UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06

Shortcut:
A/D

This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Deletion Requests

All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie [[:Category:Category]] and [[:Image:Image.jpg]]).
• A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.

Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.

Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, go to UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.

Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Speedy Deletion Eligibility

To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:

1. No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
2. Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
3. Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
4. Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
5. Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)

   As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.

6. Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
7. Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
8. User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
9. Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.

   As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.

10. Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
11. Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.

    As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.

12. Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.

    As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.

13. Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).

A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.

Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests

• One vote per user.
• Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
• There are four vote types:
  • Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
  • Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.

• The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
• At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
• If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
• If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.

Deletion Queue

The Southern Cross Club

Just J3D making yet another wiki "group" to annoy people who have no interest in being in it -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  07:09, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   Delete - I don't like being in any group with the SC in its title. Oh, and otherwise as Boxy. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 07:33, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   Yet you have no problem making racist remarks about historical cultures, interesting.--xoxo 06:20, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   Look up the word in question on an online dictionary. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:28, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   I'm not saying that i don't understand what you mean, more that it is politically incorrect and derogatory. It would be similar to me calling you a jew because you wouldn't split the cab bill. --xoxo 13:12, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   It's now not in my interest to vote delete. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:28, 18 October 2009 (BST)

3. Delete--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 09:27, 17 October 2009 (BST)
4. Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:33, 17 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete--Teln 17:14, 17 October 2009 (BST)
6. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 17:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
7. Keep - you guys are no fun.--xoxo 06:20, 18 October 2009 (BST)
8. Delete .... and you're not funny --WanYao 06:47, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   jealous northerners....xoxo 09:19, 18 October 2009 (BST)

9. DelKeep!--Nallan (Talk) 10:49, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   Every user who was on the list and has expressed any remark that could be construed as dissatisfaction about beingon the listhas been removed, thus i see no validity for this case. I will make a header on the talk page so anyone else wishing to be removed can clearlyand publically request it. So unless i'm mistaken, this case is now entirely irrelevant. And to think some of you used to think i was too hasty with jumping to admin pages to solve issues...--xoxo 09:23, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   You only fight to the death when it directly involves 2 cool, methinks. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:28, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   MMmmm maybe ALiM. Sometimes you've gotta concede ground to make ground. read the art ofwar, you'll enjoy it.xoxo 09:44, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   I AM the art of war, bitch. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   You forgot the L and the i, also gimme ideas to get my edits up...--xoxo 10:09, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   2 late 2 act all conciliatory now, mate. You've still got your fan club page to have your arbies fun with, keep it there -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:16 18 October 2009 (BST)

   I disagree. Your name is off which you said was all you wanted. You could tell me what you actually want if youwish to continue with this case.xoxo 10:19, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   Who cares if your name is on a list like that, I mean seriously I find 2 Cools antics gayer than 80% of boxys hard drive but its not under the 2 Cool namespace so why not have a bit of fun with it?--CyberRead240 10:23, 18 October 2009 (BST)

   Fucking hell when will you peoplelearn its spelled antix!!!xoxo 10:25, 18 October 2009 (BST)

10. Keep - Okay, so... it's a list of users from australia. Not very interesting. But the reaction to the list is entertaining and worth preserving. Also, what sexylegsread said.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 11:22, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    It's a cultural thing, you wouldn't understand. Some Australians would claim it is like grouping all the German users under a "Swastika Club". --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:41, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    The Swastika is banned in Germany, the Southern Cross is on your national flag.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:44, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    And yet a rag tag group of fucktards decide to use it as a symbol for beating up anyone who isn't white and who can't do a hang-ten. Think the "Swastika Club" analogy but in the 20's. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:48, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    You're using an extreme example, the 'normal' cross is still used by Christian humanitarians even though it had a connection to and was used by the KKK. Given that the Southern Cross also appears in both the Aussie and Brazilian national anthems I feel you're using a pretty weak argument by assigning the significance to this fringe minority rather than the mainstream use. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:53, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    Do you use the union jack in everyday use Iscariot? On tattoos and car windows and the like? This is practically the only message the symbol carries nowadays. As I said, you wouldn't understand. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:56, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    And in relation to the nazi analogy, you are right, it is much too extreme but I was going for notoriety and meaning in terms of an example. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:00, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    I'm trying to get across that those of us in the rest of the world certainly don't see it the way you seem to. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:02, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    Naturally. But the rest of the world aren't the ones 'targeted' here. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    DDR, you are a massive fucking idiot. Shut the fuck up with your ignorant reactionary bullshit. Cyberbob  Talk  12:31, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    QQ, Reactionary my dickhole, mr "speedy delete for no reason other than teh butthurt" --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:18, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    hm yes a speedy delete request on a shitty and insignificant wiki is certainly equivalent to equating the southern cross with the swastika. The only place where it has come up as a racist thing in Australia has been in Sydney and its surrounds, you fucking tool. I'm sorry that you live in a racist shithole but the racist connotations of the SC are purely restricted to your area. Cyberbob  Talk  13:22, 18 October 2009 (BST)

11. Delete - If and only if DDR's stance on it is actually the majority stance in Australia. Though in my time there I never once heard of anyone considering a symbol of hatred, and it's pretty much the only symbol of Australia (other than kangaroos and those silly corks-on-strings hats) that the majority of the world would recognise at a glance. 12:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    DDR has no fucking clue. Ignore him. Cyberbob  Talk  12:30, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    Fucking hell i have no idea where ddr pulled that shit. It's called the southern cross club because WE"RE ALL FROM TEH SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE. JUst so y'all know hagnat thought up the name a few months back in irc...he's not even from australia and wouldn't be aware of all the racism that is associated with it (oh wait, there isn't any!) DDR where do you pull this shite>?xoxo 13:20, 18 October 2009 (BST)

ZombieLockSystem Maybe?

Right, of the 1500 orphaned pages, this is the last one. Not really sure where it fits, this seems a good as place as any to ask? Where should it be linked from, or should it just be deleted? Cheers. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:52, 11 October 2009 (BST)

1. Keep It's already listed as a humor page, and I found it amusing.--Teln 03:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)
2. Keep This page seems to be the perfect place for it to be linked to. Or at least the archive. It need not be deleted.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:24, 11 October 2009 (BST)
3. Keep Cyberbob  Talk  01:12, 12 October 2009 (BST)
4. Keep - Very clever ross, by bunging it here you keep it off the Orphaned list. You sneaky man. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 04:58, 12 October 2009 (BST)

   as with all my submissions this month. Huzzah! --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:33, 12 October 2009 (BST)

5. Keep - As above.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 12:14, 12 October 2009 (BST)
6. Keep --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 17:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
7. keep --WanYao 06:47, 18 October 2009 (BST)

The July/August Siege of Giddings Mall

Another Orphaned page, this time a half hearted attempt to record a mall siege. and the / in the title is really annoying. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:11, 10 October 2009 (BST)

1. The amateur historian in me says Keep.--Teln 17:33, 10 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - I appreciate the effort here, but in all honesty, it'll never be expanded on or added to, so there's not really much point leaving such a small stub forever. 19:06, 10 October 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - It pains me to do this, but it isn't going to be fixed any time soon so it might as well not be in the main space. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:18, 11 October 2009 (BST)
4. Delete Cyberbob  Talk  01:12, 12 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy Delete - I agree it shouldn't be in the main space, and the title is annoying. And while the article isn't anything amazing, I love these little nuggets of history and I'd like to see the content preserved. Therefore I duplicated the content and put it in Giddings_Mall/History, and then linked to it here. So the original article is now eligible for crit 1 speedy delete and the content is preserved on the wiki.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 12:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)
6. Speedy - It's now duplicated elsewhere.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:36, 13 October 2009 (BST)
7. Delete - Poorly written and unbalanced. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:34, 17 October 2009 (BST)
8. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 17:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
9. Delete --WanYao 06:46, 18 October 2009 (BST)

The Duccan Motel Security Office

Another failed group. The page hasn't been edited since March.--Teln 21:21, 8 October 2009 (BST)

1. Pow--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:33, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   Urgh, I'm hit!--Thadeous Oakley 23:48, 10 October 2009 (BST)

2. Delete -Poodle of doom 04:54, 9 October 2009 (BST)
3. Keep - Jesus fucking Christ. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 05:05, 9 October 2009 (BST)

   Iscariot, what would it take for you to vote in favor of a group page getting deleted?--Teln 05:11, 9 October 2009 (BST)

   There is literally nothing that would get him to support a group page's deletion no matter how shitty or worthless it is. I'm thankful for this recent bunch of group pages being put up, partly because I know exactly how angry it's making him. Cyberbob  Talk  05:25, 9 October 2009 (BST)

   Unlike Bob with his misconduct cases, this wiki doesn't get to me or make me angry. The simple fact is that you are all deleting game history due to your own cases of CDO. The history of this game is that there are a load of shit, failed and aborted groups in existence due to people not engaging with the game or losing interest etc. Now this might not fit into your compulsive "make everything as good as the Philosophe Knights' page", but it is still the history of this game. Disk space = cheep, there's no need to be deleting them at all, stick an inactive template on it and get over it. History shouldn't be deleted just because you don't like it for whatever reason. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:38, 10 October 2009 (BST)

   abloobloobloobloobloo Cyberbob  Talk  23:42, 10 October 2009 (BST)

   Oh that's fucking beautiful, but unless you are going to make a page listing all of the failed shit groups that links to them they are pretty fucking worthless just being random orphans that no one ever sees. So, if your selfless reason for keeping this UD HISTORY intact is truly for historical reasons that come up with a fucking system to actually historically preserve these abortions. -- #99 ^DCC 03:13, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   I can always laugh with you Bob......., or at you, depending on the circumstances...--Thadeous Oakley 23:45, 10 October 2009 (BST)

   You know,.... I'm not much for the whole disk space=cheap rational,... but now that it has been explained.... I can understant it here. Iscariot, this is what I was expecting from you and your commrades when I tried to call you out before. I appreciate this endevour as it exist now. Iscariot has a point. -Poodle of doom 04:52, 11 October 2009 (BST)

4. Delete - Never felt so good. Cyberbob  Talk  05:25, 9 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 06:18, 9 October 2009 (BST)
6. Delete--Thadeous Oakley 23:48, 10 October 2009 (BST)
7. Keep - Isn't it already stated above that merely being a defunct group page isn't enough to be deleted? 00:24, 11 October 2009 (BST)

   It's not enough to be deleted on A/SD, but there really aren't any constraints on A/D. Cyberbob  Talk  01:02, 11 October 2009 (BST)

8. Keep Coming to Iscariots defense on this one due to rational. -Poodle of doom 04:52, 11 October 2009 (BST)
9. Delete Contact. Dartside. Recruitment. Dartside. History. Not yet. This really isn't valuable content. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:05, 11 October 2009 (BST)
10. Delete --SirArgo ^Talk 19:45, 11 October 2009 (BST)
11. Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:47, 12 October 2009 (BST)
12. Delete No content. --WanYao 06:45, 18 October 2009 (BST)

The_Borehamwood_Brotherhood

Stubbiest stub ever. Even says that it's not going to get more info. And I'm betting that right now, all of those survivors are dead.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:18, 8 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Votin' on mah own deletion.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:18, 8 October 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - It has more fucking words than The Dead did for most of its life. Stop trying to circumvent Crit 12 will "hur, its a stubz" until you put The Dead up. Number of words on a group page does not dictate the group's right to remain on this wiki for as long as any other group. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:24, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:28, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   A line or two of content? The Dead. Cannot clearly be expanded? The Dead. Duplicated elsewhere? The Dead. Still waiting for you to nominate that. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:34, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   You mean a historical group? Which is thus immune? Seriously, I thought you wiki lawyers were supposed to find flaws in other people's arguments.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:36, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   The removal of Crit 12 was specifically to stop group pages being deleted, not to encourage people to delete them through other avenues. All group pages should be immune to deletion except under vandal created or personal information stipulations. Otherwise what's to stop a group like the aforementioned using popular support to delete the DEM etc? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:47, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   The fact that there would be no grounds for it. This even fits a speedy criteria. You can't say there are no grounds.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:49, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   The grounds is the community support, the thing that rules A/D. A/SD is there to save time in the most obvious cases. Crit 12's removal implicitly shows that this page shouldn't be removed. It is an inactive group (thereby it's not likely to be expanded etc) and the removal of Crit 12 by community support should not mean that inactive groups are still deleted if they fall under an obscure character limit. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:52, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   Except the community isn't the bunch of hicks you think they are. If the dead conscripted 1000+ players to the wiki, they'd be warned for meatpuppetry, and the votes would be struck. If you weren't so obsessed with the fact that it's a "Sysop conspiracy", then you'd see that.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:56, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   I personally remember meat puppeting a deletion. QED. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 08:03, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   Criterion 12 being removed did not make group pages immune to deletion, all it did was make it harder for pages to qualify for speedy deletion. Its removal does absolutely nothing to prevent group pages from being deleted normally. And do you honestly think that we'd actually vote to remove the DEM? Preventing abuse is one of the most important parts of the normal voting system, and it's working just fine! And if something important does get fraudulenty deleted, well, stuff like that is why A/U exists.--Teln 05:45, 9 October 2009 (BST)

   If you don't think there are and have been groups in this game with enough raw voting power to put through a permanent deletion then you must have been playing for a total of 10 minutes. A/U you say? Well if someone wanted to they could push through a policy to block that. QED massive deletions due to politics. Group pages have always been preserved since the rightful eradication of crit 12, the only people with any power to delete group pages are group leadership. End of. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:43, 10 October 2009 (BST)

   Stuff like fraudulent deletions is why we have Sysops, Bureaucrats and A/U. If policy abuse is going on, it's the job of the Sysops and Bureaucrats to stop it, and the voting system is another check on fraudulent deletions. So far, the system seems to be working, and we all know what they say about fixing stuff that ain't broke. And have any of the recent group page deletions been politically motivated? No. They've all been tiny pages of stillborn groups that have been cluttering up the wiki for months, if not years.--Teln 05:38, 12 October 2009 (BST)

3. Speedydelete - crit 1 -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:54 8 October 2009 (BST)
4. Delete - Iscariot, your complaining is proving to be brilliant sustenance for me. I love how you devote yourself to the most worthless of causes just to attack the "sysop conspiracy" or shake the boat in general. You and Imthatguy must have quite the intimate moments.--SirArgo ^Talk 08:26, 8 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy Delete - OMIGOD GETTING RID OF CRIT TWELVE CONTAINED A CLAUSE BANNING THE DELETION OF LITERALLY EVERY GROUP PAGE EVERnoitdidnt Cyberbob  Talk  08:50, 8 October 2009 (BST)
6. Delete I've raised the point on the super secret Borehamwood 100 forum and none of the remaining groups have heard of them. And it doesn't even have a talk page. So no content. We can't really say that about the Dead can we? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:35, 8 October 2009 (BST)
7. Speedy - No content. -- Cheese 10:28, 8 October 2009 (BST)
8. Bandwagon (Speedy) Linkthewindow  Talk  16:23, 8 October 2009 (BST)
9. Speedy--Teln 19:00, 8 October 2009 (BST)
10. Speedy Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 06:18, 9 October 2009 (BST)
11. Keep 00:26, 11 October 2009 (BST)
12. Keep - why is this wiki so delete happy all of a sudden? These pages do no harm and someone somewhere probably quite likes it.--xoxo 06:26, 18 October 2009 (BST)
13. Delete --WanYao 06:40, 18 October 2009 (BST)

South_West_Alliance/Dartside_Information

Thanks for catching this one Rosslessness. I'd completely forgotten about it. We (the SWA) have an information center where we keep track of the TRC danger reports in various suburbs. I removed the Dartside section from our wiki a while back since we no longer have any affiliation with that suburb. Therefore the page is orphaned and unneeded. Not sure what crit that fits but feel free to delete.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 16:48, 7 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - By group request. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy delete at groups request.--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:30, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. S p,p,p --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:40, 7 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete What Bob and Rosslessness said. --Teln 21:30, 7 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete - group request isn't a speedydelete criteria, and given that group leadership is often less than clear to outside observers, it can't really become one -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:44 8 October 2009 (BST)

   Re: - To clarify, we don't have a group leader, but I'm positive we don't need this page. And if we change our minds we can recreate it using similar pages as a template.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 12:11, 8 October 2009 (BST)

6. Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:58, 8 October 2009 (BST)
7. Speedy Delete - btw thanks boxy for not speedy deleting this as per A/D policy when you voted you biased fuck. seriously thinking about some misconduct in the not-too-distant future Cyberbob  Talk  08:53, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   I think you can delete it Cyberbob, it had 3 speedy votes and no keeps. It says nothing about a sysop noticing it at the time. There was a point at which 3 speedy votes existed, and no keeps. If anyone had an issue at a later point (Iscariot), it should have had to go through undeletions, not be on here.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:54, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   You know you don't have grounds for a misconduct cases, so why don't you go and have a bex, and a good lie down. Another week or so without this being deleted isn't going to break the wiki. Biased, pfft :D -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:25 9 October 2009 (BST)

   Don't I? Cyberbob  Talk  02:39, 9 October 2009 (BST)

   No, you don't. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:47, 14 October 2009 (BST)

   niiiice d00d. gratz on teh comeback Cyberbob  Talk  03:52, 14 October 2009 (BST)

   fanks, didunt no if it wud wurk -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:57, 14 October 2009 (BST)

8. Speedy - Just delete the darn thing, we really don't need it. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 15:33, 8 October 2009 (BST)

Strolling Club

Only edited once, in 2006. A worthless article. -Poodle of doom 04:42, 7 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy As above. -Poodle of doom 04:42, 7 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete Doesn't seem to meet the criteria for a speedy, but other than that, I agree with Poodle of doom.Teln 05:42, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. Pow, pow, pow But not a stub, so not a speedy. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:35, 7 October 2009 (BST)
4. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:27 7 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:06, 7 October 2009 (BST)
6. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)
7. Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:59, 8 October 2009 (BST)
8. Delete Cyberbob  Talk  08:53, 8 October 2009 (BST)
9. Keep - Has content. --WanYao 06:45, 18 October 2009 (BST)

Zombie Evacuation Tactic

Unlinked and frankly ridiculous. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 17:56, 6 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete You may want to vote for this yourself Ross..... -Poodle of doom 04:42, 7 October 2009 (BST)

   Thanks Poodle, Generally I don't vote on stuff I've posted here, because frankly we should be able to get three people to vote on something, especially as its one of the best things to do if you're after a promotion. If I've made mistake (Like the move) request below. I'll vote, and I'll add the third speedy to an existing two. Besides, I don't really mind if their kept. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:56, 7 October 2009 (BST)

2. Delete Bad tactic, considering the widespread acceptance of the Sacred Ground Policy, and the numerous groups devoted to maintaining revive points. Also a badly written article.Teln 05:36, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. Pow, pow, pow --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:35, 7 October 2009 (BST)
4. Delete - this tactic is pure win -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:27 7 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)
6. Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:59, 8 October 2009 (BST)
7. Delete Cyberbob  Talk  08:53, 8 October 2009 (BST)
8. Keep - And recategorise as humour --WanYao 06:42, 18 October 2009 (BST)

Recent Actions

Colonel Krauser

Please delete. It was an old account, i forgot the password to, ended up making a new one, check IP addresses. I believe that makes it speedy delete. I dont want anyone assuming its a sock puppet account (not that i vote on many thing) -- 

•   Timmah!  

•   Talk  

23:40, 16 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - USE A/SD YOU PRAT Cyberbob  Talk  01:40, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   Keep - there is no need to delete your old user or user talk page. You won't get done for sock puppetry because you can't log in with it to vote anyway. IP data isn't kept for that long, so we can't really confirm it's your account -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)

   If you really want it deleted, say so in Krauser's profile. But like Iscariot says, a redirect to your new page would be better -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 14:12 17 October 2009 (BST)

   I think hes answered your question. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:30, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   Keep--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 09:27, 17 October 2009 (BST)

2. Delete - Request confirmed to be author.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:40, 17 October 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - User has claimed it's his account, if an IP check confirms this delete it as per author request. Alternately he can just turn it into a redirect to his new account. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:32, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   Note: If this user cannot prove his identity then my vote automatically should be considered Keep. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:47, 17 October 2009 (BST)

4. Delete As Isc --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:41, 17 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 17:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
6. Delete - DELETE THAT FUCKING PAGE BOXXY! MK! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 20:33, 17 October 2009 (BST)
7. Speedy - just the talk page, or the user page two? -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 22:45 17 October 2009 (BST)

Deleted. If you want the main article done too, just contact me. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:04, 18 October 2009 (BST)

Dementia subpages

Moving from A/SD, the Dementia page hasn't been edited in 6 months, and has hardly any meaningful content. None of it's subpages, listed here have any content at all, apart from the inclusion of that template -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 22:24 16 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 22:24 16 October 2009 (BST)
2. Crit 1 - For all of those sub-pages. The content is duplicated elsewhere.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:31, 16 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete Crit 1.--Teln 00:46, 17 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  01:40, 17 October 2009 (BST)

Speedy Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  01:40, 17 October 2009 (BST)

RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/Archive09

Orphaned page whose information is already duplicated by a functional template; delete request by author. --MHSstaff 02:38, 16 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - Learn to use A/SD please. Cyberbob  Talk  06:06, 16 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Unused, but it isn't eligible for crit 7 author request (boxy edited it too), and I can't find the functional template that duplicates it.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 11:12, 16 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy - crit 1 + 7 (both "authors" want it gone + we usually ignore such minor fixes because they don't add actual content, just fix what's there) -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:19 16 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:42, 16 October 2009 (BST)

Speedy Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  12:23, 16 October 2009 (BST)

MH&S/Archive 031808

Orphaned page. Information has been archived at RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/0308 which is linked to the rest of the world --MHSstaff 05:31, 16 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - Learn to use A/SD please. Cyberbob  Talk  06:06, 16 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete - Duplicated.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 11:00, 16 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:20 16 October 2009 (BST)

Deleted -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:22 16 October 2009 (BST)

Wray Heights/Barricade Plan

Orphaned, unadopted barricade plan from 2007. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:50, 30 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Pow, pow, pow. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:05, 30 September 2009 (BST)
2. Delete Cyberbob  Talk  22:32, 30 September 2009 (BST)
3. Delete--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:33, 30 September 2009 (BST)
4. Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:42, 1 October 2009 (BST)
5. Delete - although it's not exactly orphaned. I would suggest copy and pasting the plan to that talk page though -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 12:55 1 October 2009 (BST)

   I hate external links for internal links. I'm changing that now. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:13, 1 October 2009 (BST)

6. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)
7. Keep It's not orphaned. You never know, they might come up with something good. --Teln 03:01, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   Yep, but all the information has been copied over to Wray heights talk page. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 08:40, 8 October 2009 (BST)

   In that case, I'd like to change my vote to Delete.--Teln 21:05, 8 October 2009 (BST)

8. Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:59, 8 October 2009 (BST)

Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  03:37, 14 October 2009 (BST)

The Valhalla Organization

This was kept last time I put it up because it hadn't been up for long enough, and people wanted to give the original author more time to finish his work. It's been just under three months now. How much time are we alloting? -Poodle of doom 23:43, 28 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete Speedy Delete As before: The article is little more than a stub, with no one in particular looking to work on it,... or so it would seem. Criteria 1. -Poodle of doom 23:43, 28 September 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - Your reasoning is that it's a stub? You going to put The Dead up for deletion next? It's a group page, the owner is entitled to spend as long as he wants on it, and disk space = inexpensive. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:33, 30 September 2009 (BST)
3. Delete User created it on the 4th July, his last edit was the 5th of july, looks abandoned to me. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:21, 30 September 2009 (BST)
4. Delete - Pow, pow, pow. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:05, 30 September 2009 (BST)
5. Delete Cyberbob  Talk  22:32, 30 September 2009 (BST)
6. Delete--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:33, 30 September 2009 (BST)
7. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)
8. Delete--Teln 21:12, 7 October 2009 (BST)

Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  01:12, 12 October 2009 (BST)

Aequalitas per excidium

A page for a survivor group that hasn't been edited since January of 2008, and isn't showing up anywhere on the stats page.--Teln 17:37, 10 October 2009 (BST)

1. Keep You really are a fucking idiot. Now you want to go for the very pages that are the fucking definition of Crit 12. This group doesn't show up on the stats page? What a fucking shock for an old and possibly disbanded group. Go tell me if you see The Many on the stats page. Should we delete them? Stop trying to delete old group pages just because you have no fucking clue. Groups don't have to be active or historical in order for their pages to remain on this wiki. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:32, 10 October 2009 (BST)

   Chill, man, I'm new here. Forgive me for being a little fuzzy on what exactly qualifies for deletion and what doesn't. My understanding of the Crit 12 deal, as I stated below, is that 1) it only applied to speedy deletions, not normal ones, and 2) a majority of the community can delete anything it wishes, for whatever reason it wishes, as long as the deletion policy is followed. Can someone besides Iscariot (who has already made his (her?) opinion on the subject quite clear) please tell me if I'm right or not?--Teln 20:15, 10 October 2009 (BST)

2. Keep - This page nowhere near qualifies for deletion.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:54, 10 October 2009 (BST)
3. Keep - The page is not a stub, there is no reasons for it to be deleted. --^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:10, 10 October 2009 (BST)
4. Keep --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 21:32, 10 October 2009 (BST)
5. Keep - Teln, the group pages that have been being deleted recently have all had little to no content. Stick to submitting those ones. Cyberbob  Talk  23:19, 10 October 2009 (BST)

   All right, all right. Keep--Teln 23:34, 10 October 2009 (BST)

Withdrawn Cyberbob  Talk  23:40, 10 October 2009 (BST)

Section 13 Field Manual

No content. All content was considered obsolete and deleted with the launch of our group forum. --Jack ^{S13 T! PC}

1. Delete - Author vote, page has been empty for more than 6 months. no content will be added. --Jack ^{S13 T! PC} 17:40, 8 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete Criteria 7.--Teln 18:50, 8 October 2009 (BST)
3. SD - Author request.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:27, 8 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  23:25, 8 October 2009 (BST)

Speedy Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  23:28, 8 October 2009 (BST)

S13 Sub-page Redirect

Orphaned article. Original article contains no contente and will also be put up for deletion--Jack ^{S13 T! PC} 17:37, 8 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - author vote, irrelevant. --Jack ^{S13 T! PC} 17:37, 8 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete Criteria 7.--Teln 18:49, 8 October 2009 (BST)
3. SD - Author request.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:27, 8 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  23:25, 8 October 2009 (BST)

Speedy Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  23:28, 8 October 2009 (BST)

The Gray/Recruiting criteria

A small page that was meant to outline our recruiting criteria, afterwards edited to comply with the groups decision not to recruit.... - rotticus 21:32, 7 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:33, 7 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedie Deleat --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:53, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Teln 22:16, 7 October 2009 (BST)

SD -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:44 8 October 2009 (BST)

Mall Defending

What should have been a guide has been abandoned for a year and consists of only a paragraph. Oh and orphaned. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:31, 7 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - A stub with very basic information. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:33, 7 October 2009 (BST)
2. S p,p,p --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:40, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Teln 21:18, 7 October 2009 (BST)

SD -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:44 8 October 2009 (BST)

Shearbank Anarchy Cell/Speakeasy

Either a missed sub page of a deleted group, or an unlinked orphan with no real point. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:55, 7 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete Criterion 1.--Teln 18:34, 7 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. S p,p,p --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:40, 7 October 2009 (BST)

SD -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:44 8 October 2009 (BST)

Nhrn regulars

A page for a group that looks like it never got off the ground, and it hasn't been edited since December of 2008.Teln 05:57, 7 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete --Teln 05:57, 7 October 2009 (BST)
2. Pow, pow, pow --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:35, 7 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy - crit 1 -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:27 7 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete as per creaters talk page here --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:50, 7 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:26, 7 October 2009 (BST)

SD -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:44 8 October 2009 (BST)

Chocolate Thunder/N3wf locator

We truthfully don't need it anymore. It wasn't ever finished in the first place. --Alevins 22:13, 5 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - Can we make this the last of the recent slew of pages that didn't need to go here? Nobody's going to bite you if you put something on A/SD, people. Cyberbob  Talk  03:15, 6 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy And well done for requesting deletion of a page you no longer need. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 08:49, 6 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete Three strikes and it's out. --Teln 05:48, 7 October 2009 (BST)

Speedydeleted - crit 7 -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:27 7 October 2009 (BST)

Malton Small Business Association

A page about a group that existed before zombies started arriving. Unlinked and kind of pointless. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:50, 1 October 2009 (BST)

1. Move to Userspace - Normally, I'd say pow, pow, pow this, but from the talk, it looks like it's part of the malton chronicles. Whatever that is. I'm not happy voting either way without confirmation on that.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:12, 1 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Yonnua, this was created before the last history wipe, meaning that finding the original author is somewhat difficult -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)

   Oh wait, the talk page... origianal author looks like Raystanwick... mmm, move to userspace -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:17 5 October 2009 (BST)

3. In that case Move to userpage. Simpler If I just get rid of this and place a move request? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:32, 5 October 2009 (BST)

   Make a request on A/MR and I'll remove this. Cyberbob  Talk  03:19, 6 October 2009 (BST)

   Move request filed. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:29, 6 October 2009 (BST)

4. Move --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:46, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Withdrawn Cyberbob  Talk  21:34, 6 October 2009 (BST)

SSZSITREP

Unused map remnant from 2007 --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:28, 4 October 2009 (BST)

1. Pow--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:31, 4 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete 13:16, 4 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1 Cyberbob  Talk  21:14, 4 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:43, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Speedy Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  03:15, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Category:NE Corner

Seems a bit pointless and only has two entries. =/ -- Cheese 18:43, 22 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete -- Cheese 18:46, 22 September 2009 (BST)
2. Deleeete --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:31, 22 September 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - Stub + A/D = Pow, pow , pow!!!--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:32, 22 September 2009 (BST)
4. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 21:29, 22 September 2009 (BST)
5. Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:37, 23 September 2009 (BST)
6. Delete Cyberbob  Talk  22:32, 30 September 2009 (BST)

Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  02:54, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Molebankplan

Unlinked barricade suggestion from 2007 --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:51, 21 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Pow, pow, pow!!!--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:53, 21 September 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Pew, pew, pew!!! -- Cheese 18:47, 22 September 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - RELOAD, RELOAD. --SirArgo ^Talk 19:05, 22 September 2009 (BST)
4. Delete - boomyou'redeadgameover. Cyberbob  Talk  19:31, 22 September 2009 (BST)
5. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 21:29, 22 September 2009 (BST)
6. Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:37, 23 September 2009 (BST)
7. Delete - Kill it. --ZsL 22:46, 29 September 2009 (BST)

Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  11:58, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Exciting Group Boxes

All orphaned, all over a year old, all only containing a group box. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:28, 4 October 2009 (BST)

• Shearbank Survival Force

• S.A.D.Force

• South Blythville Resistance

1. Pow--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:31, 4 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete 13:16, 4 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  21:14, 4 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy - Crit 1 --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:44, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:49, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Necrotech Research Team

NO. CONTENT. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:07, 4 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  10:22, 4 October 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Pow --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 10:43, 4 October 2009 (BST)
3. Delete 13:16, 4 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:44, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:49, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Monroeville Mrhcows

Read the page. Not even the author cares. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:22, 3 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Seems fair game. 20:38, 3 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Pow, pow, pow. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:38, 3 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  22:57, 3 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy - --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:44, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:49, 5 October 2009 (BST)

MastaKillas

On every level this orphaned page burns my eyes. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:22, 3 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Or better yet, drown it in the toilet like a bag of puppies. 20:38, 3 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Pow, pow, pow. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:38, 3 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  22:57, 3 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy - --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:45, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:49, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Journal:Necrotech Special Forces

Orphaned and wiped by author last year. Only a single link to malton chronicles remains. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:09, 3 October 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Or, since it's only a single link, change it to a redirect instead? 20:38, 3 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Pow, pow, pow. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:38, 3 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete Cyberbob  Talk  22:57, 3 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:13 5 October 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:45, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:49, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Scheffer

First edit of User:Scheffer looks like character page that was never moved to namespace. Hus actual namepage contains all this info. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:28, 4 October 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Pow--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:31, 4 October 2009 (BST)
2. Delete 13:16, 4 October 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete - This is a classic crit 9, Ross. Just submit things like this to A/SD. Cyberbob  Talk  21:14, 4 October 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Its a classic crit 9. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:26, 4 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted Linkthewindow  Talk  06:59, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) - Malton Branch

Unlinked, only 1 edit, which was also the only edit of the creator, 4 links to pages about phone masts and radios and 1 to the FCC website. And I dont think its them. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:54, 18 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Maybe even speedy.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:20, 18 September 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Yup--SirArgo ^Talk 16:15, 18 September 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - Very dead. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 00:00, 19 September 2009 (BST)
4. Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:58, 19 September 2009 (BST)
5. Speedydelete - crit 1, no content except for links. But it does only has 1 edit because of the wiki history wipe -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:34 19 September 2009 (BST)
6. Delete - This message has been censored. --Haliman - Talk 19:57, 20 September 2009 (BST)
7. Keep - IT'S A GROUP PAGE! WE DON'T DELETE GROUP PAGES! Size or content is not a qualifier, old groups don't get deleted. Disk space = inexpensive. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:02, 20 September 2009 (BST)

   Hmm, I wonder what the likeliness of this user returning is? Last edit was over a year ago and I doubt he made many before that considering he doesn't even have a user page. He left an unfinished and basically content-less group page behind, but lets keep it anyway right? And say he does return, do you suspect he will be physically unable to request an undeletion?--SirArgo ^Talk 20:53, 20 September 2009 (BST)

8. Delete - I miss crit 12. --ZsL 22:44, 20 September 2009 (BST)
9. Delete - As above. -- Cheese 18:45, 22 September 2009 (BST)
10. Delete - OH WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE GROUPS Cyberbob  Talk  08:53, 23 September 2009 (BST)

Deleted Cyberbob  Talk  02:33, 2 October 2009 (BST)

Image:KTscroll.PNG

Basically, this is something I created for the group, and was edited, and is being used in it's current form without my permission. When I resigned as leader of the group, I gave permission for the original text contained within the image to be used on the groups page, under the condition that it would not be altered, or edited in anyway. I consider this a form of copyright infringment,... considering it is no longer being used with permission, as it was originally. You can see, I've taken the oppertunity to try to resolve the issue myself before coming here, on their Talk Page. The only proof I could possably offer was contained in the original forum for the group (which has long sice been deleted), and my possably having been the one to put it up... which doesn't seem to appear in my contributions, or on the groups history page. The Logs for the page seem to indicate at least one time that the page was deleted... which could explain why nothing of this edit appears. -Poodle of doom 06:09, 18 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete Infringement on terms of use. -Poodle of doom 06:09, 18 September 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - There is no proof that this image was created by the claimant and the logs, which include entries from before the last history wipe, show that the claimant did not upload the image in question. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:17, 18 September 2009 (BST)

   Wait, this isn't actually about the image, but the text? You wrote a poem and you don't like that they've changed a couple of words and are now trying to claim intellectual copyright? Intellectual copyright over the concept of the written word is extremely difficult to prove, and I believe it's unlikely to succeed here. You have to prove that your concept was original, was created solely by yourself and provide proof of the original text that can be dated to give you sole claim. You've already stated that your major resource to this is long gone. I have to go brush up on my copyright law.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:26, 18 September 2009 (BST)

   I have the original emails off the first forum the group ever had where the poem was submitted to the group. I also have documents from Roddy Winters, where he was writing a history report for the group, and gives me credit in this report for the poem. Would that work? -Poodle of doom 00:24, 19 September 2009 (BST) (EDIT: To claify, I didn't think I had them any more, but searching my email, I found a few.)

   So, it's the font you are having a problem with? What font do you enjoy? Maybe we can work something out. Because if it's the fact that we have the poem up there at all, where have you been for the last 2 years that it's already been on our page? Why do you have a problem with it after all this time? Roddy Winters 02:55, 19 September 2009 (BST)

   After reading the relevant UK precedents regarding this I am removing myself from this vote, because if Poodle can prove origination he's more than entitled to have the work removed from the wiki in any form he likes, including plain text. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:49, 20 September 2009 (BST)

3. Keep - No proof = No pasta.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:14, 18 September 2009 (BST)
4. Keep - Why can't the image have a background and font? The poem's content is unchanged but, as a page element, they are entitled to pretty it up within how they want it displayed. As is it's group content and the most you can really do is go through arbies or/and request they don't quote your poem that you made for them. --Karek^maps?! 10:21, 18 September 2009 (BST)
5. Keep - Dude. You only gave the guy 2 days to respond. And based on what he said, they didn't even alter the poem, they just threw up the background and changed the font. Give the group a little more time to respond and try working it out by being nice.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 13:19, 18 September 2009 (BST)

   The original complaint wasn't on the fact that the poem was altered, but that the style was. This can be noted in the differences can be noted between this version of the page, versus the current version. -Poodle of doom 00:34, 19 September 2009 (BST)

6. Keep - Methinks you're not too grand at figuring out the system. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 00:00, 19 September 2009 (BST)
7. Keep - If this is that large of a problem, I recommend arbies. Otherwise, work it out by talking with the current leaders.--SirArgo ^Talk 01:41, 19 September 2009 (BST)
8. Delete - but you've really got to work on your communication and negotiation skills, poodle. This new imaged version of the poem is almost unreadable -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:41 19 September 2009 (BST)

   OK, I'm going to save you guys a lot of wasted time so you can move on to real issues, and also to relieve Poodle of any more mental anguish over this. I've taken the poem down. So now you don't have to worry about anyone seeing your work in a font you don't like Poodle. Sorry for any sleep you've lost over this. Roddy Winters 17:45, 19 September 2009 (BST)

Kept Cyberbob  Talk  02:33, 2 October 2009 (BST)

Neighbourhood Watch

Yes, its a group page, but its almost a year old, is orphaned, and its contents is twenty two words. Which is less than this deletion request. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:18, 30 September 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Pow, pow, pow. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:05, 30 September 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --ZsL 22:29, 30 September 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. Cyberbob  Talk  22:32, 30 September 2009 (BST)
4. Delete--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:33, 30 September 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy - Crit 1 --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:43, 1 October 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:44, 1 October 2009 (BST)

Archive

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020