UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06

Shortcut:
A/D

This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Deletion Requests

All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie [[:Category:Category]] and [[:Image:Image.jpg]]).
• A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.

Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.

Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, head for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.

Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Speedy Deletion Eligibility

To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:

1. No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
2. Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
3. Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
4. Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
5. Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)

   As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.

6. Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
7. Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
8. User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
9. Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.

   As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.

10. Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
11. Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.

    As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.

12. Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.

    As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.

13. Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).

A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.

Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests

• One vote per user.
• Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
• There are four vote types:
  • Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
  • Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.

• The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
• At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
• If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
• If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.

Deletion Queue

The 7th Stockman Walk Regiment

Apparently disbanded, not a confirmed or historically important group, no edits since July, all members apparently inactive/not on the Wiki in the first place.

--aClashInRedSnow^|talk 02:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - We don't delete old groups' wikis, unless they're blank. And there's content in them thar wiki! Thus, it stays. --WanYao 02:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - As Wan. Crit 12 died for a reason (although "group pages" with only a sentence are occasionally deleted.) Linkthewindow  Talk  03:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
• Author Keep/Kill Request - Oh, thanks for clarification, I wasn't sure whether it was deletion material or not. That settles it for me. Can I just move this to the Recent Actions section or delete it or does it have to stay up for vote? --aClashInRedSnow^|talk 04:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Er, for further clarification, what about a group like this? I suppose I'd like to know what the threshold is on what constitutes lack of content. --aClashInRedSnow^|talk 09:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thats a keep. Were looking for a couple of lines, or a group box that isn't formatted. Something that was created one day and then abandoned. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - but only just. WanYao's comment isn't exactly correct. Deletion votes can indeed get rid of group pages if they get enough votes, it's just that a group page has to be very minimal, and lack any real history to get the required votes. People create heaps of groups that never do anything of interest in Malton (or the other cities), it's reasonable to delete these pages if they drag down the wiki's signal to noise ratio too much, like the further link provided. Don't feel that because a nomination for deletion gets voted down, that that means you've done something wrong by bringing it here -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:29 23 December 2008 (BST)

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks for the full run-down (and being friendly while at it!), all. I think I'm clear now on how slim a page needs to be for deletion. --aClashInRedSnow^|talk 21:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Boxy is right: we don't speedydelete old groups. Many abandoned groups get deleted. However, this usually is because there is mininal, or garbage, content on an abandoned group's page. Though not always... Still, we usually don't delete groups with some decent content which were once active... --WanYao 06:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Recent Actions

Http:/wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:DangerReport/Tarasius_General_Hospital_(Spicer_Hills)

My bad. Accidentally created a duplicate page with a faulty address. The correct page is now in place. Extropymine 04:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - It's a meaningless page since the corrected version is in place. Extropymine 04:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Scheduled deletion -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 05:13 27 December 2008 (BST)

The Crimson Clan/Awards

Again, no content. Again, posted here so the group has time to respond.

-- Linkthewindow  Talk  13:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Quite frankly, if a group/user wants a subpage to sit there doing nothing they can have it. Server space is cheap.--xoxo 16:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Keep - You should first use the Talk page to ask for a response re: a questionable -- but nonetheless content-containing -- page. Not just submit it to Deletions. This is wasting everyone's time, when a quick note could have got a response, or a nice simple crit 7 speedydelete... --WanYao 04:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

I did leave a note on the group's talk page here. The only content is a template at the top of the page. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

that was a "notice of deletion", not an inquiry about what they wanna do with the page. however, since that template is totally generic, and it's sat there for 6 months or something... speedy it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WanYao (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

• Speedydelete - crit 1. * (cur) (last) 21:14, July 30, 2008 Jsrbrunty (Talk | contribs | block) (New page: {{Template:CrimsonHeader}}) [rollback]. It's only "content", the header template, is duplicated on every Crimson Clan page, and it doesn't link anywhere except deletions pages and the talk page that LTW asked about it on -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:28 18 December 2008 (BST)

• Keep - but if nothing's been done with it next time I see it, it's going to A/SD -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 23:06 20 December 2008 (BST)
• Speedydelete - no content. --WanYao 22:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

• 'Keep - content has been added. --WanYao 03:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

• Hey, I'm from The Crimson Clan. If its ok, I'd like to keep that page. To be honest, I had forgotten about it completely, but now that I've been reminded, maybe I'll get on and do something with it! Thank you. --Jsrbrunty 22:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

• Since that's effectively a keep, and the group will now use it, this vote is now irrelevant. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

• Keep-as long as the author does something with it. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Kept - early, but the page owner has asked for it to be saved, and all have changed their votes to keep -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 05:13 27 December 2008 (BST)

Category:Historical Buildings

This has been sitting unused for over 6 months, created over a year ago (judging by the timestamp at the top) and the creator's been inactive since February. As it stands, it's little more than an incomplete list of locations with a few crossed out here and there. It's kinda sitting idle and we can do one of three things:

• Delete it as it's unused and probably will remain so. Only link in is from a speedy request in October last year.
• Leave it be to sit about some more waiting on someone adopting it.
• Or move it from an empty category to a regular page and decide it's fate later. -- Cheese 21:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

1. Delete - Seems to be little more than an abandoned project. I don't see it fitting into anything on the wiki right now. -- Cheese 21:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Delete - if completed, it would be too close to Category:Historical Events. Linkthewindow  Talk  02:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
3. Meh - one of those 'who cares?' pages. Might as well send it packin'.--xoxo 00:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Delete - Abandoned and not too interesting or helpful. --ZsL 05:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
5. Keep - It has potential use, if the options are making it useful or deleting it we should always choose to make use of the tools we have at our disposal. Open a discussion.--Karek^maps?! 10:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
6. Delete - Interesting concept. Abandonded page. Let's start from scratch if we wanna run with the concept. --WanYao 15:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   Doesn't require deleting the page outright, that's just a method to make sure it falls off everyone's radar.--Karek^maps?! 15:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   My problem is ... the very phrase "Historical Buildings" gives the page an official status akin to Historical Events and Groups. Highly misleading. Is there interest in having a category for official Historical Buildings? Well... let's draft a policy for such. But until that happens, i.e. such a policy passes, this really page/category shouldn't exist. --WanYao 01:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

   Change it so it's a listing of buildings where localized historical events have taken place. --Karek^maps?! 05:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

   That could be a drama-fest, though, deciding what is and what isn't... IMO an Historical Building category ought to refer to buildings have had an impact in, and garnered a reputation somehow, with lots of people not just in the local burb. It'd be often associated with historical events, like the Blackmore, for example... But buildings which are the sites of infamous, ongoing struggles, which might not be technically historical in themselves, should be historical, too. The Pask NT in Daker, for example... Stuff like that. That gives a chance to recognise groups and events that might not otherwise get anywhere close to historical status, but which are still noteworthy. But if it's just locals deciding, every second building will become historical... And, writing it all up in the building's history can deal with this... But, it's a thought... --WanYao 14:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

   This page doesn't seem to have much to do with in-game historical events, but rather "backstory" (made up) historical wiki entries -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:16 8 December 2008 (BST)

7. Move & Speedydelete - move the page to the users subpage area (or even the main namespace if others are interested in taking on the project), and delete the category as crit 4, unused category (it's only entry is itself) -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:16 8 December 2008 (BST)
8. Delete - Has potential, but nobody gives a shit Actually its just a useless list of buildings. Delete. --ScouterTX 21:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Gone. Lots of deletes, one move.--xoxo 05:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20081106 Projectiles

A suggestion that did not appear on Category:Current Suggestions and failed to recieve proper voting. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 16:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

1. Delete --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 16:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Move - Move the content to one of the user's userspace subpages. --Toejam 16:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
3. Comment - It has got two votes, why don't we just cycle it through the system? It's not like it's heading into PR is it? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Keep - like Iscariot. Looks close enough to dupe, and perhaps also put a {{notice}} at the top of the page explaining that it didn't go through voting because the category tags weren't added -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 23:35 19 December 2008 (BST)

   Cycled. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

   This is fucking retarded. I could've understood putting it back to voting instead of deleting, but cycling it to undecided when it only has two votes? If this isn't reversed, I fully expect you people to follow this precedent when we find a suggestion with only an author keep. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 11:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

   Well, the author of the suggestion agreed to cycle it. --Janus ^talk 13:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

   Frankly, that's entirely irrelevant. The whole point of the suggestions system is to put them through peer review (ie. others voice their opinions on it). You can't just cycle something that got only one vote in addition to the author's. If you don't want it deleted, subject it to two weeks of voting, or create a new category for suggestions that weren't voted on, but don't put it in Undecided when the community didn't have an opportunity to make an actual decision on it. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 14:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

   I find myself agreeing with Mid, but with less swearing. As well as being unfair (to the voters, as well as other suggestors,) it sets a horrid precedent. Lets ether move it to Removed Suggestions or put it through voting. Linkthewindow  Talk  22:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

RE After I placed my vote this was reoved from voting by the author. as such is should be a removed suggestion.--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 14:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't say that it was removed as it never really was in voting. It never had the Category:Current Suggestions tag, nor was it linked to from the current suggestions list. The author just put it on Developing Suggestions after you had voted :/. But I guess Removed would still be better than Undecided. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 14:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Now on A/PT -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC) (BST)

Bad habit/enshrinement

It's just a line of text, not edited for a few months. Posted here (instead of A/SD) to give the group time to respond.

-- Linkthewindow  Talk  13:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Make it a subpage of Bad Habit then let them do with it as they please.--xoxo 16:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Wrong place, so Move to Bad Habit/Enshrinement and then speedydelete. --Janus ^talk 16:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

• Speedydelete after page move -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:52 18 December 2008 (BST)
• Speedydelete -- because it's a typo page. --WanYao 04:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Moved.--Karek^maps?! 10:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

BlackstarC

The specified page is not a user page. ~~ThaUser 19:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - a scheduled deletion after being moved to User:BlackstarC -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:52 18 December 2008 (BST)

Liberation Day and Ironfist

Liberation_Day

Ironfist

Contains nothing but lies and negative propaganda (and it never happened) about my group. The one who created this page has done something like that on various other times and it doesn't belong here.--ScouterTX 14:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

1. Delete. --ScouterTX 14:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
2. Keep Have you tried Arbitration first? A simple conflict resolution over there should be attempted, rather than placing his own pages up for what should, and probably will be, a failed deletion. Page ownership means that they should not really be deleted unless an Arbitration verdict has been reached, or the creator requests it.--Drawde ^{Talk To Me! DORIS Яed Яum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing!} 17:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
3. Delete. We can confirm this whole "Liberation Day" crap, never happened, and "Ironfist" is just as bad. Kewabara1 17:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

   Keep This is part of our group's new backstory. If you feel otherise we'd be happy to include a section signaling your disagreement with the statements and a link a to a page of your construction. Unsigned struck. -- Cheese 21:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

   Sorry that was me, Captain Rickety

   Group backstory belongs in groupspace, because it is rarely NPOV. Linkthewindow  Talk  10:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

4. Merge with FURIG as a group subpage and stick a note on it saying its just crap they made up. -- Cheese 21:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
5. Keep Since my first vote was struck. Cheese's suggestion is fine by me.Captain Rickety
6. Merge - to subpages of groups involved. I CBAed to read this boring tripe, but I can tell it's group propaganda... Lies are permitted, just not in the main namespace. --WanYao 00:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
7. Merge - Propaganda is fun and all, but it should be in FURIG's group subpage. --Jen 01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
8. Merge - with FURIG's group page. Or, just make it NPOV (although it is pretty BS, so yeah...) Linkthewindow  Talk  09:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
9. Delete - We don't want our name used like this. This isn't even propaganda, it's just slander. If someone was to look at this page they would get the wrong idea about our group as it doesn't even say it's all false. Even if these pages are merged with FURIG, I request that the name SNAKEHOUND be changed to another, I believe this is a fair request, as it's only a backstory, right? -Ryzak Black 19:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
10. Delete - Claiming that something is a "backstory" when it's supposed to have happened a month ago is rubbish, leading me to believe that nothing on the page actually happened. Bullshit to the bin -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:47 3 December 2008 (BST)
11. Keep There have been several events in the past that have been chronicled from a non-NPOV (Battle of Blackmore anyone?) and there is no reason to delete these pages. Furthermore, no evidence has been shown that says any of this is false. If you're pissed off, take it to arbitration or talk to the author. You can't have a page deleted just because it's just there to spread negative propaganda against your group. --William Told 04:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

    Ask around and you'll see that nothing like this ever happend. Futhermore, that user has some sort of crush on us, because 90% of his contribs are about us and how "evil" we are.--ScouterTX 21:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

12. Delete No need for the drama...Information on the wiki is supposed to be accurate and not propaganda BS (outside of your own groups POV section on their page. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 13:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
13. Delete - and recreate it in your group's namespace, if you want it that badly. It's just too biased to exist in the main namespace. --Pestolence^(talk) 22:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
14. Delete - Rediculous. Met fan 02:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
15. Delete - Pollution it is.--N00bert ^foxhound 02:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
16. Delete - Worse than Harry Potter fanfiction.--James Madley 05:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
17. Delete - lol, snakehound.--xoxo 05:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Final tally: 9 Deletes / 2 Keep / 4 Merge. Both deleted. --– Nubis ^NWO 14:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Free United Republic of Independent Spicer Hills

One line of text and no edits since August.

1. (Speedy) Delete - Under Crit 1 --Janus ^talk 18:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
2. (Speedy) Delete - No content. --ScouterTX 18:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
3. Crit 1 - Yeah, no content. Let's nuke it. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Speedy - As above. --Pestolence^(talk) 00:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedied - please put these on A/SD if you think they qualify -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:24 13 December 2008 (BST)

Category:Do Not Edit

Completely pointless category due to page ownership policies that do the same thing. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

1. Crit 1 - Duplicated by established wiki process. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Crit 1 - As Iscarot. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
3. Crit 1 - See above.--ScouterTX 19:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Crit 1 - as above. --WanYao 23:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
5. Crit 1 - Bandwagoning FTW! --Pestolence^(talk) 00:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy --ZsL 01:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Black_plauge

Misspelled title and no content, dead for months, no expansion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

1. Crit 1 -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Crit 1 But I'll contact the author. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

   It's pre-purge, with the only edit coming from Nubis. Therefor, the author can't be contacted. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

3. Crit 1 - do you not know where A/SD is, Iscariot? -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 12:57 11 December 2008 (BST)

   I was on here for the categories that needed community consideration, couldn't be arsed to click the link at the top of the page ;) -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

4. Speedy --Toejam 13:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedied -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 13:09 11 December 2008 (BST)

Category:The_Wanker's_Alternate_Accounts

Scheduled deletion that should be done under new criteria:

"Swearing in page titles - Pages that have swearing in the title that is directed at a user or group (or their actions). Approved 22 July 2008"

Page title clearly swearing and directed against a user. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC) Speedy -Scheduled deletion. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - and contents moved to Category:Banned Vandals -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 13:00 11 December 2008 (BST)

The Clegg Family

No real content, an unfinished page by a user who hasn't contributed in two years.--Drawde ^{Talk To Me! DORIS Яed Яum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing!} 12:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

It's to do with Category:Families of Malton... which, along with the Lexicon project, I don't really understand -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 13:00 23 November 2008 (BST)

• Delete, not speedy in case the guy miraculously shows up and wants it. --xoxo 12:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, but I'll post on Families of Malton talk page telling them about this, and just in case they want it expanded. Linkthewindow  Talk  20:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

  Although it doesn't look like that page is active. Linkthewindow  Talk  20:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - no content; abandoned. --WanYao 22:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - As above. Would be speedy crit 1, but the Malton Families thingy might want it expanded. (what is the Malton Families, anyway?) --Pestolence^(talk) 02:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

  Just a fictional history project, similar to ALiM but less awesome. Excluding a few cases, it seems to have never really taken off.--xoxo 02:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Some of the Families pages have value. Not this one. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 06:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
• Delete -no value in that content-- Vista  T  00:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Kill with fire. -- Cheese 21:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - No content, use the Death Star.--ScouterTX 02:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Deleted.--xoxo 00:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

ZEMA Profile

Dupe of Zombie Emergency Management Agency/Profile except for the template which I'll add to the other one.. =p -- Cheese 16:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

1. Delete - Duplicated content. --Toejam 18:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
2. Delete - What Toejam said. --Pestolence^(talk) 19:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
3. Keep - It is created for Advertizement Purposes and Profiles for Users on the Game because the homepage website name is too big. Enough said. --Soldier 21:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

   www.tinyurl.com.--Karek^maps?! 02:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

4. Delete - Duplicated elsewhere. -- Cheese 22:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
5. Delete - As above. --Haliman - Talk 23:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
6. Keep and redirectSpeedydelete - crit 1, duplicated elsewhere to no purpose -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 23:27 22 November 2008 (BST)

   Redirect it then, if he can't work out the tinyurl thang -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 08:36 23 November 2008 (BST)

7. (Speedy) Delete and Redirect - dupe Linkthewindow  Talk  01:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

   Apparently, they want this page deleted as well (the dupe.) What's going on? Linkthewindow  Talk  07:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

   Some craziness over a group page in ns:0. Some of it can be seen on Boxy and Cheese's pages.--Karek^maps?! 08:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

   The only one who wants that one deleted is Soldier -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 08:37 23 November 2008 (BST)

   This microdrama is making me very confused :(. Linkthewindow  Talk  09:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

8. Delete - nah.--xoxo 05:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
9. Delete - As Toejam.--Drawde ^{Talk To Me! DORIS Яed Яum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing!} 12:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
10. delete --WanYao 22:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
11. Keep and Redirect - It's not like anyone else is gonna want this pagename. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 06:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
12. Delete - and Redirect only if really necessary.-- Vista  T  00:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
13. Delete - A redirect isn't really necessary. --ZsL 02:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Deleted.--xoxo 00:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Galbraith Hills Police Department

As Below --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Deleted--Karek^maps?! 12:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Huntley Heights Police Department

As below --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Deleted--Karek^maps?! 12:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Chudleyton Police Departments

Information now split onto individual PD's, redirects redirected, but still linked to a few archives. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 11:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Disambig - between the two PD's. Linkthewindow  Talk  11:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

1. Speedydelete - crit 1, information duplicated at the individual location pages. Leave the links to dux's archives. He did waste his time, following the old LSG, but kudos to him for that -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 12:20 7 December 2008 (BST)

Deleted, there was already a vote held on the fate of these pages, consider them scheduled but not gotten to.--Karek^maps?! 12:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Right. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

No, they're not scheduled deletions, despite it being agreed on talkLSG that they should be deleted once fixed up. Put them up on A/SD -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 12:47 7 December 2008 (BST)

I assumed that was a given, the same is expected no matter what is being deleted. My point was simply we don't need tons of reports for when these are dealt with, there may be a few thousand of them after all.--Karek^maps?! 12:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Archive

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020