Category talk:Historical Groups

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Revision as of 15:11, 12 March 2025 by Aichon (talk | contribs) (→‎Escape)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

  1. Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
  2. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups.
  3. Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must be approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.
  4. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
  5. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.
  6. Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for Malton-based groups)

Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.

ATTENTION! No new nominations are allowed.
The sysop team will start processing the current nominations through the rest of the day.
If a group or event is not promoted to historical status by the time the wiki becomes read-only on the 14th, its bid has failed.
-- The Sysop Team


New Nominations

Place new nominations for voting here.

Cannibal Corps

see Cannibal Corps voting page


DORIS

see DORIS voting page


Zerg Hunters Unlimited

see Zerg Hunters Unlimited voting page


Legends of Darkness

see Legends of Darkness voting page


Pathetic Bill Tribute Band

see Pathetic Bill Tribute Band voting page


South Paynterton Aces

see South Paynterton Aces voting page


SillyLillyPilly

see SillyLillyPilly voting page


THEM

see THEM voting page


The Dribbling Beavers

see The Dribbling Beavers voting page


Creedy Defense Force

see Creedy Defense Force voting page


Fort Perryn Defense Force

see Fort Perryn Defense Force voting page


The Malton Zookeepers

see The Malton Zookeepers voting page


Brain Curators

see Brain Curators voting page


Minions of the Apocalypse

see Minions of the Apocalypse voting page


The Burchell Arms Regulars

see The Burchell Arms Regulars voting page


Zone Defenders

see Zone Defenders voting page


Manhunt All-Stars

see Manhunt All-Stars voting page


Soldiers of Crossman

see Soldiers of Crossman voting page


PTT

see PTT voting page


McZeds

see McZeds voting page


DSS

see DSS voting page


Wulves

see Wulves voting page


The Dead

see The Dead voting page


The Fortress

see The Fortress voting page


404: Barhah not found

see 404: Barhah not found voting page


The Scourge

see The Scourge voting page


The Randoms

see The Randoms voting page


Yagoton Revivification Clinic

see Yagoton Revivification Clinic voting page


CCPD Family

see CCPD Family voting page


The Penguin Mafia

see The Penguin Mafia voting page


LUE

see LUE voting page


The Abandoned

see The Abandoned voting page


Flowers of Decay

see Flowers of Decay voting page


Creedy Guerilla Raiders

see Creedy Guerilla Raiders voting page


Knights Templar

see Knights Templar voting page


Philosophe Knights

see Philosophe Knights voting page


Feral Undead

see Feral Undead voting page


Militant Order of Barhah

see Militant Order of Barhah voting page


The Ridleybank Resistance Front

see The Ridleybank Resistance Front voting page


Quartly Study Group

see Quartly Study Group voting page


Escape

see Escape voting page


Team Xtreme

see Team Xtreme voting page


DEM Groups

see DEM Groups voting page


Creedy Guerilla Raiders

CGR was founded in 2006 and has maintained its presence in the Pitneybank area ever since. A fixture in the Pitneybank area since then, CGR was an active PK group often finding its victims in the Giddings Mall and Fort Creedy areas. At one time CGR was one of the largest PKer groups active on the groups page. CGR, throughout its tenure, maintained close ties with the PKA and several other notable PKer groups including the Philosophe Knights and Flowers of Decay. Though in its twilight, the last of us Raiders humbly request a spot among the historical groups of Malton. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wesker41 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC).

Yes

  1. Author Vote —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wesker41 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 8 March 2025 (UTC).
  2. I'm going to sling a Yes in here. It's not really for anything recent, but I really think that people forget how influential CGR were as a part of the PKer scene. Back in the glory days of the game they were founder members of the PKer Alliance and instrumental in every one of the Samhain Slaughter events. --LordMoloch (talk) 23:10, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Having fought them for years as CDF, yes. Shame they faded out. Wayson (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. yes, cheers, my friends and allies. Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 23:46, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. They're so old they haven't raided anything other than a pantry in the retirement home since 2009. RogueRisker (talk) 00:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Yes. PB&J 16:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Yes. Was a major influence on the PKer scene in the early days. HarveyCarlson (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 21:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. -- Spiderzed▋ 22:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. Yes, had great times with them. Hope you guys & gal are doing well Skyvia (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. To describe the CGR as merely influential does not do them justice. They were an inspiration to, and indeed an incubator for, many pkers and pker groups. In the 2005-2007 era, their outreach and publicity set the tone and culture for a large chunk of the wider pker population, and their membership helped many smaller PKer groups set up and thrive. -Professor DT (talk) 02:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. Yes —Aichon— 19:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. The CGR deserves historical status. Our conflict with the CDF defined Pitneybank and became a template for others. We contributed to the PKer community and the greater UD community to the best of our abilities. That said, I vote, with bias, yes. User:Franz Molotov/Signature
  14. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Yes for the Cheeky Gorilla Bois! Spud (your favourite DJ's favourite fuccboi) 10:01, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. Yes -- Dislycan (talk) 23:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  17. Counter-spite. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!01:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes --SweetIrony (talk) 11:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Never heard of them. --Starlingt (talk) 09:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Knights Templar

Founded in July 2006 and a constant presence in Urban Dead ever since. The largest active survivor group in Malton as of March 2025 with a thriving Discord community and new members regularly joining the fold. The KT battled with every major zombie and PKer group in the history of the game and worked with every major pro-survivor group at one stage or another. I don't think that anyone could dispute that the Knights Templar are worthy of Historical Group status. Thanks to all the players of UD over the years, especially those who spent so much time and effort updating and maintaining the wiki. Tarkenton 22:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes

  1. Author vote. Tarkenton 22:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. Absolutely. Parham (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. I would be sad if they didn't get it. One of the best groups (and people) I met. Hotroos 23:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. *SIGH* You're really going to make me do this, aren't you. Yes. --LordMoloch (talk) 23:06, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. A must for inclusion. kaputt (talk) 23:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Yup yup Zanz 23:15, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Yes! High marks for effectivity and style JustSlam 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. Yes! Simonyin 23:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. Deus Vult! Wayson (talk) 23:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. With one extra day in Malton, I’d collect one more KT scalp. 100% yes. 🥀 Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 23:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. Pope Clement V would approve making this lot history. RogueRisker (talk) 00:32, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. As one of the last of the founding members from all those years ago, a heartfelt Yes. BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. A biased yes vote, given I'm a member - but a yes vote nonetheless! Jacks LeRoy (talk) 03:45, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. yes, where else would we keep all our silly kniggets "Ni!" hajen (talk) 09:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Yes! Old and new guard!PossumFlash (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. Yes - Good times with KT and the EBD. PB&J 16:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC) <
  17. Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes - thanks for all the great times! Major Powers (talk) 18:46, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 21:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  20. -- Spiderzed▋ 22:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. Levixorz (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  22. Yes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Checkered (talk • contribs) 23:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC).
  23. Yes. --Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  9 March 2025
  24. Yes Clayton Carmine (talk) 08:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  25. Yes. --Preston HugeArms 1:04, 10, March 2025 (UTC)
  26. Well, I guess so. Roddy Winters (talk) 13:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  27. Yes —Aichon— 19:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  28. Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 22:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  29. Yes Kevin Turvey 11 March 2025
  30. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  31. Yep. --hagnat 19:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  32. Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:09, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  33. Counter-spite. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!01:29, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  34. Yes, definitely! Fiffy (talk) 05:54, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  35. Yes! --SweetIrony (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Never heard of them. --Starlingt (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Philosophe Knights

Recognizing that the morality of killing is vastly different in a world where death is nothing more than an inconvenience, the Knights set about “enlightening” the population of Malton on the importance of education. Though they have thousands of kills to their secretive initialisms, the Knights were famous for deploying other tactics to educate the population, such as theater, art, lectures, and training on leading tactics. One thing was always sure: when the Philosophe Knights appeared, people would listen, whether they wanted to or not.

More plainly, the Philosophe Knights were a leading PKer group for years, with an influence that spread far wider and made a much larger impact than their apparent membership might suggest (in part because they frequently eschewed the use of group tags). They were never completely inactive, but they’ve recently shown back up on the stats page in large part thanks to the Reunion. —Aichon— 22:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes

  1. Author vote. —Aichon— 22:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. A classic. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 22:18, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. The Philosophe Knights were more than a simple PKer group. They had a very unique and distinct style, were one of the very few groups respected across playing style boundaries, and stood out in the usual group dynamics of UD. -- Spiderzed▋
  4. Yes! Tarkenton 22:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. Gentlemen and scholars all. Parham (talk) 22:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Clearly yes. --LordMoloch (talk) 22:50, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Absolutely, staple in the PKA and PKing comunity. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wesker41 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC).
  8. Yes! Style and class, all the way. --JustSlam 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. Yes. Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 00:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. I'll Popper my vote here, but they Kant even Hegel; and that's not just my opinion, man. RogueRisker (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. It brings me no joy to vote Yes. We have been around (even if only 1-2 members for a few years) since 2005, we made every effort to bring fun to our members and memorable conflicts to those we battled, and with our recent revival I thought we'd have another year perhaps. Thank you to those who remember us fondly, and Praise Knowledge. - Professor DT (talk) 01:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. Classy, with a side of malice. Cheers to immortality BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. Yes - Without them, I would have never been educated. PB&J 16:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Yes. - HarveyCarlson (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. yes - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 21:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  17. Levixorz (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes. They have certainly taught me many valuable lessons! ~ Saralan Talk 404 ZHU ❤ 01:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes. --Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  9 March 2025
  20. Yes - Probably the most notorious PKer group. --VVV RPMBG 07:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 22:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  22. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  23. Yes Belmond zoo 19:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  24. Yep. --hagnat 19:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  25. Yep.FSMTMZ 20:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  26. Yes -- Dislycan (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  27. Yes Fiffy (talk) 05:55, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  28. Yes Visible One (talk) 07:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  29. Yes! --SweetIrony (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Never heard of them. --Starlingt (talk) 09:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Feral Undead

Another long-lasting and impactful zombie group. They didn't walk around and steamroll the map like RRF or MOB, but they greatly affected the area around Fort Perryn, and offered a more casual playing style than the organized hordes with their striketimes. -- Spiderzed▋ 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes

  1. -- Spiderzed▋ 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. A vastly important group in Urban Dead's history. --LordMoloch (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. FU. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 20:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Fort Feral will always be rightful zombie clay. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!20:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. They weren’t my cup of tea, but they were a force for a long time, and they controlled so many of the dynamics in the SE. —Aichon— 21:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Yes —Grakbie (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Yes! Tarkenton 22:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. Yes. Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. The group whose acronym was also their mission statement. RogueRisker (talk) 00:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. Yes, for years, this was my second home for undead action! BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. Yes- of course! User:Deathy McD 16:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. Yes! Major Powers (talk) 18:57, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yes - HarveyCarlson (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 21:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. The most worthy of adversaries --Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  9 March 2025
  17. Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 22:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes, you magnificent monsters. --Wayson (talk) 05:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  20. Yes Kylestyle4 (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. Yep. --hagnat 19:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  22. Yes -- Dislycan (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  23. Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  24. Yes! I speak for Zazie, who has lurched alongside them for years. Besides, petite fille isn't around anymore to cast a vote in favor for herself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ABSF (talk • contribs) 01:28, 12 March 205.
  25. Yes Fiffy (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  26. Yes --SweetIrony (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Never heard of them. --Starlingt (talk) 09:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Militant Order of Barhah

As we are loosening the standards to also allow active groups, and since last time MOB were very heavily favoured and only failed on a technicality, I am resubmitting them. -- Spiderzed▋ 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes

  1. -- Spiderzed▋ 19:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. Obviously. --LordMoloch (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 20:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. As recognizable as it gets. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!20:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. MAHB. The previous vote below already explains everything. —Aichon— 21:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Yes, MoB are pretty clearly a major part of UD history —Grakbie (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Yes! Tarkenton 22:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. Yes. Possibly the Knights Templars greatest foes overall. Roddy Winters (talk) 22:55, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. BARHAH!! Zanz 23:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. For reasons as Roddy stated, yes. Wayson (talk) 23:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. Yes. Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. Well, duh. RogueRisker (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. The Marines of the Undead, highly disciplined, highly organized, leaving only ruin in their wake. One of the best to ever nibble a harman! BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yes - I authored their previous nomination, and outlined my reasoning there. --VVV RPMBG 05:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Most absolutely YES. MOB has been around since very near the beginning of the game and has had a lasting and impactful effect on Urban Dead. Liche (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. Yes - It's ridiculous they somehow didn't make Historical last year. Let's fix it. PB&J 17:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  17. Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 21:10, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 21:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  20. Yes! AH MAH GAH MAHB! ~ Saralan Talk 404 ZHU ❤ 01:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. Yes --Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  9 March 2025
  22. Yes - It is time! Visible One (talk) 08:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  23. Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 22:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  24. I fought the MoB at Burchell and all I got was this dumb t-shirt, Lucky me! --John MacReilley 2:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  25. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  26. Yes Kylestyle4 (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  27. Yep. --hagnat 19:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  28. Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  29. Yeah. I was MoB before I was Dead, great time. Flesnolk (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  30. Yes - MOB! MOB! MOB! MOB! MOB! Fiffy (talk) 05:57, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  31. Yes! --SweetIrony (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. I think we should keep our standards high. --Starlingt (talk) 09:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

The Ridleybank Resistance Front

There can be no question that the RRF has been a historical group. I would suggest that it has been the most historical group in the game. No suburb is synonymous with threat to human life in the way that Ridleybank is. The Blackmore Building has been the center of countless large sieges between the RRF and humans fascinated by the danger they cause. The RRF has, simultaneously, menaced whatever area of Malton drew their attention at any particular time. From their founding in 2005 by the mythical Petrosjko to this very day, they have been one of the largest, most powerful, most respected groups in the city. Really, this vote is not over whether the RRF is historical, but rather it is over whether it is appropriate, in this final week, to override the rule against making a group which is still very much active into a historical group. I believe that it is appropriate. --VVV RPMBG 02:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes

  1. Yes - Author Vote. --VVV RPMBG 02:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. Yes - Sadly, it'll be inactive in a few days regardless... Levixorz (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. I think we can dispense with the inactivity requirement since, yes, all the groups will shortly be inactive anyway. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH!
  4. Of course. —Aichon— 06:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. --Axe Hack Talk 13:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. I don't even know where to begin. The whole history of UD is heavily intertwined with that of the RRF, and many many historical events like the Blackmore Sieges wouldn't have happened without them. -- Spiderzed▋ 14:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. Without question. The eternal 'Big Bad' of Urban Dead. Insomniac by Choice said years ago (2008/9 time) that if the RRF didn't exist, it was possible that the game itself might have died entirely at that time. That's probably a little excessive, but by no means as much so as it might first appear. --LordMoloch (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. Yes. —-NZ Idol (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. Yes --CyanEyed C-Kids 19:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. Yes --plscks (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC) (edited)
  12. Yes! - Barhah (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. Yes! Utterly, impenetrably, bogglingly renowned beyond dispute. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!20:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yes! Could there be any doubt? TommyVee (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Yes --Zoutroi (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. Yes Shocked that RRF isn't already a historical group. Parham (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  17. Yes! Tarkenton 22:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes! Obviously. Funk McBogey 22:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes. Really? Of course they deserve this! Roddy Winters (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  20. 100% BARHAH Zanz 23:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. The #1 zombie group consistently for ages, obviously yes. Wayson (talk) 23:46, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  22. Barhah & Yes! Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 00:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  23. Without question. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wesker41 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC).
  24. I'm surprised this even has to be voted on. RogueRisker (talk) 00:37, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  25. This is an unquestionable yes! BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  26. Simply a yes. Jacks LeRoy (talk) 03:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  27. Yes! I've always heard of and feared the RRF. Joined them finally in 2024. Sux I didn't before. Haifinnesoup 13:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  28. YES - Without the RRF, no UD. No other organisation has had such a defining role in this game as the RRF. They are the epitome of a historical group. PB&J 16:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  29. Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  30. Yes - this one should just jump the approval process! Major Powers (talk) 18:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  31. Yes -- Dislycan (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  32. YES - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 21:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  33. Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 21:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  34. Ridleyyes Yesistance Front Spud (your favourite DJ's favourite fuccboi) 21:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  35. Yes Papa Petro (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  36. Yes! A++ would be devoured again. ~ Saralan Talk 404 ZHU ❤ 01:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  37. Absolutely --Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  9 March 2025
  38. yes ~ Red Hawk One Talk | Thanks for the memories 05:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  39. Yes! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JaneZoe (talk • contribs) 06:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC).
  40. Yes Can't have been a part of the GC days when rotters where the only ones breathin' and not toss my vote in here Clayton Carmine (talk) 08:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  41. Yes --Thvortex (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  42. Yes - a 'No Brainer' Kevin Turvey 11 March 2025
  43. Yes. Even though Moloch reckons I have cooties :( stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  44. Yes Kylestyle4 (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  45. Absolutely. -- Cheese 19:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  46. Yep. --hagnat 19:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  47. Yes. ♥ Moonie Talk Testimonials 21:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  48. Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  49. Yes, obviously! Truly an honor to be part of this glorious horde Fiffy (talk) 05:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  50. Yes! --SweetIrony (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Sorry, but we must respect the rules-based wiki order. The RRF is still active, so I must vote no. --Starlingt (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

I propose concluding this nomination as succesful per WP:SNOWBALL --VVV RPMBG 06:18, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, bub. That ain't how we roll on the UD Wiki. We love the bureaucracy. -- Cheese 18:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Quartly Study Group

Helping a friend with this nomination, but there's no doubt in my head that QSG is worthy of Historical Group. With their famous lecture series that invited guests from all walks, their impact was felt in the meta community for decades after. Friends to survivors, PKers, death cultists, and zombies alike, they brought people together in a way that few other groups could accomplish and succeeded in carving out a sacred ground that was respected by nearly all groups, even years later. Though, to be fair to the zombies who ate them, QSG was known for having some of the juiciest brains around. —Aichon— 22:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes

  1. Author vote. —Aichon— 22:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. QSG was unique, one of the very few groups that managed to be respected and liked across all playing styles. They might not have set off great events, but they were one of the very unique things that lent UD character and distinctiveness. -- Spiderzed▋ 22:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Second. SenisterDenister 01:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. 0.95 L or 1.14 L? --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 03:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Technically speaking, the QSG is responsible for the UD Reunion being a thing. I mean, when you're bringing together a community just like that... --Axe Hack Talk 13:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Yes --Zoutroi (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. Yes! Tarkenton 22:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. Indeed. Zanz 23:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. Yes! Wayson (talk) 23:48, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. Yes. Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 00:15, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. Absolutely. Here's my 3,500-word essay on why. RogueRisker (talk) 00:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. Only remember doing battle a few times, but still known across the city. BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yes - God we'll miss eating you.PB&J 16:05, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  15. Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. Yes - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 21:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  17. Yes and sorry I hid my maple syrup pancakes in the pages of the books Spud (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes. ~ Saralan Talk 404 ZHU ❤ 01:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  20. Yes, yes, yes Belmond zoo 19:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  22. Counter-spite. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!01:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  23. I haven't voted yes until now because I couldn't figure out how to do so without 40 pages and a thesis defense. -Professor DT (talk) 02:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  24. Yes, I got to spend time with some sophisticated zombies and book smart survivors for this week. That alone is worth the vote. Dumb Bass (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2025 (PT)
  25. Yes! --SweetIrony (talk) 11:45, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Never heard of them. --Starlingt (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Recent Nominations

Previous Discussions

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=Category_talk:Historical_Groups&oldid=2450068"