UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06

This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Deletion Requests

All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie [[:Category:Category]] and [[:Image:Image.jpg]]).
A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.

Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.

Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, head for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.

Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Speedy Deletion Eligibility

To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:

No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)
As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.
Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.
As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.
Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.
As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.
Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.
As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.
Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).

A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.

Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests

One vote per user.
Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
There are four vote types:
- Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
- Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
- Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
- Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.

The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.

Deletion Queue

Suggestion:20090530_New_Barricade_Rules

This Suggestion was moved in less that 24 hours, before I had a chance to remove it from Voting, which I would have done in order to rework it. I know 6 hours is the current minimum, but I'm asking a break on this one. Thanks for your time.--Zombie Lord 21:21, 6 June 2009 (BST)

Keep - We don't delete suggestions from the system, even hilariously bad suggestions. I'll change my vote if you can get the 6 hour policy changed (and you did well going to the other page and starting a discussion), but for now the policy is king. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 22:13, 6 June 2009 (BST)
Found something relevant on the Welcomenewbie template: "You can't modify a suggestion that you've written once it has been posted on the Suggestions page. You can withdraw and resubmit it with changes later, but only do that if people liked your original suggestion while requesting changes, not if it was Spaminated." Withdrawing of suggestions was intended for Kill voting, not Spaminating, it would seem. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 00:06, 7 June 2009 (BST)
Keep - As bob.-- Adward 23:00, 6 June 2009 (BST)

Bub

THe page is pug fugly and makes it sound like bub is some big secret, this page should redirect to kevan.--x o x o 07:57, 24 May 2009 (BST)

Keep - and expand. Bub may be famous amongst old timers, but newbies who come across him can find out via a page like this -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 08:02 24 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - as above. Clean it up a little however so it doesn't look so ugly. Linkthewindow Talk 08:04, 24 May 2009 (BST)
Delete - My vote will be for deletion, until someone fixes this up. I may do it tonight. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:10, 24 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - I like it a bit more now. An hours more work and it'll be GA worthy ;) D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:18, 24 May 2009 (BST)
Keep. I'm off to find some pictures. Expand it, you know? --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 09:45, 24 May 2009 (BST)
keep can't see any reason for this to even be under discussion? --Honestmistake 13:40, 24 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - Good info. --Pestolence^(talk) 14:02, 24 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - its useful for new players - and after the updates looks much better.--Betamaxx ^◆◆◆ 15:29, 24 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - I likes. -- C h e e s e 14:53, 25 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - I'm surprised Kevan himself hasn't voted, but there's no reason not to keep this page. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 10:49, 28 May 2009 (BST)
He hasn't voted because he didn't make the page, and wouldn't have if he had the chance. It was made a week ago in a very poorly formatted form. The version you see now was heavily modified so it wouldn't be deleted. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:55, 28 May 2009 (BST)
Delete - It's a character page in the mainspace created by someone who isn't its owner. What next? A Petro character page in the mainspace? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:03, 28 May 2009 (BST)
moved to talk page- D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:23, 28 May 2009 (BST)
Keep Interesting to read about - and seeing as its kevan I think exceptions can be madePeter sissons 18:11, 31 May 2009 (BST)
Keep yes yes.--Sir Topaz ^{DR ♣ GR} 01:17, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Keep Historical and wiktastic. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 00:03, 2 June 2009 (BST)
Keep Famous guy is famous. Notability or something. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 00:11, 2 June 2009 (BST)
Keep - Bandwagon.-- Adward 18:25, 5 June 2009 (BST)

Recent Actions

Category:ZPOV

Completely unneeded, unused, and screaming flame war.

Speedy - Crit 4 --Haliman - Talk 22:12, 12 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - There is, or at least was, a template that should be part of this category. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 08:54, 13 May 2009 (BST)
I had it deleted. It was orphaned and had (in a practical sense) been replaced by an image of the template. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:57, 13 May 2009 (BST)
See here. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:58, 13 May 2009 (BST)
You had a template, where the code is easy to change for individual pages deleted and replaced with an image which can't easily be changed? You fucking idiot. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:02, 13 May 2009 (BST)
I had a template where the only members of the community who used it had specifically changed over to the image. I had a template which was unused and had been since said change happened years ago. I had a template which was put on A/SD and also approved by a sysop. Not that there is any need to alleviate responsibility in the matter. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:09, 13 May 2009 (BST)
Why on earth was the template deleted!?! This is... sorta messed up, sigh. --WanYao 21:41, 16 May 2009 (BST)
A/U? -- C h e e s e 21:46, 16 May 2009 (BST)
Keep This needs to exist in some form. (ZPOV) Not this image or template, but the idea of ZPOV Articles. --– Nubis ^NWO 10:35, 13 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - I added the image to the category. ^ -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 22:23, 13 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - Linkthewindow Talk 22:26, 13 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - --Pestolence^(talk) 22:27, 13 May 2009 (BST)
Keep --Janus ^talk 15:38, 14 May 2009 (BST)
Keep This why Haliman shouldn't be a sysop. --WanYao 21:37, 16 May 2009 (BST)
Actually I sorta half take that back... Haliman has a point, but I'm confused that the template was ever deleted, leading to this situation of an orphaned cat. --WanYao 21:43, 16 May 2009 (BST)
Delete - no one has been interested in using it up until now, and the only pages using the template/image are User pages (using it as a "zombie solidarity" flagbox, rather than to describe an article), and Katthew's article (in her user sub-space) which is the only one to actually fit the category -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:55 18 May 2009 (BST)

Kept -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 03:00 1 June 2009 (BST)

User:Decaboom/Biohazard Guy

Player is inactive, I've already got rid of text

Speedy - Inactive-- Decaboom 08:30, 31 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy - Take it to A/SD if you want it speedy'd next time. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:43, 31 May 2009 (BST)
Crit 1, Crit 7 -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:09, 31 May 2009 (BST)

Speedily deleted, please use A/SD next time :D Linkthewindow Talk 09:15, 31 May 2009 (BST)

Mr Watt

A copy of his user page--Orange Talk 02:27, 26 May 2009 (BST)

Speedy Delete - This is a speedy deletion candidate (userpage in main namespace), next time throw it there to get it done quicker. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:34, 26 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete - Looks to be a replica. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 02:39, 26 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete - Per my reasoning on A/SD :P Linkthewindow Talk 11:40, 26 May 2009 (BST)

Removed from public for being a bad child.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:30, 27 May 2009 (BST)

Malton Waste Management

Hasn't been updated by anyone but admins since pre-purge.

Speedy - Crit 1 --Haliman - Talk 22:01, 12 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy - No content. --WanYao 21:44, 16 May 2009 (BST)
Speedydelete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:05 18 May 2009 (BST)

Speedy - Crit Satu. Linkthewindow Talk 11:27, 18 May 2009 (BST)

Fourth Siege of Caiger Mall(DRAFT)

Log of a Caiger siege, no activity (besides categorizing and a revert) in over six months.

Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 04:51, 4 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy -- I'll say crit 1. Abandoned, and a 'draft' to a page which I can't seem to see exists. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 07:40, 4 May 2009 (BST)
speedy it faster than caiger falls on a monday. or a tuesday. or a thursday. etc. etc. --WanYao 11:20, 4 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy - Linkthewindow Talk 11:22, 4 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy - As above.-- Adward 19:09, 8 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy - I'm going with crit 1. --Pestolence^(talk) 16:09, 9 May 2009 (BST)
Delete - Waste of space and entirely inaccurate, as the RRF had nothing to do with the 'siege'. --Papa Moloch 02:03, 10 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy, crit 1. --Janus ^talk 16:55, 10 May 2009 (BST)
Speedy - Crit 1 --Haliman - Talk 01:40, 12 May 2009 (BST)

Speedydelete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:08 18 May 2009 (BST)

Gulsonside ruination map

Unused and an orphan.

Delete -- Rooster Dragon 21:28, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete -- C h e e s e 21:45, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Make that a Keep/Move for just now. -- C h e e s e 11:01, 25 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Janus ^talk 23:11, 20 April 2009 (BST)
On a second thought, move to group's subspace. --Janus ^talk 16:55, 10 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - Read the damn page. Move to a subpage of Minianz. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:30, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Move - As Iscariot. Linkthewindow Talk 09:59, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Move - As Iscariot Asheets 19:50, 23 April 2009 (BST)
Move - As Iscariot. Especially the part about reading the fucking page. --Papa Moloch 23:34, 23 April 2009 (BST)
Move - Keep, move, just don't delete it. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:47, 23 April 2009 (BST)
Merge - move to subpage of MotA. --WanYao 22:50, 25 April 2009 (BST)
Move - As above. --Pestolence^(talk) 16:08, 9 May 2009 (BST)

Moved to Minions of the Apocalypse/Gulsonside ruination map. Linkthewindow Talk 00:04, 17 May 2009 (BST)

And redirect (Gulsonside ruination map) gone, as it's scheduled. Linkthewindow Talk 00:04, 17 May 2009 (BST)

Shore Hills Libraries

Crit 1?

Speedy - Crit 1 --Haliman - Talk 21:55, 12 May 2009 (BST)

Done--– Nubis ^NWO 10:46, 13 May 2009 (BST)

Quarlesbank Police Department

No longer used.

Speedy --Haliman - Talk 22:43, 12 May 2009 (BST)

Unused redirect from an unmerged page - links are fixed.--– Nubis ^NWO 10:45, 13 May 2009 (BST)

P

A surviving example page dummy.

Speedy - Crit 1 --Haliman - Talk 22:03, 12 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - Making a link on 21 pages dead for no reason? Fuck off, diskspace = cheep. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 08:56, 13 May 2009 (BST)

We don't delete protected demo pages. Thank you.--– Nubis ^NWO 10:45, 13 May 2009 (BST)

Galbraith Hills Auto Repairs

As below.

Speedy - Crit 1 --Haliman - Talk 22:00, 12 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - Don't break redirects, do the fucking work before you bring pages here. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 08:58, 13 May 2009 (BST)

Took 3 mins to fix the 2 redirect links. Thank you for your hard work.--– Nubis ^NWO 10:45, 13 May 2009 (BST)

Galbraith Hills Fire Department

Crit 1. Buildings moved. This page must have survived.

Speedy - Crit 1 --Haliman - Talk 21:58, 12 May 2009 (BST)
Keep - Fix the fucking links. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 08:59, 13 May 2009 (BST)

Until the links are fixed it is not to be considered for deletion.--– Nubis ^NWO 10:45, 13 May 2009 (BST)

Useless "Maps"

Eye in the Sky

A map using binocular images. Never went anywhere.

Delete -- Rooster Dragon 21:28, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete -- C h e e s e 21:45, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Janus ^talk 23:11, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:33, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 09:59, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete -- D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:48, 23 April 2009 (BST)
Delete -- --WanYao 22:46, 25 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - this is not too much work for one person to maintain.--x o x o 14:00, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

Current Buildings of Stanbury Village

Redundant, unused and an eyesoar.

Delete -- Rooster Dragon 21:28, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - Previously nominated back in November but there's been no activity for a couple of months now. -- C h e e s e 21:45, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Janus ^talk 23:11, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Redundant Delete is Redundant - Told you so... --Haliman - Talk 23:18, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Move to subpage of User:Conner Martel -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:32, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Temporary Keep - Until I get a response from the user. He may still be around (if he doesn't reply, I'll change my vote in a week.) Linkthewindow Talk 09:59, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Been long enough. Delete. Linkthewindow Talk 14:14, 28 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - as copyright infringement ;P --WanYao 22:48, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

Some more abandoned groups

Freelancer

The group page is redundant and inaccurate. The actual group is known as "Freelance" on the statistics page, not "Freelancer", and there is a page for Freelance itself.

Delete - Redundant and inaccurate. --Cpl Adrian Shephard 19:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete - Crit 1. There are a couple of these pages kicking about. They were created as part of a "zomgz let's give every group on teh stats page a wiki page!!" thing that was going on a while back. That's partly one of the reasons the whole mess with The Dead came about. They didn't want a page but apparently they had to or something. =/ Anyway, Speedy delete. -- C h e e s e 19:07, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete or change it into a redirect. --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
speedy -- --WanYao 22:50, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

AOA

Created before the last history wipe so unsure of actual creation time, very little information on the page and no real way of expanding that content due to the fact that we have no idea who the original author was. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
delete-o-rama --WanYao 22:51, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

E.T.P.P

Created some point before November 2007, page has lain dormant since. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
ciao - no content, abandoned --WanYao 22:52, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

ODC

Created before the last purge so very little information available about the author and the page doesn't really have much content. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Must learn to check the talk pages.. group has indeed some content, so Keep. --Janus ^talk 17:03, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Page has some content and is an indication of Monroeville groups, or are we deleting history now? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:17, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - As Janus and Iscariot. --Pestolence^(talk) 23:04, 22 April 2009 (BST)
keep - as iscariot --WanYao 22:53, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)
o.O --Janus ^talk 21:21, 9 May 2009 (BST)
\o/ --Janus ^talk 21:40, 9 May 2009 (BST)

Red vs Dead

Created back in 2007, no more edits since then. Group appears disbanded and page again lacking in content. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Did you do the sensible thing and ask the user on their talk page first? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:19, 21 April 2009 (BST)
In this case, it's not too sensible to bother asking. For one, the creator and only known member is inactive, and has been for ages if I'm not mistaken. For two, almost completely worthless as a page, and three (which is entirely okay to disregard this, because I have no real proof to show for it) I was told ingame a long time ago that the group never really went anywhere, nor was meant to go anywhere. Those Dullstonites really have no idea how to have fun sometimes.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 06:12, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
delete --WanYao 22:54, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

The Chosen

Created before the history purge, no edits since then and just has a picture and a group box without the box. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete --WanYao 22:56, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

The Goodsons

Again, back in 2007 was its creation. No edits since bar categorising. Just a line of text as content. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete --WanYao 22:56, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

L.I.A

Created on the 10th of March but no edits since bar Link and Boxy. Consists only of a note saying the page is under construction. User has since set up another group with a much more completed page. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete - Crit. 1.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 17:39, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Did you do the sensible thing and ask the user on their talk page first? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:22, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete --WanYao 22:57, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

Room 215

Created in January but nothing has happened since then. One line of text, and a group box. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- C h e e s e 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Delete --WanYao 22:57, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

Some abandoned groups

DR DEAD ZED

Set up on the 27th of March (the user has since gone on to create the MALTON CITIZEN BRIGADE on the 12th) with no further edits to this page bar categorisation. -- C h e e s e 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused and seemingly abandoned. -- C h e e s e 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - crit 1. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:31, 18 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Did you do the sensible thing and ask the user on their talk page first? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:10, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Yes. :P --Janus ^talk 14:06, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Deletion brought on the 18th, user asked on the 19th. Tell me what's backwards about that process? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 14:33, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Aw, just wanted to point out that I'm sensitive :'( On a serious note, this group is kinda new, so it should be kept.. and then probably deleted in a month if it stays inactive. Just my opinion. --Janus ^talk 14:52, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)
keep until the creator replies. if it's done with then speedy. --WanYao 22:59, 25 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

D.G.

Set up 4th of March, no edits since then bar categorisation. The user created C.C.G. last month which appears to be slightly more active in that it has had some expansion on the original content. -- C h e e s e 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - Unused and seemingly abandoned. -- C h e e s e 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - practically crit 1. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:31, 18 April 2009 (BST)
Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Did you do the sensible thing and ask the user on their talk page first? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:11, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:46, 22 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 12:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)

卐Nazis of Malton卐

I'm surprised no one else has put this up yet. Though it is indeed only a day old. Anyway, going for Crit 2. For obvious reasons which I should not need to explain. This is just plain wrong. Its noticeable that it did say that it does not condone reallife nazism though the author has already removed that statement. I know this is the UD wiki, but I really hope no one is going to vote keep here.--Thadeous Oakley 15:02, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Delete - This shit doesn't belong here, nor anywhere else for that matter.--Thadeous Oakley 15:08, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Tentative Keep - The group does exist in-game, however I would endorse a move that would take the swastikas out of the title. However that is how the group is shown on the stats page. I agree that creating a group of this nature was probably a bad move and very insensitive (in fact blatantly so) and it probably shouldn't have been done. -- C h e e s e 15:12, 19 April 2009 (BST) Speedy Delete as per author request. -- C h e e s e 22:19, 21 April 2009 (BST)
The fact that the group exists in-game, makes it a justification? You should note that the group is likely one person zerging. So many members, in such a short time-span and with an average level of 1?--Thadeous Oakley 15:17, 19 April 2009 (BST)
The Dead.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 15:18, 19 April 2009 (BST)

The Dead? LUE? Shacknews? They all gained a huge number of members in one go. While I'm not saying that isn't a zerg group, it is possible its a bunch of folk off a forum all signing up together. -- C h e e s e 15:22, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Nice free speech mang --Cyberbob 15:13, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - As much as I hate the Nazi party, if someone wants a group called that, there is nothing in the guidelines stopping them from using a Nazi theme for their group and having a page of it. Also, it's not Crit. 2, as their group page is actually UD related. I'd like to see it go, as it will probably become defunct within a month, but right now it's not against any rules.Delete - Author wiped and asked for deletion.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 15:13, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - If Kevan is fine with the group being on the stats page, we should be fine with it being on the wiki. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 15:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Last bastion of free speech and all that... --Pestolence^(talk) 15:45, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - The Nazi Party of Malton has been here for that long, and nobody cared. And as an information archive, the UDWiki doesn't delete pages based on "zerg probabilities". I hate the page, but it's only harming those who are silly enough to take him seriously. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:07, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete. As per recent user request and page wipe. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:22, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete violates TOU. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 17:16, 19 April 2009 (BST)
How exactly? --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 17:17, 19 April 2009 (BST)
卐 is Considered Content that is both racially and ethnically objectionable, even illegal in certain areas. The Disclaimer on the talk page isn't enough as the 卐 can be seen without actually visiting the page. No..I'm not Jewish but a couple of the players I know are and they ARE the type to throw a shitstorm over the presence of Nazi BS. Remember the "White Storm Rising" situation we had a couple of years back? Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 17:26, 19 April 2009 (BST)
A swastika by itself, without context, definitely shouldn't be considered that (hindu use and so on). The page itself contains no racially or ethnically objectionable content. As far as I know, it's illegal only in Germany, which isn't England or Wales and that's is all that matters on this wiki (as far as legality is concerned). And no, I don't remember any "White Storm Rising". --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 18:06, 19 April 2009 (BST)
White storm (And Black Storm) were both heavily racist pages. The content of the page is not entirely known to me, because I was too busy to lurk here during that time and missed it. Both pages ended up being deleted. But comparing what little I've been told to this case, using their deletions as a base to delete this would be incorrect as the Nazi party can and currently is being represented in a non-racially offensive manner. They may be hateful to members of the Communist party, as described on their page, but that is allowed under our guidelines.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:20, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Special:Undelete/Operation_White_Storm and Special:Undelete/Operation_Black_Storm. Brought to you by The Faggots, as a griefing tool to try to associate their enemies with white supremestism by making out they were holding a fake white pride meeting in their HQ -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:12 20 April 2009 (BST)
Thank you mister Box. Sometimes I forget I can view deleted pages now. :D --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 01:15, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - As SA, Midianian, etc. --Papa Moloch 17:38, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Keep even if unwillingly. --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy, crit 7. --Janus ^talk 23:11, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Delete It is is not about free speech, this is Zerging, it is obvious. For that reason it needs to go. --Niteaxe 00:43, 20 April 2009 (BST)
SARG. --Janus ^talk 01:29, 20 April 2009 (BST)

Proof? --Pestolence^(talk) 02:57, 20 April 2009 (BST)

If I had the server logs I would have the proof. Unfortunately I have to go with the obvious, and it is obvious. It's cool, let it there and the page will be up again for deletion in a couple months when this one guy gets tired of logging in to 49 accounts. I figured we would just get it out of the way now since he lacked taste. --Niteaxe 04:15, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep FFS this is a game that endorses killing folk and eating their brains, getting het up about the use of 60 year old symbols is a bit much... --Honestmistake 00:55, 20 April 2009 (BST)
~~Keep~~ -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:12 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - This is HILARIOUS, why get rid of it? All I see from them is radio spam to join the group. Wait until they actually break a rule before trying to extinguish free speech. Try to avoid the irony and not be wiki-Nazis, guys. --DTangent 04:36, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Well said. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:18, 20 April 2009 (BST)
~~Extremely Ambivalent Keep~~ -- Pretty much as Cyberbob and SA. I dislike the Nazi Party, but don't think this should be deleted. Nearly anyone can get offended by anything, and we can't really set this precedent (Oh, and "this group zergs" isn't really a good way to argue a deletion case.) Linkthewindow Talk 07:43, 20 April 2009 (BST)
The author has replaced the page asking for it to be deleted. So Speedy - crit 7. Linkthewindow Talk 15:15, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - and their work here is done.--x o x o 14:11, 20 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:03 21 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - If only to counteract Conndraka's erroneous and blatantly wrong interpretation of British Law. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:09, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Delete I think it is ridicules that there even is an option to let them stay. In my opinion it is irony then people in a democracy support the Nazis, a group and an anti-democratic ideology that strive for extermination and censuring of other people. When those democratic people motivate there opinions they refer to the Nazis right to express them self in the name of the freedom of speech and democracy. What’s wrong with those guys? How can they support an anti-democratic movement and say it is for the freedom of speech? How does the silencing and murdering of millions do a group to something we have to accept in preserving democracy? A group that want to extinguish democracy in fact! If we believe in democracy, we have to take a stand against the people how wish to turn our democracy in to a government of terror and dictatorship. Even if this is a game, I think it’s important to make clear that we don’t tolerate behaviours and actions like that. Not here, not now and never again! --Michael Sleeman 19:57, 21 April 2009 (BST) proud member of the Communist Party of Malton
grandstanding on the internet makes you look like a raging jew hth --Cyberbob 00:19, 22 April 2009 (BST)

You are aware that Communist regimes are similarly anti-democratic and that Stalin's tyranny was responsible for a greater number of deaths than that of the Nazis, yes? --Papa Moloch 02:32, 22 April 2009 (BST)
Keep However offensive this may be (and I am not convinced wholly that it is) I would not be comfortable with restricting free speech--C Whitty 21:54, 21 May 2009 (BST)
Vote's over, mate. --Pestolence^(talk) 22:37, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Speedily Deleted as per author request. -- C h e e s e 22:19, 21 April 2009 (BST)

Conner Martel

Scheduled - User redirect in the mainspace. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:35, 21 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted - you can use {{Delete}} or {{speedydelete}} to break redirects. Linkthewindow Talk 09:37, 21 April 2009 (BST)

Bale Mallrats

Moved from A/SD

Delete - Contentless. Not going to be very hard to recreate, it's a single word. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 01:13, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - It's six days old for fuck's sake! -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:56, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - As Gnome. -- C h e e s e 19:06, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - FFS, less than a week old. There are tons of shitty pages that have been lurking ignored for months. Give him some time. --– Nubis ^NWO 03:36, 8 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - As nubis... for now. Linkthewindow Talk 07:56, 8 April 2009 (BST)
It's been long enough. And as Boxy. Linkthewindow Talk 09:15, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - Yeah its annoying but it wont hurt anyone if we give them a chance at it. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:04, 8 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - As boxy. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:13, 13 April 2009 (BST)
Keep for now. --Janus ^talk 19:38, 8 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - given his last three edits were wiping a Mall page, an idiotic edit to it's danger report template, and this page creation where the only content is "Balls". I wouldn't credit him with even being a member of this group -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:43 13 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - As the Cube.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 02:15, 13 April 2009 (BST)
Keep - It's a week old, SHEEEEEEEEEESH! If it's still crud in a month, then it's S/D material. --WanYao 21:25, 13 April 2009 (BST)
Correction --> Its now 3 weeks old and hasn't been touched. -- C h e e s e 15:13, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Correction --> It's been 2 weeks since this vote was started, at 4 to 5, this page is being deleted. Cycle this. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:27, 21 April 2009 (BST)
Make that 4-6, as I forgot to state that my vote was a delete (not that it matters.) Linkthewindow Talk 09:31, 21 April 2009 (BST)

Deleted. Linkthewindow Talk 09:31, 21 April 2009 (BST)

A clockwork orange

Crit 3, also I don't think "User" can/should make Group A, then ditch it and make Group B, a totally different group, then wipe all content from Group A's page and make it a redirect to Group B. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:33, 3 April 2009 (BST)

Why not? :/ --Janus ^talk 13:16, 3 April 2009 (BST)

Keep - Group A has ownership rights to their pages. They are entitled to put whatever they want on their page, including a redirect to other groups. For instance, I could make Walk The Earth into a pure redirect to Mall Tour 2009 and there's nothing that anyone could do because I have the right to place whatever I like on Walk The Earth pages. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:28, 3 April 2009 (BST)
Regardless of your argument, it is still a Crit 3. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:39, 3 April 2009 (BST)
Throw a tantrum about crit 3 as much as you want, it'd take me two minutes to add links from my own userpages to invalidate it. The argument that is invalid is yours, a keep vote has been registered, this must now go to the regular deletions queue for two weeks. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:39, 5 April 2009 (BST)
I don't care either way, but if I did want this link deleted on sight, getting you to try and 'invalidate' the crit through those means would be the perfect way to have it deleted on the spot, funnily enough. See the user redirect battle 6 months ago, surely you remember, martyr? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:43, 5 April 2009 (BST)
Different case, this not a user redirect, but a group redirect. I trust I do not have to explain the differences and the implications? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:09, 5 April 2009 (BST)
No no, you've already got me. Feel free to send this to deletions. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)

Actually you can not, that's an example of crossing the bounds of page sovereignty. The groups need to be connected, they aren't so you'd be intentionally making the wiki a worse resource for the sake of advertisement/redirect spam which, if you were to challenge the revert on the grounds you present here, is vandalism as a bad faith edit. You really should take some time to figure out the real rules, or maybe ask someone in the know like you used to instead of claiming stuff that's patently untrue.--Karek^maps?! 15:07, 18 April 2009 (BST)
Keep -- But only by the technicality that the redirect seems to be in use. In reality, somebody needs to get ahold of the author of The Streltsy and get him/her to clean up or update this stuff. None of this stuff has been touched since last September. Asheets 21:49, 6 April 2009 (BST)
Delete Underused, under construction, needs to be under 6 feet. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 01:42, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - Crit 3, one useless link, been accessed 180 times and I can only imagine that 10 of those were when the page was a redirect. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:54, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete - Crit 3. It's used once and looks like this [[A clockwork orange|The Streltsy]] which is where the redirect points. Just fix that and be done with it. Why is this even on deletions to begin with? -- Rooster Dragon 13:23, 7 April 2009 (BST)
It was on A/SD, but it got two keep votes, so I moved it to A/D. :) --Janus ^talk 14:28, 7 April 2009 (BST)

It was easier to take it here and have the community delete it rather than argue with Iscariot over the rules. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:54, 15 April 2009 (BST)
Delete --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 14:29, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - pretty much as DDR. Linkthewindow Talk 13:38, 8 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - As Conndraka. --Janus ^talk 19:42, 8 April 2009 (BST)
Speedy Ba-leet - Crit 3. Like it should have been last week. -- C h e e s e 18:40, 12 April 2009 (BST)
Delete - Not serving any purpose. -- AHLG T G THE END IS NIGH! 05:23, 13 April 2009 (BST)
Delete a redirect to a totally unrelated page. --WanYao 21:26, 13 April 2009 (BST)

Gorn -- C h e e s e 14:59, 18 April 2009 (BST)

Lerwill Heights Barricade Plan

Has been recreated at Template:Lerwill Heights Barricade Plan to maintain cohesion. Since the entire page is a template. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 07:30, 31 March 2009 (BST)

Speedy - that's a duplicate page. Linkthewindow Talk 07:31, 31 March 2009 (BST)
Keep - Lerwill Heights Barricade Plan is linked to on the Category:Barricade plans map, and conforms to all other barricade plan pages. I've changed the page to include the template, so now all the editing of the plan is done via the template, updating all inclusions. If we delete the barricade plan pages in these instances, ~~a lot~~ some of the barricade plan templates become unused (because they're only included on barricade plan pages). There has long been talk of removing barricade plans from suburb pages (because they are purely survivor POV), which would ensure that a lot would become unused -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:34 31 March 2009 (BST)
Delete - There's no such thing. Lerwill Heights is inanimate and non-conscious, it has no plans, for barricading or otherwise. This is a survivor POV piece of crap that needs moving into the appropriate group or user space. No space has been suggested so this is just junk in a community space. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:49, 7 April 2009 (BST)
Keep As Boxy. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:11, 8 April 2009 (BST)
Keep As Boxy for now. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:28, 10 April 2009 (BST)
keep --WanYao 21:27, 13 April 2009 (BST)

Keeped -- C h e e s e 14:59, 18 April 2009 (BST)