make the comment it's perfectly fine for me to remove it. Normally I'd say that Velo has left it too long for that but due to it's lack of being replied and that it's being used to personally insult him on the page itself I am in agreement that it just needs to go.

So, here's what I'm gonna do. First things first, I'm going to rule Not Vandalism, it's his header he's allowed to edit it and the parallel of Grim/Hagnat's talk pages is invalid simply because they preserve the original header as a subheader. Second I'm going to personally but in myself, this is not in an administrative role, and I am going to remove the whole section, again, in accordance with Velo2's wishes, if Sonny disagrees I will start an Arbitration case against him but, as far as I am concerned this whole drama's involvement with A/VB is done and at an end. We don't need to be banning people because they don't get along, especially for something so weak and borderline as differing interpretations of the wiki's rules. Especially when that dispute is fueled more by a misunderstanding/disagreement of the Administration of the interpretation of the very same rules.--Karek^maps?! 20:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't his header. He made an edit in my Suggestions at the top of the talk page and messed it al lup so I made a new section with the current header and moved his post there. Not his whatsoever. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 20:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

- Headshot Hal ^Talk 20:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Velo2

Vandalism. Was warned by Conndraka before for the same incident. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 19:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

<hagnat|atwork> ...
<hagnat|atwork> i predict that someone is going to file a vandal report
<hagnat|atwork> against velo2

Wish i had timestamps on this... anyway, Not vandalism. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

According to Conndraka's warning it is. After being told not to do it and doing it again it is considered bad faith. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 19:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

You mean this contested one?--Karek^maps?! 19:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

He got a warning regardless. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 19:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The second warning was removed. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Tselita

RE-ing every Kill and Spam vote up to this point. I can only assume the reason they stopped is because they logged out. -- Iscariot 18:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism... for now. I already asked her to stop doing that. Next time, please talk with the user before reporting someone for something this trivial. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Thekooks

Repetitively reverting any changes made to the danger levels of some north western suburbs to Very Dangerous when they are NOT very dangerous

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:DangerReport/Dunell_Hills&action=history http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:DangerReport/Chudleyton&action=history

I already warned him but he would not listen. I have an alt there who has scouted the two suburbs. In chudleyton found no more than 30 zombies in total and the largest amount of zombies around one block was 5 which were outside caiger. Please ban this moron. The man 17:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Go to Arbitration.--Karek^maps?! 17:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

How is it not vandalism to go around incorrectly changing the danger levels of suburbs as he chooses? The wiki exists to give urbandead players easily accessible information. A while ago someone got reported for changing the danger level of Ridleybank from red to green and he got punished. Seriously, you are just being a shitty hypocrite as usual karek. I demand that a real sysop make a judgment on this case and not some braindead biased moron who can't tell the difference between the word "spam" and "kill". The man 17:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

You can't show bad faith, nor have you attempted to talk it out with him to come to a resolution. He was even nice enough to attempt to start a discussion about it on the User talk:DangerReport/Dunell Hills page and instead you brought it here.--Karek^maps?! 17:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Go to Arbitration. --(Another) Real Sysop 17:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Fine. The man 17:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Dude, I am correcting your mistakes, like when YOU said Dunnel Hills was a Ghost Town when you knew full well it wasn't. Provide the proof in the form of screenshots or Iwitness (which take like 5secs to make). Also for everyone watching, it is not the first time The Man has changed Danger Rating on a whim:http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:The_man#Danger_levels_in_the_NW . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thekooks (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

Not Vandalism The Kooks provided evidence, and its also clear from EMRM and EMRP that there are AT LEAST 60 zombies in the area. The defanitions of Very Dangerous / Dangeroud and Ghost Town overlap a fair bit. It seems clear there are at least 60 zombies in Dunnell Hills- why not wait until its proven to be UNDER 60 to change it tho Ghost Town? In my experience, Ghost Towns are often rather dangerous, so its better to err on that side of things.

Swiers 19:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Like I said: fine. I didn't view kook's acts as vandalism because he reverted my edits but because he was seemingly reverting anyone's edit to the danger level. I thought perhaps that he is just doing so because he likes the color red or something. Also, the stuff on the talk page seems to me to be old since it dates to the 9t or the tenth of march and I made my scout on the 12th. Whatever, I don't really care anymore. I'm moving my alt out of the northwest shortly. The man 22:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of which, it would seem someone has once again changed it to ghost town and with adequate reasons. The man 12:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Saromu

baits others, then claims innocence and tries to get them banned when they respond he's ignored several warnings and I think action is needed when he has refused to see the error of his ways and has been ignoring the rulings of hagnat, among others Evidence More Evidence

TerminalFailure
Not Vandalism as far as I can tell from the "evidence" and I do believe this is a case for Arbitration. Which btw If I remember correctly only has to be asked for by one party (although It would be best if both parties were equal participants) Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 06:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism -- Velo2 vandalised saromu's user page and placed a comment in his talk page, Saromu later moved the comment to an offensive header in his talk page. He was asked already to change it, velo2 removed the whole section from there, but saromu decided to keep the header as is. Saromu could easily change the header to avoid all this drama, but he choose not to. This is as bad faith as DCC current creation of a page with an offensive name towards another user, therefore it's also vandalism. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 12:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism - As Hagnat, this could easily have been avoided by changing the header on his talk page. Therefore, as it is in bad faith, it is classed as vandalism. -- C h e e s e 13:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

You might have a base for that reason, that is if the case of vandalism on Velo2 was ruled not vandalism and closed. As is it's a personality conflict arising from a dispute over user talk page rights and when it's appropriate to remove something from someone else's talk page, a dispute that certain people in the administration have caused to escalate to this point. You can't punish him for the header or reading it when we haven't even been clear whether that was or was not vandalism, it's our mistake and we don't punish users for our mistakes.--Karek^maps?! 16:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Velo2 vandalized my wiki with his first comment, destroying my sections on my two Humorous Suggestions. So I did what anyone else would, I moved it to another section of the talk page under a new header. Hagnat and Grim do the same but sometimes more extreme. If I post on one of their talk pages they will move and change the header I create usually to my name so that they can read it better. I did exactly what they did, moved and made a header. So why isn't Hagnat and Grim put up on vandalism charges? They've done the same thing I did. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 17:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Please sonny, dont take us for fools. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 17:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I am doing no such thing. I didn't do anything elaborate. I did exactly what you do except instead of putting his name I put an insult. You want to argue that I'm not a nice guy, be my guest, but I did not vandalize my own talk page. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 17:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Take it to arbitration and next time have an act of vandalism before brining it here, we aren't the personality police.--Karek^maps?! 16:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Let's get these things finished and done with... I'm with Karek. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 21:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

User:TerminalFailure

Vandalized my talk page again after a sysop ruled that it was my talk page, therefor my rules, with the exception of breaking other rules like impersonation. It was advised that TerminalFailure bring this to Arby's but he refused to because he believes himself to be a wiki vigilante. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 04:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned Another Sysop may need to look at the progression to see if a temp ban is called for. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 06:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

While i disagreed with Conndraka in the other two cases, i agree with this one. Vandalism. Mind your own business, Terminal. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 12:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Just so there's no confusion, definitely vandalism, Terminal, please mind your own business and let Velo mind his.--Karek^maps?! 16:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

24 hour ban applied as per current escalation level.--Karek^maps?! 17:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Velo2

Vandalized my talk page again. Seriously. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n} 03:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah, not involved, blah blah... But I have a question that relates to this case, and would be useful information, I think... Am I allowed to delete my own posts -- and only my own posts -- to someone's Talk page? Or is a case of "once it's on their page, it ain't mine no more"? --WanYao 06:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 06:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism velo2 might not have a clear record, but that doesnt give saromu the right to create such offensive header against him. Saromu was already asked to change this header, but choosed not to. Velo2 has the right to remove such offensive comments towards him --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 12:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Ignoring the header there's no content lost, it's velo's own remark with a simple one word reply from Sonny so, I'd say it's very much his(velo's) prerogative to remove it. Now if there was a bad faith reason, such as he wanted to remove it so it couldn't be subject of a seperate discussion, it might be vandalism but, it was basically just his comment, no prolonged discussion, not even anything but a 1 word reply to it.--Karek^maps?! 16:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Lorddon

Vandalism to the RRF. --Zs L 20:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

meh. It's just a noob. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe, but that's still vandalism of which I'm sure he is aware. Warned.--Karek^maps?! 21:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Axe Hack

Is repeatedly REing other voters and then striking his own REs on this suggestion. I'm not exactly sure this breaches any polices, but I would call it abuse of the system. --H h a l 23:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

It's not the first time a user has made non-Author REs and struck them out themselves. And I'm just doing it because some parts of the votes seem to be directed at me. If you wish for me to pull up another suggestion that has been like this, I'll be happy to pull one up. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 23:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Most of the conversation Moved to Discussion Page - Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 22:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

RULING:If you know you shouldnt reply, and if you did your reply would have been struck. Strucking your own RE as you post it is actually WORSE than replying without strucking the darn thing. Anyway... i am going to follow 73 suggestion and end this sillyness with a silly unofficial warning: DONT DO IT AGAIN, Next time == official warning. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Pirate dude

Humourous suggestion -- boxy ^{talk • i} 08:28 10 March 2008 (BST) 08:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned as a violation of the community voted ruling for purely humorous suggestions in the normal suggestions system. Rule 10 of the Suggestion Creation Guidelines.--Karek^maps?! 10:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Supposed 3PWV alts

The following users have been banned for 24 hours and ~~possibly~~ more than likely require an extension to permaban. Feel free to add/ban them as you find them -- C h e e s e 00:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Thre page wiki vandl
- Thre page wiki vandl (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka obvious alt.
User:Loler skates Noob mod in town
- Loler skates Noob mod in town (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka obvious alt.
User:Like i havent heard that ones before
- Like i havent heard that ones before (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka obvious alt.
User:Im just a noob nothing suspious here
- Im just a noob nothing suspious here (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka, obvious alt made, only edits to it's user and talk pages.
User:A TEMP BAN!?!!? Don't insult me
- A TEMP BAN!?!!? Don't insult me (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka after being permabanned by User:Krazy Monkey(correcting incorrect ban I assume), for 2 edits, commenting on User:This place is getting a little STALE A/VB case and blanking User:Krazy Monkey's user page.
User:Is The Gen or cyberbob still around
- Is The Gen or cyberbob still around (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka, http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning&diff=prev&oldid=1059610 2] edits, commenting on User:This place is getting a little STALE A/VB case and blanking User:Krazy Monkey's user talk page.
User:This place is getting a little STALE
- This place is getting a little STALE (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka for 1, 2, 3 edits, Blanking a locations page, commenting on A/VB case of User:Don't you remeber me!?, and blanking User:Krazy Monkey's talk page
User:Don't you remeber me!?
- Don't you remeber me!? (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Conndraka after being permabanned by User:Krazy Monkey(correcting incorrect ban I assume), for 2 edits, commenting on User:Blargs A/VB case and blanking User:Krazy Monkey's user page.
User:Blargs
- Blargs (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Krazy Monkey for 1 edit, creatimg A/VB case of User:Krazy Monkey under the guise of Xoid, impersonation.
User:Qoiuhdce
- Qoiuhdce (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Krazy Monkey for 1 edit, blanking A/VB cases of #User:Kirayamato and #User:Kira Yamato.
User:Kirayamato
- Kirayamato (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
  - Permabanned by User:Krazy Monkey

I typicaly avoid banning (except for known proxies) but 3pWV alts are an exception. BTW You have full clearance to permaban any IP that is a confirmed proxy, Cheeseman. Its policy from Waaaaaay back. Don't ask me to cite it though. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 03:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I had him stop because of the nature of the edits from those accounts among other things. It was only encouraging the guy to do it more. Also, updated the list with every account involved and action taken. Removed all the extra cases/headers and gave these ones anchor ids.--Karek^maps?! 10:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Kaysakado

Created this humourous suggestion. -- C h e e s e 00:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Where did all the SysOps go? Warned as a violation of the community voted ruling for purely humorous suggestions in the normal suggestions system. Rule 10 of the Suggestion Creation Guidelines.--Karek^maps?! 13:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

And some people say we have too many of you little buggers. Pfft.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 14:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I was about to do it myself. :P The only reason I didn't do it at the time is because I needed sleep and I was working all day for the past two days. -- C h e e s e 14:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Kira Yamato

Wiped The Second Big Bash, for the most part. --Zs L 18:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

More than once, as you can see from the history... [21] [22] [23] Z-Slay3r's reverts were re-reverted to the vandalism. --WanYao 18:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I banned her for 24hr in order to stop the persistent vandalism, and give her time to cool down. --Zs L 18:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I may be guilty of seeing sock-puppets where none exist... but this sure looks like a previously perma'd user who's name shall not be mentioned. I'd checkuser on this one. --Stephen Colbert DFA 21:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I checked, but it appears to be a different person. --Zs L 21:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

What exactly just happened here?--Karek^maps?! 13:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

It's a regulation temporary ban to prevent persistent vandalism, but ZS, please don't record them as vandal escalations on A/VD. Warned, and A/VD updated -- boxy ^{talk • i} 08:17 10 March 2008 (BST)

User:Tomer

Impersonating a person with sysops status. He clearly has no authority to warn anyone. I apologize if this doesn't make too much sense, I'm very exhausted.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 06:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism I think. He's not a sysop (to my knowledge anyway) and pretending to be one is not a very good idea. However, as the next escalation is a 24 hour ban and as I'm not 100% sure whether this is worth it, I'm going to ask that another sysop backs me up on this before he gets banned. -- C h e e s e 00:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't going to rule vandalism here, but he's had more than enough warnings already. 24hr ban -- boxy ^{talk • i} 05:02 8 March 2008 (BST)

User:Sgthastings

serie of edits --~~~~ [talk ] 22:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 22:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Persists. Vandalism to the group image too. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 00:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Second warning then -- boxy ^{talk • i} 10:00 6 March 2008 (BST)

User:Rory2262

Vandalism to the RRF page. --Z. slay3r T 04:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned - And, I know this might seem a little off topic but, Zombie Slay3r, if there is any way you could possibly cut down on the code in your sig it would be nice, there's rather a lot of it and it adds like three lines to the text/code(meaning it's one of the few cases it would be better served in a template).--Karek^maps?! 05:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Iscariot

Impersonation.

Yes, I'm reporting myself 'lest a trenchie do it to spite me. I moved and edited posts by two other users. I leave it to our administration to decide if it warrants punishment. -- Iscariot 02:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't do this again in the future(reporting yourself for something you obviously know you didn't do in bad faith). It's not vandalism but, you might get an escalation for spamming up the Administration pages in the future as this is kinda along the lines of putting deletions up for deletion.--Karek^maps?! 02:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Redturtle

Vandalized a group page. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 23:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned--Karek^maps?! 01:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Jameshyatt2

Well deleting our group page for a start. [[24]] --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 17:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

And they've only blanked our page, out of all the wiki ones. which seem weird, i mean the only banter we've had has been from User:Xela798 and his Sinclair Hotels group. Unless theyre the same person. (Yes I'm paranoid.)--Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 18:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Warned for blanking a group page. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Gunes

Unwanted edits to the Red Rum group page here and here. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 21:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - No bad faith, just ignorance of normal editing procedure. --Karek^maps?! 04:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

User:GreyX1

Has made a series of edits to the Ruddlebank page, deleting the entire News section [25][26] -- apparently in some kind of tantrum over having an inappropriate News post deleted? --WanYao 22:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism - Settle your dispute with him on his talk page, or at the very least try. A check through the page's revision history shows that it was you who removed his post and the only thing that is even slightly close to vandalism looks to be this, everything else looks to be that he is following your precedent, and removing horribly slanted and POV comments at that. Revert the last one and stop by his talk page for a chat or something, VB is the last resort, not the first.--Karek^maps?! 23:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't have a "dispute" with the user ... I merely deleted his post ... Then noticed that he had obliterated the entire News section shortly afterwards. And reported it. I did, however, admittedly presume bad faith... For that, my bad. Also, I reverted to my original edit -- which was before GreyX1's edits -- because even after your "fix", Karek, for whatever reason the page was broken... --WanYao 00:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I meant the edit dispute, if he did do it because of some sort of tantrum then it would probably be best if you approached him and discussed why you removed the addition. I understand coming here but, I'm just saying, a little talking goes a long way towards stopping things like this(something I myself didn't realize for a while, I just assumed it was common sense why it didn't belong, it's not.) --Karek^maps?! 03:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

He's still doing it. Just reverted back another blanking about 2 minutes ago. I'm going to give him an unofficial warning just now to ask him to stop. If he continues, it goes to a proper warning with the boldness around it. -- C h e e s e 22:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Kennyd76

Kennyd was claimed a short time ago for PKing by one of our members, since then he has made complaints on Brainstock, changed his profile to accuse one of us of PKing and now has made edits to our group page along those same lines. Those are the only edits he has made to the wiki aside from a complaint on our talk page. I'm not 100% certain that this is appropriate to file here, but it seems to fall under the vandalism guidelines. --RichterFury 19:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Vandalism to me. Warned for editing a group page he was not a member of. I'll leave it up to the more experienced Sysops to decide if this falls under the "3 edits, you're out" policy. -- C h e e s e 19:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AE.N.D.&diff=1046469&oldid=983332 this edit seems to be constructive. Actually, it is fairly well established that you can edit the grammer of any page, which is what he did....I don't think this merits a warning?...--Thekooks 21:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't a Grammar change. It was changing bits of the page in revenge for his PKing. Which was done without permission of the group which is therefore Vandalism. -- C h e e s e 21:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh sorry, of course you are right. Never mind I got confused...I got it in my head that it already said GlenB PKER and he only changed it to GlenB is a Pker....I'll stay off the admin pages now...tis probably for the best :P--Thekooks 21:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It's cool. :P I'm having fun with all the new buttons I get to play with. -- C h e e s e 21:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It's a personal dispute that has obviously been handled badly, It's barely even worth a warning, just revert it and tell him that doing that may be considered vandalism in the future. Attempt to resolve the issue.--Karek^maps?! 22:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

User:DCC

Recreated this page which was deleted down in the Laughing Man case. I've redeleted it as a Crit 6 but since this case involves me directly I can't rule. Any takers? -- C h e e s e 17:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You are a 2 faced lying son of a bitch.

~~Considering the page doesn't exist, it really doesn't bother me that much to be honest. :D -- C h e e s e 22:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)~~ Ok, maybe it does. But I'm not going to throw a tantrum over it. :P Much better things to with my time to be honest. -- C h e e s e 22:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm so glad I got to see your true colors, Cheesedick.--DCC 22:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I deleted it, not because of the content, but because it was deletion workaround. Which is not allowed. You want to restore the page, go to Undeletions. -- C h e e s e 23:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

But no go ahead and make your own ruling and carry out the punishment because that's what all of you fuckhead mods do. Ask Karek! Also, that page shouldn't have been deleted in the first place because users are allowed to create information pages for their own use. Just ask Conndoucha or whatever. This precedent has been set by him. --DCC 22:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not going to do a ruling myself. Don't care what precedent has been set, I quite happy to wait. :) -- C h e e s e 23:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

That page hardly exists for informational purposes, the reason it was made was obviously bad faith, the reason you brought it back was obviously to harass another user through exploiting owned pages(i.e. bad faith abuse of the wiki guidelines). However, be glad, for I will not rule on this case. I am inclinded to say you should be removed from the community due to your constant harassing of the user base for no other reason than to stir up shit and yet I believe that's more than enough reason for why I shouldn't rule on something I consider a somewhat weak case for a 48 hour band(that's where your at in VB escalations btw, 48 hours, and somehow you managed to reach that in less than two weeks when most users can't do that in 2 months.)--Karek^maps?! 23:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Not, because it states: "Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions." <-- What that said. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 23:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

That may be relevant, AHGL, if the page wasn't ruled as vandalism in the first place. That page, titled "Cheeseman is a bloody cum filled fuck pocket that needs a Ginsu enema", is purely bad faith. Polite warning my arse -- boxy ^{talk • i} 11:35 3 March 2008 (BST)

Aye. Vandalism on me eyes. But as karek, i believe it's better me not rule on this, as i already said i would love to see him gone. (and he quote this line in his talk page... hurr) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 11:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I was treating it more as a "you can say pretty much whatever you want on your user page." Putting "Cheeseman is a bloody cum filled fuck pocket that needs a Ginsu enema" on my userpage isn't all that different, is it? I think he was being more of an idiot, than pure bad faith. That said, there certainly isn't exactly all that much good faith either, so I'll agree with your ruling.-- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 18:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Saying it on your user page is one thing, making a page entirely dedicated to it, using such explicit language in the title, is quite another. Making a page title that includes says that someone should be stabbed in the arse? For fucks sake. We put up with a heap on user pages, we don't need recent changes spammed with edits to a page like that, thanks very much. Yes, he was being an idiot, pushing boundaries as far as he could to deliberately piss people off, and he did so in a totally inappropriate manner. He knew that page was considered vandalism because he had already contributed to the vandal banning case where it was discussed before (down below) -- boxy ^{talk • i} 08:15 4 March 2008 (BST)

48 hour ban, which is the next escalation -- boxy ^{talk • i} 12:09 3 March 2008 (BST)

discussion moved to talk page

User:Qwerzt

Warned for vandalising the Communist Party of Malton page: here and here. Only made these two edits, so doesn't come under the 3 edit ban rule. However, I'm about to check IPs to see if it is a vandal alt of anyone here. -- C h e e s e 17:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit- Nothing in Checkuser. Can ah banz him? :P -- C h e e s e 17:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No, you can not.--Karek^maps?! 22:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok. :P -- C h e e s e 23:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Snuffleupagus

for spamming up about a dozen user pages (so far) with things like this [makes furnace noises] S-s-s-s-S-s-s-s... [scares Scotw out of bed] --Scotw 18:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I've blocked it for now as he is actively doing those. It's only temporary though while what to do is decided/looked into.--Karek^maps?! 18:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Upgrading to permanent ban as per precedent, here.--Karek^maps?! 18:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:56, 2 April 2008 (view source) Karek (talk \| contribs) m (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2008 03": A/G#Scheduled_Protections [edit=sysop:move=sysop])	Latest revision as of 03:00, 24 September 2014 (view source) Aichon (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
(No difference)

UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2008 03: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 03:00, 24 September 2014

March 2008

User:Timmydatim, User:Timmydatim2!

Supposed 3PWV alts

Navigation menu

Search