Clothes/Suggestions/Other

Costumes

For those sillier players amongst us. Could be mascot costumes (eg. a fullbody suit as a cow with a hockey mask and team colours, found at stadiums), animal costumes (eg. a monkey mask or bear-paw mittens, found at the zoo), or promotional advertisement costumes (eg. a giant foam banana suit, found in malls). The full body costumes would override all other options, except glasses and boots; masks and mittens etc. would just apply to those parts of the body. --c138 ^{RR - PKer} 00:25, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. As long as you can get a panda costume from the zoo. --Uncle Bill 01:14, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. Yes, definitely a Panda costume. Maybe some cool things you can wear at Halloween, Christmas and Easter (bunny suit). --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:22, 5 June 2007 (BST)
3. Yes. Gottspecial seasonal and animala have those costumes. -- Gunstar 01:54, 5 June 2007 (BST)
4. Giant foam banana suit? Yes! --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 02:17, 5 June 2007 (BST)
5. I demand a cactus suit! --dudemeister 03:19, 5 June 2007 (BST)
6. Hell yeah! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:25, 5 June 2007 (BST)
7. Got My Vote!! --Piotrcolossus 03:38, 5 June 2007 (BST)
8. Hell yeah, as long as there are a variety of animal and movie villain suits EddyB 05:22, 5 June 2007 (BST)
9. Oh... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 06:46, 5 June 2007 (BST)
10. Halloween clothes, Halloween clothes! --Kaisuke 07:47, 5 June 2007 (BST)
11. Exciting -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 16:29, 5 June 2007 (BST)
12. Like it!--Wee Sonny MacGregor 19:14, 5 June 2007 (BST)

    Comment I think that the full body suits should come in parts, rather than a whole.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:36, 5 June 2007 (BST)

13. Aye -- TheDavibob ^T 21:44, 5 June 2007 (BST)
14. Arise, Lord Vader --Mordred^MalTel 22:59, 5 June 2007 (BST)
15. Especially a zombie costume. --Toejam 00:10, 6 June 2007 (BST)
16. Kind of like those giant bannana suits that poor idiots have to stand in and give out fliers?--Seventythree 12:06, 6 June 2007 (BST)
17. I wanna be one of those Taco Suit guys that hands out coupons to taco bell! --Ktut 13:54, 6 June 2007 (BST)
18. Some cities have costume shops, why can't Malton? --1337p5yc0 18:03, 6 June 2007 (BST)
19. Nifty :) --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:17, 6 June 2007 (BST)
20. I just can't stop laughing! --Lord Evans 21:24, 6 June 2007 (BST)
21. I love this, hopefully partial costumes will be included with full costumes. I'd love to see a zombie dressed up as a clown, but I'd hate to miss seeing someone in a Panda suit. -Zed Ed 23:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
22. If I can't dress up like batman, what is the point in living in this cruel world?!? Also, we demand capes! --Mrxak 00:43, 7 June 2007 (BST)
23. The possibilities are endless. --Skitchipoo 00:46, 7 June 2007 (BST)
24. This is gonna take me a while to vote yes on almost everything. Vista, you should be shot for trying to rain on peoples parades again. Just kidding, you make a good point though. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:31, 7 June 2007 (BST)
25. Have you looked at the people already out there? This won't make them any less weird. --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
26. I agree everyone already look like morons just give them more room to look stupid without getting monotonous. --Sephikus ^T 11:19, 10 June 2007 (BST)
27. Go mascots! --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 07:37, 16 June 2007 (BST)
28. YESSSS!!!!!!!!!! --Ulysses Black 02:39, 19 June 2007 (BST)
29. May the dancing banana live! Torec _T-CC/CS 03:06, 19 June 2007 (BST)
30. As long as a Giant Lobster is included. -- Murray Jay Suskind 03:10, 19 June 2007 (BST)
31. Like that creepy bloodied bunny suit in Silent Hill... I'm for that! -- Happy 21:53, 25 July 2007
32. A BRAIN SUIT OR HAT FROM THE BRAIN MUSEUM!!!! zhodani 3:41 pm PST 8/14/07
33. Sure. Clay5x 15:50, 27 October 2007 (BST)
34. Splendid - I want to have a wallaby costume...wait.!?*§! --the wallaby^♥ 20:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC) (Vote changed)
35. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No

1. Too unrealistic. We'd have hundreds of mascots running around, while the stadiums would only stock one or two each.-- Vista  +1  15:31, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. Too goofy. --Sonofagun18 09:30, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Seperate it so we are voting on each new costume seperately so I have some idea what I'm voting for and I'll probably change to keep. --karek 10:31, 10 June 2007 (BST)
4. unlike my groucho glasses suggestion (which rawks, i don't care what the sour-souled old grouchies say ;P ) this is too much. for example, while groucho glasses (and devo hats! malton needs devl hats!) are silly, but they're one small item of a whole wardrobe. this suggestion is too over top... please don't do it.... --WanYao 11:04, 30 July 2007 (BST)
5. NO FURFAGS!!1!11! --User:ottotorrens 09:50, 18 Oct 2007 (BST)
6. not so splendid! As awlays Vista got it right. You could also use your description field to describe precisely what you´r wearing. --the wallaby^♥ 20:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
7. This is one of those ideas that is great around Halloween, but seems ridiculous for the rest of the year. -- Diano 04:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Gloves

I guess that would need a new Hands slot... On the other hand, once adding it, we could have such items for it like handcuffs. Gloves would be found in Malls, Mansions, maybe Hotels/Motels. --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 06:50, 5 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Woah, let's not get too complicated there Duke. One of the first things I thought about was gloves, which were not available. I certainly think this category would be good. Think about it. Firefighter's gloves, zoo-keeper gloves, <color>leather gloves, <color> mittens, etc. etc. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:33, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. More hell yeah. We really need disposable gloves (to be found in hopsitals and NTs) --Hejsa 12:56, 5 June 2007 (BST)
3. nice idea, but more work then simply a new clothing item.-- Vista  +1  15:42, 5 June 2007 (BST)
4. Why not add hand gear. We'd need to have catchers gloves in baseball stadiums as well.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:22, 5 June 2007 (BST)
5. I was hoping someone would suggest this. Thank you. --Pvt De 21:44, 5 June 2007 (BST)
6. Aye -- TheDavibob ^T 21:47, 5 June 2007 (BST)
7. Perhaps the hands slot would allow for rings and bracelets, as well. --Sgt Cannon 22:33, 5 June 2007 (BST)
8. I agree. Although it might be a bit much to add a whole new slot for clothing, it's still kind of strange it wasn't there in the first place. -- Gunstar 00:59, 6 June 2007 (BST)
9. I like the idea of an item that I'd probably want to have in an outbreak, also I agree wiht Dux JD 02:49, 6 June 2007 (BST)
10. Gloves would be good. --Ktut 13:56, 6 June 2007 (BST)
11. - Sure, it sounds great. --Hhal 17:31, 6 June 2007 (BST)
12. Keep as I would like a pair of tactical gloves to go with my military stuff.--Major Striker 20:25, 7 June 2007 (BST)
13. I want gloves --1337p5yc0 18:09, 6 June 2007 (BST)
14. Just plain brilliant. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:23, 6 June 2007 (BST)
15. -- Sweet, lets pave the way for more suggestions of this type, huh? --Lord Evans 21:33, 6 June 2007 (BST)
16. Don't forget those rubber gloves for lab techs and doctors, in standard white and biohazard blue. --Mrxak 00:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)

    Comment - And the yellow rubber housewife gloves! XD --Hhal 01:58, 7 June 2007 (BST)

17. As number twelve voter said, we military/cops need Tac. gloves too ya' know. I mean how else would we not get blisters and other painful hand owies in the middle of an apocalypse? A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:35, 7 June 2007 (BST)
18. i forgot to vote for my suggestion --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:30, 7 June 2007 (BST)
19. This is a great idea. I would definitely wear gloves. --Sonofagun18 09:34, 7 June 2007 (BST)
20. I do tend to get blisters from my crowbar when I'm tearing my way out of over barricaded buildings... --Daeldra 18:09, 7 June 2007 (BST)
21. How about watches too? Rolexes, digital watches, ect.--Seventythree 23:50, 7 June 2007 (BST)
22. Gloves would just be sheer practicality in Malton --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
23. And Fingerless Gloves, too! What good glove set is complete without Fingerless Gloves? --Heiki 20:10, 6 June 2007 (AEST)
24. For it, but shouldn't this be a suggestion suggestion and not a clothing suggestion? It's a profile change not a new articly of clothing, 'least that's how I see it. --karek 10:33, 10 June 2007 (BST)
25. Definately i was gonna suggest this exact thing but saw yours so ill just add my thoughts here. How about biker gloves as well. --Sephikus ^T 11:11, 10 June 2007 (BST)
26. Good idea. There should be fingerless gloves too.
27. OOOOH! Fingerless gloves! Count me in.--DerangedFerret 05:46, 18 June 2007 (BST)
28. I think it's a great idea. Latex gloves in NT buildings and hospitals, work gloves in factories, white gloves in mansions . . . maybe even rings or brass knuckles. --Zoopers 16:32, 18 June 2007 (BST)
29. Leather fingerless gloves as well, like - <Colour> Leather Fingerless Gloves, or possibly hobo gloves to shortern it. Brass knuckles would be better introduced as a weapon though, Or some kind of bonus thing adding extra damage to punching --Amras Calmacil 17:12, 18 June 2007 (BST).
30. Didn't see this when I originally suggested my hands slot, but Gloves would be so rad! I hope either one gets implemented, I don't care so long as I get some black rubber chemist gloves! ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 23:09, 19 June 2007 (BST)
31. This is a no brainer for me. There could be rings, too. Wedding rings, college varsity rings, ect. --EMAG TRESNI 02:37, 1 July 2007 (BST)
32. My hands are cold! --Midianian 18:12, 15 July 2007 (BST)
33. My hands are talking to me! --Commie Dog 04:35, 19 August 2007 (BST)
34. What about giant foam fingers at stadiums?
35. I'll put my vote in on the fingerless gloves and latex gloves. Latex gloves are perfect for doctors, and fingerless gloves...well, they're awesome, and that's that. --Klaus Gruber 02:18, 2 September 2007 (PDT)

    qwerty456*

36. Maybe gloves with claws attached to them? As a human, I find it difficult to disembowell a unsuspecting survivor with my hands
37. Yes. A hands slot would be nice, and gloves would be the first thing to put there. Clay5x 15:48, 27 October 2007 (BST)
38. For all the times I needed gloves... When I was punching this, or axing that... --JAston 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
39. Nice idea, I've been wanting to add some variety to my clothes lately and this would be a great addition to the choices at our disposal. Only point I'd make is any studded/clawed/knuckleduster type gloves people would expect to have an effect on combat, that's a no-no I think.--DI Sweeny 14:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
40. Defeniatly needs finger less gloves, as i never remove mine. Daniel camburn 16:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
41. I'm all for it. -- Diano 04:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
42. This idea is epic! Fingerless gloves, leather gloves, latex gloves all practical and realistic. Gets my vote. Kurt Halligan 22:05, 9 June 2008 (BST)
43. Yeah, awesome idea. -Kewabara1 18:10, 1 October 2008 (BST)
44. Yes. This is a great idea. --Alex Reynard 17:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
45. I have been Wanting Gloves For A Long Time Thank You. james bodkin
46. A glove section sounds like a fantasitc idead. Awson idea guys and girls. 7:00, 2 June 2009

In-Game items

I originally wanted to put in a suggestion for binoculars to be seen around the neck and found in the forts but then it hit me, what if it was possible to have items you have in your inventory in your description. In addition to the Binoculars suggestion I suggest that there be a new item slot that acts as a "holding" slot. After the he/she is wearing texts it continues to say "and is holding *item*." just about all items can fit in, from syringes to fencing foils, and FAKs to shotguns. There is only one spot which would represent the player's weapon of choice. Also if this is the wrong place I apologize, and if I should separate the two ideas, just say so.

Yes

1. Keep - Author's Vote JD 03:15, 6 June 2007 (BST)
2. Keep I like it, I like it a lot. It'd add a little more depth to what the player does for a living. Bookies can have books, hunters have shotguns, and zombies? well they have bananas. Adds a little to role playing too. -- SgtBop 08:51, 6 June 2007 (BST)
3. Keep Good as long as it is strictly one item only (so nobody can have a shotgun in each hand for example; it's just too much). --Werewolf32 12:53, 6 June 2007 (GMT)
4. I wanna hold a generator!--Lachryma^☭ 13:31, 6 June 2007 (BST)
5. Radio aka. GhettoBlasta! -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 13:45, 6 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yep! Execpt only items, not weapons. Ok, maybe weapons. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 15:10, 6 June 2007 (BST)
7. we found a use for wirecutters!-- Vista  +1  15:16, 6 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes! Yes! --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:57, 6 June 2007 (BST)
9. Keep, so I can walking around holding beer :)--Major Striker 18:00, 6 June 2007 (BST)
10. Sounds good to me! --1337p5yc0 18:07, 6 June 2007 (BST)
11. Hopefully this means people will stop saying they are have a katana in their hands.--Leonidas 19:32, 6 June 2007 (BST)
12. Brilliant. Just brilliant. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:39, 6 June 2007 (BST)
13. Great idea! --Sgt Cannon 20:29, 6 June 2007 (BST)
14. Wait, I can ACTUALLY hold the knife in my char. decription if this passes? Sweet! -Lord Evans 21:41, 6 June 2007 (BST)
15. Overall good idea.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
16. It's a great idea. Hopefully it works out smooth.--Leonidas 22:50, 6 June 2007 (BST)
17. Excellent idea! --Skitchipoo 01:09, 7 June 2007 (BST)
18. Sure, but remember to add something for the zombies, like bananas (jokes aside, there are many gory posibilities I would like to see in zombies)--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:25, 7 June 2007 (BST)
19. If this'll let me hold a poetry book when I'm parked in a library? Yes please. --Natalya Zveda 05:16, 7 June 2007 (BST)
20. W00T! Now everyone will be able to see my sexy fencer-y-like-ness. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:45, 7 June 2007 (BST)
21. Oh yeah. Now I can hold beer, while I'm inside arms. --Vortexx 15:00, 7 June 2007 (BST)
22. Sounds excellent. This could be used to identify your job choice, and also give more function to the items like beer, newspapers, and crucifixes--Daeldra 18:11, 7 June 2007 (BST).
23. This is a good idea. -- Cheeseman ^W!ASBTalk 22:29, 7 June 2007 (BST)
24. A very good one. -- Gunstar 03:22, 8 June 2007 (BST)
25. It would make a lot of sense. Ruan. 07:49, 8 June 2007 (BST),
26. I think maybe two slots as in one for each hand. That way we could hold our weapon and maybe a radio or gps or whatever. --Sephikus ^T 11:17, 10 June 2007 (BST)
27. YES! This could also be useful at revive points... imagine a zombie holding a syringe and wearing a Mrh? shirt. I bet he'd get a quick revive. --Uncle Bill 21:39, 14 June 2007 (BST)
28. Definitely. --Midianian 18:14, 15 July 2007 (BST)
29. much potential. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 19:58, 7 September 2007 (BST)
30. Yes. What more can I say? --Private Mark 05:12, 17 October 2007 (BST)
31. Sweet. Clay5x 15:50, 27 October 2007 (BST)
32. Awesome Idea. I say yes. -- PFC MiniMac
33. I want to hold a stuffed fish.......always --the wallaby^♥ 20:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
34. This is good, if the drop down list just reads straight from your inventory. -- Diano 04:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
35. Yes, Ja, Si, Oui, Evet, Kyllä!! There you have the same answer in 6 different languages. ;) --Johaen 21:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
36. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
37. It's the best. But if implemented the Trenchies will complain because they can't pretend their pistol is a HOLY NUKE LIKEIN MONTY PYHTON!!!11!! --The D of T 15:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
38. Boots 17:30, 30 March 2008 (BST)
39. Because wandering around ruins whilst occasionly reading from a poetry book just isn't enough. --Nny The Person 01:05, 21 July 2008 (BST)

No

1. Umm... isn't that something you should just put into your description. Isn't that what the description is for? You know, saying something like, "The young man is dressed in dirty military fatigues. Sweat drips down his face, and his knuckles turn white as he clenches his pistol in fear," or, "This half-mad ballerina wields a foil so skillfully... one might actually think it a real weapon." "This lab worker clutches his needles as though they were wooden stakes and he were stuck in an Anne Rice novel. Luckily for him, he's just stuck in a zombie apocalypse." I just don't want the clothing boxes to replace creativity in the description. -- William Told 2:02, 10 May 2008

   Ps. Asch's little line test can eat me. -- William Told 2:02, 10 May 2008

Historical dresses and armour

Similar to the costumes suggestion, Museums, but only some of them (I'm thinking History museums only, but Kevan should decide) could have clothes and pieces of armour from diferent historical times and locations. How about the zombie Cleopatra dressed just like her, a lot of crazy people as Napoleon Bonaparte, A medieval knights armour, soldiers dressed in the WWI uniform... the posibilities are endless--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:48, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Note: I'm not incluiding historical weaponry on propouse to avoid the katana-mania ;)--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:48, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Author vote--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:48, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. It might get absurd with everyone wearing full plate armor, but its good for now. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:57, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Nifty idea. Interesting twist: Each History museum contains one "unique outfit" along the lines of the above. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 03:32, 7 June 2007 (BST)
4. I agree if only to make musuems more special. -- Gunstar 06:28, 7 June 2007 (BST)
5. Oh man, ancient armor with a thong. ultimate combo. --1337p5yc0 06:32, 7 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yes, but only if certain select items (such as a breastplate or helmet) are avaiable in one museum, and the same for say two or three other periods. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 13:57, 7 June 2007 (BST)
7. yes, I like the idea.--Game Master
8. I like it, maybe I could find a WWII Admirals uniform like Nimitz's uniform to run around in. That would be cool.--Major Striker 16:52, 7 June 2007 (BST)
9. Well that means I can dress up as King Arthur and go on a homicidal rampage. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:04, 7 June 2007 (BST)
10. Yes! I miss the wax museums... --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
11. Sure why not. We loot the museums for gnarly stuff, I'm sure we could find these in the mansion. Suit of Armors, Baby. I could be the Black Night back from the dead! This time I'll REALLY bite your arms and legs off! Daniel Hicken 03:53, 8 June 2007 (BST)
12. Sure sounds cool... --Lord Evans 04:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)
13. I think it would be nice just no armor and stuff like that. Only because it will lead to people wanting actual defense bonuses from the stuff. --Sephikus ^T 11:18, 10 June 2007 (BST)
14. Bring on the armor! This is especially good for those "religious" orders who like to think of themselves as crusaders. Have them all meet up in one place dressed in full plate, and the effect would be amazing. I'm all for it! Simon Hollows
15. Yes please! --EMAG TRESNI 20:50, 21 June 2007 (BST)
16. Meh. Historical clothing from museums, sure. But armor should really be in a normal suggestion, not clothing suggestions, because it should take a point off melee damage (but not firearms damage, and I don't think it should be wearable with flak vests). --Clay5x 06:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

No

1. for the same reasons as with mascotte costumes. thousands of people in fullplate or 17th century regalia would break the supsension of disbelief.-- Vista  +1  09:14, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. I don't think it will be used enough. --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:17, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. As Vista said. --Sonofagun18 10:46, 7 June 2007 (BST)
4. meh ... what vista said. already enough trenchie types like the Knights Templar or the This Knight Order Here, These Other Kinghts over There, etc. etc., ad nauseum. Give them ACTUAL armour, oh my gawd, what are you, NUTS??? ;P besides, where would you get all these suits of armour? --WanYao 11:10, 30 July 2007 (BST)
5. I'm with Vista on this one. -- Diano 04:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
6. I concur. -- William Told 2:20, 10 May 2008

New COLOR

camouflage ! In Desert, Arctic, Jungle, and Stealth (night)

Yes

1. Author vote. Many of us are military!!--Squid Boy 16:23, 6 June 2007 (BST)
2. Sure why not? It will give me more opportunities to make fun of the nerdlingers who dress themselves stupidly. --8 Bucks 16:34, 6 June 2007 (BST)
3. Stealth? Also known as Urban. --Nicholas Bashere 17:15, 6 June 2007 (BST)
4. I agree but we should have digital camo too since thats what the US Army uses and thats what kind of soldier I am on here.--Major Striker 17:59, 6 June 2007 (BST)
5. Wouldn't use it... But a good idea regardless --Lord Evans 21:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
6. i agree... it would make some of us look more... pro? xD Aznmonkeyass99 19:28, 6 June 2007 (BST)
7. Yes please. --Vortexx 14:55, 7 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes, I know someone who would love this.----Lucky 1uke 00:17, 8 June 2007 (BST)
9. But we need skirts too. --genie in a bottle ^{♥ - zone} 05:12, 8 June 2007 (BST)
10. Very much yes --Toast Outlaw 15:35, 9 June 2007 (BST)
11. They sell camo shirt and pant in Store...so why not!--Skritz
12. There should be forest, urban, and desert camos --PaSTAR
13. 4shur! Kyleklbecka
14. If I said this was a crap idea, I would be lying to myself! --Mr Cane 19:24, 15 October 2007 (BST)

No

1. We already have one version. And that's enough.-- Vista  +1  17:13, 6 June 2007 (BST)
2. Use your imagination. It says camo, not what kind of pattern or colour. - Whitehouse 17:46, 6 June 2007 (BST)
3. There are already camouflage clothes in Fort Storehouses and Barracks --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:55, 6 June 2007 (BST)
4. As above. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:42, 6 June 2007 (BST)
5. A little bit gung-ho testosterone powered silly. We ahve enougth camoflage, thankyou very much.--Seventythree 20:48, 6 June 2007 (BST)
6. Camo's fine the way it is. Just use your imagination. --Sonofagun18 10:18, 7 June 2007 (BST)
7. It's fine, I'd rather more clothes than colours. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 13:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)
8. had to break the tie The man 20:59, 7 June 2007 (BST)
9. I think its a great idea but its not necessary just use your normal description to add modifications to your clothes. Like if you wanted urban camo you could specify that your camo clothes are urban camo in your description. --Sephikus ^T 11:16, 10 June 2007 (BST)
10. I agree with Sephikus. What if you took a Woodland camo jacket, left the fort, and 25 blocks away decided that you wanted desert? Why waste AP going back when you can just edit your description?--Leon Vulcan 00:08, 14 June 2007 (BST)
11. desert camo will not stop a hungry cannibal from seeing you in an urban environment... Jason Cane
12. Because we already have camo clothes. We don't need that much variation- and besides, a fort in the center of town like Creedy or Perryn would only carry urban-pattern (gray, dark blue, dark gray, etc.). --Boris 02:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
13. Right. We don't need to get this detailed. -- Diano 04:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Named Necrotech clothes

As most of us know some mall clothes are named with the name of the mall, along with the dog tags and forts. What I am suggesting is that certain Necrotech clothes would be named, IE: A Inman building Lab coat, or A Inman Lab coat, or A Inman necrotech jacket. I think this could add a bit of flavor to the bland Necrotech jacket and Lab coats. this is my first suggestion so be merciful :D.

Yea

1. if it's not to much trouble.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:03, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. I like the idea, do it. -Meatloafe

Nea

1. There are hundreds of necrotechs, a bit too much.-- Vista  +1  20:01, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. Sorry, the reason why it works with malls is because there are only a few of them. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:36, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Vista's pointed out the reason. I think a little too much work for Kevan. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:20, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. There are 10x more NTs than malls --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 08:33, 10 June 2007 (BST)
5. I don't think necrotech would go around advertising the locations of their supposedly secret buildings on their workers jackets. --Sephikus ^T 11:31, 10 June 2007 (BST)
6. Would I use one? Probably. But is it worth having Kevan have a fat lot of work, in order to implement an aspect of the game that doesn't really affect the game? I think not. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
7. Good point about the NT locations being secret. There are also too many. Yeah. --Aleksander 03:25, 13 June 2007 (BST)
8. Too many freakin necrotechs. A load of work to make, and would push more important stuff back.--DerangedFerret 05:49, 18 June 2007 (BST)
9. There's already a skill required just to identify one of the hundreds of NT buildings around. It doesn't pay to advertise these. -- Diano 04:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Finely tailored clothing

A new section in mall clothes and mansions. the prefix 'tailored' 'Patent leather' 'silk' or 'fitted' would be added to the clothes available. The range of colours would be mostly limited to browns, blues, blacks and greys. These would essentially represent high class clothes from specialist tailors within the malls. For example, you would be able to have Tailored shirts, silk ties, tailored trousers, fitted dressed and skirts, patent leather shoes and fitted coats. Perfect for the up-and-coming zombie hunter with a sense of style.--Seventythree 22:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Yea

1. My vote.--Seventythree 22:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. Why not, I'm sure some of the rich died in malton and need SOMETHING to remind them how they used to have it... Daniel Hicken 03:57, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. I'm not sure if the prefix thingo would work well, but I like. Maybe restrict to a few malls, and try to make them seem more 'classy' than the rest by the selection of clothes? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:24, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Vista is correct. The very fact that its tailored means it was adjusted to fit you and can't be purchased like that. However i vote yes because i understand what you meant. You mean more like classy clothes for the more upscale shoppers. I could see them being available in the mansions and certain malls in the higher class parts of malton --Sephikus ^T 11:37, 10 June 2007 (BST)
5. Anything fancy would count i say. =P 21:35, 13 June 2007 (BST)
6. I'm in on this one. I've started a new character who would (literally) kill to get his hands on some of this gear.--Buda Hilton 13:27, 15/06/07 (GMT)
7. I'm in favor of more class. All survivors are assumed to have been living before the outbreak, so why couldn't they still have any nice clothes they used to own? They'll be blood-splattered and tattered soon enough. --Zoopers 16:28, 18 June 2007 (BST)
8. Truly a great suggestion.But add robes to the equation like this "wearing expertly tailored black robes"Then you've got my vote!
9. I sure do like the idea of eating fellow survivors in a formal environment... Jason Cane

Nea

1. Finely tailored clothing are dependend on the measurements of the wearer. You need to have them cut for you personally or they aren't "Finely tailored". So as long as there are no tailors working in Malton, all you can get is "off the rack"-- Vista  +1  16:50, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. No. I totally agree with Vista.--Hot pants celeste 04:29, 9 June 2007 (BST)
3. Only makes sense from an RP standpoint --Aleksander 03:26, 13 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sorry, but I don't like this idea much, mainly for the same reasons as Vista. I don't see why you couldn't just add that into your character description if your really desperate for your character to have well made clothes, to be honest.
5. As much as I hate to vote this down (as my main character is a fashionista), Vista is right. It just doesn't seem plausible. -- Diano 04:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
6. Finely tailored clothing would have to be exceedingly rare for it to be plausible. In fact, there would have to be a limited number in Malton, and they would eventually run out. -- William Told 2:24, 10 May 2008

Zombies-specific items to be held

With all of the survivors getting clothing items left and right, the wild popularity of my first suggestion of being able to hold your in game items, the inspiration of Che13, and several continuous hours of [Dead Rising]; the idea came to me. How about giving zombies something zombie specific to hold?

I propose that should the in game items suggestion pass, a zombie be able to (while standing in a square, inside or out, containing a dead body) rip off a body part to place in the holding slot. As far as body parts go I had "a severed hand", "a severed foot", "an indistinguishable body part", "a digit" (fingers or toes,) and so on down through human anatomy. Also, the zombie can choose to be "holding", OR "chewing on" said body part.

Also as a sort of badge of honor/humorous note that Che inspired me to think up, a banana could be an item too. Found inside mall food courts, any zombie, once they having come inside, will be able to pick one up in his holding slot, and then has the option of "and is holding a banana".

If you know a body part not listed that you feel should be included, add it in your comment so that it can be noted by the powers that be.

• Edit: ok the banana part was pushing it a little, and seeing how both sides are not crazy about it I'll take it out. If anyone wants to put in the humorous suggestion section be my guest. 18:11, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Keep - Author's vote JD 05:00, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. You knew you had my vote, specially on the gore.--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 06:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. Yeah, this is good! More gore... --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:27, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sure. Gun, how is this disgusting? Hell Dr. 90210 is worse than TEXT saying a zombie is holding a body part. I mean come on, you don't even have to physically see the dang bloody arm. The banana thing is a bit overboard, but I still want one to sport on my zombie. Make it transition to Survivor too though. Imagine, a PKer wearing a chicken suit, holding a shotgun AND a banana. Priceless. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:09, 8 June 2007 (BST)
5. Keep - Way fun. Having a wide variety of entertaining parts to drag around would give zombies a fun and clever alternative to the harman clothes that just appeared. --Snuffleuff 13:10, 8 June 2007 (BST)
6. Keep - I love it! I want to be chewing on a torso! --DonTickles 15:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)
7. Keep - So for it my head hurts! --karek 15:49, 8 June 2007 (BST)
8. gore and zombie go together. And it would give them some zombie specific choices. Which is good.-- Vista  +1  16:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)
9. Keep "They are gnawing on a ruptured spleen." Slayerofmuffins 17:40, 8 June 2007 (BST)
10. Interesting, I like it. --Skitchipoo 20:58, 8 June 2007 (BST)
11. Gruesome, but kind of funny in a dark way. And if this takes place in England as a lot of people say it does, the British have very dark sences of humor. I know cause I lived there for a couple years.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:14, 8 June 2007 (BST)
12. -- A skull in one hand a Knife in another... I see my profile description is really going to come together with the suggestions here... (I also demand that skulls to be added to the list!) --Lord Evans 07:51, 9 June 2007 (BST)
13. As long as it doesn't get too ridiculous, I think this would be a nice alternative for zombies, esp. the ones with Brain-Rot who have a more difficult time getting interesting clothing. MolotovH 17:30, 9 June 2007 (BST)
14. This would definately be interesting i could already imagine the number of zombies walking around with severed body parts. --Sephikus ^T 11:46, 10 June 2007 (BST)
15. yea -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 13:27, 10 June 2007 (BST)
16. So cool. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
17. Keep - Now THAT's the kind of suggestion that would make me want to play as a zombie! --Uncle Bill 21:24, 14 June 2007 (BST)
18. Keep MANBAGZ AHN BANANAZ! --KiT 16:01, 22 June 2007 (BST)
19. Yes please - if the item holding thing passes, this makes ridiculously good sense. Also, zombies should be able to hold any item in their inventory, even if they can't use it. --Clay5x 06:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
20. Keep I'm surprised no one has suggested brains. --Darkferret 23:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
21. BRAINZ!!! BoboTalkClown 19:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No

1. I know this is a zombie game but, I find the idea of holding body parts disgusting. Also the banana thing is a little bit ridiculous. --Sonofagun18 06:25, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. Based on the fact that the suspension of disbelief is already in strong force when a zombie that has been head shot multiple times can be revivified and then be a survivor and not need any extra treatment, or suffer any negative buffs (temporary or not). Holding/biting body parts is fine for profile descriptions, but further than that you just mess with it too much. I like the fun-ness of the idea, but.. sorry. armareum 07:25, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. This is the sort of flavor text that I think best fits a description, not a clothing item. -- Diano 04:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Prison Clothing

For escaped prisoners. Not every prisoner could have worn straight jackets. --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 07:33, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Definitely! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:44, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. There's still no prisons in malton, however... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 10:34, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Not yet --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:51, 12 June 2007 (BST)

3. Good idea. I assume that these are for the coat/overall slot and found in Police stations, since you failed to mention any details... Werewolf32 13:55, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. I like this but there is no place to get them from. We still don't have prisons and Police stations don't use special clothes for their holding cells.-- Vista  +1  16:40, 8 June 2007 (BST)
5. Like it!--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:18, 8 June 2007 (BST)
6. I'd suggest that they be found in PDs, since that's where they're issued prior to moving the prisoner to an out-of-town prison. MolotovH 17:30, 9 June 2007 (BST)
7. Black and white strips are fine too --Druuuuu 17:42, 9 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes! --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
9. YES!! --Marie^{The Grove on Tour} 15:50, 15 June 2007 (BST)
10. A definite YES! --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 03:25, 16 June 2007 (BST)
11. I'd buy it from a costume store! --karek 22:02, 16 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes, 100%. So what if there's no prisons? It could be outside the exclusion zone. Prisoners could have broke INTO Malton to escape justice. A transport plane/van could have crashed pre-post outbreak. Escaped prisoners are part of Zombie lore!!! --Ulysses Black 02:42, 19 June 2007 (BST)
13. This would be good for rp... I escaped from an insane aslyum
14. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 20:03, 7 September 2007 (BST)
15. I completely, totally agree with Ulysses Black (cool name by the way U.B.). Vezira 7:13, 9 December 2007 (PDT)
16. I'm with this one. -- Diano 04:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
17. In PDs. --BoboTalkClown 19:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
18. yes damn people. use your imaginations. the prisoner escaped from his jail. He heared about all of the murders going on in the city and thought it would be a great place to hide because the cops would have their hands full. He arrives in the city shortly before the quarantine is initiatied. happy? --ChiTownBear 11:21, 29 July 2009 (BST)

No

1. We already have orange cover alls, don't we? --Seb_Wiers Imagine 15:42, 9 June 2007 (BST)

   Comment - actually, no. There are red overalls, but no orange ones --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:34, 9 June 2007 (BST)

2. No prisons, no prison clothing. --Aleksander 03:30, 13 June 2007 (BST)

biohazard suit

I think NT should have some of these. But now maybe all are broken like the night vison goggles.--SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 07:33, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. I like it. By the way, you get an author vote on all your suggestions. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:42, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. I think there would be plenty around after the quarantine. They'd most likely be broken beyond usefulness or repair though. --c138 ^{RR - PKer} 09:02, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. my vote --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 20:56, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Definitely.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:19, 8 June 2007 (BST)
5. Realistic and just plain cool. --Sonofagun18 06:29, 9 June 2007 (BST)
6. as c138 said, you'd expect some lying around. perhaps not in every necrotech though.-- Vista  +1  15:54, 9 June 2007 (BST)
7. I could see having them being airdropped in by those air drops we get on occassion. Although this isnt really a biohazard zone they likely would drop biohazard suits and send in teams with biohazards suits on to prevent whatever is causing the dead to rise to not spread outside --Sephikus ^T 11:51, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   I like that concession - I find them unrealistic to be found after two years of quarantine, however if they were in drops and protected from infection or something before being destroyed, why not? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:53, 12 June 2007 (BST)

8. like it -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 14:09, 12 June 2007 (BST)
9. Neat. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
10. So it'd be a torn Biohazard suit? Cool.--Seventythree 23:55, 12 June 2007 (BST)
11. A must have, but only intact ones. --Aleksander 03:39, 13 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes, this is a cool idea--Reen 05:29, 13 June 2007 (BST)
13. A defenite must-have. One of the first things NecroTech would have given their scientists in the labs would be biohazard suits, and until it was confirmed that the virus couldn't mutate into an airborne one, many of the survivors would wear them. And after that, there's a good chance that they would leave them lying around in various buildings-viola! perfect explanation.
14. Yes. But I'd like to point at that they don't have to be "broken" to be non-functional. Zombies bite, biohazard suits tear. How could they possibly prevent infection if the contagion is literally masticating you through your delicate little suit, and the only food and water you have access to is from within the quarantine zone? Biohazard suits in malton would be a glorious monument to futility, and have a nice flavor.--Father Thompson 14:50, 18 June 2007 (BST)
15. It's a zombie survival game, people. Who wouldn't want a biohazard suit, as useless as they may be? --Klaus Gruber 02:21, 2 September 2007 (PDT)
16. Completely believable. -- Diano 04:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
17. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No

Not sure if there would be enough of these around two years after the quarantine. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:44, 8 June 2007 (BST) (Vote changed)

1. same concerns --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 10:18, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   I'm conflicted, on the one hand I like it on the other I find it to unrealistic.-- Vista  +1  16:43, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   RE - Just curious. Why do you find it unrealistic to have biohazard suits in a biological disaster zone? --c138 ^{RR - PKer} 00:03, 9 June 2007 (BST)

   You have a point.-- Vista  +1  15:52, 9 June 2007 (BST)

School Uniform

I don´t know exactly what belongs to a uk school uniform. But perhaps there should be some kind of school blazer or cardigan, after all there are still some kids in malton. Obviously it should be accessable through schools. Perhaps in the colours blue, green and red depending on the school. --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 01:44, 10 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. my vote --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 01:45, 10 June 2007 (BST)
2. hummm I like the sound of it, and would open up schools for places with clothes, also what about plaid skirts and sweaters for the ladies while your at it. JD 02:11, 10 June 2007 (BST)
3. Sexy Women (18 and up) wearing a school girl uniform...you got my vote. ;) A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:35, 10 June 2007 (BST)
4. Perfect for that sexy Catholic schoolzambah look --Goolina _{Gore Corps} 07:42, 10 June 2007 (BST)
5. malton is in africa, but still... Schools should contain clothes --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 08:36, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: No, Malton is in the UK, not Africa --Game Master

6. Why not? Besides it'll satisfy all those people with that weird fetish for schoolgirl clothes. --Moctezuma 17:34, 10 June 2007 (BST)
7. Aye! --dudemeister 20:27, 10 June 2007 (BST)
8. I find it interesting where everybody's mind goes at the mention of a school uniform. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:14, 11 June 2007 (BST)
9. Yeah, but not because of the entire schoolgirl thing (never got that myself. School sucks, everyone hates school, why remind yourself of it?) I jsut want AC/DC tribute bands--Seventythree 00:29, 11 June 2007 (BST)
10. There are still some private school who have those so...why not!
11. I would think that at least some of the schools in Malton are private and require uniforms, no matter what country Malton is in. --Skitchipoo 05:40, 12 June 2007 (BST)
12. Variety is cool.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 15:40, 12 June 2007 (BST)
13. Would be fun. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
14. I'm for it. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 00:03, 13 June 2007 (BST)
15. Oh yes. --Aleksander 03:35, 13 June 2007 (BST)
16. absolutely--Reen 05:44, 13 June 2007 (BST)
17. Mheh. could easily be assembled from clothes already in existense. Blue skirt of trousers, green or white long sleeved shirt or blouse, red tie. just make them findable in schools and you're done.-- Vista  +1  10:46, 13 June 2007 (BST)
18. If there are schools, there should be school uniforms! --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 03:24, 16 June 2007 (BST)
19. Absolutely, and down under in New Zealand, 99% of all schools need uniforms, although Malton seems to be in UK but... yeah, uniforms would be cool. No idea how it would be implemented, though. Bastetmeow 05:08, 21 June 2007 (BST)
20. --EMAG TRESNI 21:24, 6 July 2007 (BST)
21. OK Kyleklbecka
22. Yes. many schools all over the world use uniforms. Clay5x 15:53, 27 October 2007 (BST)
23. This seems realistic enough. -- Diano 04:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
24. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
25. Absolutely. Kawaii!--Kagami Hiiragi 05:12, 21 June 2008 (BST)

No

1. I can't believe im now seeing suggestions that depend entirely on the location of malton. Many schools in america don't have uniforms and the same for other countries. We arent supposed to know where malton is so why are we adding clothes that depend on the location of it. --Sephikus ^T 12:11, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   Malton is clearly in the UK, where uniforms are still the norm. Try not to be so US-centric in your thinking, the world does not revolve around there you know. Robinxe 13:17, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   Everyone knows the world revolves around the U.S., what country do you constantly see in the newspapers? What country do people constantly insult and/or criticize? Which country will probably take over your country in a few years? The U.S.- everything revolves around it. And Soviet Russia, the world also revolves around that, too. --Moctezuma 17:33, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   Hmmm, he has a point. We (America) do get criticized a lot. As for the taking over of other countries thing, as soon as I become dictator I'm shuttling all of us to Pluto to colonize it. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:21, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   what country do you constantly see in the newspapers? Belgium.

   what country do people constantly insult and/or criticize? again Belgium.

   Which country will probably take over your country in a few years? Belgium! You can't trust those waffle eaters. I've been warning my countrymen for your about their danger. but nobody will listen!!-- Vista  +1  07:47, 11 June 2007 (BST)

2. If Malton isn't in England, the use of the word "Arms" for every bar in the city tells us that it's clearly in a Commonwealth country, where school uniforms are generally the norm. But they would be in children's sizes, and thus I'm not seeing the potential for most of the survivors to be wearing them. User:MolotovH

   Comment - Sure, but there are a number of players who play kids. --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 12:50, 11 June 2007 (BST)

   Comment on the Comment - Then again, ten minutes after this gets implemented we'll have Pedo Pete trying to blend in with all the likkle children in uniforms and try to do bad things with them...either that or we can just go nonce hunting :P -- Cheeseman ^W!ASBTalk 22:56, 11 June 2007 (BST)

3. There sure are a lot of Catholic churches for being in the UK. I would support athletics apparel being in schools, but I doubt that there were too many kids leaving their uniforms at schools.

   Comment - I'm sure schools have plenty of schooluniforms at the school to hand out when they are paid for. --Kagami Hiiragi 04:57, 7 July 2008 (BST)

Bags

Everyone is carrying around ten FAK's lots of ammo and even fuelcans. Where? In their pockets? This suggestion is just for roleplaying only, It has no affect on inventory limits ect. whatsoever Bags would be used by survivors to carry all their stuff wound in, these would range from rucksacks (in malls, motels, towers, schools) To overnight bags (malls, towers, Motels) Handbags (malls, mostly) Army Kit-bags (forts) canvass holdalls ( Motels, malls) Gym bags (malls). Colours are pretty varied for the backpack, but the army Kit-bag comes in Dark green only. --Seventythree 20:35, 12 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Author vote --Seventythree 20:35, 12 June 2007 (BST)
2. Handbags!!! --Marie^{The Grove on Tour} 15:48, 15 June 2007 (BST)
3. Manbagz!!! --karek 22:10, 16 June 2007 (BST)
4. It seems reasonable to me. --Fenian 01:53, 18 June 2007 (BST)
5. Yes. comment One idea could be to make the bags a standard piece of equipment, not possible to discard. You could only change its colour, and in certain locations replace it with a specialty bag such as army kit bags. This would serve to explain where everybody keeps all their shotguns... --Penny Painkiller 10:27, 27 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yes; small bags ideally as the zero effect penalty could kick in. Accessorise! :D --DrBowman 18:31, 29 June 2007 (BST)
7. Bags, Paricutes, Backpacks, ect... BoboTalkClown 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No

1. As much as I like the idea, and even considering the fact that I'm one of the survivors carrying a bag in my description, you have to remember this little line up at the top. "Relatedly, if players of the game could reasonably expect your suggested item to have some significant game effect, when they put it on - such as an ammo belt or a parachute - it shouldn't be proposed as a zero-effect piece of decorative clothing." -- Gunstar 21:23, 12 June 2007 (BST)
2. Exactly what I was going to put in. Please go to the Suggestions page and submit it there. Even if it is only for roleplaying. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:42, 12 June 2007 (BST)

RE Just uploaded a test idea for it in the discussion area of suggestions, would appreciate help on it, obviously.--Seventythree 23:43, 12 June 2007 (BST)

1. I'm in agreement here. I think it's a great idea, but too many people would expect it to function as additional encumbrance slots. -- Diano 04:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Skanky Old Blanket

Really, whats the apocalypse without people huddling like bag ladies under skanky old blankets for warmth? The blanket would be a category on its own- it can logically be combined with any other item of clothing. They would come in various gross / incongrous colors like baby blue, pee green, tan, grey, rose, patterned, etc.
Blankets would be found in residential areas (some towers, mansions), in all malls, in hospitals, and maybe elsewhere (really gross colors in junkyards). The description when worn would read: Wearing: ..., a (color) blanket draped over the shoulders, ...

Yes

1. For all the folks who want to look like hobos, rather than action heros. Or hey, for the crazy hobos who think they ARE action heros, and wear them as capes. --Seb_Wiers Imagine 02:17, 13 June 2007 (BST)
2. Yes, I laughed so hard when I read this --Aleksander 03:43, 13 June 2007 (BST)
3. Why not. I can't see why survivors wouldn't be wrapping blankets around themselves. --Sonofagun18 04:43, 13 June 2007 (BST)
4. Meh, hobo blanket. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:50, 13 June 2007 (BST)
5. Yeah, for simplicity put it in the coat section. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 04:57, 13 June 2007 (BST)

   That would be simpler, but people who really need to stay warm would likely want both. Of course, without weather in Malton, I guess it hardly matters. Good enough either way. --Seb_Wiers Imagine 13:16, 13 June 2007 (BST)

6. absolutely ... just, please make it "pea" green, not the way it's spelt above (ewwww! *laughs*)--Reen 06:13, 13 June 2007 (BST)
7. Yup. Liking it.--Seventythree 07:47, 13 June 2007 (BST)
8. Good one, realistic. but as dux said, it could be in the coat section for simplicity's sake.-- Vista  +1  10:22, 13 June 2007 (BST)
9. Yep. -- Gunstar 17:04, 13 June 2007 (BST)
10. Yes! Add it to the coats section; If you're wrapped in a blanket people cant see your coat anyways? ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 23:18, 13 June 2007 (BST)
11. Yes, skanky old blankets are exactly what this game needs.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 03:37, 14 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes, Post Apocalptariffic --RCJ 00:23, 15 June 2007 (BST)
13. With so many people huddled in drafty buildings it only makes sense. And as Dux, in the coats slot, perhaps even implemented in a winter update. JD 22:15, 15 June 2007 (BST)
14. Ohh yeah. —Revenant ^talk 09:00, 16 June 2007 (BST)
15. Hilimalarious.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:12, 18 June 2007 (BST)
16. totally. That would add some gritty realism to things. Absolutely. --Fenian 02:00, 18 June 2007 (BST)
17. Skanky old blanket hehe. Fenian is right about realism. I've always wanted to walk around as a homeless person :D Bastetmeow 05:15, 21 June 2007 (BST)
18. Yes yes yes. Amazing. I don't know why this wasn't one of the first clothing items put in. However, it doesn't need its own slot, it can go in Coats. Clay5x 15:55, 27 October 2007 (BST)
19. The realism here boggles the mind. -- Diano 05:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
20. Add newspapers. --BoboTalkClown 19:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
21. God yes! -- William Told 2:02, 10 May 2008

Add a "hands" slot!

I think a "hands" slot would be a great addition to the game! Even in a zombie apocalypse people would still use their hands! By adding a hand slot to the clothing system you would allow further character customization, and I think it would open the door for lots of other creative options!

The following provides examples of some things that a "hands slot" might enable if it were implemented:

1. an "is carrying" feature. (ex. you select one inventory item to display on your profile; you could set your "hands" slot to read "Is holding a cricket bat" which may later read "Is holding a blood splattered cricket bat" a la Shaun of the Dead. Or you could be carrying a spraypaint can? Or a book! Or beer!)
2. Gloves (which could include black or dark red industrial rubber gloves from power stations, junkyards and factories, Latex exam gloves from Hospitals,and other types too like leather gloves or wool mittens!)
3. Rings/Bracelets/Watches (in many different styles, expensive things like diamond rings might be found in mansions, whereas watches could be found in Malls)

So vote yes on adding a "hands slot" to the clothing system! ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 03:13, 13 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Author vote: is of course yes! but I forgot to add it originally so here it is! ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 23:21, 13 June 2007 (BST)
2. Of course, this makes so much sense. I'd surely use my hand slots for every character no matter what. --Aleksander 03:45, 13 June 2007 (BST)
3. I'm all for this. --Sonofagun18 04:50, 13 June 2007 (BST)
4. Very good idea, but I've already said that, havn't I? Check the "Other" part of the archive section. -- Gunstar 04:56, 13 June 2007 (BST)
5. I want my scientist to have gloves! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:05, 13 June 2007 (BST)
6. I want a rolex, myself. --Seventythree 07:45, 13 June 2007 (BST)
7. Add me to this list! Definately for this idea. --Kiablade 08:42, 13 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yah, is lovely. Though there was a suggestion sorta like this, but it didn't have gloves and watches and feth (Sorry Gunstar!)--Lachryma^☭ 08:59, 13 June 2007 (BST)
9. We already have this suggestions (initial made by me, by the way), so just saying again, yes, it is good! --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:06, 13 June 2007 (BST)
10. As Garland. (except that it was his suggestion not mine.) -- Vista  +1  10:19, 13 June 2007 (BST)
11. Yup Werewolf32 12:57, 13 June 2007 (BST)
12. I want some sweet gloves.--Leonidas 15:48, 13 June 2007 (BST)
13. Oh, yes. Shusamchen 1819, 13 June 2007 (GMT)
14. Although we've already had this voted on already, since I was the one who first thought of holding in game items along with Duke Garland who was the first to think up the other gloves idea too. Normally this would be a total dupe vote but to show support its a yes! Also see the here for both of our original suggestions JD 19:05, 13 June 2007 (BST)

    RE: I thought suggestions had to be kept simple, and concise; so I suggested the bare minimum, just adding a hands slot, planning that this would allow us to keep adding stuff later! But your Ideas are great too! I hadn't read up before suggesting this, but check the note! I didn't suggest gloves or holding things, sorry for the misunderstanding, but I'm not trying to steal your ideas! ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 23:13, 13 June 2007 (BST)

15. honestly, the issue of "who thought of it first" doesnt really matter to the rest of us. quit squabbling. anyhoo, I vote yes. Saria231
16. This is a great idea, regardless of who's it is.--Leon Vulcan 23:17, 13 June 2007 (BST)
17. Absolutely. Just so long as it would be possible to wear jewellery/watches and gloves at the same time. And sparkly Michael Jackson gloves. Heeeee-Heeeeee!!! --Buda Hilton 13:20. 15/06/07(GMT)
18. --Marie^{The Grove on Tour} 15:55, 15 June 2007 (BST)
19. It turns out it was Saddam Hussein's idea in the first place. He told me of it back in '87. --Skitchipoo 19:15, 15 June 2007 (BST)
20. Just because your sig is kinda cool. And above, I guess. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:35, 17 June 2007 (BST)
21. Allright...this is a zombie apocolypse, correct? When someone swings at a zombie, points a gun at them, or even points at them in general, what is most vulnerable? THEIR HANDS! Now, i don't know about you, but the first thing i would put on in a zombie outbreak would be gloves. And the thought of not finding a single glove in the city...ridiculous! I vote Yes, but also, i vote add different kinds of gloves. Tweed, Silk, and Cloth gloves for Mansions, Tweed being exclusive to mansions, leather and fireproof for fire stations, and leather and steel backed for police stations. Optionally, fingerless gloves in various locales, including military bases like Fort Creedy, and all of the above, save for tweed, in Malls.- Simon Hollows Simon Hollows 07:24, 18 June 2007 (BST)
22. Definitely, though I think that "gloves" and "holding" should be separate slots. —Revenant ^talk 08:57, 17 June 2007 (BST)
23. hand slot, yes. "Is carrying", no. --Fenian 02:02, 18 June 2007 (BST)

    RE: I just want to make it as clear as possible that this is support for adding a hands slot only I don't want this vote tied up with things that could go in a hands slot, we need to get one implemented first before we start adding things! This is just to let the creators know that citizens of Malton want hands at the very least. Personally I was hoping to get some jewlrey implemented... and thought (to start) I should keep it simple... 23:21, 19 June 2007 (BST)~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^,

24. Got my vote! John Z. Delorean 18:57, 18 June 2007 (BST)
25. Really needs to be implemented.
26. Yea, and verily. --Midianian 18:22, 15 July 2007 (BST)
27. The inventory slot is a nice touch. --Soloman Frisbee 04:54, 21 August 2007 (BST)
28. Yes please. --Clay5x 06:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
29. Yes, pretty much for the same reasons I voted yes on gloves.--DI Sweeny 14:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
30. As above. -- Diano 05:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
31. Yes please! --Johaen 21:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
32. Impliment!!! Gragghhh!!! --BoboTalkClown 19:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
33. Yes please! I'd like to wear a diamond ring, since I'm in game asking a gal to marry me. *grin* Docmortand 08:59, 18 September 2008 (BST)
34. YES - I would love to hold a beer in my hand, as well as a pistol or shotgun! So much fun! --Corinthias 22:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

No

Vote no here.

Bracers/Armguards

honestly, I'm surprised that this hasn't been suggested sooner. a bracer is related to Archery, and would probably fit in the Hand slot if it is approved. it would be found in sports equipment stores and come in the colors Brown, Black, and Maroon. --Borkins

yes

1. . Sure why the hell not, the creator may not like it but he is obviously a nay sayer. Let's tar and feather him, and do it in our bracers! --karek 03:19, 14 June 2007 (BST)
2. Just because bracers always look cool --Kiablade 13:00, 14 June 2007 (BST)

no

1. author's vote: honestly, this is the dumbest suggestion I have ever made and everyone is now dumber for having read it. all I will recieve for this is humiliation and ridicule, and may god have mercy on my soul. --Borkins
2. Trust me, It is far from the dumbest suggestion. Very far. Still, it isn't to my taste. --Seventythree 23:44, 13 June 2007 (BST)
3. It's not horrible, it just doesn't fit in this game. --Sonofagun18 04:06, 14 June 2007 (BST)
4. too specialistic for my taste, but seriously? not as horrible as you're saying.-- Vista  +1  15:09, 18 June 2007 (BST)
5. Maybe, but I'm leaning towards no due to rarity, and the possibility that these could be confused with suspenders, which are sometimes called bracers (I think). But if hand slot comes in, and these are included, you might as well add leather ones in the goth store. --Clay5x 06:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
6. Do people actually wear bracers in everyday life, and I'm just missing it? -- Diano 05:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Upmarket clothing

Found in mansions, some clubs and malls (boutiques). Essentialy the prefix 'Designer' would be added to Long sleeved and short sleeved shirts, blouses, trousers and jackets. 'Fitted' would be added to Coats, 'silk' added to ties and 'Patent leather' added to shoes. Changed slightly from my previous suggestion as people said having tailored clothes is innacurate. these clothes are not tailored, they are merely higher quality than most.--Seventythree 20:53, 14 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Think i've adressed the problems with the last suggestion.--Seventythree 20:53, 14 June 2007 (BST)
2. Hell yes, I want my expensive suit and tie. I'd say restrict this to only one or two malls to keep it 'rarish'. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 01:59, 15 June 2007 (BST)
3. I'm already wearing designer clothing! But only the pure of heart can see it! Still... It is a little drafty so I'd love some other options... ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 15:46, 15 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sure. There's Steve in the Dawn of the Dead remake and others like him. --Clay5x 06:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
5. Now I'm with you. -- Diano 06:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
6. I AM WITH YOU!!! PRAISE ALLAH!!! --BoboTalkClown 19:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No

1. i still don't think it's fitting... or is it something "donators only"? --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 21:29, 14 June 2007 (BST)
2. Just use your imagination. If you want your clothing to be high quality, just pretend they are. --Sonofagun18 03:54, 15 June 2007 (BST)
3. as duke -- Vista  +1  09:59, 17 June 2007 (BST)
4. no need for it, I'd say. Besides, who the deuce would be wearing some kevin klein outfit in the middle of a zombie apocolypse? But if you want to wear designer clothing, just wear nice clothing and add something into your decription.

Pajamas

Pajamaas are great to wear and comfy ro sleep. Pajamas can be found in all sort of places. --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 09:18, 15 June 2007 (BST) 21:39, 15 June 2007 (BST)

Yes

1. Author Vote :) --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 09:18, 15 June 2007 (BST)
2. Yep, good idea. I know one or two psychiatric patients who wouldn't be so cranky in the morning if they could only find their jim-jams--Buda Hilton 13:31. 15/06/07 (GMT)
3. Good idea: so my vote is yes! My only worry is that if I change into pajamas at nighttime I'll wake up and my normal clothes will be missing! Its strange, but since the outbreak I can't keep more than 1 pair it seems! ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 17:52, 15 June 2007 (BST)
4. I like to sleep naked despite the the rabid cries of horror from the people around me. But I still like this idea. --Skitchipoo 19:20, 15 June 2007 (BST)
5. I'm all for this. --Anotherpongo 19:41, 15 June 2007 (BST)
6. Why would you change out of pajamas, anyways? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:44, 15 June 2007 (BST)
7. Heh. Maybe a dressing gown as well.--Seventythree 21:41, 15 June 2007 (BST)

   You can find dressing gowns in hospitals, if you're after one. —Revenant ^talk 08:58, 16 June 2007 (BST)

8. Mheh.-- Vista  +1  13:32, 16 June 2007 (BST)
9. Not the most practical survival wear, but why not.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 05:03, 17 June 2007 (BST)
10. Sure. --Sonofagun18 11:57, 17 June 2007 (BST)
11. Yes please. Long underwear, union suits, thermals, etc, would be great too. --Clay5x 06:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
12. Silly, but still in existence. -- Diano 06:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No

Nay, Nada, and No. --Sonofagun18 05:32, 16 June 2007 (BST)

• Comment: I thought everybody loves pajamas. Lolz. What's the reason you said no? --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 06:59, 16 June 2007 (BST)

• Comment: Well... I was thinking it was a little silly but, I guess it's realistic. I'll change to yes. --Sonofagun18 10:42, 17 June 2007 (BST)

1. I never wear pajama... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:32, 22 June 2007 (BST)
2. Nay! If "suitcases" are implimented, yes! BoboTalkClown 19:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Mexican Wrestler's Gear

Very simple suggestion for all you Lucha Libre cosplayers out there. An array of Wrestling Masks available at a selected stadium sorted by designs AND colour. Examples - Tiger Wrestling Mask, Demon Wrestling Mask, Fiery Wrestling Mask, Golden Wrestling Mask, Silver Wrestling Mask. Also accompanying Trousers, Shirts and Footwear would accompany, classed as Lycra Vest, Lycra Shorts and Wrestling Boots, all in corresponding colours and designs.--Ulysses Black 03:03, 17 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Mexican Wrestler's Gear)

1. Author vote -- Variety is the spice of life, and for all those saying suggestions like this make people look like morons, look around, it's already happened anyway, and it enhances the game, not detracts from it! Play Dead Rising and you'll see my point, and the post-apocalyptic nature of a zombie attack will always bring out people's inner insanity... --Ulysses Black 03:03, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. I know some people who'd like this. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:13, 17 June 2007 (BST)
3. More strange gear is cool.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 05:10, 17 June 2007 (BST)
4. Keep.--Seventythree 12:12, 17 June 2007 (BST)
5. Keep it. It'd be interesting to see more weird clothes, plus my group's leader is Bullgod, so...--Zorinth 22:13, 17 June 2007 (BST)
6. Fuck Yeah! - my charictor is deep rooted in the luchador lifestile, if there were clothing to match this would be a great thing. -Bullgod 00:44, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: Then get your Feral bro's behind the vote and hopefully we can make this a reality! It will make me have to create an El Santo character though! :) --Ulysses Black 01:29, 18 June 2007 (BST)

7. We don't know where Malton is located, but in many areas of the US, Mexico, and parts of Spain this would be common, along with in any city in a because it is a common Halloween costume, they do keep them year round they don't just suddenly appear like magic on Halloween. --karek 05:21, 18 June 2007 (BST)
8. Sure.. - Whitehouse 14:46, 18 June 2007 (BST)
9. muucha luuucha - ZOMBIEKILLCORE16:11, 18 June 2007 (BST)
10. No wrestling gear means no wrestlers. No wrestlers mean no Bullgod. I have to vote yes. And no, finding a wrestling outfit isn't completely improbable. --Project K9 04:26, 19 June 2007 (BST)
11. Hell yeah, that would be awesome. Somehow gives a whole new meaning to names like "The Undertaker" etc, when worn by a fleshhungry zombie the size of a refridgerator.. FreakyM 07:40, 21 June 2007 (BST)
12. This would be awesome --EMAG TRESNI 19:33, 23 June 2007 (BST)
13. lucha libre is popular in many places, and an institution in mexico where wrestlers are huge pop cultural icons. and even in canada, you see famous luchadore knock-off masks being sold in stores, sometimes in malls. i see kids posing in photos with lucha masks on all the time. maybe this would be less controversial if it were just a generic "pro-wrestler's" mask, that came in a lot of colours. though keeping it lucha keeps the trenchy undertaker and kane wannabe types from using it, which is good IMO. and we don't really need the whole array of garmets, and the types of masks the author describes are IMO too specific, just colours is good enough, as long as gold and silver are included. --WanYao 10:53, 30 July 2007 (BST)
14. Less common than combat ready swords anywhere but Mexico, but sure. Why not? --Clay5x 07:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
15. YES TIMES A MILLION FOR "*color* wrestling mask". HooperX 01:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
16. yes Then I can wrestle the horde! --volt 23:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

No(Mexican Wrestler's Gear)

Votes against go here

1. Silly, and has the same problems as rice hats, etc.-- Vista  +1  10:02, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. Sombreros, Ponchos, and now this. Why do people think Malton's in Mexico. --Sonofagun18 11:22, 17 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: I'm not saying Malton is in Mexico! The gear would only be found in Sports Stadia. Pro Wresting is popular in England too at local levels (I'm from there) and some gear could be left over in the locker rooms, especially if Hockey Gear can be.--Ulysses Black 16:06, 17 June 2007 (BST)

3. No--Hejsa 12:56, 17 June 2007 (BST)
4. They do not have luchadors in England, and this is a ridiculous suggestion. --Fenian 02:14, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: First of all they may not have genuine Luchadors in England, but like certain WWE wretlers, you have people on the pro wrestling circuit emulating the Luchador costume. Pro Wrestling (though i'm not a fan) is still very much still alive on the club and sports hall circuit in England. And as for 'ridiculous' last time I looked there were no Zombies walking down my high street in England either... C'mon guys! Where's your imagination? --Ulysses Black 14:12, 18 June 2007 (BST)

5. Not funny. --Saint Murphy 03:03, 18 June 2007 (BST)
6. Silly and not funny at all. --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 15:24, 18 June 2007 (BST)
7. Umm, Malton's in England right? -- John Z. Delorean 19:03, 18 June 2007 (BST)
8. It's just... no. No, sorry. I can't in good faith support this. Also, there is already a character in the game named "El Santo." He PKed my alt a while back. --MolotovH 06:48, 27 June 2007 (BST)
9. Just a tad silly. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:27, 28 June 2007 (BST)
10. No way. --Midianian 18:24, 15 July 2007 (BST)
11. Hell no. -- Diano 06:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
12. No border jumpers please. --BoboTalkClown 19:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Sandwich Boards

Goes in the Coat slot and comes in a variety of designs and slogans unique to the area discovered in and carrying content that takes on humorous double meanings in the context of a zombie apocalypse.

Descriptions would read "A Sandwich Board..." and "displaying" for designs and "reading" for slogans. Examples - Cathedral: "reading 'The End of the World is Nigh'" Cinema: "displaying a poster for a zombie film" Hospital: "reading 'Give Blood Generously'"

Yes(Sandwich Boards)

1. Author vote -- Why not? Death Cultists would go wild for the Cathedral one, and I'd personally love to see a zombie wearing the hospital one! : ) --Ulysses Black 03:35, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. I like this idea. Necro Tech buildings should have ones saying "Mrh?".--Wee Sonny MacGregor 02:47, 20 June 2007 (BST)
3. Perhaps allowing for personal graffiti.-- Vista  +1  10:03, 17 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sure. Liek the guy in london with the board saying that too much protien is the cause of all our problems.--Seventythree 12:06, 17 June 2007 (BST)
5. I rather just go with the "end of the world" ones. --Sonofagun18 12:13, 17 June 2007 (BST)
6. I don't see why anyone would have a problem with this. I like the personal graffiti idea too.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:19, 18 June 2007 (BST)
7. ...! --Uncle Bill 02:53, 18 June 2007 (BST)
8. I'm all for it. But wouldn't it be even more cool if anyone with the tagging skill could tag on their own and other zombies boards (since zombies probably wouldn't be able to write)? --Dex Frivolous 21:52, 18 June 2007 (BST)
9. We should have some that say "Give a little love" from the Coca-Cola commercialUser:Kenny
10. Great idea. armareum 05:28, 22 June 2007 (BST)
11. mmmmhmmm -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 12:31, 22 June 2007 (BST)
12. You get 1 Yes. If the option to tag your own message on one is given that converts to 10 YES!s. --EMAG TRESNI 19:35, 23 June 2007 (BST)
13. Ha zombies being tagged at random! --Iggy13 22:20, 25 June 2007 (BST)
14. 'Yes' to the idea of a handful of specific boards. 'Maybe' to taggables, because I think it's a fun idea, but it would take considerable re-programming to handle it. Better to handle it with 'a sandwich board' (in addition to the handful of specific ones) and let users put their messages in their description. --MolotovH MolotovH 06:44, 27 June 2007 (BST)
15. Just scrapes in there. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:28, 28 June 2007 (BST)
16. Totally genre-appropriate. It would be best if you could graffiti yours to say what you want. Clay5x 15:59, 27 October 2007 (BST)
17. The end of the world will come! "Dude, it's here. Get over yourself." --BoboTalkClown 19:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No(Sandwich Boards)

Votes against go here

1. Taggable boards is a great idea, but sadly, I'm not sure if its possible. so no.--Pharo2i2 ^{Barbraz Employee} 00:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
2. This just seems like so much work for such little benefit. Use your description, folks. -- Diano 06:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Club Items

I noticed there are no clothing pickups in clubs.

How about glow necklaces (for the neck), all colors (for rave and trance clubs)? There could also be big necklaces, silver and gold (cheap disco medalions and/or hip-hop club bling) and party hats, all colors. --RCJ 11:23, 17 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Club Items)

1. Yup--Seventythree 11:57, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. YES!! Our group is a Rave group that tours the clubs of malton and we could use this.--Doc Kelly 16:27, 19 June 2007 (BST)
3. *shrugs* see no reason not too... --Turner Calton 16:49, 19 June 2007 (BST)
4. Your protestations are a bit late, the Night Ravers have already existed for some time. Though I am sure that this will disturb the oh so serious among you. --Bette Noir 17:04, 19 June 2007 (BST)
5. I can't imagine why this clothing wouldn't be in a city this size with this many clubs - --John Blast 17:10, 19 June 2007 (BST)
6. Ahh, go on then! : ) --Ulysses Black 17:39, 19 June 2007 (BST)
7. Even though wearing glowsticks would be incredibly stupid in a zombie apocalypse, I'm voting yes on this because not every clothing item has to have some sort of advantage towards staying alive (in the RP sense). Would you wear a ballgown while running away from zombies? No, but it should still be in the game. This items supports the role-playing party people of Malton and supports the fact that raves are really fun if the DJ/crowd/setting are right. --Skitchipoo 22:44, 19 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes -Night Haunter 23:30, 19 June 2007 (BST)
9. YES! - Myself 00:46, 20 June 2007 (BST)
10. Ha! Yes, what Bette Noir said (above) ... there are those among us who love to fiddle while rome burns!--Reen 01:28, 20 June 2007 (BST)
11. There's gotta be something in clubs--Wee Sonny MacGregor 02:48, 20 June 2007 (BST)
12. Okay, to let you all know the only reason people are voting on these pages are because they want items that will mean they don't have to chew up valuable and limited text in their descriptions anymore, I now no longer need a top hat description or suit jacket and all the other things I've had for the past 20 or so months! The Club stuff is for those few of us that love to Role Play ingame, because many of us have done it all, or everything within the bounds of the games' system - Kill zombies - check; survive - check; run several groups - check; Mastermind the first major assault on Ridleybank barricading the entire suburb to EHB in less then 10 minutes with less then 50 people, incidentally at the exact same time the 2006 superbowl was airing in the U.S. and subsequently get group added to wiki historical groups section - check! Yes, for those of us who are still playing Urbandead after almost the full 23.5 months of it's existence, we are devoted to teh Role-playing elements of the game. Having funky clothes allows us to add more depth to charcater descriptions and keep an atmosphere of interest around us as we move from place to place. I have been running The Gingerbread Men side by side with The Night Ravers for the past 1/2 a year or more, as well as running beside Malton Tours Inc.; The Malton Zookeepers; and several other highly Role-playing based groups who basically run around, and spend all their AP talking, fencing/fighting with fisty cuffs against each otehr and all other manner of crazy things like chandelier swinging duck duck goose in the mansion party of the century earlier this year etc. etc. Allowing Glow sticks and other Rave oriented gear such as - Aqua Heals - would increase the fun of many groups and keep those of us who have been playing with such dedication and support for so long here for a much longer time indeed. Thus I vote yes to Club Gear such as glow sticks, and potentially Aqua Heals to boot!--Ram Rock Ed First

    ...Wow. Thats alot of talking.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 11:05, 21 June 2007 (BST)

13. Ram Rock Ed First and Bette Noir and Mad Girl Kiki all make incredibly valid points, this is a game, and it is a survival game, many people like to look good whilst playing this game, it's a game and we are all supposed to have fun! So yes for the Raving Fun!!!--Squidgey
14. Yes--Morlond 20:43, 21 June 2007 (BST)
15. This is all a clever setup for that joke about ravers being similar to zombies. I'm all for it. --EMAG TRESNI 19:37, 23 June 2007 (BST)
16. --Penny Black 12:36, 26 June 2007 (BST)
17. Hell yeah! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:28, 28 June 2007 (BST)
18. Yeah, clubs need clothes. -- Diano 06:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
19. Yeah, clubs need clothes. -- BoboTalkClown 19:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No(Club Items)

1. While I agree there needs to be wearable items in clubs. Party hats and glow necklaces aren't exactly what I had in mind. --Sonofagun18 12:20, 17 June 2007 (BST)

   So what were you thinking, miniskirts? I can just see the zambahz now... *shudder* —Revenant ^talk 13:21, 17 June 2007 (BST)

   I don't know, the punk clothing idea below, doesn't sound to bad but, party hats and glow necklaces are unrealistic (survivors of a zombie virus outbreak wouldn't run around wearing this stuff) and just flat out ridiculous. --Sonofagun18 03:22, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   Unlike bowties, clerical miters, 3-D glasses, aprons, football scarves, ballgowns, waistcoats, or kilts?--RCJ 06:12, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   You can't include kilts in your list because the kilt is a legitimate clothing item (I actually have one too). Though I do agree that 3-D glasses are ridiculous.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:45, 19 June 2007 (BST)

   IT LOOKS SO REAL!!! --BoboTalkClown 19:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

2. There are gold and silver necklaces (although real, not fake) in game already. And the party hats - i just don't like it --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 15:21, 18 June 2007 (BST)
3. neh.-- Vista  +1  15:30, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   Nope, before we admit any ravers into Malton, we need to get rid of the Zombies we already have here! (ho! ho!) *hits cymbal and drum* --Ulysses Black 16:27, 18 June 2007 (BST) Vote changed by Doc Kelly's persuasion! --Ulysses Black 17:37, 19 June 2007 (BST)

4. Just seems a little wired to see people running around in party hats. now if they had a strait jacket on then I could say okay. Urban Dead pl- come on I already posted a couple times!

Full Outfit Descriptions

When a pre-set list of clothing in that group is completed, as a reward the clothing description is condensed to a single outfit description instead of the components.

For example - Wearing: A Malton PD Uniform; A Malton Ranger's Replica Football Kit (No. 9); A Malton Firefighter's Uniform; A Paramedic's Uniform; A Private's Military Fatigues; A Special Forces Outfit; A Nurse's Scrubs; A Black Tuxedo; A Tweed Suit; A Cinema Usher's Uniform; A Malton Zookeeper's Uniform.

Further clothing description is available on top of this (if you wish to wear Safety Goggles and Clown Shoes with your Tweed Suit for example) as the outfit description just condenses sets within your clothing description, not replaces the whole description.

It's a bit cumbersome and unrealistic to have a Black Tuxedo described as "Black shoes, Black Waistcoat, Black Bow-Tie, Black Trousers, White Shirt, Black Jacket" Instead of simply "A Black Tuxedo" If you want to wear that with a Red Shirt or Orange Tie though, it would revert back to listing the individual components. The condensing is a reward for snappy dressing only. Hidden descriptions could also be included such a "Jason Voorhees Costume" for all those Hockey Mask/overalls/boots wearers.

Yes(Full Outfit Descriptions)

1. Author's Vote It's a reward for those who like to collect full sets and RP in that character. --Ulysses Black 16:23, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. Yes, if you can still choose to show every piece of clothing. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:33, 18 June 2007 (BST)
3. Yes. This is pretty much how Kingdom of Loathing handles clothing, with the exception that some outfits also grant a bonus. I'm for this either way. --Uncle Bill 02:57, 18 June 2007 (BST)
4. I'm good with this, except, for the Jason Voorhees costume, thats just silly. --Sonofagun18 03:29, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: I agree, I wouldn't want that exact one in, but just an example of how outfit descriptions could be used to encourage people to experiment with combinations for 'hidden' or 'secret' descriptions. --Ulysses Black 17:35, 18 June 2007 (BST)

5. I can see the point.--Seventythree 12:12, 18 June 2007 (BST)
6. This would make the clothing discription a bit more natural. If you complete enough of the outfit, you'd simply start listing the differences. Same with blood spatters.-- Vista  +1  15:41, 18 June 2007 (BST)
7. With note that only all clean clothes in a set can form a "clean" set --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 16:57, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: Thanks Duke! I'll leave my note below as is to explain that concern to others. --Ulysses Black 17:30, 18 June 2007 (BST)

8. I like the idea,it really is tiresome to have suits put down as Black shoes, black this, black that...simple is better -- Darwin Blaine 23:21, 18 June 2007 (CEST)
9. I'd love to see this for RP--Oranchov 01:59, 19 June 2007 (BST)
10. If the code allows it to be implemented without causing too much havoc - I Love It. --Dex Frivolous 04:09, 19 June 2007 (BST)
11. Got my vote.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 09:12, 19 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes --Morlond 21:10, 21 June 2007 (BST)
13. could I wear a Zoot suit? Rupert Johnson

    Sure! That's the idea! --Ulysses Black 21:25, 22 June 2007 (BST)

14. Yes please --EMAG TRESNI 19:43, 23 June 2007 (BST)
15. Yeah sure. Makes it easier to read. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:30, 28 June 2007 (BST)
16. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 20:11, 7 September 2007 (BST)
17. Sure. --Clay5x 07:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
18. I don't really know how this would work, but I like it. -- Diano 06:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
19. I love it!!!!! Note the 5 exclamation points. --BoboTalkClown 19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
20. It would be a good reward for people who work really hard to find all articals of clothing.--LucasBlack 07:09, 6 August 2008 (BST)

No(Full Outfit Descriptions)

1. not necessary --Fenian 02:18, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   What if, for example, in tuxedo: your shirt is blood-flecked, jacket - torn and bloodstained, while all other clothes - new. How would that be combined in Full Outfit description? --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 15:16, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: Hmmm... Good point. What if the description only condensed if the outfit was in perfect condition? As I said, the description is not just condensed for brevity, but also as a reward/incentive for people to complete a set for RP purposes. Keeping your clothes clean should be part of that incentive. Although I concede some want bloodstained clothes for RP purposes, to me the description is how an onlooker would describe your appearence. I would describe a man wearing Tuxedo as a man wearing a Tuxedo. I would describe a man who's individual components of his Tuxedo were ripped/bloodstained to another person by the individual components (his tie was ripped, his trousers torn, his shirt bloody, etc). --Ulysses Black 15:53, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   I see, vote changed --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 16:56, 18 June 2007 (BST)

2. I don't like this idea very much. Maybe you should just have the option of getting a full outfit description.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 15:56, 25 June 2007 (BST)

Dog Tags / Collars / ID tattoos

One of my zombie characters, ZMAZH is in Zombies Unlimited, and has (in his description) a very durable collar with an information tag on it. ZMAZH started out "wearing: white cover-alls", and has now been killed so many times that he is "wearing: a brown rag" as you can see in the profile. Which is cool, but I'd like the collar to be an actual in game clothing item.

The idea is that people would either want to be certain they could be identified at death (weraing dog tags, getting ID tatoos) or somebody would be tagging zombies (as ZMAZH is) with durable neck bands. These items might get damaged, but they would never reach worse condition than "scuffed and blood soaked" or some such.

These items would take up the neck slot- its visable, and if you loose your neck, you have bigger problems than not being IDed. Rather than having a color, they would have a user-enterable text field (max 125 chars) that is displayed in all caps. Items in the category would include:

• A (condition) set of military dog tags printed with USER TEXT HERE
• A (condition) (metal, plastic, leather) collar with a tag reading USER TEXT HERE
• A tattoo that says USER TEXT HERE

Military dog tags would be found in the forts, and also in PDs and FDs. Collars would be found in the malls. Tattoos would be "found" in NT buildings (via tat guns used for ID tats on lab animals). Military dog tags and collars are treated like clothing (in the neck slot) - they can be dropped or replaced at will, but zombies can't pick up new ones. A tattoo can also be removed; it is assumed you ask a friend to cut off the affected skin while you are dead, and then you get revived. As such, they are (for simplicities sake) also treated as neck slot clothing, despite the rather disturbing implications.

It might seem unlikely that folks could read dog tags at a glance, but then, how do they know what skills you have, or how many times a zombie has died, or how many xp you have... 17:27, 17 June 2007 (BST)

YES(Dog Tags / Collars / ID tattoos)

1. Uhuh.--Seventythree 17:28, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. Author's vote. 17:43, 17 June 2007 (BST)
3. good. johnson
4. I like it, but the Tattoo idea needs some tweaking, maybe make a tattoo go in any slot and it is seen as on that body part (shoe slot = ankle, ect) And the condition would be the freshness of the tattoo (Like New, recent, fadeing, old, barely visible; or whatever works really) --EMAG TRESNI 19:48, 23 June 2007 (BST)
5. This would be nice if someone did not have a DNA extractor. --LucasBlack 07:14, 6 August 2008 (BST)

NO(Dog Tags / Collars / ID tattoos)

1. There are already dogtags in Forts, although without this your text. Anyway i don't find this writing on clothes suggestion really fitting --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 22:13, 17 June 2007 (BST)
2. Agreed, already exist no point in changing them.--karek 22:20, 17 June 2007 (BST)
3. Dog tags are already ingame and there's no reason to change them. As for the collars and tattoos, well.... I'm just not to crazy about them. --Sonofagun18 04:12, 18 June 2007 (BST)
4. I really like the tattoo one but that wouldn't fit in the current system.-- Vista  +1  15:34, 18 June 2007 (BST)
5. For some reason I just can't seem to hop on the "changeable text clothing" bandwagon. -- Diano 06:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
6. PWNDDDDDDDDDDD!!! See above. --BoboTalkClown 19:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Police Riot Gear (REVISED)

You guys were right, the whole getup was too much (too many parts and so)...I'm gonna go with the Riot helmet and Riot gear...You can either go for both or only one, your choice

This is what's going on > PDs have almost no police stuff (only a police cap and jacket), so how's about some riot gear? Riot Helmet (or anti-riot helmet) would go into the head slot (should come with the broken visor), and the rest of the Riot gear (or anti-riot gear) can go into the coat slot (since we still don't have a slot for an entire getup)...as for what this Riot gear should contain, I'll leave it to the user's imagination (missing one arm guard with a dented shinguard and so on)

Examples

Wearing: A Riot Helmet and Riot Gear

Wearing: A Anti-Riot Helmet with a broken visor and Anti-Riot Gear

Wearing: A Riot Tactical Helmet with a broken visor and Riot Tactical Gear

Write down which one you like the best and again the riot gear is an extra if you don't like it just say so

EDIT: Only the helmet it is then >>>> Anti-Riot Helmet with a cracked or broken visor --Darwin Blaine 15:00, 21 June 2007 (CEST)

Yes(Police Riot Gear (REVISED))

1. Author's Vote, hope you like the changes and sorry if I offended you with those replys Seventythree that wasn't my intention...I promise not to reply anymore -- Darwin Blaine 19:21, 18 June 2007 (CEST)
2. I've gotta say I like this... As long as you go for the fact that the visor is cracked in the description, cos otherwise people might expect it to give em a bonus in the game.--Seventythree 19:30, 18 June 2007 (BST)
3. I like the anti-riot helmet with the cracked visor but, the riot gear wouldn't work though. People would expect that to work like flak jackets. --Sonofagun18 20:10, 18 June 2007 (BST)
4. I agree that a riotsquad helmet would be good, and I don't think that it particularly needs to be broken – hockey masks aren't broken, and they're designed to protect the face. However, I don't think that the "riot gear" is necessary – Kevan has already said that flak jackets will be folded into the new system later, and really, the "flak jacket" is a ballistic vest. Any stronger body armour would protect against melee weapons to some degree, and would need to be a full-blown suggestion. In summary: riotsquad helmet YES, riot gear NO. —Revenant ^talk 20:20, 18 June 2007 (BST)
5. Yes to both! They'd be PERFECT for me to RP! --Oranchov 01:59, 19 June 2007 (BST)
6. as revenant. and not in every PD.-- Vista  +1  16:09, 20 June 2007 (BST)
7. I like 'Anti-Riot helmet with a broken visor' the most, I feel it sounds better said as anti-riot instead of just riot. --EMAG TRESNI 19:52, 23 June 2007 (BST)
8. yess please!--Zyll ^GIFD 23:03, 21 July 2007 (BST)
9. Yeah, that would be nice. But I have a suggestion. Let the helmet work like clothing, but instead of getting bloodstained, the visor gets broken after a while. --Johaen 22:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

No(Police Riot Gear (REVISED))

1. No, only because clothing shouldn't have an un-believable effect on the game. I have no problems with people wearing clown suits as that does not effect the combat or game engine, just the RP side which is pretty unbelievable anyway with zombies and such, however, what doesn't suspend disbelief to me is that a man wearing riot gear will take the same damage as a guy in a T-Shirt, which is what will happen under the current clothing system, so I vote no I'm afraid. --Ulysses Black 19:32, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   Comment: Still no for me I'm afraid. If it has a broken visor, what's the point? Doesn't do anything for me, much like the broken night vision goggles. --Ulysses Black 00:00, 22 June 2007 (BST)

   Reply: For roleplay...if you don't want it don't use it (in your char's description) -- Darwin Blaine 15:46, 23 June 2007

2. Has to be a no, since there could be a perceived in-game benefit to wearing the Riot Gear. armareum 05:37, 22 June 2007 (BST)

   Reply: This helmet is broken, just like the goggles...on the other hand fireman's helmets and (soon to exist) army helmets are not broken...now THOSE could be perceived as in-game benefits... -- Darwin Blaine 15:47, 23 June 2007

3. This is of what Kevan made comment "people will think it gives in-game benefits" --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 10:23, 22 June 2007 (BST)
4. Too many people would expect this to aid them somehow. -- Diano 06:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Rare clothing found in houses

I propose rare clothing to be found in street locations, as much as looting Auto Repair Shops and Cathedrals is fun, surely residential properties would be a more realistic goldmine for clothes hunting in the event of a Zombie apocalypse? It also has the advantage of putting relatively useless blocks to some use and encourages survivors to venture outside of safe houses for more than just Trenchcoating and fleeing.

The use of "rare" (but still believable) clothing would be employed the same way that different types of museum stock different hard to get items of clothing, and would be a way to implement some of the more outlandish clothing suggestions without making them so ubiquitous (by putting them in malls) as not to offend the more serious players.

Example, Avenues could stock "Goth/Punk" clothes, Drives "Hip-Hop" clothes, Walks "Summer/Beach" clothes, Boulevards "Nightclub" clothes, etc, etc, etc. Hopefully it'd engage people like the recent Easter Egg hunt and a great way to implement more clothing without overstocking and clogging up other locations. --Ulysses Black 19:55, 18 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Rare clothing found in houses)

1. Author Vote Not the most exciting of ideas, but what the hell, and it encourages exploration which is always a good thing, and is a good way of adding more varied clothing without annoying traditionalists and makes use of relatively useless squares. --Ulysses Black 19:55, 18 June 2007 (BST)
2. Since I've always thought of the blank blocks as housing, this makes sense to me. Also yeah, it might be a good place for some of the odder suggestions to turn up. After all, who DOESN'T have some weird stuff hidden in their closet? --Queen Mum 00:20, 18 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: In the Firefox graphical extension that a lot fo people use, they do come up as little houses. Yup, weird stuff indeed! Imagine if just one unknown house out of the 1000+ residential blocks held a gimp suit! And you could be the proud possesser of such a rare artefact if you were lucky or diligent enough to search seemingly empty spaces! Rare clothing hunt!!! --Ulysses Black 00:48, 19 June 2007 (BST)

   RE *glances at Queenie* Oh god, he'd get completely lost looking for it wouldn't he? --Turner Calton 10:34, 21 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: *catches Turner's eye, giggles* Yes! Still, he should get what he wants. Ulysses, I didn't actually know that about the map graphics when I thought of it - and you didn't know we'd have a friend who wanted a gimp suit *laughs* --Queen Mum 22:07, 21 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: Hey Queenie! But then who wouldn't want a gimp suit? ;) --Ulysses Black 23:08, 21 June 2007 (BST)

3. Yes - Clothes should say something about where you've been. --Uncle Bill 03:00, 19 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sounds good, would give empty blocks some use. --Sonofagun18 11:36, 19 June 2007 (BST)
5. It does sound solid --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 15:19, 19 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yes, yes, and yes again. --Turner Calton 17:04, 19 June 2007 (BST)
7. Extremely excellent idea! --Skitchipoo 22:52, 19 June 2007 (BST)
8. good solution.-- Vista  +1  16:10, 20 June 2007 (BST)
9. What a fantastic idea. Bastetmeow 05:22, 21 June 2007 (BST)
10. Yes so much wasted space lets use it --Evl kitty 19:36, 21 June 2007 (BST)
11. Just another yes vote, no smartass comments here --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 10:21, 22 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes!...now to plot out what disturbing and/or kinky clothing items to suggest once this is implimented... --EMAG TRESNI 19:55, 23 June 2007 (BST)
13. Not bad at all. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:38, 28 June 2007 (BST)
14. Yes nice idea, has the potential for some really interesting items to turn up.--DI Sweeny 14:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
15. I actually kind of dig this. -- Diano 06:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
16. Digg it. -- BoboTalkClown 19:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Martial Arts Gi

For those in the dark, a Gi is the loose fitting uniform martial artists wear. Comes in Black Ninjutsu, White Karate, White Judo, Yellow, Red and Dark Blue varieties. Jacket - (colour) Gi Jacket; Trousers - (colour) Gi Trousers; Head - (colour) Headband. All would be available in a selected Sports Stadium and some selected malls. I'm aware the jacket and trousers have individual names in reality rather than just "Gi Jacket and Gi Trousers", but most players would be unaware of and confused by the correct terminology, so I'm keeping it simple.

Due to there not being a belt slot, the coat slot (as it goes over the jacket) would be used for a belt. I.E. Coat - (colour) Ranking Belt. Rather than the six varieties above, these belts would be available in traditional martial arts colour ranking schemes - White, Yellow, Orange, Green, Blue, Brown, Red and Black. Yes I'm aware there's more, but again, keeping it simple. Example, Ulysses Black is wearing a White Karate Gi Jacket, White Karate Gi Trousers, a Red Headband and a Black Ranking Belt.--Ulysses Black 03:27, 19 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Martial Arts Gi)

1. Author vote: Please, please, please don't spam as 'unrealistic' or 'goofy' As much as a soldier would wear fatigues in a combat situation, a martial artist would wear a Gi to fight, so there! And I KNOW Malton isn't in Asia before the pedants strike, but there are TENS OF THOUSANDS of Martial Artists or people who take classes in England/America/Canada, so get off the high horse! We're not in Haiti either, but there's plenty of Zombies. : P --Ulysses Black 03:27, 19 June 2007 (BST)
2. For the fact that I study Judo and Jujitsu.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:41, 19 June 2007 (BST)
3. The city I live in has about 50000 people and (according to the internet) at least 15 martial arts clubs. These would be plentifull. Nuff said.--Seventythree 17:42, 19 June 2007 (BST)
4. Clothing designed for ease of movement and protection in hand-to-hand combat? Why wouldn't you want to wear this, especially if you have trained with it? —Revenant ^talk 11:53, 22 June 2007 (BST)
5. would it give a bounus to melee attacks?

   Nope, it's not allowed. --Ulysses Black 21:24, 22 June 2007 (BST)

6. The only problem is that everyone is just going to take the black ranking belt, why take a lower rank when you can choose? --EMAG TRESNI 19:59, 23 June 2007 (BST)
   1. reply:Some might prefer other colors, I myself would take red. --volt 23:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
7. As a martial artist myself I have to say that this would be kinda a cool thing to have --Alaskaguy 09:33, 26 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes to ninjas and pirates. Clay5x 16:03, 27 October 2007 (BST)
9. Hell. Yes. And if there's every belt color, then a double hell yeah. --JAston 09:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
10. WHACHAAA!!! --BoboTalkClown 19:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
11. YES! I'd take a black Gi, not ALL stereotypical ninjas are game-breakingly stealthy, I'd be one that uses guns and agility. --volt 23:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

No(Martial Arts Gi)

1. It just doesn't suit me. --Sonofagun18 11:41, 19 June 2007 (BST)
2. well the analogy is wrong, There wouldn't be a squad of Martial arts specialist dressed in Gi-uniforms roaming the street. Any Martial arts masters would wear his normal clothes because he/she would be trying to survive, not trying to do battle with the undead. But seriously, i would find all the bruce lee wannabees annoying.-- Vista  +1  16:15, 20 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: Fair point, in the real world, but this is fantasy, and in a Hollywood/Videogame Zombie apocalypse they would, which was the feel I was aiming for and feel the game represents more than gritty realism, which of course is a just my subjective opinion though and I appreciate a lot of players prefer the serious RP side more to the satirical outlandish RP side. --Ulysses Black 16:55, 20 June 2007 (BST)

3. As soon as they put in pirate hats I will vote yes for ninjas.--Leonidas 17:16, 21 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: I see your reluctance, but i'm not trying to put ninjas or Kung Fu masters in, just civillians in Martial Arts wear, which unlike Pirate and Ninja costumes, a lot of everyday people have in their homes and stocked at Malls, and use frequently. --Ulysses Black 23:16, 21 June 2007 (BST)

4. I'm with Vista. This isn't Big Trouble in Little China, though I wish it was. -- Diano 06:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Unique Clothing Rewards

Not sure if this would be too much of a system drain, but here it is. After completing a set number of actions, a unique item of clothing would appear permanently as a selection in your drop box as a reward, like the achievements in Dead Rising if anyone is familiar with that.

Examples are...

For 500 Zombies Killed - Cuban Cigar (face)

For 500 Survivors Killed - Halloween Mask (face)

For 500 Barricade Levels Destroyed - Balaclava (head)

For 500 Barricade Levels Built - Yellow Hard Hat (head)

For 500 Revives Performed - Stethoscope (neck)

For 500 Deaths - Floral Garland (neck)

For 500 Buildings Ransacked - Black Jackboots (footwear)

For 500 Tags Laid - Black Bomber Jacket (jacket)

For 500 Infections Performed - Soiled Boxer Shorts (trousers)

For 500 Heals Performed - Surgical Gown (shirt)

For 5000 Unspent XP - Golden Trenchcoat? :) (coat)

As there have been some long-term players attracted back by the clothing system (due to a lack of rewards upon reaching their optimum levels years ago) I think this system would be perfect to give a new sense of challenge and reward past the XP system, and a wearable badge of honour personalised for different (medic/warrior/builder/infecter) types as the rewards are sorted by actions, thus also promoting active play and diversifying roles for new rewards. The final reward is for XP unspent, not a certain level as some players purposely don't want Survivor/Zed skills, so don't advance past the mid 20 levels.

Targets would not be retrospective (apart from the XP one) but counting would start when the system was implemented. Please vote for the suggestion as a whole, not the examples or numerical targets. These are just a guide for a proof of concept.--Ulysses Black 05:04, 20 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Unique Clothing Rewards)

1. Author's Vote: Hell yeah! I think (rather immodestly) this'd be great! --Ulysses Black 05:04, 20 June 2007 (BST)
2. I Like the idea, but it would take a large tally for kevan to implement, and would it start counting from now, or when the player started? --Lukeninersfan

   RE: It would start counting now, as one aspect of it, is to give max level characters something new to aim towards and play for. If it was retrospective, they'd probably have them all! --Ulysses Black 16:49, 20 June 2007 (BST)

3. Hell yes! What a great way to show off your accomplishments. Of course, as soon as this was implemented, everyone's tallies would have to be set to zero. --Uncle Bill 14:33, 20 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: The accomplishments bit would be cool. Imagine in a siege (using these examples) one guy is wandering around with a Yellow Hard Hat on, you'd know he was a legendary barricader and show him mucho respect! --Ulysses Black 16:49, 20 June 2007 (BST)

4. mheh.-- Vista  +1  16:19, 20 June 2007 (BST)
5. Sure. --Sonofagun18 03:36, 25 June 2007 (BST)
6. Why not. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:08, 29 June 2007 (BST)
7. Definetly! This would add more incentive to do all these random actions... You know one better to add? A suicide reward! Like, after 20 suicides, as you stand up, you find an <xxx> in your hand. I don't know -- something emo or sad... Like a blues' guitar! You strap it to your back.--BrickInTheHead 01:03, 30 June 2007 (BST)BrickInTheHead

   How about a bottle of No More Tears Shampoo, emo kid? -- Diano 06:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

8. I actually kind of dig this. -- Diano 06:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No(Unique Clothing Rewards)

1. I've already found one unique clothing item ("a brown rag") - you can only get by earning it through multiple deaths (many fewer than 500; I put it at less than 50) and having your clothes take damage / get bloody. It can't be found anywhere in the game, but when you earn it, you'll know. Point being, that one makes sense; the above ones are just arbitrary badges. Swiers 05:09, 20 June 2007 (BST)

   RE: You've missed the point! If you'd read the suggestion, you'd see I said the items and numbers were just placeholders, by your comment, it seems you actually support the basic idea, which I what I asked you to vote on not the items or numbers, they were just for illustrative purposes. And anyway, some people like "arbritary badges" as it's not the item, but the achievement and bragging rights it represents that counts. Can people please read the suggestions fully before voting? (I fixed your broken sig too) --Ulysses Black 05:43, 20 June 2007 (BST)

   My sig is not broken. 13:25, 20 June 2007 (BST)

   Swiers is intentionally trying to be obscure.+1 15:54, 20 June 2007 (BST)

   Thanks Vista, I see now he hid it in the full stop! : ) --Ulysses Black 17:05, 20 June 2007 (BST)

2. I just don't like the idea. Never liked those people who put how many zombies they've killed in their description etc; it's just annoying. --dudemeister 18:33, 20 June 2007 (BST)
3. I like the "Spend Extra XP on Unique Clothing" idea, but as for the rest... Meh. Also, balaclavas are already in-game. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 22:28, 3 July 2007 (BST)
4. NO just cause of the trenchcoat. My general oppinion about anything with a trenchcoat can be found on my page.--Sachaztan 10:06, 31 July 2007 (BST)
5. Too much like showing off for me. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 20:15, 7 September 2007 (BST)
6. No. -- William Told 2:56, 10 May 2008

Shinobi Shuzoku

This might be tacky, but in Malls,and other locations i cant think of,you should be able to get the Ninja suit. Available in green, gray, White, dark blue,and of course black. Just for those people who want to release thier inner ninja

Yes(Shinobi Shuzoku)

1. Putting this on the yes side but it is really a suggestion to modify the idea. There is one place in Malton to find a kilt, and I assume it's a specialty shop. There are many more costume shops than kilt shops, and for example one corner of various malls could have one or more of the 'silly, impractical' items like clown suit, pirate costume, cosmonaut outfit, Richard Nixon mask, sexy tiger nightie, ninja suit etc.--Bunkhumper 15:56, 25 June 2007 (BST)
2. Make it available during Haloween! Costume! Get some shurikens! --BrickInTheHead 01:09, 30 June 2007 (BST)BrickInTheHead--BrickInTheHead 01:09, 30 June 2007 (BST)

No(Shinobi Shuzoku)

1. Wrong game genre. Sorry, but no ninja pirate robot zombies. --Uncle Bill 16:17, 21 June 2007 (BST)
2. Not at all!!! There's odd but still attainable costumes, but a ninja suit? In a Mall? Get real! Nope, totally out of genre, what game are you playing? --Ulysses Black 16:44, 21 June 2007 (BST)
3. only if we get pirate outfits; peglegs, eyepatches, pirate coats, and cutlasses. The cutlasses would be a new weapon.--Fenian 18:20, 21 June 2007 (BST)

   Yarr!!! --KiT 20:28, 21 June 2007 (BST)

   Kit, you kinda messed up the voting system. I fixed it for you. In the future to comment like so you'd type #: -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:31, 21 June 2007 (BST)

   Avast! Ye fergot the hats! —Revenant ^talk 11:46, 22 June 2007 (BST)

4. No That's like a trenchcoat, but worse. --RCJ 18:43, 21 June 2007 (BST)
5. Sorry, but even though Ninjas are some of the coolest people, this is kinda ridiculous.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:31, 21 June 2007 (BST)
6. A what?--karek 03:51, 22 June 2007 (BST)
7. otaku... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:39, 22 June 2007 (BST)
8. Excuse me, but what's a "ninja suit"? Martial arts gis are up for voting somewhere around here, maybe that would do it for you? At least they're confirmed to exist... —Revenant ^talk 11:46, 22 June 2007 (BST)
9. Unrealistic. At the end of the day I doubt that most cities have a ninga clothing shop.--Seventythree 12:34, 22 June 2007 (BST)

   Well, seeing as how the author seems to not wanna defend his suggestion at all, S.A. to the rescue! Someone could make their own ninja suit. ;)-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:57, 23 June 2007 (BST)

10. WEEABOO WEEABOO, DID SOMEONE SAY WEEABOO? SgtBop 16:05, 22 June 2007 (BST)
11. I don't think so. --Sonofagun18 02:33, 25 June 2007 (BST)
12. ah, No.-- Vista  +1  18:51, 28 June 2007 (BST)
13. Ninjas rule, but they are not in UD sorry. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:11, 29 June 2007 (BST)
14. Eyepatch + Ninja suit + Foil = Instafail. Dear lord no. --JAston 09:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
15. Nijnas are awesome, but it's a zombie game. No --Koju the Quick
16. The last thing Malton needs is a bunch of ninjas flipping out and killing people all over the place. -- Diano 06:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Bandages

Found in hospitals, (and isn't there a medical area in fortresses?) bandages can be worn, either to mask someone's Identity, or just to look realy creepy.

• Head slot-bandages bandages around the face Gauze eyepatch A medical Gauze eyepatch
• Neck slot - A neck Brace A neck brace
• Torso or shirt slot- Bandages Bandages wrapped round the arms and chest
• Leg slot - Plaster cast A leg in plaster (this can be changed i guess to bandaged leg if people feel that it might realisticly be expected to have an effect) Bandages A leg wrapped in bandages
• Hand slot. - Plaster cast A plaster cast and metal brace on the wrist
• Foot slot - Gauze wrapping Guaze-wrapped feet

Now this, I feel may add something to the game, People would love it for RP, for example if you get mauled by a zombie go to a hospital and wear some bandages on your chest for a day or so, it'd add a realy creepy atmosphere to have a zombie encased in bloodsoaked bandages and adds flavour. Oh, and yeah, thanks to whoever dreamed up the paper bag thing, that got me thinking about this.--Seventythree 10:22, 22 June 2007 (BST)

Yes(Bandages)

1. Author vote. --Seventythree 10:23, 22 June 2007 (BST)
2. I like it, and a friend would already have a use for it. SgtBop 10:30, 22 June 2007 (BST)
3. Nice. I'd wear some... —Revenant ^talk 11:16, 22 June 2007 (BST)
4. I love this! Alternate clothing options FTW! Maybe we can even have an ABC party in Malton for Halloween? ^_^ ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 16:16, 22 June 2007 (BST)
5. Give the game a discusting horror tone. I like it. Johnson
6. Yes - Not my highest priority in expanding the available wardrobe ;), but a nice touch indeed. -- Queen Mum 15:02, 22 June 2007 (BST)
7. Bandages yes, casts, no. --Ulysses Black 21:28, 22 June 2007 (BST)
8. As above. Casts don't seem very good for fighting zombies -- Gunstar 23:02, 22 June 2007 (BST)
9. Cool! I would use this so that new players (w/o diagnosis) could tell I needed healing and get themselves some XP. Nice idea. :) --Uncle Bill 00:08, 23 June 2007 (BST)
10. Nice, but no casts. This idea gets us as close to mummies as we can get, and mummies don't wear casts. :) -Zed Ed 10:44, 23 June 2007 (BST)
11. I like this 'battle scarred' idea --EMAG TRESNI 20:13, 23 June 2007 (BST)
12. I think it would be awesome to have bandages it would make sense to have them in hospitals I would totally wear them. --User:afro ninja
13. I like this but, casts are a little to much. --Sonofagun18 06:32, 25 June 2007 (BST)
14. Casts would make great melee weapons :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:13, 28 June 2007 (BST)
15. Bandages yes, casts, no. sums it ups for me.-- Vista  +1  18:39, 28 June 2007 (BST)
16. Yea to bandages. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:12, 29 June 2007 (BST)
17. Mummy style... -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 23:50, 14 July 2007 (BST)
18. could be fun why not--Sharline Jade 01:01, 20 July 2007 (BST)
19. Of course. Clay5x 16:06, 27 October 2007 (BST)
20. Yes - I like the idea, the exact wording for the descriptions needs some work. Drop the cast I think, even though clothes are just for RP purpose some people might still complain when a guy with both legs in plaster can move at normal speed and free run between rooftops. Overall a nice suggestion.--DI Sweeny 14:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
21. I think that, implemented correctly, this could work. -- Diano 06:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
22. IT'S THE MUMMY!!! ZOINKS!!! -- BoboTalkClown 19:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No(Bandages)

1. Sorry can't vote yes for this, Possible expected effects. Preservatives and all, slowing or preventing infection, among other things.--karek 08:44, 23 June 2007 (BST)

   RE But surely bandages are apllied after an injury, not before? Therefore It couldn't prevent infection. I think that there needs to be a disclaimer within the game itself, that clothes have no affect. We're losing a lot of good suggestions because of this.--Seventythree 12:05, 23 June 2007 (BST)

   Do bear in mind that the update which introduced clothing included the text "Flak jackets still work as before, and will be folded into the new system later." So items that have both an effect and a visible appearance will most likely be making an appearance somewhere down the line – although the first ones will likely be existing items. —Revenant ^talk 12:50, 23 June 2007 (BST)

Firearms holsters

Lets face it, in any area that has firearms, there are going to be holsters to hold them for them. I say that there should be the choice of holsters that can be used though. IE: a concealment holster for the Coat/Jacket slot, a duty holster can be worn on some Trousers. Also, to find holsters, they could be in the Forts, Malls, and Police stations. Night Warrior

Yes(Firearms holsters)

1. Could be hard to implement, but I like it. Werewolf32 16:55, 22 June 2007 (BST)
2. agree as above~ Aznmonkeyass99 14:00, 22 June 2007 (BST)
3. I like it. Could we also choose the gun holstered in it? ~Bio~ 19:48, 22 June 2007 (BST)
4. Yes, as a jacket slot. --Ulysses Black 21:27, 22 June 2007 (BST)
5. Maybe just make clothing items with holsters as permanent parts of them (pants that always have the holster, and jacket with the hidden holster; just to avoid cluttering things up with new slots, ect) --EMAG TRESNI 20:16, 23 June 2007 (BST)
6. good idea but, I'd rather see holsters have there own slot, than just sticking them in the jacket slot. --Sonofagun18 06:44, 25 June 2007 (BST)
7. mheh-- Vista  +1  18:38, 28 June 2007 (BST)
8. I prefer holsters as their own slot, concievably with "Phone Holster" being added as a choice for all those consumers. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 18:15, 29 June 2007 (BST)
9. I'd like to see it. JD 03:37, 3 July 2007 (BST)
10. You should have different holsters, Like a toolbelt, police holster, ect. That'd be cool. --Seventythree 00:33, 4 July 2007 (BST)
11. Don't see why not.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:37, 4 July 2007 (BST)
12. I love this idea--Sharline Jade 01:00, 20 July 2007 (BST)
13. Hell yeah. Then i dont have to have it in my description space. Daniel camburn 17:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

No(Firearms holsters)

1. Would have an expected effect; as with bags, holsters are used to carry things, hence raise the expectation of decreased encumbrance. If this one gets keep votes, backpacks also should. _. ^. _{. swiers} 16:20, 15 July 2007 (BST)
2. Same as Swiers. People will assume this adds some in-game effect. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:42, 29 July 2007 (BST)
3. It's that darn expected effect problem, all right. -- Diano 06:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The Man With No Pants: Nudists in the Zombie Apocalypse

I suggest that if the pants slot is left empty, the character description should explicitly state that the zombie/ survivor is not wearing any pants. Same goes for shirts.

Yes(The Man With No Pants: Nudists in the Zombie Apocalypse)

1. Author's Vote: With the breakdown of societal norms that inevitably accompanies a zombie apocalypse, pants could well become a thing of the past. Some zombies might have also risen while pants-less. Eugene the Zombie 05:16, 23 June 2007 (BST)
2. While the image of a zombie with no pants would cause anyone to go blind, we can't escape from the facts. In real life, if someone doesn't wear pants, people definitly make note of it more than anything else that that person may happen to be wearing. -Zed Ed 10:38, 23 June 2007 (BST)
3. Naked zombies?! The Cap'n, fer one, would wish ter be informed o' such things, aye. Captain Crooks 12:42, 23 June 2007 (BST)
4. I'll support it, but my preferred implementation would be to make "no pants" and "no shirt" explicit choices rather than the default, in keeping with the default "non-descript" description. —Revenant ^talk 12:56, 23 June 2007 (BST)
5. People in real life who are not wearing pants are noticable, so it makes sense to me to make people ingame who are not wearing pants more noticable also. --dudemeister 19:29, 23 June 2007 (BST)
6. It'd be funny as hell. OH NO! A HORDE OF NUDEY ZOMBIES! AHHHHHH! Okay, done yelling now. I think I'll go play some more at deviant art. I need a scanner. Anyone want to make a "S.A. needs a scanner" foundation?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:01, 23 June 2007 (BST)
7. Must be specifically chosen as a clothing instead of the default choice. This 'clothing' would be avaiable for selection at any location. --EMAG TRESNI 20:17, 23 June 2007 (BST)
8. I am voting yes for this, but If this was added, people would have to start out with clothes. Also, this would cause PK wars between those with pants and those without.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 02:29, 24 June 2007 (BST)
9. Change - Add it so you choose whether you say you're not wearing pants, or don't specify. --Anotherpongo 18:17, 26 June 2007 (BST)
10. Yes, but as said, you need to specify it explicity; as in you could choose to derobe at any time. Maybe a "just underwear" option too. --DrBowman 15:13, 1 July 2007 (BST)
11. Sorry I tried to dupe you earlier... A fairly sizable number of zombies enjoy expressing themselves as pantless. While we can now choose to not populate the trouser field, a literal selection of "No Pants", would help us make it a little more obvious that it was more a matter of self expression than disregard. "No Pants" would need to be available as a zombies initial selection, and perhaps at an outdoor location such as a wasteland or cemetery for those needing to make a later quest for it in harman form. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 22:49, 11 July 2007 (BST)
12. Yes, this is funny and practical. I like the idea of "just underwear" option too.--Pdeq 04:28, 18 July 2007 (BST)
13. Of course. Obviously. Clay5x 16:07, 27 October 2007 (BST)
14. This is supposed to be a post-apoc-survival-*Horror*. I can't think of anything more horrifying than a swarm of nekkid zombies with Vigor Mortis bashing down your barricade. --JAston 10:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
    1. Reply: Naked zeds with "Vigour Mortis"? Oh god, that's so funny and disgusting at the same time! --volt 00:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
15. Totally, on the condition that "no pants," "no shirt," and "no shoes" be available from the drop-down menu. Maybe add "white briefs" to the pants menu, too. HooperX 19:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
16. Change So people start with clothes, and must choose No Whatever as an option before they streak. -- BoboTalkClown 19:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No(The Man With No Pants: Nudists in the Zombie Apocalypse)

1. Yeah, no, states what you are wearing not what you aren't.--karek 10:39, 23 June 2007 (BST)
2. Most people dont bother to select which clothes their characters wear. So, we'd get lots of nudists. --KiT 21:25, 23 June 2007 (BST)

   Perhaps new characters should start with clothes that are appropriate for their character class, with consumers getting a randomized set of unisex civilian clothes, military personnel wearing khakis and scientists wearing white coats and such.Eugene the Zombie 19:33, 8 July 2007 (BST)

3. I have to go "No" on this one, simply because it takes away choice from those who either do not choose to pick out clothes or who do not have the right option for their look. I am, in my description, wearing something up top, but the item specified is not available as "Clothes" so I didn't just pick a plain ol' blouse. If you want to rephrase the suggestion as a choosable option among the others, i.e. "No Pants", "No Shirt", etc. that would be fine. --Queen Mum 17:35, 23 June 2007 (BST)
4. As Queenie said. I was going to suggest something like this (with flesh being ripped and torn like clothes for Zombies) but didn't for the reasons above. Clothes are a CHOICE. If you have a description forced upon you for not wearing specific clothes, it's unfair and takes away the remaining purpose of the description box. --Ulysses Black 22:17, 23 June 2007 (BST)

   Actually, there are enough 'generic' clothes that can be further described in the description box. A black t-shirt or light blue trousers can be many things.Eugene the Zombie 19:33, 8 July 2007 (BST)

5. I just don't want anybody, survivor or zombie runing around waving their naughty bits in peoples faces.--Seventythree 23:55, 23 June 2007 (BST)

   Then why'd you vote no for the thongs? :P-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:57, 23 June 2007 (BST)

   Dude, I Suggested THe thongs! No-one else found it funny though.....--Seventythree 00:19, 24 June 2007 (BST)

   I know you suggested it. But you still voted no. :P-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:16, 28 June 2007 (BST)

6. Ewww. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:12, 24 June 2007 (BST)
7. No. Just...no. Why would you need it? You can only take whackiness so far. Plus, a whole bunch of level 1 characters would be nude. --Fenian 01:44, 25 June 2007 (BST)
8. No - Because I will probably have to kill them, if not for the sake of roleplaying, for the sake of web-based decency. :P --Private Mark 20:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
9. Unnecessary. -- Diano 06:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
10. Don't be lazy, just explain that they're bare chested/bare bottomed/naked in the description. That's what I did. -- William Told 2:53, 10 May 2008

Umbrellas

Let's face it, for a rainy city you'd expect more umbrellas. Maybe only in Umbrella Museums, but ideally elsewhere. Just normal <insert colour here> umbrellas, with some fancy umbrellas in Umbrella Museums? --DrBowman 18:02, 29 June 2007 (BST)

Yes! (Umbrellas)

1. Author vote --DrBowman 18:02, 29 June 2007 (BST)
2. splendid. they are a very common piece of clothing-- Vista  +1  22:02, 29 June 2007 (BST)
3. Yes. Not really an article of clothing, is it? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:20, 29 June 2007 (BST)
4. Yes - obviously an essential piece of kit for any gentleman. Only one question; what slot??? Werewolf32 22:46, 29 June 2007 (BST)
5. Yup. A copy of the times, a smart suit and an umbrella... Perfect!--Seventythree 22:58, 29 June 2007 (BST)
6. Hmm, but there's no slot to put them in yet... I thimnk that there should be 2 types of umbrellas - regular ones, found in malls, offices etc. and "antique" umbrellas, found in umbrella museums. (woops, i always forget to sign) --KiT 13:42, 1 July 2007 (BST)
7. Heh, of course. --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 02:45, 30 June 2007 (BST)
8. I like. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 04:56, 30 June 2007 (BST)
9. There should be a carry slot for them --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 08:57, 30 June 2007 (BST)
10. We wouldn't want frizzy hair now would we? --Marie^{The Grove on Tour} 16:07, 30 June 2007 (BST)
11. Singing in the rain...-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 02:29, 1 July 2007 (BST)
12. It could go in a shoulder slot or something. Anyway, I think there might be some slight copyright issues with a zombie game having umbrellas, but I'm no expert.--Lachryma^☭ 07:42, 2 July 2007 (BST)
13. I like this suggestion...but is there really an umbrella mueseum? I don't pay attention... --EMAG TRESNI 22:03, 5 July 2007 (BST)
14. Umbrella Corpiration. -- BoboTalkClown 19:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Nah. (Umbrellas)

1. Umbrellas aren't a item of clothing there something you carry and currently, there isn't a carring slot. --Sonofagun18 05:22, 30 June 2007 (BST)
2. As above. Probably best left to profile description. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 21:40, 3 July 2007 (BST)
3. Um, doesnt really fit into the game as a real item of clothing to me...--Combine 108 01:53, 14 July 2007 (BST)
4. Maybe, but you'd expect umbrellas to have some sort of effect (such as being able to be used as a weapon). This should not be in the clothing section.--Pdeq 04:31, 18 July 2007 (BST)
5. Not unless we implemented that "hold" slot. -- Diano 06:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Group Logos

Many survivors and zombies are proud of the group they represent, and want to start wearing their alleignces on their sleeves. Literally. Certain factories would have been used to make clothes, and in these factories you should be able to produce your own clothes with personal logos. I propose that in certain factories, you can wear shirts, T-shirts, blouses, jackets, coats, and maybe baseball caps displaying a <xxx> logo, where xxx is your current group name.--Tom1990 09:08, 3 July 2007 (BST)

Yes (Group Logos)

1. Yeah, all in favour. --MK 18:55, 15 July 2007 (BST)
2. One of the best "writing on T-shirts" suggestions so far. although i wouldn't mind some more effort, maybe ap-cost, to get shhirt made --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:12, 3 July 2007 (BST)
3. A nice suggestion.-- Vista  +1  10:38, 3 July 2007 (BST)
4. Works well, works very well. Maybe a leather jacket with (insert group name) stitched on the back? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 13:00, 3 July 2007 (BST)

   Heaps of people are already doing this in their profiles... I'm not sure whether that's a point for or against. —Revenant ^talk 14:11, 3 July 2007 (BST)

   I'm just saying that this is the first clothing suggestion that incorporates a limited amount of text well. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 14:15, 3 July 2007 (BST)

   Maybe... this would better (also) be in normal suggestions system as "Clothes Factory"? --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 18:12, 3 July 2007 (BST)

5. Defenitely. This is actually the suggestion I came here to make --Ju Ju Master 18:06, 3 July 2007 (BST)
6. This. Awesome. Would save some profile space for a few.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:41, 3 July 2007 (BST)
7. Cool! --Seventythree 12:12, 4 July 2007 (BST)
8. Oh yeah, author vote. Heh, I'm a bit forgetful sometimes. --Tom1990 16:17, 4 July 2007 (BST)
9. Sure --EMAG TRESNI 21:56, 5 July 2007 (BST)
10. Sounds cool to me.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 01:58, 9 July 2007 (BST)
11. Please. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 19:37, 11 July 2007 (BST)
12. Awesome! User: Rune Kerr
13. yeah! good idea. -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 23:57, 14 July 2007 (BST)
14. a little hard to implement yes but I'd like that--Sharline Jade 00:59, 20 July 2007 (BST)
15. it could probably use more detail but it seems like a good idea, maybe you could also other buildings, to put the group tag on, such as schools could write in thick marker pen, NTs and other office building have it written in biro Zoutroi 16:34, 21 July 2007 (BST)
16. SWEET! --Brainz 20:28, 24 July 2007 (BST)
17. sexy --Cap'n Silly ^T/W/P/C 05:45, 5 August 2007 (BST)
18. Hellyeah this would make groups more uniformed and individual.perfect for the more oganised groups--Dikki 12:22, 9 August 2007 (BST)
19. This sounds fun... BoboTalkClown 22:22, 14 August 2007 (BST)
20. Free advertising for whenever people look at you? Heck yes! Koju the Quick
21. I want to say no because of the logistics problems involved, but... I won't. -- Diano 06:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
22. Yes, if you have to spend an AP to manufacture the shirt and that the building must be powered. --Johaen 22:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
23. This could be great for military groups as they could display rank. --LucasBlack 07:26, 6 August 2008 (BST)

No (Group Logos)

Votes against go here

1. Naaah -- This is long, sorry. First of all, I don't want it limited to just in-game group names. If I want, say, a Ramones t-shirt, I should be able to have one. And a factory is way too complicated and cumbersome. Instead, how about it's an item found in searches? The best (or only?) place to search being a mall, of course. The text would read something like: "You find a cool t-shirt! Enter the in this text box." Then you enter whatever you want. The shirt would be an inventory item until you used an AP to put it on, then it'd be a regular part of your wardrobe. Simpler and much more elegant, n'est pas? --WanYao 14:38, 29 July 2007 (BST)

Hands-free Radio/phone set

Well, you guys know the drill. Hands-free set. Appears on the head-slot, like sunglasses. They are those realy hi-tech things that you get in some call centres, a cross between a set of old-fasioned headphones and a mic that links to a phone or radio. Found in necrotech buildings, offices and fortresses. As a side-note, these would appear as a hands-free phone-set, and i hope that no-one would be dumb enougth to think that wearing a hands-free phoneset is the same as having a mobile.

Yes (Hands-free Radio/phone set)

1. Author vote--Seventythree 21:35, 3 July 2007 (BST)
2. Even with the headset, you still need the mobile/cellphone to allow the device to operate. I see nothing wrong with this --Ryiis 21:58, 5 July 2007 (BST)
3. People wouldn't expect to make calls on this because it's Bluetooth and so needs to be activated for a handset. You can't make calls with just a bluetooth.

   They'l still be expecting advantages over "without headset" situation--Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 20:47, 7 July 2007 (BST)

4. We're losing too much clothing because we think people might try to use them. So what if they try to use them, whats the worst that could happen? This is a good suggestion. The more clothes the better. --Sir DanteSparda of the Dunell Hills Police Force 11:33, 18 July 2007 (BST)

   but this suggestion is most certainly not an article of clothing. it is an electronic gadget, thus an item. although, admittedly if nightvision goggles made it in, then technically these are fair game, too. --WanYao 22:05, 29 July 2007 (BST)

5. I like this idea, especially for those of us who are military. makes us look a little more professional--Sharline Jade 00:58, 20 July 2007 (BST)
6. YES. because the Millitary uses them in important operations it should be allowed for us who are in millitary.Tony Darkgrave
7. Might want to call it a headset or something. --Druuuuu 04:53, 5 August 2007 (BST)
8. I see no harm in this cool looking accessory. --JAston 10:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
9. I'm for it. -- Diano 06:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Hands-free Radio/phone set)

Votes against go here

1. to much. Besides they're annoying enough in real life.-- Vista  +1  23:29, 3 July 2007 (BST)
2. I like this one. I like it a lot. But yes, 73, many people would be (not necessarily 'dumb' but) newbish about this and expect to be able to make calls. Remember, try not to suggest something that people would assume to do something. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 02:27, 4 July 2007 (BST)
3. As above, people will expect this to make calls. I like the idea, but you'll have to wait for clothing to be allowed to do things. Also they should be found in buildings with comm towers, that makes sense. --EMAG TRESNI 21:55, 5 July 2007 (BST)
4. Is that the thing that annoys you when someone called you? No way, then! :P --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 12:28, 10 July 2007 (BST)
5. i hate these things in real life Zoutroi 16:15, 21 July 2007 (BST)
6. as dux duxis says, this item is suggestive of an in-game function. and it's not a good idea, anyway... except for Agent Smith wannabes -- an accessory for a hypothetical antithesis to the trenchie, perhaps? hmmnnnn --WanYao 14:53, 29 July 2007 (BST)

More than One?

Not sure if i am in the right place or not, if not then please feel free to move this to the right place. My question/suggestion is as follows, could be made possible to wear, for example, BOTH a GASMASK and a BLACK BALACLAVA at the same time?

Yes (More than One?)

1. Yes, great idea, haha ;) --MK 19:03, 15 July 2007 (BST)
2. For some things, sure. The only problem there might be, I guess could be to do with coding, but seeing as I know very little about codes, i could be very wrong.--Seventythree 19:19, 15 July 2007 (BST)
3. Yeah, two head slots would be cool. Bandanna + monocle combo! Headgear is the best sort of clothes, and while some combinations would be odd, I can't think of any impossible combinations. --  T   10:25, 31 July 2007 (BST)
4. This makes total sense for some combinations, but not others. For example, you should be able to wear a bandana on your face, bandit-mask style, along with glasses. Or one of those medical face masks with glasses. But not a gas mask with a medical face mask. Other combos in different slots could work too, but most would not. For example, a t-shirt and a long sleeve shirt. As for the "practicality" and "Kevan's time" votes, there's this in Suggestion Voting Rules: "Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide." --Clay5x 07:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
5. Yes - with some reservations. I would love to be able to wear multiple items on the same area but as mentioned some of the possible combinations wouldn't make sense. Seems to me neck and shirts are the only areas where this would really work. Just imagine a character being able to wear a dozen or so necklaces? I pity the foo'..--DI Sweeny 14:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

No (More than One?)

1. If it were meant to be, there would be more than one drop-down menu. I think it works well with only being able to wear one thing at a time as well. You have to think about what you want to wear. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 01:18, 16 July 2007 (BST)
2. in almost all cases it wouldn't work. A gasmask and a balaclava tend to be mutually exclusive. If you limited it to glasses it would be more realistic but still not worth Kevan's time.-- Vista  +1  01:33, 16 July 2007 (BST)
3. As much as I'd like to be able to wear my glasses w/ something else, I don't see how this could be practically worked out. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 04:31, 16 July 2007 (BST)
4. as vista --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:12, 16 July 2007 (BST)
5. Not only are you murdering fashion but you're taking common sense with him, lay of the drugs hippy!--karek 11:01, 16 July 2007 (BST)
6. It's nice in theory, murder in execution. -- Diano 06:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Expand Color List

I would like to see more modifying adjectives in the "<color> list", beyond colors- like patterns and materials. This is already done with the khaki clothes. These new descriptive terms would be placed on the list with sensible restrictions, of course.(not really sure how any of that works, but...) Some possible terms: silk, wool, baggy, tight, torn, tailored, starched, pressed, wrinkled, dirty, soiled, stained, striped, patterned, colorful, faded... and so on. Some examples: a silk tie, a silk dress, a polka-dot skirt, a herringbone jacket, a striped shirt, a checkered shirt, a cashmere sweater, a wool sweater, baggy jeans, faded overalls, dirty boots, ect. This would greatly increase the variety in the already existing clothes. --Raystanwick 15:52, 29 July 2007 (BST)

Yes (Expand Color List)

1. Author vote..... I see "swanky scarves and ties", "canvas basketball shoes", and other specific suggestions... I'd like to see the color list itself expanded for a much broader and more descriptive selection. --Raystanwick 15:52, 29 July 2007 (BST)
2. I like it but I'd like to see more specifics on how to get them to be wrinkled,dirty.(HK-47ish thought)Musing:It would activate my hilarity receptors in my behavior to see 'soiled clothing' in a siege situation,when a meatbag is frightened and worried about their survivalChill 04:04, 31 July 2007 (BST)
3. I just want plaid added to the list, like a plaid flat cap for instance.--Big Bur 06:02, 2 August 2007 (BST)
4. A few modifiers wouldn't hurt for some stuff, though I don't want to go crazy and get all Crayola about it. -- Diano 06:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No (Expand Color List)

1. I think that this is not needed. Some of those prefixes suggested already happen as a part of wear-and-tear of normal clothing. I feel that you have to keep in mind of that paragraph in your character description, and make sure it flows well. Make sure it doesn't get too long. I think the large selection of colors are fine. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:08, 30 July 2007 (BST)
2. a well-intentioned suggestion, but far too cumbersome to impliment, i'd think. i certainly don't want to deal with all the huge drop downs it'd involve. and the list will never be complete. soooo... use your text box for more depth. but... expanding the 255 char. limit in the text boox could be something we should ask Kevan to do?--WanYao 03:56, 31 July 2007 (BST)
3. most you list are either already in the game, or unpractical. try again while being more specific. use a wool coat for example.-- Vista  +1  15:42, 31 July 2007 (BST)

Wristwear

This is simple. It expands on the clothing feature by allowing an extra slot for wrist items such as Watches and Wristbands. There can be different types of Watches such as Sports Watches, Stopwatches, Rolexes, etc. Other types of Wristwear could be spiked, studded, or cloth wristbands or other types of gold/silver bracelets. One could even possibly pick up an ID wristband from a NT building or patient tag from a hospital. Another possibility is pass wristbands at the various stadiums.

Yes (Wristwear)

1. Author vote. --Travis Wells 21:15, 17 July 2007 (BST)
2. I see no problem with it.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:16, 17 July 2007 (BST)
3. WINNAR! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:22, 17 July 2007 (BST)
4. Wow, spiked stuff and gold bracelets?!--Lachryma^☭ 21:46, 17 July 2007 (BST)
5. Cool. I'm getting me some studded wristbands....--Seventythree 22:13, 17 July 2007 (BST)
6. moar slotz --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 22:49, 17 July 2007 (BST)
7. YES to watches! - Werewolf32 23:01, 17 July 2007 (BST)
8. Yea. Give me a nice rolex to loot. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:31, 17 July 2007 (BST)
9. Ach, why not.-- Vista  +1  23:57, 17 July 2007 (BST)
10. Sure. Sounds good. --Pdeq 04:36, 18 July 2007 (BST)
11. Does anyone else remember "slap bands"? They'd be great to include for giggles. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 16:20, 18 July 2007 (BST)

    Bloody hell, those things that looked like rulers, and you hit em againgst your wrist, and they curled round? I think I've still got one, somewhere...--Seventythree 16:59, 18 July 2007 (BST)

    73, you messed up the votng order. Fixed now. Those things were the coolest thing to play with in elementary school.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:29, 18 July 2007 (BST)

    Plus, with a little bit of accuracy, you could wrap them round some unsuspecing persons throat... Yeah, they got banned pretty fast at my school.--Seventythree 19:19, 19 July 2007 (BST)

12. Good idea! -- Mordac the Refuser 16:25, 18 July 2007 (BST)
13. Possibly even add in "Left" and "Right" slots as well. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 22:58, 18 July 2007 (BST)
14. I like this idea adds a little more freedom--Sharline Jade 00:55, 20 July 2007 (BST)
15. i want a patient/stadium tags... Zoutroi 16:12, 21 July 2007 (BST)
16. I like it! B0ba Fett 17:49, 5 August 2007 (BST)
17. I like it too! I want a Rolex. P02 Samuel 16:08, 8 August 2007 (BST)
18. Sure. --Clay5x 07:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
19. I'm up for this. Watches, bracelets, hospital tags, bracers, sweatbands, cufflinks... -- Diano 06:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
20. PWND!!! -- BoboTalkClown 19:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Wristwear)

Votes against go here

Store Clerk ID badges.

You know the ones. Bored teenagers in crap uniforms working for big chain stores wear them pinned to their shirts. Would have to create a new slot, Badges maybe. Anyway, badges that say My name is XXX may I help you? Think the badge that Shaun has in Shaun of the dead. Found in malls.--Seventythree 18:50, 5 August 2007 (BST)

Yes (Store Clerk ID badges)

1. Author vote. "You've got red on you"--Seventythree 18:50, 5 August 2007 (BST)
2. No votes? I'll change that! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:10, 7 August 2007 (BST)

   Why thank you Mr Target zombie. People are so apathetic these days.....--Seventythree 18:10, 7 August 2007 (BST)

3. Hey, where ya' been 73?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:13, 7 August 2007 (BST)

   Oh, I've been around, but I've had a lot of those daft time consuming boring things to sort out, like bank account changes, and work's been a bastard.--Seventythree 07:43, 8 August 2007 (BST)

   Haha work! I'm a homeless who got his hands on a laptop with infinite battery life. Yes I'm so bored that I post useless RE's to 3 day old comments. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:47, 11 August 2007 (BST)

   Meh. Anyway, my point was that work sucks, theres too much of it.--Seventythree 10:28, 12 August 2007 (BST)

4. Yes!... Even the great one himself, Bruce of the House of Campbell, was proud of his employment at S-Mart! - MolotovH 06:15, 22 August 2007 (BST)
5. Sounds good and simple. Would be a good addition for my civilian character. -MikhailA 14:10, 29 August 2007 (BST)
6. Change - Why not just have it say "a name tag" in the description. After all, you can already see your fellow survivor's names anyway. --Sonofagun18 06:34, 30 August 2007 (BST)
7. Sounds good. A badge slot could have any of the following: name tag, police badge, fire fighter's badge, NecroTech ID badge, dog tags, etc. --Uncle Bill 00:40, 7 September 2007 (BST)
8. Sure. --Clay5x 07:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
9. Yeah. -- Diano 06:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
10. I want to be a name-tag-douche! -- BoboTalkClown 19:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Store Clerk ID badges)

1. I'm for NT tags, but not really store clerk tags. I mean, NecroTech is still active, whereas most stores have closed and been looted. And you have to be a douche to still wear your name tag. Yes, even those zeds are douches! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:38, 19 August 2007 (BST)
2. Again, I vote with Dux, but feel the need to point out that, as usual, he's wrong in his "authoritative" definition of what the Urban Dead ethos entails: the game has fast food restaurant caps, usher's hats, zoo uniforms, stuff like that -- all relics of a bygone era of commercial activity. My reason for rejecting this is the usual reason I reject most of these ideas: it already basically exists in some form. I just listed the building blocks of a character description that would incorporate this suggested item. Start being more creative, peepz... --WanYao 05:48, 25 August 2007 (BST)

Arm Bands

I don't mean swimming one more military.Would give organised groups the chance to individualise division within their groups with names and insignia.Arms band could come in a range of colours from red,black,blue,green and what would be really nice to be able to have custom writing on them e.g DD Stormtroopers" What do you think. --Dikki 12:35, 9 August 2007 (BST)

Yes Arm Bands

1. .Author vote.i see what people are saying just think groups that want uniforms need something to identify themselfs and divisions within organised groups.--Dikki 12:56, 12 August 2007 (BST)
2. Yep, especially black armbands. --  T   10:26, 21 August 2007 (BST)
3. Yes, loads of organisations use arm bands (called Brassards in military sense) use them, and it would be cool to see them around. It would be easy for groups to unify their clothing, in the lue of full uniforms which tend to be time consuming to acquire. --Conan2 13:44, 28 August 2007 (BST)
4. YesHung Henry 07:51, 31 August 2007 (BST)

No Arm Bands

1. Sorry,just not feelin' it...Chill 22:04, 10 August 2007 (BST)
2. I don't think we should be implementing more clothing categories and types. It's best to expand on the current selection methinks. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 01:02, 11 August 2007 (BST)
3. Nah.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:09, 11 August 2007 (BST)
4. I would ahve voted yes for swimming arm bands.--Seventythree 15:16, 11 August 2007 (BST)
5. naa I dont think arms bands would be good besides who wears arm bands besides the Former Nazi party. I dont think people would go for arm bands--Johnny Reb 16:41, 21 August 2007 (BST)
6. naaaa .. put in your write up if it's that important to you. --WanYao 05:28, 25 August 2007 (BST)
7. No, only interesting for nazis and other groups that SHOULD NOT BE IN UD. --Stark Senap 17:48, 29 August 2007 (BST)
8. Arm bands are for nazi and commmunists. --Sonofagun18 22:59, 29 August 2007 (BST)

   What's wrong with communists?--Seventythree 23:38, 29 August 2007 (BST)

   What's wrong with Nazis? Communists? Anarchists? Their ideologies are unstable, don't last long and are never implemented well. They assume that humans are robots essentially and will accept any ideology forced upon society as a whole. But let's not get into a whole discussion about that here. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 00:16, 30 August 2007 (BST)

   Heh. I know. I was just being daft. Mind you, we have never actualy had a communist reigime, the closest we had was state sposered capitalism in the USSR, although your point is a pretty major (and relevent) criticism of communism, it all depends on your interpritation of Karl Marx at the end of the day..... No, you're right, here is not the place to get into this.--Seventythree 00:20, 30 August 2007 (BST)

   what wrong with nazi's you say ? Me personally I have nothing against it but groups in UD have been utterly destroyed for praising Nazism or hitler I cant blame them but as a Pker I would probably PK people who have the arm band--Johnny Reb 04:10, 3 September 2007 (BST)

   I didn't ask what was wrong with the Nazis, I know that one, It's the way they tried to kill all the Jews and take over the planet. Dead giveaway when a political party tries that one on.--Seventythree 12:43, 3 September 2007 (BST)

9. This is just a bit too specific. -- Diano 06:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
10. Meh... -- BoboTalkClown 20:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Split Clothes

You remember that scene from the Night of the Living Dead (1990) where one of the zombies is shambling in the graveyard, who looks all nice and formally dressed, but when he passes the camera, we can see suit was split to make it easier for the mortician to dress the corpse. We don't have to describe past "A black suit with a split down the back" or a "white dress with a split down the back". It's basically another zombie flavored clothing item.

A formal black suit with a split down the back and a white dress with a split down the back. Found in cemeteries, churches, and a few random buildings that could be "technically" mortuaries (I.E. no location change).

Yes (Split Clothes)

1. Author vote --Akule ^{School's in session.} 18:05, 12 August 2007 (BST)
2. Suppose...Chill 16:13, 14 August 2007 (BST)
3. Has anybody else got any more zombie clothes Ideas?--Seventythree 23:24, 14 August 2007 (BST)
4. ↑↘↗↓˫--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:57, 15 August 2007 (BST)

No (Split Clothes)

Votes against go here

1. Uhm, no, sorry. We're getting a little carried away the mortuary fashion now, I think... --WanYao 06:12, 13 August 2007 (BST)

   Not really, Seventythree liked the toe-tags, and made a suggestion that follows that style. It's just three suggestions in a row that are zombie-themed, in a sea of survivor clothing suggestions. How many zombie movies do you find zombies coming out of the grave with split clothes? A lot. I'm just trying to suggest clothing that would be appropriate in a zombie-genre game. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 22:40, 14 August 2007 (BST)

   exactly my point.. we had toe tags, which were cool as fark. and new. but then shrouds, now this... it's getting carried away, methinks. and, again, as i say in so many suggestions -- use what's there, and go nuts in your description. be creative. and for the record i vote against most survivor-themed suggestions, too. --WanYao 05:34, 25 August 2007 (BST)

2. I don't like this much. We already have clothes that can be torn and bloodied up, I don't think there is room for this level of detail and distinction. Besides, Toe Tags don't build on something already available. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:36, 19 August 2007 (BST)
3. Gonna have to say no. --Sonofagun18 17:20, 29 August 2007 (BST)
4. Sorry, no. -- Pavluk 00:07, 4 September 2007 (BST)
5. I like the idea of more zombie clothes, but this just seems like polish. -- Diano 06:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

FAKE Bandolier

Now I KNOW something like this has been suggested...multiple times BUT those had a perceived in-game affect,mine doesn't.A fake bandolier can be found in Malls,perhaps there could also be an antique bandolier in Mansions or Historical Museums that's far too fragile to be used effectively.Chill 18:01, 21 August 2007 (BST)

Yes (Bandolier)

1. Keep - Hey, bandoleer as a clothing item isn't the same as an equipmentsuggestion.. if yer hunter has one what the hell? Real ones can be bought in hunting stores, even today.. One way to end a suggestion is to say "it was implimented, as clothing." MrAushvitz 11:22, 23 September 2007 (BST)
2. Keep -I like it, but it doesn't have to be useless to to be useless. If it can hold your clips for you, it still doesn't alter your weight-carrying abilities by much. --volt 00:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Bandolier)

1. No, this has been suggested before. Besides, do the trenchies really need another reason to be annoying? "OMG LOK I HAVA BADLOOREER!!!1!!" --Hhal 01:51, 22 August 2007 (BST)

   Umm if you're going to say that fake bandoliers have been suggested please give a link.Secondly it says right there FAKE Bandolier,not Bandolier or ammo sling,B.A.N.D.O.L.I.E.R!Chill 03:36, 22 August 2007 (BST)

   Fine, click here. Just read what Kevan wrote in that one, he really nailed it. --Hhal 18:41, 23 August 2007 (BST)

2. Nah.--Seventythree 18:08, 22 August 2007 (BST)
3. No to real Bandoleer, no to fake Bandoleer. Let's have fake riot shields and other fake items! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 05:34, 23 August 2007 (BST)
4. Nope, sorry. --Sonofagun18 16:52, 29 August 2007 (BST)
5. Fake stuff? haha no --Stark Senap 17:59, 29 August 2007 (BST)
6. Fake stuff is a bad road to go down. -- Pavluk 00:02, 4 September 2007 (BST)
7. This Idea is so turdish I don't know what to say, I mean hell even the author didn't vote to keep his implemented suggestion so it must suck something fierce--Johnny Reb 13:14, 4 September 2007 (BST)
8. -- Vista  +1  09:11, 7 September 2007 (BST)
9. Dupe, and a link was provided.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:49, 21 September 2007 (BST)
10. How about a replica sniper rifle too?--Liam Degen 02:14, 21 September 2007 (BST)

    well I guess it could be implemented I mean we do have broken night vision goggles and as Aushvitz said they are common in gun stores and hunting stores. --Johnny Reb 22:30, 24 September 2007 (BST)

11. Dupe and benefits. Sockem 07:28, 15 October 2007 (BST)
12. No - Should allow you to carry more ammo, which is a mechanic proposal, which should go in the regular suggestions, not clothing. 'But it's *fake*!' Um, yeah. And a "fake" bandolier could still carry ammo or be easily modified to. Clay5x 07:30, 27 October 2007 (BST)
13. The problem here is that a real bandoleer is reasonable, but has an implied effect. A fake bandoleer does away with the implied effect, but what tard is wearing one? -- Diano 06:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Vintage Dance Clothes!

Cmon, I went to the clubs looking for some good dancing clothing. Couldn't we have some dancing gear for the groovier retro UD players? For example, white platform shoes, vintage leather pants or tight white leather jackets, all to be found in the Clubs. Cmon, we need to dance in something. DanceDanceRevolution 07:33, 29 August 2007 (BST)

Yes (Vintage Dance Clothes)

1. retro club look. Makes sense.--Seventythree 11:58, 29 August 2007 (BST)
2. yes! yes! yes! How about different kind of clothes for different kind of clubs? One disco club, one punk club, one rave and so on :)--Stark Senap 18:05, 29 August 2007 (BST)
3. Ohhhhh yeah! Also, we need glowsticks. -- Pavluk 18:51, 29 August 2007 (BST)
4. Yes, it adds some more variety. -- Ehrmn 23:00, 23 September 2007 (EST)
5. Flavor. Sockem 07:30, 15 October 2007 (BST)
6. Yes - I'm all for this if it's expanded in the way Stark Senap suggests. It shouldn't only be vintage. The whole point of having the clothes option is to allow different people to dress their characters differently. I am not a big fan of much of the military stuff, and I may never put a character into any of this stuff either (although I do like the more punk stuff available at the Goth store), but I'm quite happy to see other people enjoy dressing their characters this way. It's the post-apocalypse, half the fun is being able to loot stores and dress any way you please, or not at all, since people have more important concerns than dress codes - like sociopaths and zombies (who should also enjoy the pleasures of fashion freedom). Oh, and just for the record, I want a sword, too. Clay5x 07:49, 27 October 2007 (BST)
7. Sure, it sounds interesting! :) Karen Howard 06:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
8. I'm all for more clubwear. -- Diano 06:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Everybody dance now!!! -- BoboTalkClown
10. Yes Disco Boogie Night Tonight! I want a golden Disco Suit, Giant Fro, Pimp Cane, and Platform Shoes!!! I want to hunt zombies with style!!! -- Discopimp

No (Vintage Dance Clothes

1. Ummm...No --Sonofagun18 16:16, 29 August 2007 (BST)
2. No... - yet again this is all getting too specific, and while there is a small amount of "subculture" stuff in UD, it's very limited and pretty generic. As IMO it should be. If this is that important to your character development, write it in your profile, that's what I do. So does everyone else. Quit trying to make the server do all your work... --WanYao 21:58, 31 August 2007 (BST)
3. NO - no...freakin'...way...Chill 23:55, 31 August 2007 (BST)
4. -- Vista  +1  09:20, 7 September 2007 (BST)
5. Hell no. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 12:21, 17 September 2007 (BST)
6. Only if I get a sword.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:51, 21 September 2007 (BST)
7. DISCO IS DEAD; please let it rest in peace... ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 04:50, 17 October 2007 (BST)

Earrings

I play a new female alt in Rolt Heights named Jacqueline Natla and I was looking for earrings to complete her "look" and found that there were none.I used another alt(these are my only two characters I DON'T ZERG!!!!)to check the mall if there were some,no dice.It seems logical why wouldn't there be earrings?I think you should be able to find a pair of earrings in a mall,tower,hotel/motel,and mansions.They come in most of the current colors.NOW VOTE!!!Chill 23:25, 30 August 2007 (BST)

Yes (Earrings)

1. Author Vote Self explanatory really...Chill 23:25, 30 August 2007 (BST)
2. Yes. Would be option in neck section. options: Hoop, Stud, Stud left,Stud right, Diamond, Diamond left,Diamond right, and Traditional.--Hung Henry 20:33, 31 August 2007 (BST)
3. This isn't too detailed. We have necklaces, why not earrings. --Sonofagun18 06:30, 1 September 2007 (BST)

   Thing is, where would you put them? what slot? would you give up hats or eyeglasses to get ear rings? --WanYao 06:40, 1 September 2007 (BST)

   I don't know, maybe a new earring or ear slot. --Sonofagun18 06:49, 1 September 2007 (BST)

4. Stick up a new slot for em. Why not? Oh, and add saftey pins as an earing option.--Seventythree 22:32, 2 September 2007 (BST)
5. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 19:48, 7 September 2007 (BST)
6. Yes keep! More bling and clothingtypes is GOOD! :D --Stark Senap 14:45, 14 September 2007 (BST)
7. Yep yep. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 10:33, 10 October 2007 (BST)
8. yep yep yep. Sockem 07:30, 15 October 2007 (BST)
9. yep yep yep YEP! -- BoboTalkClown 20:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Earrings)

1. Hell no. Let's not go into that kind of detail. Arm bands got shot down, and they can be pretty prominent. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 00:04, 31 August 2007 (BST)

   Why not though?They're a popular piece of clothing/jewelry and would have a place in our apocalyptic city of Malton!Chill 00:45, 31 August 2007 (BST)

   I just see it as such a minor piece though. I mean, it's on the level of belt buckles and shoe laces. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:47, 31 August 2007 (BST)

2. Pretty sure new clothing slots, as this would require, should go to normal suggestions. Anyway no more head items, you want jewelry get a necklace.--Karek^maps?! 03:52, 31 August 2007 (BST)
3. Meh--~~~~_T^''' 07:02, 31 August 2007 (BST)
4. Again, it's just too specific. There's always room for a few more things, but if we had every single tiny thing everyone wanted, man, it'd be absurd. And what slot would they go in?? Write a good decription in your profile if you want them. --WanYao 22:02, 31 August 2007 (BST)
5. As WanYao. --Hhal 22:29, 2 September 2007 (BST)
6. as WanYao-- Vista  +1  09:21, 7 September 2007 (BST)
7. As someone who isn't here.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:51, 21 September 2007 (BST)
8. No - This is too close to minutiae. Although I would love the safety pins, orange ear plugs (for shows at clubs and to avoid losing your hearing while firing guns all day), walkman, mp3 player, ear muffs, the arrow through the head gag, and those sweet gigantic cage things worn by Tina Turner in Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome. Also costume bunny/cat/etc ears would be cool, but would have to go in the head slot. But yeah, this is probably too marginal a category of clothing to include. Clay5x 08:00, 27 October 2007 (BST)
9. I'm with Clay5x -- it's just a level above what's reasonable right now. -- Diano 06:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Gold Crowns or something...

I need something to waste XP on - and I think clothing might be it! I've mentioned this on my user page, but here I'll go and actually make it an official-like suggestion. For X amount of XP, someone could "purchase" a special article of clothing, like a Golden Crown from a Museum or something.

Yes (Gold Crowns or something...)

1. Yes? TheUncleBob 01:54, 4 September 2007 (BST)
2. Bling bling -- Pavluk 21:49, 4 September 2007 (BST)
3. For the same reason Suicidalangel voted no. It's a apocalypse scenario. Of course crazies are going to claim the divine right to rule. All Hail MCS, Emperor of the Living and the Dead! --MrCoolantSpray 20:05, 29 September 2007 (BST)

   The problem is, I still don't talk to crazy people. Me being God, and talking to crazy people will only cause suspicion once something bad happens. See where I'm coming from?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:49, 16 October 2007 (BST)

4. Because I left my Bling in my other Browser... ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 04:44, 17 October 2007 (BST)
5. If we can find the dang thing in a museum instead, then hell yes. But using up leftover XP's sounds good too. --JAston 10:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

No (Gold Crowns or something...)

1. No/Change - As the song goes... "Money. It's all we want. We want money"... If you changed this suggestion to allow you to get a customised article of clothing for a large donation to the game, I bet Kevan would scoop it up faster than all those other suggestions he implimented before they were even done being voted on!! ;P --WanYao 05:30, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   You know, that's not a horrible idea... It doesn't help solve my abundance of XP issue, but it could be pretty neat. TheUncleBob 15:55, 4 September 2007 (BST)

2. Kill - It doesn't make sense to me to buy clothing with "EXPERIENCE" points. --Sonofagun18 06:08, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   Why does it have to make total-sense? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 12:20, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   If you're more Experienced, you're better at finding cool clothing? I'm just trying to come up with a way to use some of my 14,000+ XP... TheUncleBob 15:55, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   I know what you guys are saying, but I would just like to spend XP on something that shows experience, like scars or something, but thats just my opinion. --Sonofagun18 17:10, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   Not a bad idea either. I don't know if I want my purdy face all messed up, but at least it's *something*... TheUncleBob 18:10, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   I know it doesn't make sense from a "realism" point of view to "buy" clothes with experience. However, you also use that experience to "buy" better skills with weapons, the ability to speak whilst dead, and even employment with NecroTech. I can't see any problem "spending" XP on clothes, there needs to be some way for the old-timers to use their 10s of 1000s of XP... -- Pavluk 23:50, 4 September 2007 (BST)

3. Ok if I see someone with a crown in game as Pker in UD I would shoot them dead and jack there golden crow just be mean--Johnny Reb 17:24, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   I'd just like to point out that you cannot steal clothes. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:44, 4 September 2007 (BST)

   Geeze let a Pker Rp would yea --Johnny Reb 04:35, 5 September 2007 (BST)

4. I think we're running out of clothing ideas here...--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:00, 6 September 2007 (BST)
5. two dozens players walking around with crowns? -- Vista  +1  09:37, 7 September 2007 (BST)
6. Yeah, vista is right. I could agree with giving the top 3 xp players a crown. Not more ppl! --Stark Senap 14:52, 14 September 2007 (BST)
7. No because people would be claiming to be ruling under the divine right of god, which is bullshit because I don't talk to crazy people.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 02:02, 21 September 2007 (BST)
8. Nope. Monarchies are a terrible idea. The French had the right idea about the aristocracy. Chop, chop!--Seventythree 09:00, 25 September 2007 (BST)
9. Not likin the implications. Sockem 07:34, 15 October 2007 (BST)
10. As much as I love my grillz, this is taradiddle. -- Diano 06:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Holsters

I was thinking that there should be black/brown leather pistol holsters available in police stations would be cool. However you could only have one. It should be either in the slot where coats are or in a new slot by itself.--Acoustic Pie 20:19, 2 September 2007 (BST)

Yes Holsters

1. Why the hell not? MrAushvitz 11:26, 23 September 2007 (BST)
2. ONLY IF they are sexy dual leg holsters...Lara Croft style oh yeah! Vezira 19:18, 2 October 2007 (BST)

No Holsters

Votes against go here

1. Don't need it... I think it's already assumed that guns come with holsters... 'sides, you gonna carry 6 holsters, one for each pistol? I think not.... --WanYao 20:51, 2 September 2007 (BST)

   You carry 6 pistols? Yeesh.

   That's nothing... I got 9...

2. Pretty much what he said.--Seventythree 20:52, 2 September 2007 (BST)
3. As above. --Sonofagun18 16:56, 3 September 2007 (BST)
4. Expected benefit which means it won't and shouldn't be added. For those wondering what benefit, lower encumbrance for pistols.--Karek^maps?! 17:33, 3 September 2007 (BST)
5. As Karek -- Pavluk 00:10, 4 September 2007 (BST)
6. Enuff said. remove from voting? --~~~~ [Talk] 07:43, 7 September 2007 (BST)
7. -- Vista  +1  09:38, 7 September 2007 (BST)
8. Yeehaw! Let's shoot 'em up! --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:42, 7 September 2007 (BST)
9. As WanYao and Karek. --Hhal 03:04, 14 September 2007 (BST)
10. Chocolate Rain, Chocolate Rain, sing it loud, sing it proud!-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 02:04, 21 September 2007 (BST)
11. Benefits. Sockem 07:35, 15 October 2007 (BST)
12. How were we carrying our pistols before? ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 04:40, 17 October 2007 (BST)
13. I've got mine already. Clay5x 15:20, 27 October 2007 (BST)
14. I put my pistols in my mouth and pull the trigger. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 12:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
15. Expected effects, again. -- Diano 06:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Padded Clothes

In the average zombie outbreak, a few smart people realise that to not get bitten,and to look awsome, one must wear padded clothing! DO NOT think that these padded clothes will have any defence benefits, as I do not propose they do, since the idea of padded clothes is purely for roleplaying reasons. And you can't really say that its going out of the zombie genre, since padded clothes are perfect for the zombie genre.

Padded Clothes would come in shirt, trouser, and shoe selection of varied colours. I would suggest to Kevan (if this idea goes well) to make it difficult to find, otherwise everyone would have one. I did not add a head selection, since there is already a proposal for a padded hat (the helmet) and it will most probably be put into the game!

If you are going to reject my idea, please give a reason as to why you think it is a bad idea.

YES (Padded Clothes)

Author's vote Unsigned Vote struck.Chill 20:31, 12 October 2007 (BST)

1. I can't help myself... "Are you ready for some Football^(American)!" ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 04:27, 17 October 2007 (BST)

NO (Padded Clothes)

1. Even if it doesn't have an actual benefit it has an expected one.--Karek^maps?! 05:12, 11 October 2007 (BST)
2. As Karek - Kevan clearly stated that clothes shouldn't be such that one can expect a benefit --~~~~ [talk] 15:08, 11 October 2007 (BST)
3. Benifits ect.--Seventythree^Talk 00:07, 12 October 2007 (BST)
4. Benefits and general lameness. --WanYao 01:21, 12 October 2007 (BST)
5. Pretty much the same as my reasoning above. If you want to offer alternative flavor texts for the flak jacket but not change any in-game effects, I would support it, but you'd have to do it on the Suggestions page. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 01:43, 12 October 2007 (BST)
6. As everyone above. --Sonofagun18 06:09, 12 October 2007 (BST)
7. As some person here.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:33, 13 October 2007 (BST)
8. Nope. Perhaps a puffa jacket, or shoulder-pads maybe - both good retro looks. This suggestion is a bit vague, and as Karek mentions there's a problem with expected benefit. --Pavluk ^{A! E!} 19:28, 22 October 2007 (BST)
9. No. Too vague. --Clay5x 05:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
10. So.. what are you trying to suggest again? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 02:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
11. Expected effects, again. -- Diano 06:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Fat Suit

Why not? (Found in Malls and certain Clubs)  Nalikill  ^{TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI}  22:43, 12 October 2007 (BST)

Yes (Fat Suit)

1. Heh. I quite like this.--Seventythree^Talk 23:59, 12 October 2007 (BST)
2. Heh. I quite like dis.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:05, 13 October 2007 (BST)
3. Heh. I quite like this/dis. Sockem 07:26, 15 October 2007 (BST)
4. Heh. I quite like zis.Studoku 15:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
5. Lol pseudo-fat-zombies! -- BoboTalkClown 20:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
6. Hee. Me quite likey dis(obvious parody of previous comments).--volt 00:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Fat Suit)

1. "It works, mate! The fat one balances the two skinny ones!" No, sorry, just don't see it. Also, possible expected AP/encumbrance penalty maybe. I forsee some players ask it be implemented as such. So again, no. --Slightly Lions 14:11, 13 October 2007 (BST)
2. Why am I not surprised to find a dumb clothing suggestion?--Karek^maps?! 22:26, 13 October 2007 (BST)
3. Eh....No.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:35, 13 October 2007 (BST)
4. *Yawn* no. --Sonofagun18 05:42, 15 October 2007 (BST)
5. Meh, I quite dislike. --WanYao 21:15, 15 October 2007 (BST)
6. No. - I've never seen a fat suit in a mall or a club. Or any location type in Malton. They seem to be highly unusual specialty items for county fairs and MTV spring break. When either of those come to Malton, then yes. Clay5x 15:42, 27 October 2007 (BST)

   SHOW ME YOUR BONES! --Karek^maps?! 17:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

7. Say no to fatties. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 01:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
8. Die - What the hell is a fat suit? --Private Mark 20:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
9. GRAB MAN, HARM MAN- At the very least explain what the hell you are talking about. It sounds quite stupid right now. --Grognor 04:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
10. No - Weird Al is not in the zombie apocalypse. --Druuuuu 04:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
11. No - I don't usually vote out of genre, but this is very clearly out of genre. --Howard Bentley 17:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
12. No - With the fire of a thousand suns, no no no. I'm all for diverse shapes and sizes, but if you really need to indicate your size you can do it in your description. Fat suits are not amusing. Sheana ^{T / TMZ} 20:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
13. What they said. -- Diano 06:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Inflatable parrot

An inflatable parrot sitting cheerfully on the shoulder. For the pirates amongst us.

The description could read An inflatable platic parrot

or if you're a zombie A deflated plastic parrot

Yes (Inflatable parrot)

1. Authors Vote.--Rosslessness 12:53, 13 October 2007 (BST)
2. We're really running out of clothing ideas here.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:44, 13 October 2007 (BST)
3. Only if it's like the paper party hat.--Karek^maps?! 22:26, 13 October 2007 (BST)

   As in it's only available on Speak like a Pirate day?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:35, 13 October 2007 (BST)

   Sounds good, gives him a whole year or so to hop to it.--Karek^maps?! 22:57, 13 October 2007 (BST)

   Alright, lets go with a hybrid of our ideas.

4. As Karek, but only on Speak Like A Pirate Day.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:03, 13 October 2007 (BST)
5. Garr!--Seventythree^Talk 11:22, 14 October 2007 (BST)
6. This parrot is dead. (No he isn't.) --Uncle Bill 07:05, 15 October 2007 (BST)
7. Shiver me timbers! An inflatable parrot? --Private Mark 07:08, 15 October 2007 (BST)
8. Arrg. Sockem 07:26, 15 October 2007 (BST)
9. Until we get rum in this game (the drinkable kind, not the Red kind), this'll keep me crew from mutinyin'. --Pavluk ^{A! E!} 21:58, 15 October 2007 (BST)
10. Very cool idea! I like this. - Kai Tan Sying ^{Malton Rangers} 06:29, 17 October 2007 (BST)
11. ARRRRRRRRGGHHHH! I like it! --Vkkhamul 01:51, 18 October 2007 (BST)
12. Yes - And yes, it causes scurvy. Which is fantastic and fashionable in its own right. Clay5x 15:44, 27 October 2007 (BST)
13. Holiday item only. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 01:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
14. Angry Parakeets wants a cookie? AP wants a cookie? Perfect for holidays, maybe we can keep them later--Grognor 04:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
15. Impliment with ninja suggestions. Should be head wear, though. -- BoboTalkClown 20:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Inflatable parrot)

1. Wow! Another stupid suggestion. --Sonofagun18 05:48, 15 October 2007 (BST)
2. Causes scurvy + AIDS --Slightly Lions 13:19, 15 October 2007 (BST)

   Dude...The AIDS?!? things was totally my idea....Why is everyone stealing my shit all of a sudden? :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:44, 16 October 2007 (BST)

   I'd steal your complaint but no one steals my shit so it would be out of place.--Karek^maps?! 06:13, 17 October 2007 (BST)

   Might as well do it anyway.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 11:05, 17 October 2007 (BST)

3. Causes scurvey in rats. --WanYao 21:16, 15 October 2007 (BST)
4. The Hell is this? --Druuuuu 04:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
5. I must echo my brother Druuuuu. -- Diano 06:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Stereotypical Halloween Costumes

I think we should get stereotypical Halloween costumes for Halloween. I know this probably will not be put up in time, but oh well. They will appear in the SHIRT category, while eliminating anything worn in the TROUSERS category. They will be in Malls, perhaps in Costume Shops? Here is a list of costumes to put up:

• Ghost Costume
  
• Devil Costume
  
• Angel Costume
  
• French Maid Costume
  
• Vampire Costume
  
• Fairy Costume
  
• Lil' Red Riding Hood Costume (my god it it's sooo popular this year:S)
  
• Pumpkin Head Costume
  
• Pirate Costume
  
• Witch Costume
  
• Superman Costume
  
• Nerd Costume
  
• Genie Costume
  
• "Mystery Costume" (see below...)
  
• ETC.
  

To see the "Mystery Costume", go to the humurous suggestions page and find Halloween Costume Suggestion under new humorous suggestions. It'll be pretty self-explanatory:P. Lol... --Vezira 17:55, 30 October 2007 (PDT)

• EDIT Ok well, if people think only one or two costumes should be holiday items, let's pick two random costumes...The Angel Costume and the "Mystery Costume"...lol, jk! Ok how about the vampire costume and the pirate costume? Vezira 19:14, 30 October 2007 (PDT)
• EDIT2 LOL, we DO have masks now!!! I guess they're the same! That's funny... Hey! They added my "Mystery Costume" as a mask!!! Weird..I'm like psychic.. Vezira 5:58, 1 November 2007 (PDT)

Yes (Stereotypical Halloween Costumes)

1. Author's Vote --Vezira 17:55, 30 October 2007 (PDT)
2. I'm all for one or two special 'holiday' items available in select locations around Malton, for a period of 24hrs (like the paper party hats). This list seems a little excessive. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 01:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3. As the druggie up above me.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
4. Only if it's a limited time only holiday item like christmas trees or party hats. --Sonofagun18 04:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
5. Only if it's not a limited time item!--Seventythree^Talk 09:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
6. Only if limited time item --~~~~ [talk] 09:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
7. Great idea. Maybe we'll have to wait for next Halloween, but either way, good idea. I don't care if it's time limited or not. --Clay5x 13:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

   Well, we got masks! --Clay5x 02:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

8. I'm voting for this on either a Halloween or a Costume Shop basis. -- Diano 06:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Yes. BoboTalkClown 20:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Stereotypical Halloween Costumes)

1. Costumes have been suggested before. --Karek^maps?! 02:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh for heaven's sake. By who? What's the link?  P02 Samuel  Talk to me! Stop that asshole!PoleCats 13:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh for heaven's sake. It doesn't matter does it? After all they were implemented a day before your comment.--Karek^maps?! 17:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

prison UNIFORMS

A convicts suit, Orange jumpsuit, orange Trousers, Black boots, they would be found in police stations . --Worthog117 22:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes (Prison uniform)

1. YES: It would COMPLETELY fit the apocalypse theme with all the law and order gone down the drain...convicts and innocents must now choose.. Join forces? or.. Battle each other while zombies claw at their doors and rip out their throats... Such perfection!:') *tear* Vezira 19:28, 3 December 2007 (PDT)
2. Mmmmkay.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
3. For some reason, a little part of Cuba comes to mind.... --Seventythree^Talk 07:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
4. Sure. --Sonofagun18 18:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
5. Yes... but only if the classic variation (white with black stripes) is also available. A Lost Boy 19:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
6. I like it. It goes along perfectly with the zombie theme - it would be popular amongst role-players.SecB 12:09 412 December 2007 (SST)
7. I'm all for this. -- Diano 06:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
8. Add classic -- BoboTalkClown 20:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No (Prison uniform)

1. Uhm no.--Karek^maps?! 09:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Huh? You stated, "Yes", for the Prison Clothing (Click on Dupe below), but say, "No", to Prison Uniform? Yo no te comprendo chico! --Vezira 7:19, 9 December 2007 (PDT)

   Different times with different things in the game, a lot of clothing items have been added since then.--Karek^maps?! 20:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

2. Dupe --~~~~ [talk] 14:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
3. Gah, trenchies... --Stark Senap 09:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
4. - Duh, it exists basically already -- overalls. --WanYao 22:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Cape

You know how when you want to just stand heroically, posing over a pile of zombies who you just beat off, or a new layer of PKer-shaped tiles? But it looks really bad, because you can't effectively block out the pile of your friends who were killed? Tah-dah, cape. Well, I thought the cape would just sort of be a 'jacket' clothing item, in any color you would like. --Jon McCarthy 03:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes (Cape)

Yea?

1. YES who wouldint like this idea --Molester jester 17:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
2. I voted yes on the last one, so I'm voting yes on this one, even though the No voters are right. -- Diano 06:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
3. YES Can we at least imagine people jumping out of buildings with a red cape? -- Kuji Muji 18:21, 21 October 2008 (EST)

No (Cape)

1. No. --Sonofagun18 06:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
2. Dupe of other tight wearers--Karek^maps?! 20:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
3. No --~~~~ [talk] 07:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
4. Enougth of these capers already.--Seventythree^Talk 12:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
5. Superman?--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
6. You probably don't recognize me without my cape. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
7. "posing over a pile of zombies who you just beat off" ahahahaha--Mary 07:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
8. - only if lucha masks were implimenterd. --WanYao 22:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
9. No, just because you made it up....fuckin trenchcoater. -Downinflames 00:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Western Attire

A city the size of Malton ought to have at least one shop carrying "western" attire, even if it isn't in the U.S. or Canada. Also, odds off there's at least one nightclub in the city that catered to the country & western crowd, and certainly some "rockabilly" types as well. You can already find cowboy hats at the hat shop, but there ought to be a few more options available for all the cowboys and cowgirls out there:

• Neck:

A gold bolo tie

A silver bolo tie

A turquoise bolo tie

The colors here refer more to the metal clasp that holds the tie together, not the string itself.

• Shirts are probably fine, although you could possibly add "a plaid western shirt" and "a (color) western shirt" if you were so inclined.
• Jackets:

A brown fringed jacket

A black fringed jacket

A blue denim jacket (I seriously can't believe denim jackets haven't been implemented!)

You will note the conspicuous absence of the "Coats" category, because traditional dusters are too close to a trenchcoat for comfort. You could probably shoehorn "a (color) poncho" in here, though.

• Trousers:

A pair of black leather chaps

A pair of brown leather chaps

• Footwear:

A pair of brown western boots

A pair of black western boots

Western gear would only be available in one mall, like the punk gear and the hats and what have you. I know there will be naysayers who don't think it's necessarily themely, but even a cursory google search will reveal that the U.K. has a dedicated country music scene, and hey, cowboys vs. zombies! Plus, anyone going for a "biker" aesthetic would find the chaps and denim handy, I'm sure.

ETA: I know that bolo ties and ponchos are duped, but they fit, thematically, with the rest of the suggestion. HooperX 19:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes (Western Attire)

Votes for go here

1. BLAM BLAM! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes. However IF you don't suggest dusters (especialy available in brown) I will have to!--Seventythree^Talk 20:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
3. Boots...yes. Everything else...no. --Sonofagun18 06:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
4. The boots alone should probably do it. --Sec 12:13, 12 December 2007 (MST)
5. Meh.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
6. lol! I approve. --Stark Senap 09:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
7. Dusters,hats,boots,chaps(ok maybe not chaps) I want it all.

No (Western Attire)

1. Suggest things one at a time.--Karek^maps?! 20:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
2. Cowboys in a zombie apocalypse? Just say no to Resident Evil Extinction! --Calypso 22:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
3. Can we stop talking about Resident Evil Extinction? I never saw it yet and plan to get it on DVD... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

   Never seen it. No desire to. I just like cowboys. HooperX 01:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

4. No/Dupe - You can get Stetsons at the Tompson Mall hat store, and I am pretty sure that bolo ties already exist in-game -- they were suggested here and passed and I think implimented, correct me if I am wrong about the implimentation. Anyway, cowboy hats and bolo ties would be plenty, imo. --WanYao 22:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

   ... okay, cowboy boots, too... i loathe them.... but... not just cowboys wear 'em, it's a rocker staple... --WanYao 22:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

   Bolo ties are not, to the best of my reading the wiki and fooling around in-game, available. I still seriously can't believe you can't find a blue denim jacket. that's a classic. HooperX 01:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

5. No --~~~~ [talk] 16:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
6. I'm with Karek. It's not that I disagree, it's that you should suggest things item by item. -- Diano 06:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
7. Simply because I don't like the South(e.g. Texas). -- BoboTalkClown 20:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Fingerless/'Hobo' Gloves

For that instant hobo look! Or emo/goth seen as many shops in England sell these I think they wouldn't be frowned upon for UD too much right? The idea of wearing a pair of nice warm pair of fingerless gloves while doing a raid or clawing at a harman seems like a good idea to me.

They would be avaialble in all malls and those marked with a (+) only in the goth store of Ackland Mall.

Colours

• Black woollen
• Green woollen
• Multi coloured woollen
• Black Leather (+)
• Brown Leather (+)
• Black and white stripey (+)
• Black and red stripey (+)
• Black and purple stripey (+)

I don't mean to discriminate against anyone by calling them 'hobo' gloves, but that seems to be the nam that they have picked up around my area of England, if these make it through voting then I think that fingerless gloves would probably be better as a description, but I don't mind either way.

Also I don't think this is a dupe of the gloves suggestion, but I think these should be implimented as well. Acoustic Pie 20:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes (Fingerless/'Hobo' Gloves)

1. Yes - Helps keeps the hands warm in winter too. Acoustic Pie 20:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes - Hoboriffic --Pavluk ^{A! E!} 21:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
3. Sure - I don't really care either way about these, but they ARE very common, not just with goths and punks... And in Canada we usually call 'em hobo gloves or just the descriptive "fingerless gloves", too. --WanYao 22:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
4. Hoborosome. :) --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
5. Keep I have a pair of these, theyr'e absolutely fantastic, beacuse you can smoke, or use a phone or whatever without taking them off.--Seventythree^Talk 01:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
6. Keep Call them merely fingerless gloves... more RP possibilities that way. (martial arts gloves, FTW.)  Nalikill  ^{TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI}  19:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
7. yes, but my suggestion of gloves slot should be implemented for this to be possible --~~~~ [talk] 16:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
8. Yeah, they'd be handy for people in wheelchairs. Not that we have wheelchairs.... -- Diano 06:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Found in parks. --BoboTalkClown 20:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

1. Yes. But they must be called "Fingerless gloves" 80s FTW! --Firetwig ^W! 04:50, 4 October 2009 (BST)

No(Fingerless/'Hobo' Gloves)

1. Suggest them one at a time, some of it I hate some I find tolerable. --Karek^maps?! 10:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

   Do you mean the colours? Also which ones don't you like? Acoustic Pie 16:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

   The different types you suggest are actually unique articles of clothing, not variations on one.--Karek^maps?! 01:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

   Oh I see what you mean, well what would you suggest I do now? As looking at it, i could take off the woolen and leather bits, just leaving the colours, that way it'd be less specific and leave more to the imagination. However if I edit it now will it be vandalism for changing the idea now that people have voted on it? Acoustic Pie 16:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Belts

A new clothing category: BELTS

To start out with, belts would come in leather (in future, people could suggest other materials). They would also come in various colors: black, brown, dark brown, and tan. Just for clarification, this would be your standard, metal buckle belt that you'd use to hold up your pants.

Belts would be found in Malls and Mansions.

I don't think anyone has suggested this before, but if they have, please let me know. --Hhal 17:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes (Belts)

1. Yes I like the idea --Major Striker 18:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Almost forgot I get an author vote. --Hhal 20:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
3. Otherwise our pants would fall down. We can't have that. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 20:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
4. I Like it, simply because In the future I want to have a snakeskin belt for the hell of it. Acoustic Pie 23:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Yeah, why the hell not? --Seventythree^Talk 00:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
6. Don't forget belts with really big buckles! I like any idea for more clothing slots. --Desperado 21:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
7. I think it would be a very good idea. --Jamie Cantwell3 04:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
8. Conditional - only if we can also use these as weapons. --Ms.Panes 05:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Yes please - I was thinking of suggesting this myself! --Vladimir Kosenko 01:44, 15 January 2008 (GMT)
10. Belts don't always come with clothes, nor are they ever required, so...--Zach016 22:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
11. I want to wear a belt, i am sick of my kilt falling off. do you even wear a belt with a kilt? i would like to suggest poor people belts also, such as extension cords and rope. would suspenders count as a belt?--Scotw 10:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

    Yes. You wear a rather thick belt, actually. Mikhos 02:36, 16 May 2008 (BST)

    If you mean would suspenders be in the belt category, sure, it makes sense. If someone would like to make a suspenders suggestion, that'd be cool. --Hhal 17:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

12. Why not? --_└^Frozen_┘^┌_Flame^┐ 20:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
13. Sure I say yes so long as you can have rope belts.--Carnexhat 13:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
14. Pie. --_LH779 13:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
15. Sounds like a good addition to me. I also like how it'd be a new category, leaving room to make future suggestions for the fashionable citizens of Malton. --Fifth Element 13:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
16. Studded belts would be the only reason i vote yes for this item possibility, it would fit my survivor.--Themaccles 22:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
17. Belt buckles would go smoothly with belts! Comrade 47, 23:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
18. I vote yes! a great idea! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Firetwig (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
19. Variation is good. --Shusamchen 08:44, 4 May 2008 (BST)
20. Yes only if they come with interchangeable cowboy buckles. --#19 - DrPain ^TMG 18:00, 29 May 2008 (BST)
21. Sure sounds good to me just hoping for belts with buckles like an NT buckle --Jae 12:36, 30 May 2008 (BST)
22. --Jae 12:36, 30 May 2008 (BST)
23. Go on then. What with the limited choice of clothes (sizes), I suspect a belt would be very handy - Zig13 - 16/06/2008 at 12:29(BST)

No (Belts)

1. Clothing is generally representational - you have to imagine the stuff that goes along with it all, like cufflinks and blets and buttons and shoelaces and socks etc. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

   That's true, but a belt isn't as much of an accessory as a button, or a cufflink. It's more of an independent item of clothing. For instance, you can't attach your imaginary holsters to a shoelace. A belt is used for a lot more things than other accessories. --Hhal 00:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

2. No. too minor --~~~~ [talk] 13:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

   Not necessarily. If you look here, you'll see that there are dozens of different minor neck accessories such as ties and necklaces. --Hhal 16:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

   first of all, very nice of you to refer me to a page i created. secondly, you only strength my arguement: neck items are major - it could be a common tie, a bow-tie, a scarve, a piece of jewellery. Let's see what kinds of items will go to belts, hmmm... black belt. brown belt. leather belt. oh, how major! What about lacing category too then? --~~~~ [talk] 17:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

   Well, since you seem dead set on your vote, all I have to say is: YOUR PANTS WILL FALL DOWN FIRST. --Hhal 18:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

3. I'd rather have the Adult Diapers.--Karek^maps?! 14:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Diapers dont need belts. -doc crook 01:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

   Would you mind explaining that a bit more? Because your vote is rather unjustified. --Hhal 01:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

   And I'm sorry to say, unjustified doesn't matter here. If you really don't get it though, he's saying he'd rather have the diapers, which don't require belts.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 16:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

   Why does everyone think that wanting diapers is good enough justification? People are really strange... --Hhal 21:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

5. No - Unnecessary, plus little opportunity for variation.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  04:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
6. While I like the idea of more clothing categories, I don't think belts are it. -- Diano 03:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
7. As Karek --/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 01:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

   I assume you know that Karek's vote says he wants adult diapers instead? --Hhal 01:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

   I do, I also voted Keep on that suggestion...--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 00:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

8. Too detailed. --Vandurn 14:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

   Uhh...what? The idea is to provide as much detail in a suggestion as possible. Did you mean overcomplicated? --Hhal 01:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

   No, I meant detailed. I like the current setup of clothing. Adding more will only make cause to give me grief. When some dumb BHer kills me and ruins my getup, I don't want to run any farther than I do now to set it back up again. --Vandurn 00:34, 3 April 2008 (BST)

Backpacks!!

Purely because my suggestion for a use for them is going down the toilet right now and I haven't yet got around to writing a revision, I thought I should suggest them here.

Right, moan over. Time for the suggestion. Backpacks will require a new slot for Accessories to be created, this means that more stuff can be added as time goes on. Anyway, back to the topic at hand: Backpacks can be found in Malls, Offices, Police Stations, Hospitals and Fire Stations. They can come in a variety of colours including your basic red, blue, green, black etc and patterns such as Tartan and Camouflage. They don't do anything (yet) but will look rather nice with your black trenchcoat, pink skirt combo. --Cheeseman ^W!RandomTalk 22:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes (Backpacks)

1. Teh Awthar Keep - Nuff said. -- Cheeseman ^W!RandomTalk 22:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
2. This would be useful If, when worn, it reduces the encubbrance of all items held. GenCorp|xeon renamis
3. I like my guys black duffle bag, but a backpack would be cool.--Jamie Cantwell3 01:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
4. Sure, why not, so long as it is purely cosmetic, at least until it can be balanced for actual gameplay use. --Raynor16 03:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
5. I am not, repeat, NOT just agreeing to this becuase Cheesey suggested it. I want to be able to sing the backpack song, damn it!--ZR 20:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
6. Yes -I like it and think it should reduce encumberance--Airborne88 11:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
7. HELL YEAH I got one on! Red cross painted on it and everything! put it in or else. >:D --SiEVE 00:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

  8. I need one for My RE4 merchant alt

1. Yes - I realize it has no effect, but it still would be cool. --Jared^{Talk SPA CK} 18:14, 27 July 2008 (BST)

No (Backspacks)

1. The only concern I have....Do these backpacks have any special effects? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Same issue. This will make people assume you can carry more items. --Diano 22:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
3. Expected Effect.--Karek^maps?! 23:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
4. I like your functional rucksacks better. These are nice, but people will think that they are REAL backpacks and not just clothes. --Hhal 23:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Implied use. Clothing suggestions should not have any assumptions that they may have some in-game use. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
6. expected effect a.k.a. implied use --~~~~ [talk] 19:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
7. Too much of an implied effect. --Seventythree^Talk 16:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
8. Expected effect. --_└^Frozen_┘^┌_Flame^┐ 20:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
9. No - Refer to vote #2 and 4 in the Yes section. Both are expecting an eventual use out of it, and they understand it is a clothing suggestion. It has so much implied use that non-wiki users would be irritated when they find it can't hold anything extra. Also, you haven't defined much of what the new slot would actually be. I imagine a new "back" slot? --Amanu Jaku 07:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
10. No - Not a bad suggestion, but "no" due to expected effects.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  17:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
11. Please desist, Diano is right.--Vandurn 00:36, 3 April 2008 (BST)
12. As Above. -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 17:21, 13 May 2008 (BST)
13. I think it is kinda assumed that survivors have come into the possesion of some kind of bag - how else would they be able to carry so much?!? Unessasary Zig13 - 16/06/2008 at 12:45(BST)

Clown outfit

A four piece outfit involving:

1)Giant red clown shoes,
2)A curly red wig,
3)Baggy, multicoloured clown pants,
4)Baggy, multicoloured clown shirt.

A nose could also be added, perhaps. They would be found in malls, the zoo, cinemas, and joke shops. Think of the joy this would give a number of varied players!--Magnum Odus 17:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes (Clown outfit)

1. FOR! It would be super excellent. Magnum Odus 17:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Heh, why the hell not? And btw, I fixed your vote for ya. --Hhal 20:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
3. I.... actually really want this one. Murderous clowns anyone? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Yes - Although I personally hate clowns, I cannot think of any reason to vote "no" on this.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  17:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
5. Yes! Seeing someone torn apart by a mob of zombie clowns would be hilarious to watch! --The Greaseman 04:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
6. YES! A whole army of zombies wearing rainbow afro wigs and red noses would be an awesome sight. - Headshot Hal 18:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
7. I love it!!! Mob of zombie clowns = totally great. A lot of players would have fun with this. --Fifth Element 14:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
8. Hell yes! "We all float down here..." See also the (late) Malton City Circus. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 11:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
9. I hate this so much it is silly. Which is why I am voting for it. Killing clowns is juvenile and cliche and I might as well get on with it sooner than later. --Vandurn 00:37, 3 April 2008 (BST)
10. Isnt there a movie called Killer Zombie Clowns from Outer Space? Now I know where it came from and why I had to waste 90 minute of my life. I will come for you and hurt you for making this suggestion, and hurt you more for making me vote for it --Tselita 21:06, 10 April 2008 (BST)

No (Clown Outfit)

1. The circus is not in town. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 17:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Yeah, I just... no. --Diano 17:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
3. way out of theme. --Pgunn 20:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

   I would disagree. I think if you asked an PKer about the prospect of running around as a murderous clown they would be in favour of it. Same with zombies--and I can think of at least eight zombie films with clowns in them.Magnum Odus 20:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

   Learn to indent. Oh. By the way. I am a PKer and even I voted no. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

4. Oh god no! I have a thing about clowns. They're horrible.--Seventythree^Talk 16:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Stephen Kings' It?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 16:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 16:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

   I vaugely remember when I was quite small there was a department store near where I lived that had a "lifesise" clown model that waved it's hand and moved it's head about. That's why I don't like clowns.--Seventythree^Talk 16:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

   But that's exactly it! It would add a new level of terror to the game!Magnum Odus 17:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

   Umm....73, I wasn't asking if "It" was the reason why you don't like them. It was just a response to the suggestion. :). I'm going back to bed now. i r sik.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

   Suicide is talking about the Stephen King book, the book was called It and it was about evil clowns and shit....--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 05:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

6. Stephen Kings' Babalu?--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 01:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
7. Zombie clowns... no. --_└^Frozen_┘^┌_Flame^┐ 04:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

   There was a zombie clown in Day of the Dead... --Hhal 23:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

8. --Druuuuu ^OcTRR 23:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
9. I hate clowns.--Jamie Cantwell3 01:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
10. No Ha ha ha. No.--Carnexhat 13:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
11. No - Excrutiatingly impractical and also probably very rare - Zig13 - 2/07/2008 at 10:04(BST)

SWAT Team Uniform

The SWAT uniform would most likely be found in Police Departments or maybe Forts, It includes a:

Black PASGT Helmet (Head), Protective Eye Goggles (Face), Black SWAT BDU Shirt (Shirt), Black SWAT HMPE Vest (Jacket), Black SWAT Cargo Pants (Trousers), Black Combat Steel-Reinforced Boots (Footwear)

These would be very logical items in the city of Malton just because most Police Departments will have a SWAT Team and most of them being former Military I wouldn't think it would be to much of a stretch to believe that these uniforms might also end up being on a Military Fort. --Dante GunZ

Yes (SWAT Team Uniform)

1. "Yes"-Given since I am a personal fan of SWAT items and the creator of this suggestion I will give an automatic YES!--Dante GunZ
2. "Yes"-Cool^ ~ ^ --Jamie Cantwell3 04:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
3. "YES" I love SWAT teams, so it's a yes. Leon Cane
4. "Yes" - Nice! --Waterspark2 22:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
5. "Yes" - Me play cs:s so Im for it. --ccsc

   Counter strike sucks. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 14:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

   You forgot the Colon.--Karek^maps?! 14:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

   Oh. That I did. It's "Counter Strike: Sucks". Thanks for that reminder. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 14:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

   No need to be jerks you've made your points. --Dante GunZ

   Here I was thinking my comment was funny_{(I actually like Counter Strike for the most part)}--Karek^maps?! 13:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

   What's counterstrike? Sounds like a type of flu medication.--Seventythree^Talk 13:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

   Oh how you jest 73. It's a computer game based on team warfare I think, a few years ago there was a serious hype about it and I mean a really big hype about it, these days you just don't hear of it that much. Acoustic Pie 16:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

   I think I heard of that. I didn't know it was called counterstrike though. and it does sound like flu medication. You know the kind, with a picture of a sniper scope on the box with "targeting pain fast" written on it. Most of that stuff is ground up paracetomol usualy, by the way. --Seventythree^Talk 19:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

   You sure counterstrike isn't too pro-survivor Karek?  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  04:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

   ENough with this Counter Strike talk already. SOCOM is obviously better. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

6. Yes Inserting a copy from another clothing sudjestion: "What Implied use? Thats is just like wearing a high visibility jacket so your friend can see you a few blocks away. Or that wearing scrubs would help in surgery to heal AP? You would have to be really dumb to think that this might confer any benifit." Id also like to mention Balaclava's. Do you expect them to conceal you identity?--Carnexhat 14:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC) EDIT Why does it say im number 1?--Carnexhat 14:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

   YES! And how do i frickin use this editing??? User Sig ^B! 04:58, 9 June 2008 (BST) Improperly signed. Sign with a link to your user page -- boxy ^{talk • i} 07:06 22 June 2008 (BST)

No (SWAT Team Uniform)

1. Expected effect. I mean, come on! I see Kevlar here, here, and there! Isn't the flak jacket enough? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 14:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
2. EE and definitely a Dupe --~~~~ [talk] 15:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
3. - As they say. --Diano 16:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
4. - Expected Effects.--Karek^maps?! 17:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
5. - "Weak Kill"- Only because it would indeed have a few too many expected benefits. Keep trying though! --Raynor16 19:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
6. No! - Please, we have way to many "elite SWAT units" or "super secret army dude" units running around. Let's not give them any more encouragement. If you want to play a police officer, wear a uniform. 99% of police officers, strangely enougth are not in SWAT units.--Seventythree^Talk 12:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
7. No!- If one wishes to play as a SWAT-type character, let them use the existing clothing (balaclavas, police jacket, black boots, etc). Comrade 47, 21:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
8. No. Not now, not ever.. - Maybe that was a bit much, but I am sick to the core of these police type uniforms! Enough already, jeez at least the clown costume was original. Acoustic Pie 16:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
9. No - Too trenchy, plus current clothing suffices.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  04:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
10. No' - Separate out the items and suggest pieces that aren't already in existence, such as the safety goggles. I'd start viewing the clothing items already in existence with boots, then suggest anything that is lacking, but individually. --Amanu Jaku 07:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
11. No ways, Joses - Implied benefits. And meh, trenchy. --WanYao 18:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
12. No - As above. Also, isn't Malton thought to be based in Britain? Believe it or not, we just get armed police whenever things get serious (mainly terrorist bombs in London). • DS • ^{Tlk•Dev•W!•+1} 11:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
13. Keep - Trenchy stuff is awesome1 I carry like, 12 shotguns everywhere to impress my friends. :( --Vandurn 00:48, 3 April 2008 (BST)
14. No - You can pretty much already have a SWAT uniform by getting a black jacket, trousers, beret, etc. No need for a "uniform".--Leon Vulcan 00:10, 5 May 2008 (BST)
15. No - As above. Enough with the trenchie clobber. --Sir Bob Fortune ^RR 08:59, 9 June 2008 (BST)
16. No - Exrutiatingly trenchy! And I hate Counter-Strike fanboys (althougth it is a good game). Also expected effects - Zig13 - 18/06/2008 at 09:28(BST)

Beach Wear

Sometimes it's warm outside. Sometimes people go to the beach. With a complete lack of swimming trunks, flip flops, arm floaties and the like (okay, maybe not arm floaties), it's no wonder the city is such a gloomy place. For what it's worth, this suggestion does not include womens' swimwear. While the lack of loose clothing actually makes it semi-viable in this sort of setting, it's just asking for trouble with most of this playerbase.--Canopus 18:07, 9 April 2008 (BST)

Yes (Beach Wear)

1. Yes but make it so ladys can wear this stuff too, I should not need to put a reason why.--Jamie Cantwel3 08:02, 10 April 2008 (BST)
2. Yes - Wait, I get to be bountied by bikini-clad Marshals? Sign me up!  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  18:14, 15 April 2008 (BST)
3. Yes - http://www.lastblood.net/main/2006/12/29/page-3-sharks-and-bikinis/ and http://www.lastblood.net/main/2007/01/01/so-juicy-sweet/ --Tselita 22:35, 30 May 2008 (BST)
4. Yes - For the purpose of humor - Zig13 - 2/07/2008 at 10:12(BST)
5. Aye - Yes. --Private Mark 07:26, 7 July 2008 (BST)
6. Strong yes i was going to make my own suggestion for flip-flops, but you saved me the hassle- it is entirly feasable that with todays fashion there would atleast be the option of flip-flops in malls. come on...for realitys sake add it.--Irounds 01:49, 14 July 2008 (BST)

No (Beach Wear)

Votes against go here

Barman/Barmaids Uniform

The Barmans/maids uniform would consist of a Shirt/Blouse,(tops),Waistcoat,(Jacket),Bow tie,(Accessories),Trouser/skirt, (Trousers) and Black shoes (shoes).They would probabley be found in Hotels, Since some might say its more like a waitor/waitress uniform, Bars (obviously),Clubs and possibley mansions. Its kinda like the hommage to RE: outbreaks waitress Char as well as allows civillians to say they were a member of a bar if they so desire. --Beau Dece 18:14, 27 April 2008 (BST)

Yes Barman/Barmaids Uniform

1. Firetwig: I vote yes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Firetwig (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
2. Yes, I like it.--Jamie Cantwel3 ^Talk 03:26, 29 April 2008 (BST)
3. Hmm. Yes, a posh outfit for serving drinks. Clearly needed - shame on all the no voters!--Seventythree^Talk 13:36, 23 August 2008 (BST)
4. Yes - As a member of a group that drinks their own collective weight in beer each week, I can say I would love this addon... and I'm sure Phil will Freak... --Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 06:08, 24 August 2008 (BST)

No Barmans.Barmaids Uniform

1. - Sorry, but no. These are articles of clothing that can be found elsewhere, and as any building marked Arms is a pub/bar, I think hotels are the wrong central location for this. --Diano 23:51, 30 April 2008 (BST)
2. Spaduplicate! - As above... which makes it spaduplicate... Ans I can't think of a "uniform" for batenders/servers that isn't associated with a chain store of some kind... However, I would support some of these items being in hotels, specifically waistcoats, a few dark colours of pants, black shoes and suit jackets, etc... --WanYao 03:06, 12 May 2008 (BST)
3. No - Outfits are stupid. You'd end up with people all wearing the same thing. Mix-and-matching is much better. If someone wants to role-play a barman/maid then they should set their clothes accordingly and say something relevant in their description - Zig13 - 2/07/2008 at 10:14(BST)

Walking Sticks/Canes

Mansions,Hospitals.A plain ole granny style one,and a slightly fancier model for those of us who choose to wear the whole fancy Top hat and Monocle look --Bando red 04:19, 16 May 2008 (BST)

Yes (Walking Sticks/Canes)

1. Yes - As someone who carries a cane in RL, I am 100% behind this suggestion.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  20:03, 3 June 2008 (BST)
2. Yes - Hell yeah!!!--Jamie Cantwel3 ^TalkAll glory to the Hypnotoad! 14:56, 6 June 2008 (BST)
3. Yes - We certainly have people who cannot walk unaided... perhaps the cane works like a newspaper? 'You smack ____ in the shin with your cane.' Mikhos 07:56, 22 June 2008 (BST)
4. Yes - Could use a weak damage point/percentage hit. (Like 2 damage per 5%, or something.)
5. Yes - and it SHOULD be an improvised weapon, totally. --WanYao 15:39, 8 July 2008 (BST)
6. Yes - As Mikhos.  P02 Samuel  Talk to me! Stop that asshole!PoleCats 04:24, 25 August 2008 (BST)

No (Walking Sticks/Canes)

Votes against go here

1. Expected Effect - A cane is like a weapon here, didn't you ever see it used to beat annoying children with? Acoustic Pie 16:08, 17 May 2008 (BST)
2. Expected Effect - This should be a weapons suggestion, not a clothes suggestion. However, it would be one of the only weapons suggestions that I'd be willing to vote for, especially if it worked the way Mikhos suggested.--William Told 22:42, 28 August 2008 (BST)