UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06
This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.
Guidelines for Deletion Requests
All Deletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie
[[:Category:Category]]
and[[:Image:Image.jpg]]
). - A reason for deletion. This should be short and to the point.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.
In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the {{delete}} tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.
Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the Archive.
Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, go to UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling.
Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Eligibility
To be eligible for a Speedy Deletion Request, the page must fall under at least one of the following criteria:
- No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose.
- Off-Topic: The page is a clearly off-topic page.
- Unused Redirect: The page is an unused or underused (ie, only 1-2 pages using the link) redirect.
- Empty Category: The page is a Category page that has no entries within it.
- Missed Talk Page: The page is a Talk: Page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so)
- As of 19 May 2010, Crit 5 is now a scheduled deletion.
- Deletion Workaround: The page is a duplicate of a page that has been deleted from a previous deletion request (please note the relevant deletion request if this is so). A page that fits this criterion is immediately qualified for deletion without requiring it be nominated on the 'Speedy Deletions' page. Recreating a page that fits this criterion will get you a polite message to stop doing so. Any further infractions of this nature will qualify as vandalism and will be treated as such. Note that criterion 6 does not apply when the page has been restored through Undeletions.
- Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
- User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.
- Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.
- As of 2011, August 29, Crit 9 is now a scheduled deletion.
- Unused Template: The page is a template that has existed for at least one week and is currently unused within the wiki.
- Non-existent User Page: The page is a User: page for a user that doesn't exist, and any content on the page has been moved to the appropriate User: or Journal: page.
- As of 20 June 2009, Crit 11 is now a scheduled deletion.
Defunct group page: The page is a non-historical group page, it is over two months old, it has not had an update in a month, and is not on the stats page. Such pages will remain in the queue for 5 days to determine their defunct status has been correctly identified. Due to the large number of pages that fit into this criterion, please {{speedydelete12}} on the pages to ensure that they are categorized differently from normal speedy deletion requests.- As of 2007, September 16, this is no longer a valid criterion.
- Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).
A page may also fall under a scheduled deletion and should be posted here if it is missed by the sysops.
Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests
- One vote per user.
- Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a # with no empty lines inbetween votes.
- There are four vote types:
- Delete. For agreement with the deletion request
- Merge. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit Delete).
- Speedy Delete. For indication that the page meets one of the Speedy Deletions Criteria (includes an implicit Delete).
- Keep. For disagreement with the deletion request.
- The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.
- At least one Delete vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.
- If more Delete votes are entered than Keep votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.
- If 3 Speedy Deletes are lodged, and there are no Keep Votes, the page will be deleted as per Speedy Deletions.
Deletion Queue
The Dead's Resurgence
Very strong cat 2, i mean just look at it......--Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 20:57, 23 April 2011
- It is currently under consideration to be moved to the group namespace of The Dead. A deletion vote doesn't make much sense until that is sorted out. -- Spiderzed█ 21:15, 23 April 2011 (BST)
- user:Imthatguy is a pretty shit page too, let's delete that while we're at it – Nubis NWO 23:56, 23 April 2011 (BST)
The living
Not really much in the way of content here. I'd like to have the page deleted so that I can use the name (with a capitol L). *Clint Clintstone* Talk 10:35 21 April 2011 (EST)
- delete - never got off the ground etc. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:46, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - This is both history, a group that existed(and we don't delete disbanded groups just 'cause), and also a page stuffed full of content when context is shown. We killed crit 12 for a reason. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 03:52, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep. Its well linked. --Rosslessness 11:04, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- My arse. it has like 8 and you made half of them years ago and only because they mentioned the dead? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 12:07, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Sorry, its referred to as part of the did you know section of the wiki, I don't know why Clint doesn't just use The Living --Rosslessness 12:28, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- My arse. it has like 8 and you made half of them years ago and only because they mentioned the dead? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 12:07, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep. As Ross. You don't have to get rid of that page to create The Living. And we could also add a disambiguation notice on top of the page to refer to the older/newer group respectively. -- Spiderzed█ 12:47, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- This^. Especially since they're both unique pages and the stats page links by caps(like the whole wiki). --Karekmaps 2.0?! 13:42, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - As Above.--T | BALLS! | 13:46 22 April 2011(UTC) |
- Delete Just another of those "exists only on paper" kind of groups with no real content, the kind of which we deleted hundreds of. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 13:59, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete - this page doesn't stop you using the capital L space... and anyway, afaik, this one is just a reactionary page to The Dead... puppy tears, and all that, y'know -- boxy 15:08, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep -- Asheets 16:15, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep SHUT THE FUCK UP!. i loled.--bitch 16:19, 22 April 2011
- Delete - get out. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 17:50, 22 April 2011 (BST)
Recent Actions
Wotan's Templar
Sorry but this was asking for it really. From what I can tell there is a previous deletion of this page undocumented as per a previous A/VB and Delete action involving this page. It's also been predated by a few relevant precedents of successful delete votes for this kind of blatant racism in the past. In addition to being a violation of the wikihost's ToS, partially documented and linked here.--Karekmaps?! 20:03, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- So what are you planning on going with Karke? You've submitted a page for deletion which has some grounds as a deletion candidate, then after 10 votes changed it dramatically back ([1]) to what it was before it was even considerable for deletion... -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:26, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- That's more of an in-case of failure here's a relevant revision. It's still qualified for deletion just now it is out of Crit 2 status and the keep votes actually are relevant. --Karekmaps?! 04:22, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- You've illegitimised the vote and it should start again if this is the state the page is going to stay in before its potential deletion. I don't know about the other sysops but I wouldn't be acting on this vote's result regardless of what the outcome is, in this state. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:42, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Regardless of what you want to act on you're basically claiming you can ignore the results of a vote because a revision was undone in the process because it's related to an ongoing vandal case. The vote was about the page, and thus why it was put here not on A/SD. Stop trying to exercise promotion as a badge of authority, kthnkbai.--Karekmaps?! 05:26, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Many deletion votes are cycled early because the issue had with the article (if that's the reason it's brought to a/d) is resolved and the content of the page is no longer an issue. As for what you said, conversely, you're basically claiming you can submit a page to A/D, have a vote started in your majority, then remove the issues you have with it and continue to get it deleted as per the old revisions? Ha -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:33, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Protip:Deletion votes are about pages not revisions. --Karekmaps?! 08:25, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for agreeing with me, the page should be voted on in its current state, not the revision you put forward to them and then changed. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:09, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Ugh fuck it I don't care anymore. If no one else cares enough about what you're doing then I sure as hell am going to try not to. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:30, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for agreeing with me, the page should be voted on in its current state, not the revision you put forward to them and then changed. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:09, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Protip:Deletion votes are about pages not revisions. --Karekmaps?! 08:25, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Many deletion votes are cycled early because the issue had with the article (if that's the reason it's brought to a/d) is resolved and the content of the page is no longer an issue. As for what you said, conversely, you're basically claiming you can submit a page to A/D, have a vote started in your majority, then remove the issues you have with it and continue to get it deleted as per the old revisions? Ha -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:33, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Regardless of what you want to act on you're basically claiming you can ignore the results of a vote because a revision was undone in the process because it's related to an ongoing vandal case. The vote was about the page, and thus why it was put here not on A/SD. Stop trying to exercise promotion as a badge of authority, kthnkbai.--Karekmaps?! 05:26, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- You've illegitimised the vote and it should start again if this is the state the page is going to stay in before its potential deletion. I don't know about the other sysops but I wouldn't be acting on this vote's result regardless of what the outcome is, in this state. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:42, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- That's more of an in-case of failure here's a relevant revision. It's still qualified for deletion just now it is out of Crit 2 status and the keep votes actually are relevant. --Karekmaps?! 04:22, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy - Crit 2, it has nothing to do with UD. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 20:07, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- I might add, to the keepers, that the content of the page clearly has nothing to do with UD, so it makes it off-topic and Crit 2. Not only that, it's also quite inane, dumb, offensive, and like Karek, its purpose is very blatant (like that of what I mentioned). Whether or not some people ingame have "Wotan's Templar" inserted in the group section should have little bearing on wiki affairs, especially permitting the aforementioned. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:38, 9 April 2011 (BST)
Speedy - Crit 2, I wasn't going to vote but a link on there I overlooked makes the page's purpose pretty blatant. --Karekmaps?! 20:21, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete - If it weren't an in-game group I would have gone for speedy crit 2, but since it is, I won't. Content is still inappropriate and likely to be deleted anyway if found to be vandalism. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 20:25, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy - 1.20 YOU agree not to use the service to do any of the following and it is expressly agreed between US and YOU that if there is any breach of this Clause 1.19 may, without notice and without obligation to pay compensation apply service credits or refund any monies, suspend restrict or terminate your service if YOU:
- (a) Upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene (illegal pornography), libellous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable. Please note that IRC services may not be run on our network. Contact us for clarification where needed. --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 20:29, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - Precursor group pages National Socialist Union and Combat 18 have been allowed to exist. Former incarnations of WT haven't been speedy-deleted for being racist or off-topic, but for being being created by a ban-avoiding perma-banned vandal. With Bankschroef as creator, this A/SD reason doesn't apply. -- Spiderzed▋ 20:31, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- show me where it says kill jews on combat 18 page and i would want it deleted.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 00:03 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- That's not actually relevant Spider, it doesn't matter why the page was recreated, without an undelete request it(Recreation) does apply and qualifies it for instadelete. Not only that but Crit 2 means that the page has to be about the group not about how jews deserve to die. --Karekmaps?! 01:12, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- It is relevant, and not only that but crit 6 has to be a duplicate. The vandal versions that were deleted were crit 1 sentences from Cornholioo, the ones recreated were expanded, so they weren't duplicated. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:46, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- That's not actually relevant Spider, it doesn't matter why the page was recreated, without an undelete request it(Recreation) does apply and qualifies it for instadelete. Not only that but Crit 2 means that the page has to be about the group not about how jews deserve to die. --Karekmaps?! 01:12, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- show me where it says kill jews on combat 18 page and i would want it deleted.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 00:03 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Active group. --VVV RPMBG 20:48, 9 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy and they are not a even a group triple u it's one fucking guy and his zergs which has already been proven.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 23:05 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy As Anime has said this sort of thing is expressly against Poundhost's TOS. The fact that other racist nonsense is on here doesn't justify keeping this. In fact I would go further and say we should rereview and delete all the racist content on the wiki before someone complains to Poundhost and the whole game gets pulled. Freedom of speech does not equal the right to be an arse on someone else's private property. Gordon 01:17, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - Aha no. delete the images, not the group. they are a shock group, they don't just have one guy and they are trolling everyone. the amount of hypocrisy from supporters of Columbine Kid's historical bid is phenomenal. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 01:19, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete existing revisions & replace with NPOV section per Specific Case Editing Guidelines for Group Pages. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:54, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - Suppression of things that you don't happen to like cuts more the the core of Nazism than anything on that page. As far as shock tactics go, yes it's lazy, cheap, and utterly devoid of creativity. But so what. If you want to let Nazis look like idiots, you just need to let them open their mouths.--T | BALLS! | 05:04 10 April 2011(UTC) |
- Delete Burn all of it. Smyg 06:56, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete Destroy, eradicate, erase. Oidar 08:03, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy Inappropriate, distasteful and nothing to do with the game. It's a speedy due to the TOU violation noted above. Linkthewindow Talk 08:38, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete - As Revenant. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 09:55, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete - As link.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 10:24, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy No place for that kind of thing here, however 'ironic'. Betamaxx 11:25, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy TOS violation and irrelevant to the game. Hardly worth risking getting this wiki pulled by Poundhost.--Penguinpyro 13:18, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete - As above. -- Cheese 15:56, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep Agreeing with DDR. Of course if it deleted, I'll shed no tears. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:55, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - As Ross and DDR. The Columbine Kids analogy is a good one here.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:33, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- yon you are out of you're fucking mind. please elaborate? cause I know your not comparing 11-20 deaths which were perpetuated in a pathetic attempt for attention to the systematic murder of a entire race of people which during a world war. are you? seems that way?-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 03:26 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- He's not comparing the RL events, he's comparinging the in-game reaction to their re-embodiments. CK intentionally offended people, and nearly became historical. WT intentionally offended people, and had their page stripped of most of its content and probably deleted. He's questioning the fairness of hosting an inactive, offensive group while angrily censoring a active, offensive group. Not to put words into his mouth. --VVV RPMBG 03:37, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- If you can't tell the difference between parody and genuine hate speech, then I feel sorry for you, and you have no business attempting to adjudicate this. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 05:26, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Presumably it would be okay if it had a hilarious satirical caption, e.g. Executioner: "Need MOAR AMMO!"; Waiting Victim: "LOL"; apparently images of people shooting schoolkids is acceptable as long as it's played for laughs.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 05:48, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Presumably, you are a weak minded fool who thinks that burying evidence of Mankind's complete and utter failure will somehow make it go away.--T | BALLS! | 06:07 11 April 2011(UTC)
- I'm not sure the UDWiki is an appropriate place for memorialising Mankind's complete and utter failure, but in any case, I've not suggested burying the evidence: I'm wondering if this image would be considered okay if it were used for "parody" or satirical purposes as there seems to be some confusion (or just hypocrisy). Perhaps Harrison, Revenant or other CK apologists can let us know exactly how many people need to have died in an atrocity for it to be beyond the pale of wiki satire.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 07:04, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Let the CK thing go mang, they're dead and gone and it's got nothing to do with this vote beyond people with a poor sense of reality claiming the two are in anyway similar. --Karekmaps?! 07:05, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Sure, but don't complain when you're stuck with a 'satirical' neo-Nazi group page using offensive images. Consider yourself lucky that Cornholio's such a half-wit or these double standards and fudged principles about what's deemed offensive would already be a much bigger problem.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 07:12, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Says the self proclaimed "Formatting Nazi". Damn that's offensive. How can you use that term for silly light humor when it was so tragic. What a reprehensible human being. To quote one of our so noble, compassionate and rightly nazi hating voters above: "Destroy, eradicate, erase." Then lets look for some more books to burn.--T | BALLS! | 07:47 11 April 2011(UTC)
- Good idea. Oidar 07:51, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Yes, and lets send all Nazis to concentration camps. --VVV RPMBG 07:58, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Even better! Oidar 08:51, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- There is no hope for humanity. --VVV RPMBG 09:01, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Nope. Oidar 10:25, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- I find it funny that DDR's vote, making the same comparison, has absolutely no replies, but mine has plenty, surprisingly all made by the same crew that seem to be wiki-stalking me at the moment.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:16, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Welcome to the club!-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:24, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- I find it funny that DDR's vote, making the same comparison, has absolutely no replies, but mine has plenty, surprisingly all made by the same crew that seem to be wiki-stalking me at the moment.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:16, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- i can't speak for the others.. but I'm not stalking you, you just write some stupid not well thought out garbage. and shriek like a girl when you don't get you're way.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 11:52 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- You can make anything about you, can't you Yonnua.--T | BALLS! | 13:50 11 April 2011(UTC) |
- Nope. Oidar 10:25, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- There is no hope for humanity. --VVV RPMBG 09:01, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Even better! Oidar 08:51, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Yes, and lets send all Nazis to concentration camps. --VVV RPMBG 07:58, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Zombie Lord, please note that I've not voted on this issue, and my questions about it are all regarding the use of the Vinica image that has already been removed.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 08:45, 11 April 2011 (BST)
| - Good idea. Oidar 07:51, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Says the self proclaimed "Formatting Nazi". Damn that's offensive. How can you use that term for silly light humor when it was so tragic. What a reprehensible human being. To quote one of our so noble, compassionate and rightly nazi hating voters above: "Destroy, eradicate, erase." Then lets look for some more books to burn.--T | BALLS! | 07:47 11 April 2011(UTC)
- Sure, but don't complain when you're stuck with a 'satirical' neo-Nazi group page using offensive images. Consider yourself lucky that Cornholio's such a half-wit or these double standards and fudged principles about what's deemed offensive would already be a much bigger problem.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 07:12, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Let the CK thing go mang, they're dead and gone and it's got nothing to do with this vote beyond people with a poor sense of reality claiming the two are in anyway similar. --Karekmaps?! 07:05, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- They were satirising the media response, not the acts themselves. Which were reprehensible, albeit tragic, predictable, and ultimately should have been avoidable. If it's any consolation, you're responding exactly as you have been programmed to. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 07:44, 12 April 2011 (BST)
| - I'm not sure the UDWiki is an appropriate place for memorialising Mankind's complete and utter failure, but in any case, I've not suggested burying the evidence: I'm wondering if this image would be considered okay if it were used for "parody" or satirical purposes as there seems to be some confusion (or just hypocrisy). Perhaps Harrison, Revenant or other CK apologists can let us know exactly how many people need to have died in an atrocity for it to be beyond the pale of wiki satire.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 07:04, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Presumably, you are a weak minded fool who thinks that burying evidence of Mankind's complete and utter failure will somehow make it go away.--T | BALLS! | 06:07 11 April 2011(UTC)
- Presumably it would be okay if it had a hilarious satirical caption, e.g. Executioner: "Need MOAR AMMO!"; Waiting Victim: "LOL"; apparently images of people shooting schoolkids is acceptable as long as it's played for laughs.--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 05:48, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- If you can't tell the difference between parody and genuine hate speech, then I feel sorry for you, and you have no business attempting to adjudicate this. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 05:26, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- He's not comparing the RL events, he's comparinging the in-game reaction to their re-embodiments. CK intentionally offended people, and nearly became historical. WT intentionally offended people, and had their page stripped of most of its content and probably deleted. He's questioning the fairness of hosting an inactive, offensive group while angrily censoring a active, offensive group. Not to put words into his mouth. --VVV RPMBG 03:37, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- yon you are out of you're fucking mind. please elaborate? cause I know your not comparing 11-20 deaths which were perpetuated in a pathetic attempt for attention to the systematic murder of a entire race of people which during a world war. are you? seems that way?-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 03:26 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - But add a NPOV section. MHSstaff 22:36, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep. ~ 04:41, 11 April 2011
- Delete J.I 07:42, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- keep it's in poor taste but in the linked form i can't really see why its a deletion candidate. To be frank, the only reason anyone is likely to even see this page is because of this request. --Honestmistake 12:20, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep the only reason to kill it would be a very weak 2 --Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 18:11, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - you know, you can just ignore things that offend you. Is that so fucking difficult? 20:04, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - If you're worried about violating the TOS, then when are you going to start deleting everything that can be found "otherwise objectionable" on the wiki? The CK page is clearly satire, and this is clearly not, but the TOS does not make any exceptions for satire. And one could make a case that quite a few PKer group pages "promote physical harm or injury against any group or individual." And what about the Nazi Party of Malton? --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 05:12, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Because besides the very, very few like Karek and Akule who wish for the TOU to cover everything on the wiki without exception, TOU is just mostly used for arguing one's agenda. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:35, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- The ToS do cover the entire wiki (and, in fact, the entire game); that is indisputable fact. It's the enforcement that is lacking. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 07:48, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Apologies. That's what I meant. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:43, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- The ToS do cover the entire wiki (and, in fact, the entire game); that is indisputable fact. It's the enforcement that is lacking. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 07:48, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Most of these clearly refer only to causing harm to in-game personae, which last I checked did were not considered equivalent to real persons even under British law. The page in question equally clearly does not. Nice try, but your argument is invalid. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 07:39, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- It's interesting how some people can't understand the difference between wanting enforcement in extreme and blatant cases of ToS violation and forcing everything to match every possible interpertation of the ToS. Things like that exist for webhosts to remove highly damaging content, specifically anything that can 1)get them sued(which is why copyright keeps coming up) and 2) anything that can get them in serious trouble(Like the link deleted from this page's rev history). When people refer to ToS violation in this case it's pretty blatant what they mean and why. Please stop acting like it's some fringe agenda to actually want extreme violations addressed, no one wants to take away your images. --Karekmaps?! 02:31, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- Because besides the very, very few like Karek and Akule who wish for the TOU to cover everything on the wiki without exception, TOU is just mostly used for arguing one's agenda. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:35, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete -Casue it annoys people to ruin party--TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:42, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete -What he said above ^^^^^^ --Limpus 19:48, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Mega Delete - I cannot overstate my disappointment in some of you right now. There is a massive difference between a shock group and a hate group. The KKK, neo-nazis, and others of their sort don't do it for lulz, and you're all smart enough to be able to recognize the difference between simple Internet trolling by folks like the Columbine Kids, and actual hate by people that want to see others wiped out in real life. Since shock groups != hate groups, deleting this page does not set a dangerous precedent, and even if you do support freedom of speech for hate groups, none of us have an obligation to help spread hate speech. If the fact that this is expressly against the TOS ("You agree not to use the service to upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is...hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable") is not enough to dissuade you, then have the decency to see that we shouldn't be doing anything to help spread hate speech, and recognize that you can choose to vote Delete for any reason you want (the criteria are only for SD, after all). —Aichon— 20:17, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Also, to cut off argumentation along the lines of Paddy's, we've always been a bit lenient on the "otherwise" part of "otherwise objectionable" in the TOS, since it's vague, open to interpretation, and can easily be abused to delete almost the entire wiki, but clear terms like "hateful, or racially, ethnically...objectionable" are less open to interpretation or abuse. There's no reason for not abiding by them. —Aichon— 20:20, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- well said-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 20:46 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- If the supreme wiki commanders get to interpret the ToS as they see fit, or if the ToS is really "not to be [cited]... as a reason why something is a problem," then I hope they (the supreme wiki commanders) decide to put all these other Nazi pages up for deletion. Now how do I change my vote on this one to Delete? --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 22:31, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Strike your "keep" vote and just respond saying "delete" in bold as if it were a response. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:24, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- paddy tbo all the other nazi pages were not that bad. or for the most part had something to do with UD.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 23:45 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Strike your "keep" vote and just respond saying "delete" in bold as if it were a response. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:24, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- If the supreme wiki commanders get to interpret the ToS as they see fit, or if the ToS is really "not to be [cited]... as a reason why something is a problem," then I hope they (the supreme wiki commanders) decide to put all these other Nazi pages up for deletion. Now how do I change my vote on this one to Delete? --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 22:31, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Cannot overstate your disappointment. What are you, everyone's fuckin dad? I would have credited you with enough intelligence to realize that "Hate Speech" is an artificial construct created by the radical left so that they can stifle free speech without feeling guilty about being hypocritical thought-fascists.--T | BALLS! | 00:52 13 April 2011(UTC) |
- well said-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 20:46 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Also, to cut off argumentation along the lines of Paddy's, we've always been a bit lenient on the "otherwise" part of "otherwise objectionable" in the TOS, since it's vague, open to interpretation, and can easily be abused to delete almost the entire wiki, but clear terms like "hateful, or racially, ethnically...objectionable" are less open to interpretation or abuse. There's no reason for not abiding by them. —Aichon— 20:20, 12 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - such epic fail in the field of wiki coding, basic grammar and unintentional irony only serves to highlight the obvious inferiority of the aryan race -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:05 14 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep Unfortunately, blatant stupidity != a valid crit. Asheets 16:17, 22 April 2011 (BST)
if only dem friggin chews didn't ave their way. deleted -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 12:55, 23 April 2011 (BST)
some unused talk pages
made these by mistake. please kill.--
bitch 16:27, 21 April 2011
User_talk:Sexualharrison/Archive
User_talk:Sexualharrison/Archive2
Speedy ~ 16:28, 21 April 2011Scheduled - Crit 7 by proxy. ~ 16:42, 21 April 2011
User:Max Hetfield
I think this user was trying to create their own user page based on my old user page. However, there have been zero edits to the page in over 3 months (he hasn't even bothered to change the links on the header at the top to his own userspace pages) and the user has made other contributions to the wiki. I'd like the page deleted. ~ 17:24, 13 April 2011
Delete. ~ 17:24, 13 April 2011- Question On what basis do you want this deleted? Impersonation would be a good one, since he's basically posing as you right now. Or is this because he copied your code? Because page/code stealing happens everywhere, and okay if he actually bothered to change the description and links, which he didn't. I'm asking this because deleting the user-page of an active user isn't something to do lightly. Also, have you tried contacting him? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 17:36, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- I've just contact him on his talk page outlining what I'd like changed. It is sort of impersonation but I don't believe it to be malicious. ~ 17:44, 13 April 2011
- Why not just delete the code? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:38, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - Aren't we supposed to contact people first before Vandaling them? Especially if its something as trivial as this? Perhaps he liked your style and was going to alter it when he got around to it and didn't think to use Sandbox. Just a thought.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 18:21, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- Keep - Jesus, really? My god you put the user's page up for deletion and the user up for vandalism before it ever occurred to you to fucking use his talk page? Come on vapor I thought you'd be better then this. You're a sysop now, you should be a model wiki citizen and use some basic communication channels before you go around deleting and A/VBing stuff. --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 19:18, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- Wow, really? Why don't you put the microscope away, buddy. I didn't delete anything or touch his page. I did use his talk page to communicate my concern and I only brought to A/VB because deleting his user page is too extreme of a request. All I care about is having my personal stuff off his page and I'm taking every step necessary to do it. ~ 22:25, 13 April 2011
- I don't really need a microscope for this one. It is fairly obvious that your handling of this situation was weird. The talk page is such a simple avenue to pursue and I'm surprised you completely overlooked it. It only occurred to you to use his talk page after you put his userpage up for deletion and people suggested you should just contact him. Then you didn't even give the guy 25 minutes to respond before you assumed bad faith, put him up for vandalism and used your sysop vote against him.
- Do you see where that can come off as a bit overbearing and dysfunctional? I guess the lesson here is assume good faith, try contacting a user about simple matters via their talk page, and don't be afraid to ask some of your more experienced peers for advice before you plow headlong into the bureaucratic option.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 22:50, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- Nope that's not really how it went down. It may have been a mistake to put the page up for deletion voting but I contacted him pretty much right away after doing so as well as asking him to make some changes. Thad's comment about making contact had nothing to do with me contacting him. I think I had taken a phone call or something in between A/D and talk so if you're basing your assumption on that gap in time then I guess I can see how you might jump to that conclusion. As far as my assuming bad faith, that is a false assumption as well. I knew it was likely just a newb mistake and the dude just never went back and made the page his own. I never intended to put him on A/VB. I even commented above about how weird that seems to me. I may not have made the best descision to bring it to admin pages but I don't take to kindly to being called dysfunctional, overbearing or incapable of basic communication. Especially when F bombs are used. I'd appreciate a little more tact and less assumptions if you're going to bring things like this up. ~ 00:05, 14 April 2011
- Wow, really? Why don't you put the microscope away, buddy. I didn't delete anything or touch his page. I did use his talk page to communicate my concern and I only brought to A/VB because deleting his user page is too extreme of a request. All I care about is having my personal stuff off his page and I'm taking every step necessary to do it. ~ 22:25, 13 April 2011
- Keep - Ownership is irrelevant, just fix the damn links. --Karekmaps?! 21:51, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- It's more than just links I'd like removed. My name, age, personal background, accomplishments, group affiliation and characters are all there in the code. ~ 22:25, 13 April 2011
- Comment So remove the personal information too, he probably wanted the design not your extra nonsense. Odds are he's not trying to impersonate, he's trying to copy the style like so many users have done and had done to them before without deletions and VB getting involved.--Karekmaps?! 23:39, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- Karek, thanks for making the changes. I should have just made the damn changes myself and not worried so much about possible consequences of editing another person's user page. If this particular circumstance ever comes up again i will know what to do. I am cycling this as Kept now since the changes have been made. Sorry for shitting up admin pages for a few hours. ~ 16:06, 14 April 2011
- Comment So remove the personal information too, he probably wanted the design not your extra nonsense. Odds are he's not trying to impersonate, he's trying to copy the style like so many users have done and had done to them before without deletions and VB getting involved.--Karekmaps?! 23:39, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- It's more than just links I'd like removed. My name, age, personal background, accomplishments, group affiliation and characters are all there in the code. ~ 22:25, 13 April 2011
Some more gumph
XXR
- Delete - No edits since June last year. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- speedy ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 05:43, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Kill with supreme fire --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 16:03, 8 April 2011 (BST)
Yves Koch (Lexicon)
- Delete - Pretty much a statement of intent, long gone though. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- speedy ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 05:43, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
The BrainFriendlies
- Delete - Nothing since 2009. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- speedy ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 05:43, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete with extreme vengeance - This "group" turned out to be one or two zergers anyway. We questioned them about some of their strange activities and then they just disappeared. Should be relegated to oblivion.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 16:06, 8 April 2011 (BST)
MarchingOrders
- Delete - Link is dead. I'm assuming this is long gone. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Keep – Worked last I checked? If not, I still have a working version and can re-upload and expand the page. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 21:38, 29 March 2011 (BST)
Keep - Wasn't actually aware that that was under the sim, I never really looked there because I spent too much time with other parts of the domain. I'll fix that posthaste soonish many apologies for the dead link. --Karekmaps?! 05:24, 30 March 2011 (BST)- Crit7/1? - I know, not swiers but since it's a .info and since it is already duplicated here I might as well say I wouldn't mind at all if the page were removed speedily nor, I highly doubt, would he. In the future though it may be recreated if MarchingOrders sees any significant development worth a full page like IWitness. Not that that likely anytime soon. --Karekmaps?! 05:12, 2 April 2011 (BST)
- Merge? Aren't external widgets and gadgets all listed at External_Links#Firefox_Tools? I don't remember seeing individual pages for plugins etc but I could be wrong. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:04, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Merge in to the above linked article.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:23, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Deleted. The information can already be found at External_Links#Other. ~ 15:26, 12 April 2011
Journal:Glenstone
- Delete - User long gone and no real content. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Journal:pistol935
- Delete - As above. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
PzD
- Delete - No edits since 2009. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Dr. xDante's Clinic
- Delete - Dead. Forum seems to just be him talking to himself. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
The Rainbow Organisation
- Delete - Dead, changed to Task Force 141 back in April last year. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Keep/Merge. What I mean is just change it to a redirect, simple enough. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:06, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
27.94
- Delete - Radio page, no edits since August last year. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- Please. Asheets 20:09, 1 April 2011 (BST)
The LOF
- Delete - Nothing since 2008. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Ladder kids
- Delete - Nothing since 2009. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Zed Research Group
- Delete - Nothing since 2008. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Journal:Milton Cross
- Delete - Another dead journal. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
The Malton Malters
- Delete - Nothing post-wipe. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Z.E.O.
- Delete - Nothing since 2009. -- Cheese 15:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:08, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
Gift of the Goddess
Blanked inactive group. RHO seems to have investigated the guy who blanked and he's the same IP as the guy who made it. Thought I'd stick it on here either way. -- Cheese 14:27, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Speedy -- Cheese 14:27, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- Scheduled crit 1 by crit 7, by the sounds of it -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:02, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Scheduled --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:21, 30 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete - I remember that a few images were uploaded for this group as well, they should be deleted too.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 16:09, 8 April 2011 (BST)
I missed this. Assuming scheduleds are implicit speedy votes (as things that should be deleted on sight etc) I've deleted this under speedy clause. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:44, 12 April 2011 (BST)
DELETE MY STUFF PLOX
User:S_Aline & Image:Pretty_in_pink.jpg
I haven't played in forever and I don't want my shit on here anymore. So please, delete my userpage and the headerimage which contains my username. Kthxbai S Aline 07:12, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy – Crit 8. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 09:03, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- scheduled -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:08, 10 April 2011 (BST)
Deleted. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 09:12, 10 April 2011 (BST)
Image:Vinica.jpg
With a purposeful delay of one day to the WT entry, I'm putting this one up for A/D. If WT ends up deleted it would be a scheduled deletion anyway. But if WT is kept, we won't lose any substantial time on getting rid of this one.
So, yeah, reasoning. This one is utterly tasteless and has no place on this wiki. I can't think of any tactful use of this. Plus, I think pulling the stinger from the WT page is a far less invasive solution than to delete all of the page of a group (even if it is a zerging two-guys neo-nazi outfit). -- Spiderzed▋ 01:04, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 01:04, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy - Crit 2, again, the image has no relation to the wiki in it's use or purpose. --Karekmaps?! 01:06, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy nuke from orbit as above -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 01:08 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy - 1.20 YOU agree not to use the service to do any of the following and it is expressly agreed between US and YOU that if there is any breach of this Clause 1.19 may, without notice and without obligation to pay compensation apply service credits or refund any monies, suspend restrict or terminate your service if YOU:
- (a) Upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene (illegal pornography), libellous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable. Please note that IRC services may not be run on our network. Contact us for clarification where needed. --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 01:09, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy Same reasoning as I have given below. Gordon 01:18, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- Speedy crit 2 -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 01:20, 10 April 2011 (BST)
Speedied. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 01:20, 10 April 2011 (BST)
MOAR SHORT PAGES!!
Redir
- Delete - No edits since July last year. -- Cheese 22:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
XD
- Delete - No edits since 2009. Although I do like the image. -- Cheese 22:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
ODC
- Delete - No edits since before the wipe. -- Cheese 22:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Delete--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)- Keep - see below.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Given the amount of members and participation, I'd say they played a big enough role for them to stay in the archives. If they had been in Malton, my thoughts might be different, but Monroeville has an important past, and these five played their part in it. Besides, that talk page has hundred times more historical data than a current status section. --VVV RPMBG 00:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen that talk. Looks like it's full of useful stuff.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep -- Spiderzed▋ 15:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
S.C.A.N.N
- Delete - No edits since September. -- Cheese 22:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete (don't forget the talk page) - Not on stats page, only editor has been notified via talk page (the email address on the page is non-functioning). --VVV RPMBG 23:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Big Red
- Delete - No edits since December. -- Cheese 22:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Not on stats page. Only editor has been informed via talk page and email. --VVV RPMBG 23:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Short Pages Episode XII: The Extraneous Header Text
Malton Giants
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - It was not deleted back in January because it was on the stats page. It no longer is. But a group that had ten members two months ago probably has a few left today. --VVV RPMBG 18:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. See Trips. It failed just one friggin' month ago, and I hate when the same thing gets filed and filed again just so that someone gets his way. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- ...just so that someone gets his way. - I'm clearing short pages. I see a short page, I put it on deletions. Do I have an agenda? No. Would I prefer these pages got edited to tell us something about the group? Yes. Putting them up on deletions draws attention to long forgotten pages that may be of use or have historical note. If no-one comes forward to claim them, then they're just wasting memory. -- Cheese 22:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - so what, bitchez -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep – Given their forum is open, can be filled out by others if necessary. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - would be speedy, if not for the keeps. No content (and I mean none)... none since december, none likely -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:54 22 March 2011 (BST)
Malton zedsmash society
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing worthwhile -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:56 22 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
The Survivor's Ministry
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - No edits since October 2009, not on the stats page, small amount of content. The only editor has been notified via talk page and email-this-user. --VVV RPMBG 04:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:58 22 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
List of Beer Cruzade Enemy Groups
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - I'd send it to a subpage of Beer Cruzade... but it seems that there are no enemy groups to list on this page -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:01 22 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
The MagiScience Lords
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- speedy - groupbox, and nothing else. crit 1 -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:02 22 March 2011 (BST)
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
I. C. Wiener
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- keep - meh, recent addition -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:04 22 March 2011 (BST)
- Delete ~ 06:05, 26 March 2011
5 delete votes and 1 keep. Deleted. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Urban Rangers
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- speedy - crit 1. groupbox with FILLTHIS and groupnumber as 1, since... forever -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:15 22 March 2011 (BST)
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Sentinals
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy -
keeprecent addition -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:16 22 March 2011 (BST)
Struck, and as below -- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:11 28 March 2011 (BST) - Speedy - C1. Now if boxy would drop his keep vote... -- Spiderzed▋ 20:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy ~ 21:11, 24 March 2011
Should have been speedy deleted. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Legion of Doom
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Not on stats page, no edits since pre-wipe, minimal content. I've left a note on their forum, on both of the users' talk pages, and email-this-user-ed them both. --VVV RPMBG 18:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:18 22 March 2011 (BST)
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Oakes Arms Regulars
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Last edited in April 2010, only editor has been gone since May. Minimal content, and the group isn't on the stats page. I've informed the only editor via talk page. --VVV RPMBG 22:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:19 22 March 2011 (BST)
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Full Effect
- Delete -- Cheese 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Not on the stats page, no edits since late 2008, minimal content. I've notified the only known editor on their talk page. --VVV RPMBG 18:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As Cheese.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:20 22 March 2011 (BST)
Unanimous. ~ 07:02, 7 April 2011
Archive
Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|