UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06

Shortcut:
A/D

This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Deletion Requests

All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie [[:Category:Category]] and [[:Image:Image.jpg]]).
• A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.

Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.

Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, head for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.

Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Speedy Deletion Eligibility

To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:

1. No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
2. Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
3. Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
4. Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
5. Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)

   As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.

6. Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
7. Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
8. User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
9. Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.

   As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.

10. Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
11. Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.

    As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.

12. Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.

    As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.

13. Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).

A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.

Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests

• One vote per user.
• Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
• There are four vote types:
  • Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
  • Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
  • Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.

• The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
• At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
• If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
• If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.

Deletion Queue

Some more abandoned groups

Freelancer

The group page is redundant and inaccurate. The actual group is known as "Freelance" on the statistics page, not "Freelancer", and there is a page for Freelance itself.

1. Delete - Redundant and inaccurate. --Cpl Adrian Shephard 19:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. There are a couple of these pages kicking about. They were created as part of a "zomgz let's give every group on teh stats page a wiki page!!" thing that was going on a while back. That's partly one of the reasons the whole mess with The Dead came about. They didn't want a page but apparently they had to or something. =/ Anyway, Speedy delete. -- Cheese 19:07, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete or change it into a redirect. --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

AOA

Created before the last history wipe so unsure of actual creation time, very little information on the page and no real way of expanding that content due to the fact that we have no idea who the original author was. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

E.T.P.P

Created some point before November 2007, page has lain dormant since. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

ODC

Created before the last purge so very little information available about the author and the page doesn't really have much content. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Red vs Dead

Created back in 2007, no more edits since then. Group appears disbanded and page again lacking in content. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

The Chosen

Created before the history purge, no edits since then and just has a picture and a group box without the box. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

The Goodsons

Again, back in 2007 was its creation. No edits since bar categorising. Just a line of text as content. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

L.I.A

Created on the 10th of March but no edits since bar Link and Boxy. Consists only of a note saying the page is under construction. User has since set up another group with a much more completed page. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy Delete - Crit. 1.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 17:39, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Room 215

Created in January but nothing has happened since then. One line of text, and a group box. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused, orphaned and gathering dust. -- Cheese 16:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

卐Nazis of Malton卐

I'm surprised no one else has put this up yet. Though it is indeed only a day old. Anyway, going for Crit 2. For obvious reasons which I should not need to explain. This is just plain wrong. Its noticeable that it did say that it does not condone reallife nazism though the author has already removed that statement. I know this is the UD wiki, but I really hope no one is going to vote keep here.--Thadeous Oakley 15:02, 19 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - This shit doesn't belong here, nor anywhere else for that matter.--Thadeous Oakley 15:08, 19 April 2009 (BST)
2. Tentative Keep - The group does exist in-game, however I would endorse a move that would take the swastikas out of the title. However that is how the group is shown on the stats page. I agree that creating a group of this nature was probably a bad move and very insensitive (in fact blatantly so) and it probably shouldn't have been done. -- Cheese 15:12, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   The fact that the group exists in-game, makes it a justification? You should note that the group is likely one person zerging. So many members, in such a short time-span and with an average level of 1?--Thadeous Oakley 15:17, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   The Dead.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 15:18, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   The Dead? LUE? Shacknews? They all gained a huge number of members in one go. While I'm not saying that isn't a zerg group, it is possible its a bunch of folk off a forum all signing up together. -- Cheese 15:22, 19 April 2009 (BST)

3. Keep - Nice free speech mang --Cyberbob 15:13, 19 April 2009 (BST)
4. Keep - As much as I hate the Nazi party, if someone wants a group called that, there is nothing in the guidelines stopping them from using a Nazi theme for their group and having a page of it. Also, it's not Crit. 2, as their group page is actually UD related. I'd like to see it go, as it will probably become defunct within a month, but right now it's not against any rules.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 15:13, 19 April 2009 (BST)
5. Keep - If Kevan is fine with the group being on the stats page, we should be fine with it being on the wiki. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 15:23, 19 April 2009 (BST)
6. Keep - Last bastion of free speech and all that... --Pestolence^(talk) 15:45, 19 April 2009 (BST)
7. Keep - The Nazi Party of Malton has been here for that long, and nobody cared. And as an information archive, the UDWiki doesn't delete pages based on "zerg probabilities". I hate the page, but it's only harming those who are silly enough to take him seriously. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 16:07, 19 April 2009 (BST)
8. Delete violates TOU. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 17:16, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   How exactly? --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 17:17, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   卐 is Considered Content that is both racially and ethnically objectionable, even illegal in certain areas. The Disclaimer on the talk page isn't enough as the 卐 can be seen without actually visiting the page. No..I'm not Jewish but a couple of the players I know are and they ARE the type to throw a shitstorm over the presence of Nazi BS. Remember the "White Storm Rising" situation we had a couple of years back? Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 17:26, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   A swastika by itself, without context, definitely shouldn't be considered that (hindu use and so on). The page itself contains no racially or ethnically objectionable content. As far as I know, it's illegal only in Germany, which isn't England or Wales and that's is all that matters on this wiki (as far as legality is concerned). And no, I don't remember any "White Storm Rising". --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 18:06, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   White storm (And Black Storm) were both heavily racist pages. The content of the page is not entirely known to me, because I was too busy to lurk here during that time and missed it. Both pages ended up being deleted. But comparing what little I've been told to this case, using their deletions as a base to delete this would be incorrect as the Nazi party can and currently is being represented in a non-racially offensive manner. They may be hateful to members of the Communist party, as described on their page, but that is allowed under our guidelines.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:20, 19 April 2009 (BST)

   Special:Undelete/Operation_White_Storm and Special:Undelete/Operation_Black_Storm. Brought to you by The Faggots, as a griefing tool to try to associate their enemies with white supremestism by making out they were holding a fake white pride meeting in their HQ -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:12 20 April 2009 (BST)

   Thank you mister Box. Sometimes I forget I can view deleted pages now. :D --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 01:15, 20 April 2009 (BST)

9. Keep - As SA, Midianian, etc. --Papa Moloch 17:38, 19 April 2009 (BST)
10. Keep even if unwillingly. --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)
11. Delete It is is not about free speech, this is Zerging, it is obvious. For that reason it needs to go. --Niteaxe 00:43, 20 April 2009 (BST)

    SARG. --Janus ^talk 01:29, 20 April 2009 (BST)

    Proof? --Pestolence^(talk) 02:57, 20 April 2009 (BST)

    If I had the server logs I would have the proof. Unfortunately I have to go with the obvious, and it is obvious. It's cool, let it there and the page will be up again for deletion in a couple months when this one guy gets tired of logging in to 49 accounts. I figured we would just get it out of the way now since he lacked taste. --Niteaxe 04:15, 20 April 2009 (BST)

12. Keep FFS this is a game that endorses killing folk and eating their brains, getting het up about the use of 60 year old symbols is a bit much... --Honestmistake 00:55, 20 April 2009 (BST)
13. Keep -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:12 20 April 2009 (BST)

Some abandoned groups

DR DEAD ZED

Set up on the 27th of March (the user has since gone on to create the MALTON CITIZEN BRIGADE on the 12th) with no further edits to this page bar categorisation. -- Cheese 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused and seemingly abandoned. -- Cheese 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - crit 1. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 15:31, 18 April 2009 (BST)

D.G.

Set up 4th of March, no edits since then bar categorisation. The user created C.C.G. last month which appears to be slightly more active in that it has had some expansion on the original content. -- Cheese 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)

1. Delete - Unused and seemingly abandoned. -- Cheese 15:17, 18 April 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - practically crit 1. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 15:31, 18 April 2009 (BST)
3. Delete --Janus ^talk 19:46, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Bale Mallrats

Moved from A/SD

1. Delete - Contentless. Not going to be very hard to recreate, it's a single word. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:13, 7 April 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - It's six days old for fuck's sake! -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:56, 7 April 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - As Gnome. -- Cheese 19:06, 7 April 2009 (BST)
4. Keep - FFS, less than a week old. There are tons of shitty pages that have been lurking ignored for months. Give him some time. --– Nubis ^NWO 03:36, 8 April 2009 (BST)
5. Keep - As nubis... for now. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:56, 8 April 2009 (BST)
6. Keep - Yeah its annoying but it wont hurt anyone if we give them a chance at it. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 13:04, 8 April 2009 (BST)

   Delete - As boxy. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 05:13, 13 April 2009 (BST)

7. Keep for now. --Janus ^talk 19:38, 8 April 2009 (BST)
8. Delete - given his last three edits were wiping a Mall page, an idiotic edit to it's danger report template, and this page creation where the only content is "Balls". I wouldn't credit him with even being a member of this group -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:43 13 April 2009 (BST)
9. Delete - As the Cube.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 02:15, 13 April 2009 (BST)
10. Keep - It's a week old, SHEEEEEEEEEESH! If it's still crud in a month, then it's S/D material. --WanYao 21:25, 13 April 2009 (BST)

    Correction --> Its now 3 weeks old and hasn't been touched. -- Cheese 15:13, 19 April 2009 (BST)

Recent Actions

A clockwork orange

Crit 3, also I don't think "User" can/should make Group A, then ditch it and make Group B, a totally different group, then wipe all content from Group A's page and make it a redirect to Group B. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:33, 3 April 2009 (BST)

Why not? :/ --Janus ^talk 13:16, 3 April 2009 (BST)

1. Keep - Group A has ownership rights to their pages. They are entitled to put whatever they want on their page, including a redirect to other groups. For instance, I could make Walk The Earth into a pure redirect to Mall Tour 2009 and there's nothing that anyone could do because I have the right to place whatever I like on Walk The Earth pages. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:28, 3 April 2009 (BST)

   Regardless of your argument, it is still a Crit 3. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 13:39, 3 April 2009 (BST)

   Throw a tantrum about crit 3 as much as you want, it'd take me two minutes to add links from my own userpages to invalidate it. The argument that is invalid is yours, a keep vote has been registered, this must now go to the regular deletions queue for two weeks. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:39, 5 April 2009 (BST)

   I don't care either way, but if I did want this link deleted on sight, getting you to try and 'invalidate' the crit through those means would be the perfect way to have it deleted on the spot, funnily enough. See the user redirect battle 6 months ago, surely you remember, martyr? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 12:43, 5 April 2009 (BST)

   Different case, this not a user redirect, but a group redirect. I trust I do not have to explain the differences and the implications? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:09, 5 April 2009 (BST)

   No no, you've already got me. Feel free to send this to deletions. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 13:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)

   Actually you can not, that's an example of crossing the bounds of page sovereignty. The groups need to be connected, they aren't so you'd be intentionally making the wiki a worse resource for the sake of advertisement/redirect spam which, if you were to challenge the revert on the grounds you present here, is vandalism as a bad faith edit. You really should take some time to figure out the real rules, or maybe ask someone in the know like you used to instead of claiming stuff that's patently untrue.--Karek^maps?! 15:07, 18 April 2009 (BST)

2. Keep -- But only by the technicality that the redirect seems to be in use. In reality, somebody needs to get ahold of the author of The Streltsy and get him/her to clean up or update this stuff. None of this stuff has been touched since last September. Asheets 21:49, 6 April 2009 (BST)
3. Delete Underused, under construction, needs to be under 6 feet. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 01:42, 7 April 2009 (BST)
4. Delete - Crit 3, one useless link, been accessed 180 times and I can only imagine that 10 of those were when the page was a redirect. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 01:54, 7 April 2009 (BST)
5. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. It's used once and looks like this [[A clockwork orange|The Streltsy]] which is where the redirect points. Just fix that and be done with it. Why is this even on deletions to begin with? --  RoosterDragon  13:23, 7 April 2009 (BST)

   It was on A/SD, but it got two keep votes, so I moved it to A/D. :) --Janus ^talk 14:28, 7 April 2009 (BST)

   It was easier to take it here and have the community delete it rather than argue with Iscariot over the rules. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 02:54, 15 April 2009 (BST)

6. Delete --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 14:29, 7 April 2009 (BST)
7. Delete - pretty much as DDR. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:38, 8 April 2009 (BST)
8. Delete - As Conndraka. --Janus ^talk 19:42, 8 April 2009 (BST)
9. Speedy Ba-leet - Crit 3. Like it should have been last week. -- Cheese 18:40, 12 April 2009 (BST)
10. Delete - Not serving any purpose. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 05:23, 13 April 2009 (BST)
11. Delete a redirect to a totally unrelated page. --WanYao 21:26, 13 April 2009 (BST)

• Gorn -- Cheese 14:59, 18 April 2009 (BST)

Lerwill Heights Barricade Plan

Has been recreated at Template:Lerwill Heights Barricade Plan to maintain cohesion. Since the entire page is a template. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 07:30, 31 March 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy - that's a duplicate page. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:31, 31 March 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - Lerwill Heights Barricade Plan is linked to on the Category:Barricade plans map, and conforms to all other barricade plan pages. I've changed the page to include the template, so now all the editing of the plan is done via the template, updating all inclusions. If we delete the barricade plan pages in these instances, a lot some of the barricade plan templates become unused (because they're only included on barricade plan pages). There has long been talk of removing barricade plans from suburb pages (because they are purely survivor POV), which would ensure that a lot would become unused -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:34 31 March 2009 (BST)
3. Delete - There's no such thing. Lerwill Heights is inanimate and non-conscious, it has no plans, for barricading or otherwise. This is a survivor POV piece of crap that needs moving into the appropriate group or user space. No space has been suggested so this is just junk in a community space. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:49, 7 April 2009 (BST)
4. Keep As Boxy. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 23:11, 8 April 2009 (BST)
5. Keep As Boxy for now. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 05:28, 10 April 2009 (BST)
6. keep --WanYao 21:27, 13 April 2009 (BST)

• Keeped -- Cheese 14:59, 18 April 2009 (BST)

Image:LC1.JPG

DDR found this and asked about it on my user page. It could be argued it's a scheduled deletion (porn) but it's somewhat borderline. I was going to delete it, but thought I would come here for a second opinion. Also, just to state the obvious the image is not work safe. Linkthewindow  Talk  11:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Delete - I would have found it except she took the liberty of categorizing it before anyone could search and destroy it. Anything that gets me hard shouldn't be on UDWiki. Sept Grim.D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Keep - playing by the book is all well and good, but wanting this gone is too far imho.--xoxo 12:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3. keep Not porn and perfectly safe for work use? Its a bit crap but thats not the same thing.... Oh and DDR; if that gets you hard you should be in therapy and not on the internet ;)--Honestmistake 12:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Ah! A man get get lonely sometimes. Especially if he spends most of his time on an Urban Dead Wiki. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 21:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

4. DONE This fits my definition of porn. --– Nubis ^NWO 12:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
   • that's a very odd definition of porn you have Nubis.... this had only been up for an hour and 2 of the 3 (4inc you) thought it was fine. Don't you think that maybe leaving it up for discussion for 24 hours may have been worthwhile?--Honestmistake 12:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Mah.. I'd keep or change it a bit; I find this to be much worse. :/ --Janus ^talk 14:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Don't even suggest deleting that one, it could certainly be better but it is still funny :) --Honestmistake 15:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   De gustibus... ;) --Janus ^talk 18:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

5. Delete Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 01:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

So, speedy deleting it under crit 7? --Janus ^talk 20:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

leave it for the vote, it would give a sufficient indication of what the prudes in this community consider to be porn..--xoxo 05:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Re-deleted - scheduled deletion, both as Nubis did, and because the author wants it gone (crit 7 by proxy) and has uploaded a replacement. If you don't like the scheduled deletion of porn, please take it to a scheduled deletion vote to remove it from the list -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:55 28 March 2009 (BST)

lol the new one is hotter...so whatever....--xoxo 14:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Old Image Deletion Request

• File: Image:Feon.jpg
• Request: Please delete this as I wish it to be removed (I hope I have done this right - please forgive me if I haven't).
• Reason: Old image of mine for my profile (my own work too) that isn't used anymore. No longer needed by me and no one else uses it. Many Thanks.
• Stamp: --Feon Kensai 10:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedydelete - crit 7 -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:26 26 March 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - Not a Crit 7, another user first uploaded the image. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Ummm, don't you mean last? Andrewzz reverted it to a smaller image that Feon had uploaded before (21:07, January 4, 2008). Hardly a significant contribution... what the hell, it may as well go as a scheduled deletion (unused image) -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:48 26 March 2009 (BST)

   Perhaps you can tell me where in the following sentence the words 'significant contribution' appear? "The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count." -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Nice try. Copyright > Wiki Policy.--– Nubis ^NWO 12:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

3. Speedy - As Boxy (also, change that * to a # in your vote.) Linkthewindow  Talk  11:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Speedy Delete - As Boxy. And link, do it yourself you wimp >=[ D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Save Feon (keep)--xoxo 12:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

DONE Copyright holder requested that the image is deleted. We will honor the request of the image creator. --– Nubis ^NWO 12:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Die Angriff-Maschine

Old (Inactive) group page, blocking the ability to type DAM to get to the Danversbank Armed Militia page,. "This page was last modified 15:22, 9 July 2007." before I added the delete request at the top of the page. --Super Nweb 02:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Keep - there's enough on there for it to be worth keeping. We are looking for 1-2 poorly formatted lines of text, not a proper page + pictures. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

   That said, feel free to take over the redirect, and I'll throw up the {{InactiveGroup}} template once this vote's over. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

2. Keep - No reason to delete the page if all you want is the DAM re-direct. I believe the re-direct page is the page you ought to be requesting a deletion for. ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 08:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

   No need to request a deletion, he can just change the redirect (or create a disambiguation if the group is still active [although it's not]). Linkthewindow  Talk  08:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

3. Keep - ummm you can't just get rid of group pages coz they have your acronym. Just nick the redirect, no one's gonna complain ;) --xoxo 08:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Keep --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 08:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Keep - but can we delete the DEM pages? I'm thinking about starting a group called Dangerous Eagle Muffins, and I would like the redirect. --Blackboard 10:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
6. Keep - I would definitely join the Dangerous Eagle Muffins though. -- Cheese 12:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
7. Keep --Janus ^talk 13:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
8. Keep - Crit 12 is dead. However, if they are truly inactive, take the redirect, I doubt anyone would stop you.-- Adward  20:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
9. Keep - As above. Plus, it's fairly obvious this is directly connected with your bid for sysop. Though rather proving that you know the system well, this proves why you shouldn't be elected.--SirArgo ^Talk 20:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
10. Keep - Presently, they are inactive, just take the redirect, maybe put something on it or on your page that they did exist, a link. _■^■ 01:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
11. Keep - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
12. Keep - Just change the redirect into a disambig page. --ZsL 12:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
13. Keep - You and your group are clearly selfish arseholes. --Papa Moloch 13:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
14. Keep - Inactive you say? Steal the redirect. --The Cop 00:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
15. Keep - Durr.--ScouterTX 13:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Kept --ZsL 20:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Human Groups

Today I moved the 1000+ pages from this category to the more correct Category:Survivor Groups. I have copied the content over from the original, fixed up the pages in the category, and fixed up the links. I would move this and create a redirect though A/MV but I think the red link is a better detterent from this category ever spawning in the wiki again. Discussion?

Please note that the 30 or so pages remaining in the category are protected and thus will be moved by a sysop in due time. After that, the page will be Crit 4 worthy. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 19:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I've moved the discussion from Category talk:Human Groups to here. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedy Delete under crit 4 once the last groups are moved accordingly. --  RoosterDragon  19:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Delete - but will change to speedy once I move those last groups. Linkthewindow  Talk  22:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

   Now it's an unused category, with the protected/historical groups fixed. So Speedy Delete, crit 4. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

3. Speedy--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Speedy Deletion - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

• Killzored -- Cheese 12:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Diary Of Dan Frank

and it's talk page - Crit 9.--Nallan (Talk) 07:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedy - but fix the links on the creator's talk page (inside your comment,) first, please. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Speedydelete - links fixed, content at Journal:Diary Of Dan Frank -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 14:33 6 March 2009 (BST)
3. speedy -- crit 9 Asheets 20:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

• Deleted -- Cheese 21:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

STARS Radio FM

Not updated in a long time, looks unused to me (and I've never heard of it)--ScouterTX 07:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

1. Delete --ScouterTX 07:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Keep Delete -- There's enough on there to make it worth keeping (although if the STARS guys come over and want it nuked, I'll happily change my vote.) Linkthewindow  Talk  07:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   "There's enough on there to make it worth keeping" ... like what? (Most of the people mentioned aren't even in the group anymore BTW. Actually, the cop is the only one)--ScouterTX 09:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   Vote Changed - Group wants it deleted, it should go. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

3. Keep - As Jorm. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
4. Keep - Put some more evidence forward first Scouter, do some more research.--DiscoInferno 11:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   I've been part of that group for over one year and I know what went down, thank you.--ScouterTX 11:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

5. Delete - Abandoned, nothing really interesting or important there. --ZsL 02:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
6. MergeDeleteMake it a group sub-page. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 08:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
7. Baleet. Useless, abandoned, potential-free. --Blackboard 15:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
8. Delete Part of an old group. We don't use it no more. Feel Free --The Cop 23:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
9. Delete - As above.--SirArgo ^Talk 06:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
10. Delete - per group's wishes. --  RoosterDragon  23:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
11. Delete - Group wants it gone. --Johnny Bass 19:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
12. Delete - As above. --Janus ^talk 19:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
13. Delete - We don't use it. --Kewabara1 14:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
14. Delete - That is incredibly old, and the new group leaders have voted on this too, so I vote with them. No I have no free will. Elven2006 22:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleted --ZsL 01:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Resurrection_of_Caiger_Mall

A barely used, barely filled "conflict" page. No edits to expand upon it in almost two months. Left a note on the talk saying I would put it here. Gave them over a month. Still nothing. Not something deserving of its own page.--BFFs +SA+NSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN 4 EVA!!! 22:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

1. Baleet --BFFs +SA+NSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN 4 EVA!!! 22:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Ion Cannon (Delete) From low orbit Linkthewindow  Talk  05:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
3. Delete. Delete delete delete. --Blackboard 13:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
4. Delete. Seriously, a wiki page doesn't need to be made for every single thing that happens at this mall. --Johnny Bass 15:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

   I disagree. May I direct you to my page - Blackboard finds ammo, pool cue at Caiger.--Blackboard 16:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

   Clearly a very epic struggle has been immortalized by your page. It's right up there with this event and probably should go up for historical status. --Johnny Bass 17:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

5. Delete - Cillit bang!--SirArgo ^Talk 16:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
6. Delete - Caiger Mall? Does anyone still actually give a shit about that place? --Papa Moloch 17:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
7. Delete - Spam. --Pestolence^(talk) 22:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
8. Delete - For great justice. --ZsL 08:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
9. Delete - Meh. --Janus ^talk 16:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
10. Delete - Boringasslicious. MEIN FUHRER, I CAN WALK!--ScouterTX 23:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
11. Delete - --WanYao 14:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
12. Delete - So short it could be Vern the Midget. --The Cop 23:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleted -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:09 27 February 2009 (BST)

Barhah-Raz

A propaganda page pushed by the long inactive Rowcliffe Must Fall group. Most of the content is just an out of date edit of the Pegton page. Their various propagandistic additions are also repeated on their group page anyway. I guess it could just be moved to a group subpage, but as noted above they are inactive, and the content is largely duplicated. I bring it here, since more discussion can be generated.

Included in this request are the following:

• User:DangerReport/Barhah-Raz
• User:NTstatus/Barhah-Raz
• Template:NonSuburb - (Redundant if page deleted)
• Barhah-Raz Building Information Center

Discuss. --  RoosterDragon  14:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

--

1. Move - Make sub-pages of Rowcliffe Must Fall. --Papa Moloch 17:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Merge - to subpage of RMF, as Moloch. --WanYao 17:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
3. Merge - All hail Papa Moloch. His age is Papa, and his face is Moloch. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n} 18:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
4. Move to their subpage. --Janus ^talk 20:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
5. Move As Janus. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Haven't we already voted on this in the last couple of months? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 17:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I believe we did, yes... --WanYao 17:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Whatlinkshere is a wondrous thang! Try 7 months ago -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:19 10 February 2009 (BST)

So? :| --Janus ^talk 13:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Since it was voted to move, I've cleaned up their templates a little, and three of the pages above now qualify for SD. Barhah-Raz and Barhah-Raz Building Information Center just need moving and some link fixes afterwards. --  RoosterDragon  16:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Moved to Rowcliffe Must Fall/Barhah-Raz & Rowcliffe Must Fall/Barhah-Raz Building Information Center -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 07:09 27 February 2009 (BST)

Grayside Civil War

A pointless page about a non-event which provides not a whit of useful, informative, factual or even entertaining information. It doesn't approach anywhere near NPOV: it's just a collage of POV rants which don't even make sense. --WanYao 00:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

1. Delete - Has no "potential". Except for spastics to make drama amongst each other. --WanYao
2. Delete - See above, excluding the "spastics" --ScouterTX 00:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   "Except for to make drama amongst each other." sounds stupid though. -- Cheese 00:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   Doesn't really matter in this case I guess. --ScouterTX 01:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

3. Delete to avoid further drama concerning it. Replace "spastics" with "people" then to avoid illogical fallacy. My brain hurts :/ --Ryzak Black 01:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
4. Delete - Wow. --Met Fan ^F 01:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
5. Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
6. Delete - Dammit Wan, you beat me to it! Linkthewindow  Talk  01:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   Just remembered these from last month. If I remember correctly, the content is quite different (but one could argue that this page still is breaking the spirit of the policy-although it would be a bit of a long shot, tbh.) This silly little bout of drama has been going on for a while, it seems. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

7. Delete post-haste. Saying "opinion" is not a way to make POV okay on a public page. ߘlackboard 01:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
8. Keep - It seems to be an active page and maybe with more work it won't suck so hard. Is there anyway we can move it to a group or user subpage?--SirArgo ^Talk 01:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   You should lurk more--ScouterTX 01:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   You should have a VB warning for editing a subpage of a group you aren't in.--– Nubis ^NWO 22:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   Um, what the hell did that prove? I have read that before and I merely agree that is should be moved to the group namespace.--SirArgo ^Talk 01:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   You mean like last time? -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:43 29 January 2009 (BST)

   Oh yeah, that was really hardcore vandalism! How could I! --ScouterTX 14:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

9. Delete - about 3 people will care when this goes. Liberty 04:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
10. Keep - Let them get it all out -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:42 29 January 2009 (BST)

    Meh, there's no potential here. It's too big a mess, and everything I have seen of the contributors points to the fact that they don't possess the skill set to turn it into a coherent page. Furthermore, I object to the name. STARS, who are probably the single most important group in E Grayside, weren't involved in this.... Therefore to call it a "civil war" when the largest, longest-standing, most important group in the suburb had nothing to do with it is misleading. If someone wants to create a REAL page, with a legit title and REAL content on this conflict -- fine. But this page belongs in the trash. --WanYao 20:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

11. Delete - While I think it's a laugh, I agree with WanYao that it isn't really a civil war, otherwise STARS would have been involved, which we wasn't. --The Cop 22:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
12. Delete - Kill with fire. --Haliman - Talk 03:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
13. Move A cute little page, but needs to be in a different namespace Asheets 20:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
14. Delete - and move to group subspace. --Pestolence^(talk) 01:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
15. Merge - Send it to one of the groups' userspaces. --ZsL 01:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

    They've already got one that was moved to their group sub-page area, guys -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 23:51 5 February 2009 (BST)

    I see, but it doesn't have that purdy template and certain info from the Civil War page isn't on the one you linked. --ZsL 06:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

    Does it need to be? The one already in their group space is fine, after the first deletions case over two of their pages, we stated if they were so inclined to make a page, not to mention our name anywhere. So if this one was deleted, it leaves that one, and if only that one remains, with no reference to us, I don't care. Although the upcoming Project Malton page they're creating doesn't look promising. --Ryzak Black 14:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

16. Delete--BFFs +SA+NSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN 23:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
17. Delete - Meh. Just kill it. -- Cheese 23:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
18. Delete - KILL IT WITH FIRE --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n} 18:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleted--– Nubis ^NWO 18:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Blue Aegis Group/History/Grayside Conflict

Due to a mutual agreement, that satisfies both parties, I would like this page to be deleted. As this page has been edited by others (albeit in a very minor way) I would like to ask that this page be deleted. --Captain Rickety 17:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedy Delete then? --Janus ^talk 17:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I got it. It was only editted by others to fix NPOV stuff. Still qualifies as a speedy.--– Nubis ^NWO 18:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Zombykiller user page

Reason - I have created a new wiki account with exact same info as this one User:Bhuwannabe --bhuwannabe 00:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

1. Speedy Delete - crit 7 (You'll notice that he posted under that name in the history.) Please use speedy deletions in future if you are requesting a deletion for your own page. Linkthewindow  Talk  00:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
2. SD - Liberty 00:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
3. It would be better if you keep and redirect the old user page (and talk page) to your new ones, so that people can still find you if they need to discuss any of your old edits -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:23 3 February 2009 (BST)

   Users don't get redirects--– Nubis ^NWO 16:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

4. Keep - with redirect. --WanYao 14:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

   Users don't get redirects--– Nubis ^NWO 16:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

5. Speedy Delete - Crit 7. As above. --User:Axe27/Sig 00:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
6. Speedy - I'd advise him to keep it, but it's up to him. As above. --Pestolence^(talk) 02:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
7. Get this off ma A/D, if he wants it gone then it shall be done.--xoxo 02:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
8. Keep as redirect, because he just told me so :) --Janus ^talk 13:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

   Users don't get redirects--– Nubis ^NWO 16:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

9. Crit 7 - And if he requests it under the zombykiller account all your keeps count for nothing under Nubis' precedent. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

   I asked him and he prefers the page to be kept as redirect. --Janus ^talk 15:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

   Users don't get redirects.--– Nubis ^NWO 16:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

   I thought that only redirects like 'zombykiller' (without the User prefix) weren't allowed.. :| --Janus ^talk 16:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

   Redirects are redirects. Besides, I edited all the links to go to Bhuwanbananadanana. And he signed them all that way too.--– Nubis ^NWO 23:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

   Yeah, but redirects in the main namespace are redirects in the main namespace, and this wasn't. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦C:RCS¦} 00:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

   Users don't get redirect from the main namespace. There is absolutely nothing to say that you can't redirect an old account to a new account if you change usernames. It's pure common sense to do so, so that the user can still be found later despite having a whole new user name -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 03:27 13 February 2009 (BST)

   ^This is 100% correct and true. Users have always been allowed to redirect their old accounts wherever they deem appropriate within reason. It would be dumb if we did it differently than that for the aforementioned reason. --Karek^maps?! 15:11, 18 April 2009 (BST)

Done--– Nubis ^NWO 16:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Archive

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020