UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Nov 2006

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki:Administration‎ | Deletions‎ | Archive
Revision as of 01:25, 25 January 2008 by Zombie slay3r (talk | contribs) (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Nov 2006": Scheduled [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of November 2006.

Criterion 12

Dulston Defense Death Squad and DDDS - No updates in months, not on stats page.--Gage 21:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Keep - I still see 6-8 of them scampering around Dulston. I'd like to try making contact w/them on there forums before changeing my vote to kill. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 21:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Pave the way for group pages that actually DO something.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 21:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete - Gage 23:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep- I'll take Max's word on it.--Labine50 MHG|MEMS 00:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Delete --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 03:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Keep - They don't seem gone in game, but it's hard to talk to them as a brain rotted zombie. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 03:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep - They're still in game. Even without that, they're notable. –Xoid M•T•FU! 15:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. Keep - They must have done something at the seige of Dulston, so lets not be so harsh. --MarieThe Grove 16:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. Keep - They are an active group, part of a larger alliance. This deletion was initiated by an enemy of the Dulston Defense Death Squad, DORIS.--Cheeser 22:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. Keep - Just another way for DORIS to try to screw everyone else. The group is very much alive and active. EDIT: Also, DORIS, one of your own "martyrs", Xoid, is voting keep. Nice work keeping the "populat" on the same page.Blue Command Vic DvB 23:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    We believe in freedom of speech. Obviously you don't. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 00:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
    If DORIS wanted to rush this vote, we would have already done so. We have over 30 members. Hurr.--Gage 00:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  11. Keep - If there are active members then the page should stay. Pillsy FT 09:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  12. Keep - They are an active group & historical to Dulston at that. Whoever put this up for deletion is a moron. --Officer Murphy 09:02, 19th November 2006 (CST)
    Dulston ain't much of a suburb anyway. If it wasn't for DORIS being there I'd put it up for deletion. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 03:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Don't act stupid Sonny - DORIS is not what makes the suburb worthwhile. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 03:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Have you been there? It's more boring than Grigg Heights. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 03:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Yes - I help run a small zombie group in the area, the Shamblin' Crooners. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 03:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Well you guys are outside of the buildings. Inside it's very...dead... --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 03:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Wow, we have some real arrogant pricks running this place don't we? Oh well, least the DDDS group page is going to stay intact. --Officer MurphyDvB 05:55, 19 November 2006 (CST)

Kept-Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Zombie Survival guide

Now I don't have my copy of the book with me but after reading it it's either an exact copy or damn close to the actual book. The "author" of the page simply stole it and claimed as his own. With a naive "fan" beleiving it was really his work, on the talk page. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 22:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Keep Not even close to the book which at least uses more better grammar. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 00:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    Really? I remember this line though "Although most movies also inform that zombies have certain powers, like teleportation, the ability to fly, telepathy, (etc.) " --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 00:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    Perhaps we are not referring to the same material. I was comparing to the copyrighted work of Max Brooks which shares the same title. The Zombie Survival Guide (Complete Protection from the Living Dead) - Three Rivers Press - 2003. Highly Recommended. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 00:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    That's what I'm talking about and I know that somewhere in there he says about how zombies have no special powers that they didn't have before death. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 00:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    Your right it does, I didn't recall it metioning teleportation...
    There is no way a zombie could fly unless the human it used to be could fly. The same goes for projecting force fields, teleportaion, moving through solid objects, transforming into a wolf, breathing fire, or a variety of other mystical talents attributed to the walking dead. - Fair use snippet from TZSG
    What do you think? Although there are similarities I don't think the article infringes on any copyrights. It may draw on those themes but on the whole it is certainly not as cleverly presented. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 02:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    I'm the author of This. I'm saying I understand why you want to delete it, but I've never read the book except for one chapter. I used only a couple details from what I've read. But most of My Survival guide is based on my knowledge from movies, games, etc. please don't request to delete it.--Tsume 22:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Tsume
    You still shouldn't create a page of the same name with close to the same text. If it isn't copyright infringement it's just bad taste. I'd rather see completely original material.--Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 03:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete - I have seen better grammar in grade school papers. Nuke it.--Gage 23:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    Does grammar really matter! It's the damn microsoft word!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaun Thompkins (talk • contribs) .
    Yes, it does. Microsoft Word is responsible for bad grammar? What kind of argument is that?--Gage 22:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete - Misnamed: with that title, it should be a survival guide for zombies, and that would be oxymoronic. (Not to mention short: "Chapter 1: Don't get shot. Chapter 2: When you get shot, stand up. Continue feeding. The end.") -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 23:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
    I'm done with this bullcrap! delete it for all I care! Those who think otherwise about deleting it I respect you. DELETE it! It's only pissing my off!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaun Thompkins (talk • contribs) .
  4. Delete - Because of all the above and also the creator cannot sign his posts correctly. Pillsy FT 11:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Delete - Sign or die. See also: Atticus's comment. - 343 U! 01:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)There I signed it for you. I'm sorry I didn't sign it,it slipped my mind. I first typed it up on Microsoft Word and when I heard of the wiki I copied it onto here.
  6. Keep - While I'm tempted to vote delete due to the poor quality of the page itself, I can't delete this on terms of plagrisim. The chapter titles are similar, yes, but the overall content isn't even CLOSE to enough to smack of utter plagarism. --MorthBabid 05:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Delete On the contrary, this is the pure definition of plagiarism, and the author admitted as such. Quote: "I've never read the book except for one chapter. I used only a couple details from what I've read." i.e He HAS read the book, but only one chapter. He made reference to, or used details in the book without providing a reference or acknowledgement. THAT is plagiarism. Can someone please also fix the formatting of the votes on here, I tried but I can't see what's wrong. --Panserbjørn 23:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


Elias Taylor vs. Crabapplelegalteam fallout

This edit war was begun by Elias, and ended by us, and we'd like the following pages to be deleted please (we've aready deleted the school and factory entries):

Theres unlikely to be any argument, we suspect! Crabappleslegalteam 03:46, 12 November 2006 (GMT)

Note: The two externally linked pages are already deleted, apparently. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Delete - The remaining page is a PWOT, uninformative and little more than propaganda. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Jeebus, enough already. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 04:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete - Nuke it from orbit. Twice.--Gage 23:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Delete - What...?--Labine50 MH|ME|P 23:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Delete - Double kill delete the drama! - 343 U! 01:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't this have gone by now? Cheers...Crabappleslegalteam 01:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

And so it is... The Holiday and other concerns have taken my time and powers of observation. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
So we see! Well, that's what's called a very good excuse. You have our sympathy.--Crabappleslegalteam 01:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Confederacy of Malton

Stupid shit that doesn't exist. Reptileus claims a bunch of stuff that isn't real. He's already had several "history" pages deleted for this reason. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Delete Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 21:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 21:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete - For more than a little justice.--Gage 21:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    WHAT! HELL NO YOU BETTER NOT DELET IT! IF YOU DO IT WILL BE UN ENDING WAR OVER THE WIKI--Reptileus 21:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    Is that a keep vote?--Gage 21:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    HELL YEAH IT'S A FUCKING VOTE, WHAT YOU THINK I'M JUST GONNA STAND BY AND WATCH MY PAGE BE DESTROYED, YOUR LOONY. AND IF ANYONE DOSE DELETE IT, YOUR ENTIRE WIKI WILL BE COMPLEATLY FUCKED!--Reptileus 22:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    No it won't.--Gage 22:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    You are completely not helping yourself, man. Register a Keep vote and be civil. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 22:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    CIVIL! I'M DONE BEING CIVIL! YOU WANT TO DELETE MY PAGE. GO RIGHT AHEAD! BUT DON'T BE SUPRISED IF ONE MORNING YOU WAKE UP TO FIND THE uRBAN DEAD WIKI COMPLEATLY DESTROYED! AND THAT IS A TREAT --Reptileus 01:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    I look forward to seeing you permabanned if you try. Better vandals than you have failed. Cyberbob  Talk  02:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    I would direct you to notice that I am registering the one legitimate Keep vote on this section, though I am really starting to have second thoughts on it. -- ∀lan Watson T·RPM 05:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    He was acting like this on my talk page too--Apex 22:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    I say that warrants a threat, except anyone who spells that bad is incapable of action. - 343 U! 03:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Delete - Yeah, Arbitration isn't going to work on a guy who cops this sort of attitude. -- ∀lan Watson T·RPM 02:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Keep - As bullshitty as this is, it is a legitimate group. Slap an NPOV section on it stating that Reptileus is an egotistical liar and let his bizarre ravings speak for themselves. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 21:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    You can't make it NPOV. It's just a bunch of lies and untruths. Deleting it would make it NPOV. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    Edit He claims Katthew is the leader. Katthew doesn't play the game. He claims that groups joined him that haven't. The New Maltonian group was created by Swiper, who didn't join him. It's all fake stuff. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    Yeah, I agree that it's mostly shit and lies, but there's still some legitimate stuff on the page; I know M-BEK and some of the PKA is working with him at very least. I think this is more of a case for Arby's, get him to remove all the obvious lies and make him live with a big NPOV statement showcasing what worthless drek he is. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 21:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
    Nah, that wont work. If we leave it then soon he will claim his group took down Caiger themselves. Get his crappy group off this wiki. Pillsy FT 10:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    They tryed that one too, surprisingly only the big zombie hordes actually managed that one. --MarieThe Grove 14:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Delete - Who's Katthew?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 21:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Delete - Katthew was an old DARIS... Swiper is on their kill list, and the defunct New Maltonian Order is on their members list... --Agent White WTF•W!•SGP•CMS-Meta•CMS 00:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    I'm fairly sure AS was being sarcastic. ^_^ Cyberbob  Talk  01:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    :D I was. Katthew was the only.... one of her kind... to make me cry--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Delete - I've been waiting for this moment for a long time. Cyberbob  Talk  01:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. Delete - Goodbye to lies and crap. Pillsy FT 10:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. Delete - Why hello again Reptilues. We meet again, well techinally we don't but I've had reason to run in with this low excuse of a group before. Now let me remember their name... The Malton Bounty Emo Killers. they are a 'part' of this so called 50+ group. Well they seem to have a member of my group on their list (and its a pathetic excuse to PK people too- their desciption says they are wearing a trechcoat). Anyway Waaaaggh is his name and we don't appreciate his name on the list despite the fact the group has about 3 members and they live in a suburb halfway across Malton. Well with groups like that in your organisation isn't it just as well we deleted the page full of lies? Now I remember it was you that attempted to organise another seige on caiger through PKer groups, and the ASS... --MarieThe Grove 12:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
    Trenchcoaters are universally reviled for numerous reasons. You should be totally unsurprised that he's being targeted over that. Another thing; what are you implying by mentioning the ASSault? –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    Me? Nothing. I just recalled reading they asked ASS to join and someone mentioned the Coalition for Fair Tactics. The ASS is the biggest group on the wiki in terms of active members and so forth. Personally I thought killing people for having a trenchcoat was a pathetic excuse to PK someone. I mean if you want to go around and PK people then fine, but because they have written is wearing a trenchcoat in their profile was a bit low. It surprised me that they found the profile in the first place seeing as they hold base on the other side of Malton. Seeing as they had about 3 members they were harming themselves rather than anyone else. --MarieThe Grove 13:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    It's not the trenchcoat alone that makes him a target; it's the mindset trenchcoaters have. Admittedly, some people who don't have the mindset use the same description and look like a trenchie. Then again, some people kill trenchcoaters purely because they are so cliche. As to Reptileus' lil' confederacy, they may have asked the ASSault to join, but we're just as disgusted by his blatant lies and unfathomable stupidity as everyone else seems to be. –Xoid M•T•FU! 02:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. Delete - With prejudice. This has to be the biggest collection of non-facts outside of Wikipedia's BJAODN. Or Uncyc. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  11. Keep - Awww, let the little trechies have their shotgun dreams. They're not doing any harm, and besides, it's a good laugh to read. --Preasure 18:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    But he isn't a trenchcoater. All he wants to do is make up as much shit as possible and create mayhem on the wiki. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 19:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    Yes, he makes shit up. Hell, I'm a relative newbie and even I can see that. He's not the first. This wiki provides a lot of pathetic cretins people with a big damn microphone, and some just can't resist spouting crap when they have a microphone. But if most of us recognize the crap for what it is, the only mayhem I see is the reaction we get when his someone calls him on his BS. Understand, Sonny, I'm not registering a keep vote by any means; if enough people strongly feel that the page should go, it will go, and it won't break my heart either way. I just hate the thought that we're handing this guy some sort of legitimacy by intimating that his mad ravings have any effect whatsoever on our enjoyment of the game or the wiki. You don't kill a troll with bullets or bludgeons; ignoring them is the only way to make them wither and die (or spur them into doing something that gets them banned). IMHO, of course. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 20:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
    No, part of his group go and kill people wearing trenchcoats. --MarieThe Grove 16:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  12. Delete - Because I can. --Karlsbad 00:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  13. Delete - OK, First of all-Ok, this is one of the most spam-tastic pages I've ever seen, Second-I'll be using the {{CIJ}} template, Third-Delete the crap out of this, then burn and nuke it.--Labine50 MHG|MEMS 00:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  14. Delete --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 04:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    DELETE BULLCRAP! The plan is a piece of crap just waiting to bemunched on by a HOBO! Why seperate the City of MALTON into territories?!?!?!?!?!
    unsigned vote struck.--Gage 23:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  15. Delete - OK, I'm convinced and therefore jumping on the bandwagon. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 18:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  16. Keep -- But which of the Eligibilites for Speedy Deletion does this meet? I question the desire to delete this; It seems more like the vote is being brought up for personal reasons, and not for any actual on-Wiki griefing or spamming or even an actual PROBLEM. In my personal opinion, this is just as valid a page as the Church of the Resurrection or C4NT. Both of these groups make stuff up, and yet they're tolerated. It's a roleplaying group that views themselves as would-be rulers of the world. They may think they are, but who cares? Unless they start vandalizing other groups wikis and the like, this shouldn't be deleted. One man's stupid is another man's hobby. --MorthBabid 21:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
    But which of the Eligibilites for Speedy Deletion does this meet?. None of them. Thats why it is being voted on this page instead of M/SD.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thari (talk • contribs) .
    No it isn't. It's complete bullshit. He made it all up. It's not real. He even claims people who don't play anymore are leaders. You believing it is real is just proof that this page needs to be deleted. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  17. Delete - The PKer Queen would create her own drama herself. Heck, if she came back, I would vote her to Mod status myself. Don't greif the memory of people. That is drama enough. - 343 U! 01:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
    Deleted.--Gage 23:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Zombie_Skills/Brain_Rot

Uh...I really don't get why this page exists, or why it was ever made, but I'm pretty sure it's a waste of space.

Pearl Arms and The Pearl Arms

I suggest merging these under Pearl Arms as per the Location Style Guide, which omits "the" at the beginning of names. Paul Brunner 14:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

We were just going to mention this, but it looks like we've been making minor variations in entries on these pages. Hang on a minute--St. Ethelbert Crabapple 14:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I've made a copy of the Pearl Arms, so you can delete this now. We should have asked you to delete this some time ago! Thanks! --St. Ethelbert Crabapple 15:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. As the content was already on the The Pearl Arms, I turned Pearl Arms into a redirect as per the LSG. Might as well Keep this now. –Xoid M•T•FU! 00:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Category:The_Human_Liberation_Front

Another pack of lies.--Gage 06:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 4 Delete - For truth.--Gage 06:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - For Justice Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 06:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 4. Two entries? From two unexistant groups?--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
More Importantly UNIT and Club Veal Gang Were the only two real memebrs of this organization to begin with (other than Reptileus' 501st Armed Division). Its another one of Reptileus' lets see how much ilegitimate information I can spout without anyone noticing...I don't think I ever rememebr being involved with it...Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 06:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 4. One entry is a rederict to itself? --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 06:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedily Deleted.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 07:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

94.1 Star FM

Every now and again, My stupidity amazes even myself. Like really, what the bloody hell was I thinking? I wouldn't have noticed this again if I hadn't clicked on the RRF link. Kill it, burn it, then nuke it from orbit.--Labine50 MHG|MEMS 02:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted Under Crit 7 Conndrakamod T CFT 03:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


Mockridge Heights Streets

I'm nominating this for deletion under Criteria 1. It just lists every street in Mockridge Heights and its location. No other information is there. Also, there is only one primary editor of the page,User:Boxy with edits by other users being limited to spelling fixes and a Category addition. I dont think Boxy is going to make much more out of this page, as it hasnt been touched since August. --GhostStalker 21:12, 25 October 2006 (BST)

  1. Keep - All the redirects to it keep folks from making 32 pages just like it. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 21:31, 25 October 2006 (BST)
  2. Keep - Better to have one page that 32. Pillsy FT 21:33, 25 October 2006 (BST)
  3. Keep - Eventually someone is going to deal with it, I think MAX said it best. Conndrakamod T CFT 22:01, 25 October 2006 (BST)
  4. Keep - Criterion one is for pages that are clearly non-expandable or have little to no content on them. This is clearly expandable and would take a substantial effort to recreate (trust me on this, it's more work than it looks). –Xoid S•T•FU! 01:22, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  5. Keep - I'm cuurently trying to do this with Judgewood. Xoids rights its a lot more work than I first thought. If its got the redirects then even better. The idea like it is that then anyonw can add bits about separate streets/revive points etc. and it be in one place. --MarieThe Grove 12:01, 27 October 2006 (BST)
  6. Keep - I've always wanted to know more than I could ever want to know about Mockridge Heights' streets!--Labine50 MHG|MEMS 22:47, 28 October 2006 (BST)
  7. Keep - For all the reason above. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 06:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  8. Keep - Why are you trying to destroy Boxy's Amazing work?--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  9. Keep - My precious! -- boxy T L PA DA 03:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Kept by Unanamous decision. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 03:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

10th_of_November

Speaking of Reptil-crap, I'm pretty sure we don't need another page with just a template on it. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 21:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete - Crit 1.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 21:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - yep, Crit 1 -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 22:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Criterion 1 --Gage 23:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedily Deleted.--Gage 23:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Unban Amazing

  • Delete - It needs to go.--Gage 07:51, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - It's a dupe.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 07:55, 26 October 2006 (BST)
    • It's not a dupe, it fixes what several people said was wrong with the last policy.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 08:31, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Let it go under voting.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 08:31, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - A sad, pathetic attempt by an equally sad, equally pathetic person. How's the ossom butseks over in SW, General? Cyberbob  Talk  08:36, 26 October 2006 (BST)
Translate that last sentence into English and i might reply. It's a better re-write of Rueful's policy.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 09:37, 26 October 2006 (BST)
You just replied... *rolleyes* Cyberbob  Talk  10:19, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Too.Much.Drama. Pillsy FT 09:03, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Let it go! --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 19:18, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep People said they'd vote FOR if the other policy didn't ban Rueful or didn't clear Amazing's record. Let this go through unless it was all a lie. You should NOT be able to delete valid policies!! Basil 20:36, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete I don't personally think this is a valid policy, though. This request should be under the ban hearing sections. -MorthBabid 22:10, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete This is ridiculous. There is already a similar policy under voting. This is verging on harassment. And besides, isn't it a little stupid to draft policies that affect only one person? Policy should deal with operation of the wiki, not one user's ego. Bubba 23:18, 26 October 2006 (BST)
    • For what it's worth, the Congress passes laws for a single person all the time. --Ron Burgundy 09:35, 27 October 2006 (BST)
      • That doesn't mean they are good laws, or even legal at the end of the day. Look at all the special laws that were passed in the Abraham scandal. Do you really like that type of government? Bubba 18:31, 27 October 2006 (BST)
        • Oh, but they are. I'm pretty sure that's how Miranda warnings came about. :) --Ron Burgundy 00:31, 28 October 2006 (BST)
          • For what it's worth, the Miranda warnings were the result of a Supreme Court ruling, not a law, and they apply to more than one person. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 09:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I originally wasn't going to touch this one, but Bubba actually raises a pretty good point. If you really want some sort of apparatus to unban users, formalize it in a policy, don't just make Amazing-centric things. Leave a comment on my policy and maybe we can hammer something out. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 23:24, 26 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - If you are against it, vote that way. Bringing it up for deletion is just trying to exploit a wiki loophole. --Ron Burgundy 09:33, 27 October 2006 (BST)
    • If it can't withstand a deletion vote, there's no way it'd pass the policy page. I don't exactly like deleting policies either but with policy guidelines as loose as they are there's no other way. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 23:00, 27 October 2006 (BST)
      • Right, but this is superfluous and double jeopardy. What if the policy passes but is also deleted? --Ron Burgundy 00:31, 28 October 2006 (BST)
        • How would that be possible? You need a simple majority to save a page from deletion, and 66% of the vote to pass a policy. The only way I could see it is if you could convince me that people would not bother voting on a policy that had a delete tag on it, so it could count as intimidation or something. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 01:50, 28 October 2006 (BST)
          • Fewer people could vote on this page than that one. A lot of people don't know how voting for deletion works. But I don't even need that contingency to make my point; this voting will end before that voting does. --Ron Burgundy 03:25, 28 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - We kept the other one didn't we? And the one about Pluto, just wait until voting is over. --MarieThe Grove 11:59, 27 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - PWOT, sure, but let it fail of its own accord. –Xoid S•T•FU! 12:12, 27 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - As Xoid. Pillsy FT 12:41, 27 October 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - --Zod Rhombus 19:56, 27 October 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - the thought of amazing makes my anus itch... and not in the good way.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 03:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • IMPROPERLY FORMATTED DELETION REQUEST This Deletion request only contains a link. There is no reason for request and no signature with timestamp as required for legal deletion. --Kiki Lottaboobs 19:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Hey dipshit. My vote was the reason and the timestamp. I submitted it! HURR.--Gage 19:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
      • "It needs to go"... great reason. Hey, let's just make a rule that says that rules are optional for you, just like signing statements. --Kiki Lottaboobs 18:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
        • If you wanna get technical, whingebucket, every vote here is invalid by not being preceeded with a #, instead of a bullet. We overlook minor shit like this because there is no reason to waste time on it. There's no effect on the outcome whether there is a bullet or a hash, just as there is no effect on the outcome if someone happens to use the initial vote as the reason. –XoidM•T•FU! 00:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
          • Rules = optional. I get it. --Kiki Lottaboobs 04:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
            • Would you like it if I dogged your edits till you messed up? I am sure you would be singing a different tune in M/VB when you were reported because you broke some minor rule buried in the annals of the wiki somewhere. Get over yourself, this doesn't really matter all that much. We don't follow rules just to follow them on the wiki, because some rules are not essential to the smooth operation of the wiki. Get a life.--Gage 04:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - for fuck's sake! We just went through this bullshit already. We have to go through it again? For the people making these pathetic fan-wank policies, how about you take your tongue out of Amazing's arse just for a couple of minutes so that he can sit down. --Funt Solo 12:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Do you have anything anything to say that wouldn't be more at home on a porn site?--The General T Sys U! P! F! 21:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, your idea sucks. No, that's no good...it totally blows. Uhm...it's a cheap shot. No...no, I guess not. --Funt Solo 00:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I don't think we should un-ban amazing and/or clear his record, But I don't think this page should be deleted.--Labine50 MHG|MEMS 23:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - This is, for all practical intents and purposes, the same fucking policy that was just shot down. I'm also not sure this belongs on Deletions, but that's because I think it might be better suited to Vandal Banning as a bad-faith edit. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 22:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - For great justice. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleted--Gage 21:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Nov_2006&oldid=996137"